Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:19:04 -0500 From: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <501EE348.9020609@une.net.co> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 05/08/12 13:03, Wojciech Puchar escribió: >>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the >>> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first >>> I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will >>> gonna be the differentiator. >> >> The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do > > is ZFS supposed to be faster at all? > > really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL on SSD. There is no doubt in the benefits of SSD on the fileservers (SMB, NFS,etc.) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501EE348.9020609>