From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri May 31 13:42:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA12178
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 31 May 1996 13:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mpp@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA12167;
          Fri, 31 May 1996 13:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mike Pritchard <mpp>
Message-Id: <199605312042.NAA12167@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: When msdosfs (re)finished?
To: rnordier@iafrica.com (Robert Nordier)
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 13:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: hoek@freenet.hamilton.on.ca, questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199605311021.MAA00354@eac.iafrica.com> from "Robert Nordier" at May 31, 96 12:21:17 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Robert Nordier wrote:
> 
> As far as I know, I'm the only one actively working on the msdosfs
> code.  The rewritten msdosfs (now 'vfatfs') is mostly complete in
> essentials, but I'm still reconsidering the way VFAT support is
> implemented, and trying out various strategies for handling the
> metadata updates so as to best support 'fsck'-style recovery.

FYI:  I don't recall if this has been mentioned before, but
I noticed that NetBSD has an fsck for msdos now.  
-- 
Mike Pritchard
mpp@FreeBSD.org
"Go that way.  Really fast.  If something gets in your way, turn"