From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 9 17:01:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA17462 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 17:01:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from chopin.seattleu.edu (chopin.seattleu.edu [206.81.198.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17451 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 17:01:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hodeleri@seattleu.edu) Received: from seattleu.edu ([172.17.25.95]) by chopin.seattleu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA04907; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:47:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36478CF3.B9BE4E71@seattleu.edu> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 16:46:43 -0800 From: Eric Hodel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pat.groce@state.sd.us CC: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help References: <5D2C95997022D21187350008C7F4CF793E6BFD@ESPR1SRV5.state.sd.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG NT? Why? If you can't handle UNIX why switch to an OS that is VERY difficult to maintain and administer? Novell Netware 4.x is 100 times the NOS that NT is, and I doubt that it can "hold a candle" to any UNIX. Of course, that would require reading, wouldn't it? pat.groce@state.sd.us wrote: > > To hell with FreeBSD. We are replacing all of the systems with NT versions > of sendmail. And it works great! I neat little GUI makes sendmail and the > Exchange listservs easy to manage.The software may cost more, but in terms > of staff time, we're saving thousands, not to mention all the frustration. > > I read all the news on how unix is going to give microsoft a run for the > operating system market. I don't believe it for a second. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message