Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:30:55 +0400
From:      Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
To:        David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Greg Lewis <glewis@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/java/openjdk6 Makefile ports/java/openjdk7 Makefile
Message-ID:  <86vd7nbt4w.fsf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201008012222.o71MMirC065381@repoman.freebsd.org> (Greg Lewis's message of "Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:22:44 %2B0000 (UTC)")
References:  <201008012222.o71MMirC065381@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lewis <glewis@FreeBSD.org> writes:

> glewis      2010-08-01 22:22:44 UTC
>
>   FreeBSD ports repository
>
>   Modified files:
>     java/openjdk6        Makefile 
>     java/openjdk7        Makefile 
>   Log:
>   . Mark MAKE_JOBS_SAFE.
>   . Use MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER as HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS.
>   
>   PR:             148753
>   Submitted by:   David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.26      +5 -3      ports/java/openjdk6/Makefile
>   1.13      +5 -4      ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile

Does this work? I'm just confused why the committer outsmarted submitter
by silently dropping some important parts[1] of the patch in ports/148753.

I can still reproduce that error reported by QAT. But pointyhat seems to
not use make jobs so it's not in its logs[2].

[1] the workaround for ports/148754 - empty _MAKE_JOBS after bsd.port.post.mk

[2] empty HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS indicates make jobs are not used
       http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/openjdk-7.0.82_1.log



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86vd7nbt4w.fsf>