Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 13:55:29 -0500 From: "James A. Mutter" <jmutter@commercialmovers.com> To: Gene Harris <zeus@tetronsoftware.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPNAT - One more time - [More Info This Time] Message-ID: <38724221.E4B4C1E3@commercialmovers.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001041248450.3239-100000@tetron02.tetronsoftware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > /etc/rc.conf > > gateway_enable="YES" > > tcp_extensions="YES" > > firewall_enable="NO" > > router="routed" > > router_flags="-q" > > ifconfig_pn0="inet 192.196.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > ifconfig_pn0_alias0="inet 204.107.254.XXX netmask 255.255.255.XXX" > > defaultrouter="204.107.254.XXX" <- This is not the address of > > 'pn0_alias0' - but rather the address of the router. > > > > I see one BIG issue here. Where's the second NIC?????? You > ain't gonna do this unless you have another interface, like > ppp or at least a 2nd NIC. I thought that alias on pn0 would take care of that problem. Traffic goes in on pn0:0 (192.196.1.10) and leaves on pn0:1 (204.107.254.XXX) - Is this incorrect? Please let me know. Thanks, Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38724221.E4B4C1E3>