From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  2 23:33:37 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA06816
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 23:33:37 -0700
Received: from temptation.interlog.com (temp@temptation.interlog.com [198.53.146.54])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA06810
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 23:33:34 -0700
Received: (from temp@localhost) by temptation.interlog.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id CAA17139; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 02:31:37 -0400
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 02:31:37 -0400
From: Temptation <temp@temptation.interlog.com>
Subject: Re: A performance mystery
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu, rls@kilroy.id.net, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com,
        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506030624.XAA05904@freefall.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9506030226.B17093-0100000@temptation.interlog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


that is strange, the 2940 is faster then the Buslogic, whats the numbers 
if you put both cards in compaq and run that repeat ........
 
> The Compaq currently has a Adaptec 2940 in it, the Micron a buslogic 946C, I
> have swapped the two however and performance is nearly identicle.
> 
> -Crh
> 
>     Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu
> 
>                      http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/
>