From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 00:33:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E12410656C5 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84FF8FC0A for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 26159 invoked by uid 399); 8 Jan 2009 00:33:18 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 8 Jan 2009 00:33:18 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <496549CC.4090506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:33:16 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pav Lucistnik References: <200901072134.n07LYRcn081359@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200901072134.n07LYRcn081359@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/ports-mgmt Makefile ports/ports-mgmt/portsnap Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/ports-mgmt/portsnap/files patch-portsnap patch-portsnap.8 pkg-message.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:33:20 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > - Remove portsnap port, it's now integrated into the base system Isn't this moving in the wrong direction? We keep talking about keeping ports tools in the ports collection so that they can more easily be updated for all users. Is that the plan, or is that not the plan? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection