Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:32:23 +0100 From: Benjamin Podszun <dar@darklajid.de> To: <ports@freebsd.org> Cc: marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/luasec needs bump to 0.5 - but there's no direct =?iso-8859-1?Q?maintainer=3F?= Message-ID: <af0857a0-e4de-44d7-96ca-129a197ca4db@darklajid.de> In-Reply-To: <52F4E5E4.7020407@marino.st> References: <da044364-0e2f-49de-999f-2f6779b10055@darklajid.de> <52F4E5E4.7020407@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, February 7, 2014 2:55:48 PM CEST, John Marino wrote: > On 2/7/2014 14:43, Benjamin Podszun wrote: >> Hi. >>=20 >> Change of mail address, new thread with a decent title (previously: >> prosody update, which is sort of independent as far as I've confirmed so >> far). >>=20 >> With the attached patch luasec-0.5 builds & installs fine in my > ... > > Hi Ben, > One approach is to submit this patch as a PR but add a change to make > the yourself the maintainer! Then you're coming from a position of > authority that the port needs bumping. :) Thanks. I submitted ports/186533 just now. I hope the discussion will=20 continue over there. Given that you're one of the guys with the freebsd.org=20= tag: So what are the next steps? Someone's hopefully going to chime in,=20 look into that PR and (if it seems acceptable) commits that patch? Just=20 works=E2=84=A2 from here on? > seriously, why not? While I offered to adopt the port in the PR, the answer to that one is=20 easy: I'm running a FreeBSD machine for less than 24h so far (if we ignore=20 playing with it > 6-8 years ago) and I'm not sure if I should change a=20 maintainer field _just yet_.. ;) Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?af0857a0-e4de-44d7-96ca-129a197ca4db>