From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 14:53:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5313EC1B for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39BA7131 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9RErj9h003547 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:53:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:53:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: conrad.meyer@isilon.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:53:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D194604 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to Dag-Erling Sm=C3=83=C2=B8rgrav from comment #2) > Sorry, but no. Use something like kpasswd instead. So, this option then? > we'd prefer more ports shipping > setuid helpers instead of providing one standard one. (In reply to Dag-Erling Sm=C3=83=C2=B8rgrav from comment #3) > Sorry, I meant kcheckpass. $ pkg install kcheckpass pkg: No packages available to install matching 'kcheckpass' have been found= in the repositories Any idea which of the myriad KDE ports actually provides kcheckpass? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=