From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 00:56:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5735116A4CE for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:56:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5C643D46 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:56:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garya@dreamchaser.org) Received: from [12.32.36.74] (imagination.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.74]) i8F0uGX0000420 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:56:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from garya@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <41479332.3070108@dreamchaser.org> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:56:18 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: shared irqs and performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:56:18 -0000 On my 4.10 system, I added in a third ethernet device. However, I see from dmesg that the irq assigned is shared with my scsi controller: de1: port 0xf880-0xf8ff mem 0xfdfffc00-0xfdfffc7f irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 bt0: port 0xfcec-0xfcef irq 9 at device 17.0 on pci0 Since the driver was already present, things went ok, in the sense that the system booted and scsi devices still work. 1. Will this work reliably (I haven't actually hooked anything to the new network card yet)? 2. Even if it does work, I assume it would be better to force it to an unused irq for performance reasons? Thanks, Gary