Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:11:30 +1100 From: Tony Maher <anthony.maher@uts.edu.au> To: Milan Obuch <current@dino.sk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell D810/FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE/interrupts?? Message-ID: <440B6212.7020909@uts.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <200603031142.51384.current@dino.sk> References: <f428381aa27e.4408a946@uts.edu.au> <f57489aeb658.4408ae7c@uts.edu.au> <20060303120227.I86586@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <200603031142.51384.current@dino.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Milan Obuch wrote: > On Friday 03 March 2006 11:19, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >>On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Anthony Maher wrote: >> >>>In /etc/rc.conf, commenting out the following solved the problems. >>> >>>###performance_cx_lowest="LOW" >>>###economy_cx_lowest="LOW" >>> >>>sorry for the noise. >> >> It's not a noise, it's a real problem. My ASUS M5A notebook (Intel >>Pentium M CPU model 750 1.86GHz), usually quite fast machine, becomes >>dead slow if I leave now-default settings *_cx_lowest="LOW". Every >>keystroke takes almost second to get echo on idle machine. I understand, >>ACPI developers want to test non-C1 cx states, that's why default >>settings have changed. But with this level of performance everybody will >>just switch back to C1. > > Could you eventually try another Cx state? I have similar trouble with VIA > Samuel based system, available states are C1, C2 and C3. LOW means C3, but > this is terribly slow and unusable, in effect. C2, set via sysctl works well. > I think ACPI developers would like to know our experiences. > Regards, > Milan Only state C1 works correctly. C2/1 C3/85 (and C4/185) all make emiclock behave badly. I did not bother to test shutdown for C2/C3 states. This behaviour did not happen under 5.4-> cheers -- tonym
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?440B6212.7020909>