From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Jun  1  4:53:49 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3855237BF31; Thu,  1 Jun 2000 04:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from vic.sabbo.net (vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.106])
	by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA13427;
	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:52:34 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1])
	by vic.sabbo.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16569;
	Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:53:32 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <39364EBD.823113C1@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 14:53:33 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Vega International Capital
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Extra in the bento's logs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi,

It seems that addition of the "Extra" reson to the bento logs is extremly bad
idea, at least in its current implementation. The logs has been bloated (~600
broken ports in the list - sic!) with false alarms and it is now very difficult
to differentiate really broken ports from those that just adds several subdirs
into locale directory. I propose to more ports with "Extra" problem into
separate list.

-Maxim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message