From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 9 23:03:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA19181 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 23:03:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from answerman.mindspring.com (answerman.mindspring.com [204.180.128.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA19176 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 23:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms039149.mindspring.com (ip123.tulsa3.ok.interramp.com [38.12.221.123]) by answerman.mindspring.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA00557; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 02:13:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <2.2.16.19961110070059.23bfed18@pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: jrasins@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 09 Nov 1996 23:00:59 -0800 To: "David L. Meeks" From: "John W. Rasins" Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ Cc: questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 04:09 PM 11/09/1996 -0600, you wrote: >I am running FreeBSD Ver 2.1. I recently purchased a Intel EtherExpress >Pro/10+ network board. I have it >configured for i/o 300 (default). The ROM is disabled. When booting >the network board is not seen by the >system. However the board does pass the DOS diagnostics on the drivers >disk. > >Any ideas? > >Thanks > > Dave Meeks > dmeeks@mcs.com > I don't believe this card is supported yet, though David G. is working with a couple of people to see if the Intel driver (ix) can be updated, or a new driver written, to handle this card. John