From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 1 19:41:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0460816A403 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: from downloadtech.com (dt2-sfo.downloadtech.net [66.220.3.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD1343D6E for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:41:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: from dglawrence.com (c-24-21-220-242.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.21.220.242]) by downloadtech.com (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k91Jfc6C011739; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: from tnn.dglawrence.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dglawrence.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k91JfX6G073389; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:41:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by tnn.dglawrence.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k91JfW9l073388; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:41:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tnn.dglawrence.com: dg set sender to dg@dglawrence.com using -f Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:41:32 -0700 From: David G Lawrence To: Martin Nilsson Message-ID: <20061001194132.GQ14975@tnn.dglawrence.com> References: <451A1375.5080202@gneto.com> <45200654.6030103@gneto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45200654.6030103@gneto.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:41:49 -0000 > Just an observation. > > All the boxes I've had this problem on have _two_ em interfaces. I have > never seen it on my boxes with just one em NIC. > > The error is always em0 timeout - never em1 (I haven't seen any!) > > Yesterday my local network got completely wacky, the gateway had em0 > timeouts on the screen: but em0 is the _outside_ the windows box that I > had to reboot was attached to the inside on em1! > > Could there be something wrong in the driver if we have more than one em > interface? A machine I have here that shows the problem has one fxp and one em and the timeouts occur on both interfaces. -DG David G. Lawrence President Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Pave the road of life with opportunities.