Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 23:38:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: source code layout? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980419233507.523C-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <19980419203139.35191@hydrogen.nike.efn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 Apr 1998, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > well.. I guess we should put all of sys/net, sys/kern, sys/isofs, etc. > under sys/i386 as they haven't been compile and ported to another arch... You missed the implicit qualification that I was speaking of device drivers. Actual hardware. > if the bus/device code was writen properly, these last two wouldn't > exist... if they did, they would only have a couple of files... Indeed. This would be optimal. > > NetBSD does have its problems but they've taken steps towards resolving > > some of these issues. > > hmm... guess I need to update my tree and see what they've done > reciently... They've done a good bit towards doing some of the things mentioned below, but I belive after a cursory glace over the spec that jmg's proposal is superior. http://d183-205.uoregon.edu/~jmg/FreeBSD/busdevice.html /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980419233507.523C-100000>