From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 28 14:25:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248DA16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:25:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com
	[66.218.94.94])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D806443D3F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:25:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hardcodeharry@yahoo.com)
Received: (qmail 40984 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Mar 2005 14:25:22 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
	b=VF9phbFw6iPmFfThF4nBJZc/lyPsH1JtQiPoQjBgJgnWs46I0BJa3Y1QUMOG2vL04ZVNnkgoFXfO3leoBQJ3EwEUWJM159UN3PTZKA+fk0VwB8CbpbBUgsPHpVWAaDgMsaWKksCznw5n3yp/CqgUmxWciYBRFpX/ql3hlCbZMr4=
	;
Message-ID: <20050328142522.40982.qmail@web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com>
Received: from [24.47.116.25] by web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:25:22 PST
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:25:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Boris Spirialitious <hardcodeharry@yahoo.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: hyper threading.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:25:23 -0000


--- Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
wrote:
> em1897@aol.com writes:
> 
> > Polling is simply unecessary in most cases. You
> could get
> > better performance using an em driver and setting
> max
> > ints to whatever is optimal for your system.
> Polling adds
> > latency and over head for no good reason.
> 
> Polling often provides better performance, at the
> expense of higher
> overhead.

If you understood what I said, then you wouldn't
say what you said, because its just plain wrong.


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/