From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  6 22:20:07 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8406D618;
 Tue,  6 Nov 2012 22:20:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440C18FC15;
 Tue,  6 Nov 2012 22:20:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA6MK70K060871;
 Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:20:07 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
Received: (from bapt@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA6MK73d060869;
 Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:20:07 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to
 bapt@freebsd.org using -f
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 23:20:05 +0100
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r307080 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg
Message-ID: <20121106222004.GB4862@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References: <201211061632.qA6GWfvF002597@svn.freebsd.org>
 <CAF6rxg=0xBS4Gi31HOKQQfJDDmY6vU3gmQoGV_8=rpaBHgvVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADLo83-XcBk8kGDxDhiYbTiOFoWpYmVsbGGrSyg-Os1dCMWLVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF6rxg=7pJLUq=wuJnhXwnqKuoSj6s+5r3Ry-0-6qHXqVyPFHg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wq9mPyueHGvFACwf"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=7pJLUq=wuJnhXwnqKuoSj6s+5r3Ry-0-6qHXqVyPFHg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:20:07 -0000


--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 03:03:38PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 14:59, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On 6 November 2012 19:16, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> On 6 November 2012 11:32, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>   Feature safe: yes
> >>
> >> Given that every single port relies on pkg, is this really feature saf=
e?
> >
> > Given that 9.1-RELEASE won't use pkg by default, yes :)
>=20
> "by default" isn't the only concern.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Eitan Adler
> Source, Ports, Doc committer
> Bugmeister, Ports Security teams

yes it is feature safe, for multiple reason, the feature freeze is there to
allow us to build the full packages for the release so it only concern defa=
ult
way of building.

Second this is a bug fix release

regards,
Bapt

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCZjRQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyU1QCgg4QWW0ZU5tkJ2Lw2LAscmHKZ
W20AoI9zUPzroMU/gKC4pwjGlYPARFNm
=JM+h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf--