From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Wed Jun  1 14:47:41 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF84B603F6
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  1 Jun 2016 14:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@bec.de)
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net
 [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::195])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8714F1F2B
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 Jun 2016 14:47:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from joerg@bec.de)
Received: from britannica.bec.de
 (p20030057E2138604050FB0D91903B4F3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [IPv6:2003:57:e213:8604:50f:b0d9:1903:b4f3])
 (Authenticated sender: joerg@bec.de)
 by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72ABAA810C
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 Jun 2016 16:47:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:47:38 +0200
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: EFI GELI support ready for testers
Message-ID: <20160601144738.GA14531@britannica.bec.de>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <519CC1FC-84DF-4710-8E62-AF26D8AED2CF@metricspace.net>
 <20160528083656.GT38613@kib.kiev.ua>
 <d6b96a6c-4e92-35a5-e78b-cc674b6d2f25@freebsd.org>
 <20160528172618.GB38613@kib.kiev.ua>
 <6A9DADE0-B214-424A-BB14-0B0848F0D08D@metricspace.net>
 <20160529091827.GD38613@kib.kiev.ua>
 <46B3F9E2-A25B-4F9D-B35F-11AC782495B1@metricspace.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606011623410.3503@laptop.wojtek.intra>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606011623410.3503@laptop.wojtek.intra>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:47:41 -0000

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:29:16PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > It's undesirable because the whole point of ZFS is to have one ZFS
> > volume for the whole system.
> This sounds more like a religious dogma than anything else.

If "ZFS volume" means "ZFS pool" here, it is also blatant bullshit.
There are a lot of reasons for having more than one ZFS pool, the
easiest being separating SSDs and HDDs for fast vs cheap storage.

Joerg