From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 13 16:11:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4BC16A41F; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D889243D45; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:11:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9DGIdTt093873; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:18:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, thierry@herbelot.com Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:10:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200510131331.27906.thierry@herbelot.com> <200510131621.07299.thierry@herbelot.com> In-Reply-To: <200510131621.07299.thierry@herbelot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200510131210.55135.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050919/1131/Wed Oct 12 16:35:32 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Warner Losh , Juergen Lock , Joshua Coombs Subject: Re: Loss of ed(4) in a RC1 booted in qemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:11:12 -0000 On Thursday 13 October 2005 10:21 am, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > Le Thursday 13 October 2005 15:38, Joshua Coombs a �crit : > > Welp, while I have no real help, I can point out this was > > reported by another user on the stable list, QEMU + RC1 == no ed > > well, I should have looked there before posting here ;-) (sorry for > the excellent Michel talon at lpthe.jussieu.fr : I should have > seeen your post) > > > I'm kinda dreading upgrading my 386... I'll pull down the generic > > kernel and do a test boot to see if it's a QEMU thing or a > > reguression in RC1 > > for me, it's definitely a qemu thing : I have two other machines > upgraded to 6.0 post-RC1, and both are working *fine* ; moreover > one is a notebook with a pcmcia ed(4), and this NIC works perfectly > (the issue is therefore seen only on qemu) QEMU emulates RTL8029: ed0: port 0xc100-0xc1ff irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0 ed0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0xc100 and Warner Losh MFC'd new ed(4) right before 6.0-RC1: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510081800.j98I0fRI089493 The new driver does more aggressive probing and it seems QEMU cannot handle it. Jung-uk Kim