Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:19:04 -0500
From:      Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <501EE348.9020609@une.net.co>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
El 05/08/12 13:03, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
>>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
>>> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
>>> I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
>>> gonna be the differentiator.
>>
>> The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me.  Do
>
> is ZFS supposed to be faster at all?
>
> really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best.

Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use 
L2ARC/ZIL on SSD.

There is no doubt in the benefits of SSD on the fileservers (SMB, NFS,etc.)

> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501EE348.9020609>