From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 20:50:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FFB16A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:50:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (storm.uk.FreeBSD.org [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB2043D45 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1HKo8dY098421 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:50:08 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)j1HKo7hF098420 for freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:50:07 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grovel.grondar.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1HKmNuu046454 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:48:23 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Message-Id: <200502172048.j1HKmNuu046454@grovel.grondar.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mark Murray In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:42:01 +0100." <1145421846.20050217214201@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:48:23 +0000 Sender: mark@grondar.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:50:10 -0000 Your position on this point is abundantly clear. Now please do your bit for the list's signal level and stop repeating it. M Anthony Atkielski writes: > Sander Vesik writes: > > > For example, presently you cannot do serious data warehousing without > > using a proprietary database, potentially running on a proprtitary OS. > > Some users of open-source DBMS might argue with that--just as some > users of open-source operating systems argue with the notion that their > operating systems cannot be used as serious desktops. > > -- > Anthony > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH