From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 13 19:25:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634A616A417 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B95013C45A for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from 35st.simplicato.com (static-71-249-233-130.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.249.233.130]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E5A17036; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:08:45 -0400 (EDT) References: Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Palle Girgensohn Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:07:17 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD or Intel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:25:33 -0000 Palle Girgensohn writes: > Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for performance >From what I have read in the past, specially in the postgresql list, it seems the AMD64 cpus do better with Postgresql. Possibly because of better bus architecture. Personally I think having lots of memory and a good disk subsystem is going to make a bigger difference. What sizes are you expecting for your data? What type of growth? How many concurrent connections?