From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 13 20:37:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA23046 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 20:37:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA23041 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 20:37:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA05871; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 20:37:15 -0800 (PST) To: Drew Derbyshire cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pentium Bug to be ignored -- say it ain't so In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Nov 1997 22:54:07 EST." <346BCB5F.E8C4F50F@kew.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 20:37:14 -0800 Message-ID: <5867.879482234@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I was under the impression that the FreeBSD core team took support of web > servers and the like very seriously. For anyone to take the opinion that > such an obvious Denial of Service attack is not something to worry about is > at best unfortunate, and seriously conflicts with my believe about the > seriousness of the support of FreeBSD. Sean is twisting the truth beyond all measure here and has now joined my procmail file as someone I'm no longer interested in dealing with. If you're into believing outright falsehoods then continue being depressed, otherwise please wait for us to collect the relevant information and make a proper fix which neither adversely impacts performance nor obfuscates the code beyond any reasonable degree. Jordan