From owner-freebsd-gnome Sat Nov 16 22:27:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5409A37B401; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF42E43E4A; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:27:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAH6QY4U038750; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:26:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Repo copies From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Akinori MUSHA Cc: cvs@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD GNOME Users , portmgr@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <86y97s2066.wl@daemon.musha.org> References: <1037512418.43391.11.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <86y97s2066.wl@daemon.musha.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZJr/o18WqB2gxWa6ExZc" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Message-Id: <1037514449.43391.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 17 Nov 2002 01:27:30 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05 version=2.43 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=-ZJr/o18WqB2gxWa6ExZc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 01:13, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > At 17 Nov 2002 00:53:39 -0500, > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > www/galeon --> www/galeon2 > > www/mozilla-devel --> www/mozilla2 > >=20 > > The reason for adding yet another Mozilla to the tree is so that we can > > build galeon2 packages. Without a separate mozilla2 port, mozilla-deve= l > > would be built with the default GTK 1 bindings, and galeon2 would fail > > to build. Thanks. >=20 > I'm afraid mozilla2 would sound like Mozilla version 2.x. Wouldn't it > be nicer to name it mozilla-gtk2 or mozilla+gtk2 ? Or if GTK+ 2.x is > going to be the default before long, you may as well consider copying > mozilla to mozilla-gtk1 and updating mozilla to be built with GTK+ 2.x > instead. What do you think? Well, sobomax and I decided in the xxx2 naming convention for this type of thing. However, you and Kris have a valid point. There will most certainly be a Mozilla 2.x, and this is not that. We can't update mozilla to add GTK 2 support since it's mozilla-devel (1.2b) that has the hooks. But what about: www/mozilla-devel --> www/mozilla-devel-gtk2 ? Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-ZJr/o18WqB2gxWa6ExZc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA91zbRb2iPiv4Uz4cRAiaBAJ9cuVf8gTbccPR8xEJxiXGuMCJufwCeNe08 o6UKs8YW5arL6PEPiI8O0JQ= =jjk8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZJr/o18WqB2gxWa6ExZc-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message