From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Feb 18 23:22:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mobile.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B3E37B67D for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:22:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.wemm.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1J7M0r54717; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:22:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200102190722.f1J7M0r54717@mobile.wemm.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jos Backus Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND In-Reply-To: <20010218220227.H28286@lizzy.bugworks.com> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:22:00 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jos Backus wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 05:47:02AM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > I think the license is a show stopper, anyway. Somwthing so basic > > has got to be locally hackable, > > What kind of hacking do you foresee? It does not matter. The fact that we cannot is a show stopper. We do not have read-only source in our tree, period. If we ever did need to (eg: a compile problem), we could not distribute it. Even the djbdns port is marked FORBIDDEN because of this as it has two tiny patches. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message