Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:15:52 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [jakub@redhat.com:Linking against libpthread via -pthread? Message-ID: <20060211071552.GA99012@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0602110118310.9242-100000@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20060210191637.374daa37@kan.dnsalias.net> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0602110118310.9242-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:21:48AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > > No. The change to link in libc by default and libpthread with -pthread > > are inthe works and will be committed shortly. There is not way around > > this if we want working versioned libc and libpthread in our system. > > Why is that? We really don't want -pthread to build in libpthread > dependency when linking shared libraries. Uh, well, you do if you want to use GCC 4.2.X -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060211071552.GA99012>