From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 30 09:32:32 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C970637B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core.staszic.eu.org (dialup03.1lo.lublin.pl [212.182.71.172])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E55A43F93
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from koper@staszic.eu.org)
Received: by core.staszic.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id ED8BF1CCEDC; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:33:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:33:27 +0200
From: Piotr Koper <koper@diab.eu.org>
To: current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030730163327.GA3566@core.staszic.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Does bimap (ipnat) work to anyone ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:32:33 -0000


Hi,

Does ``bimap'' work to anyone ? I'm using IP Filter: v3.4.31 (336) and
I can't make it work for me:

ipnat.conf:
bimap fxp0 212.182.x.x/32 -> 192.168.10.5/32

I have aditional ethernet alias (212.182.x.x) and when I ping this
address from the Internet it replys from 192.168.10.5, traceroute shows
this as destination also. The funny thing is that mtr shows many many
destinations with address 192.168.10.5.

while this works fine:
rdr fxp0 212.182.x.x/32 port 0 -> 192.168.10.5 port 0 tcp/udp
rdr fxp0 212.182.x.x/32 port 0 -> 192.168.10.5 port 0 icmp
map fxp0 192.168.10.5/32 -> 212.182.x.x/32

So.. is bimap working well ?


Piotr Koper