Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:32:48 -0800 From: Matt Olander <matt@offmyserver.com> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... Message-ID: <20050217123248.E42152@knight.ixsystems.net> In-Reply-To: <224383192.20050217213351@wanadoo.fr>; from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr on Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:33:51PM %2B0100 References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr> <2810734464.20050217192707@wanadoo.fr> <20050217123730.O79252@makeworld.com> <224383192.20050217213351@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:33:51PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > How do you prove that FreeBSD is suitable as a replacement for Windows? FreeBSD and others make for an excellent desktop operating system once a few kinks have been worked out. My company uses it, the state of Florida uses it, Pair Networks, Juniper, etc. There are many examples of large organizations replacing Windows with an opensource operating system for their desktop deployments. -matt -- Matt Olander (408)943-4100 Phone (408)943-4101 Fax www.offmyserver.com -- "Those who don't read have no advantage over those who can't" -Mark Twain
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050217123248.E42152>