From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 24 14:11:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA02322 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:11:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA02262 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:11:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id VAA22023; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 21:34:26 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199804241934.VAA22023@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Bandwidth throttling etc. To: jlemon@americantv.com (Jonathan Lemon) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 21:34:26 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: julian@whistle.com, kjc@csl.sony.co.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19980424155224.37465@right.PCS> from "Jonathan Lemon" at Apr 24, 98 03:52:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > If everything goes well, the bandwidth limiting code (dummynet) > > should be working under ipfw control in a week or so. > > Yay! Then I can get rid of my own bandwidth limiter/delay/drop hack. > > (it runs at the IP level, before packets are reassembled, so it isn't > too useful in a general sense) this would be the same thing i believe since it runs after the ip_fw_chk() call. luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message