Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 15:57:14 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= <ache@nagual.ru> Cc: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache/patches patch-ag patch-ac Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961105145304.20622O-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199611051754.UAA00673@nagual.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Nov 1996, [KOI8-R] Андрей Чернов wrote: > It seems that you try to become even more restrictive than Apache group, > but I not see any reason to count your opinion. My point is that the FreeBSD ports collection represents changes need to make a given application run on FreeBSD. These Apache patches have nothing to do with FreeBSD and consequently I think they would be more appropriate for distribution in an Apache forum where Apache users could, if they choose, take advantage of your patches regardless of platform. The more a port differs from a standard distribution, the more trouble it is to maintain, and it is a hassle for users who want to apply third-party tweaks. However, if you must put the patches in the ports collection, please document them in an obvious place (like the Makefile) so that users need not decrypt the patch files to become aware of the difference between "FreeBSD Apache" and regular Apache. But then again, if a differing opinion is not worth counting, you can just ignore mine. -john == jfieber@indiana.edu =========================================== == http://fallout.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.961105145304.20622O-100000>