From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 15 18:38:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC6D106566C for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985518FC19 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lenovo.syrec.org (c-24-7-25-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.7.25.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9FIckGf042162; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:38:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4CB89FB4.4020907@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:38:44 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100723 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bf1783@gmail.com References: <20101014120034.B794D10656D8@hub.freebsd.org> <20101015012001.F2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "b. f." , Ian Smith Subject: Re: Too many binary packages are missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:38:53 -0000 On 10/15/10 09:39, b. f. wrote: > On 10/15/10, Ian Smith wrote: > ... > > >> http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable works, >> it's what portupgrade looks at on an 8.1-STABLE system, but it's a bit >> sad finding the last directory updated at 1st October. I checked just >> one subdir, sysutils, and the newest file there is 30th September. >> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html > http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portsuploadstatus.py > > ... > > >> Er, 8-STABLE (packages) is for currently 8.1-STABLE (world/kernel), no? >> > No. I thought the 8-STABLE packages were from a recent snapshot of > 8-STABLE, because that's the way that tinderboxes are set up. > However, I checked, and actually a version of the last supported > stable branch of 6.*, and some versions of the _oldest_ supported > stable branches of 7,8 are used. Right now, for i386 it's: > > 6.x-stable --> 6.4-RELEASE-p9 > 7.x-stable --> 7.1-RELEASE-p12 > 8.x-stable --> 8.0-RELEASE-p2 > 9.x-current --> a snaphot of 9-CURRENT > For example I am watching the update process of one i386 system. portupgrade just failed to find one more package: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/All/kdeutils-4.5.2.tgz Is it misconfigured, wrong path? I didn't touch this part of configuration at all. Yuri