From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 21 19:18:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E982DD73 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtrigg@spamcop.net) Received: from argent.heraldsnet.net (argent.heraldsnet.net [69.60.117.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C938210EA for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by argent.heraldsnet.net (Postfix, from userid 11001) id 10D075C8E; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:11:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:11:52 -0400 From: Jim Trigg To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: texinfo vs. emacs... Message-ID: <20130621191151.GB46303@spamcop.net> References: <51C46978.2010102@freebsd.org> <20130621171843.GB78584@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130621171843.GB78584@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:18:34 -0000 On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:18:43PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > > On 21 June 2013 15:55, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > On 21/06/2013 14:34, Ben Laurie wrote: > > >> Installing texinfo-5.1.20130419_1...pkg-static: texinfo-5.1.20130419_1 > > >> conflicts with emacs-24.3,3 (installs files into the same place). > > >> Problematic file: /usr/local/info/info.info.gz > > >> > > >> There doesn't seem to be any clean way to fix this ... hints? > > > > > > Add > > > > > > PERMISSIVE : yes > > > > > > to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pkg.conf > > > > > > It's not really clean in that it just allows packages to stomp over each > > > other's files, but it lets you get the job done. > > > > Also, is there an env flag that does the same thing? > > > All configuration in pkg.conf can also be set by env flags. so PERMISSIVE=yes > will do the same. OK, is there a way to do this for specific ports so that an administrator can approve specific combinations of ports without giving blanket permission? Thanks, Jim