From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 23 15:41:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt010nb9.san.rr.com (dt010nb9.san.rr.com [204.210.12.185]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8502E15891 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by dt010nb9.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA15219; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:39:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:39:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug X-Sender: doug@dt010nb9.san.rr.com To: Mike Tancsa Cc: Ollivier Robert , Harlan Stenn , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NTP daemon and Y2K issues In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990823155309.01ea6180@staff.sentex.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 07:37 PM 8/23/99 +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > >According to Harlan Stenn: > >> Also, a *huge* number of bugfixes and improvements have been made to the > NTP > >> code since xntp3.4anything. > > > >I plan to upgrade CURRENT up to 4.0.97 soon. I don't run STABLE at all and > >we're too close to 3.3 to change anything in it. Maybe for 3.4. > > > Will 3.4 come out before Jan 1 ? Also, any chance of backporting the fixes > RELENG2_2 ? I imagine quite a few people still use the 2.2 branch Changing to a different version of NTP in the 2.2 branch would violate a lot of freebsd development guidelines. What you want to do is upgrade to 3.2-Stable then run the verion of [x]ntpd that suits your fancy. They should all compile right out of the box. Good luck, Doug -- "My mama told me, my mama said, 'don't cry.' 'She said you're too young a man to have as many women you got.' I looked at my mother dear and didn't even crack a smile. I said, 'If women kill me, I don't mind dyin!'" - John Belushi as "Joliet" Jake Blues, "I Don't Know" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message