From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 16 22:45:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1B648A for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iamatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (mail-pb0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9B7723 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rp2so5303110pbb.20 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:45:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=44N9hqYU3Evih5NIAy2YeOCtLtVEJgJ/heOK2yWYO7g=; b=AEzBnF4BElcsiO9tBSBs5rCJpvv987gbRSWzHB6dKt+LC5arTudkM1mTb1vZ2+JwH9 xMXty9fkoz4qqil7DwRmU6vph2/n43771zcMr1QYYRQCYdBe52MHS229BD2fxi0iiv1p n9GsfnwM7ieHl5Mc+BH2bgw0nUlDOndhefJcBpydrT9MTeh4reUfWG0QVRVMo2xByS+L MNdWVdUJaFgJbzewQqTk6dYlbsqWNPUQDgFeeket06iHyA6DwiPxmixyegOEBiMJhrT3 3qfrBgU7g9PkMXXBbabPBAytkxqHfiGaVdSkClBErknLFc55B9uPAiwL/Y1I7xCs5wIt vCvw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.239.231 with SMTP id vv7mr25566414pbc.171.1363473922027; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.4.100 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:45:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5144BEB7.3090906@tundraware.com> <5144ED13.7020808@tundraware.com> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:45:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder From: iamatt To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Tim Daneliuk , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:45:23 -0000 just slap an netapp 8.x with an avere flash box in front if you want NFS performance... or isilon. On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> On 03/16/2013 04:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> With respect to your mount points : /usr1 is spanning TWO different >>> partitions : >>> >>> /dev/ad4s1f 390G 127G 231G 35% /usr1 >>> /dev/ad6s1d 902G 710G 120G 86% /usr1/BKU >>> >>> >>> because /usr1/BKU is a sub-directory of /usr1 . >>> >>> >>> If you create a new directory , for example /usr2 , and /usr2/BKU , and >>> using this new separate directory for sharing , such as : >>> >>> /dev/ad6s1d 902G 710G 120G 86% /usr2/BKU >>> >>> and >>> >>> machine:/usr2/BKU /BKU nfs rw,soft,intr 0 0 >>> >>> >>> will it make difference ? >>> >>> >>> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk >>> >> >> >> I just tried this and it made no difference. The same file copied onto >> the NFS mount on /usr1/shared takes about 20x as long when coppied >> on to /usr[1|2]/BKU. >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >> ---------------- >> Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com >> PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ >> >> > > Michael W. Lucas in Absolute FeeBSD , 2nd Edition , ( ISBN : > 978-1-59327-151-0 ) , > is suggesting the following ( p. 248 ) : > > In client ( mount , or , fstab ) , use options ( -o tcp , intr , soft , > -w=32768 , -r=32768 ) > > tcp option will request a TCP mount instead of UDP mount , because FreeBSD > NFS defaults to running over UDF . > > This subject may be another check point . > > > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"