From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 15:04:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6022316A42B; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:04:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcreid@ourcorner.org) Received: from frad.org (66-208-209-61.cdnt02a.rtchrd01.md.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.209.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D2443D76; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:04:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcreid@ourcorner.org) Received: from MICRON by filenet.wwiv.net (MDaemon.PRO.v8.0.1.R) with ESMTP id md50000066637.msg; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:01:48 -0500 From: "Frank Reid" To: "'Craig Rodrigues'" Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:02:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcXxBe6YLjZQxIJVS0SRKMsOOYKUZgAAdyZg In-Reply-To: <20051124144836.GA902@crodrigues.org> X-Authenticated-Sender: fcreid@ourcorner.org X-HashCash: 1:20:051124:bp@freebsd.org::CqPGFditzc3h5DzR:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008GTU X-Spam-Processed: new.frad.org, Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:01:51 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: fcreid@ourcorner.org X-MDAV-Processed: new.frad.org, Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:01:51 -0500 Message-Id: <20051124150406.47D2443D76@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'Boris Popov' , freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FW: mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:04:26 -0000 > You could be more helpful by debugging with Ethereal, to see what > is causing the bad RPC packet error. I'm building Ethereal from ports now. Again, I'm not familiar with the tool. Will the process to capture what's needed be self-explanatory? Frank