From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Sep 20 17:30:09 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA20172
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 17:30:09 -0700
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA20118
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 17:29:23 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id BAA01237
	  for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 01:28:35 +0100
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: elm
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 01:28:34 +0100
Message-ID: <1235.811643314@palmer.demon.co.uk>
From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Hiya

FreeBSD has dropped the default optimization level for the system down
to -O now, and I just noticed that by default elm is compiled with
-O2. Do we want to drop this down to match the rest of the system?
(For those who didn't see the reasoning behind the -O2 -> -O move
 for the base installation, it's because of optimizer bugs in GCC
 on Intel platforms)

Comments?

Gary