From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 30 08:40:01 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F0F307;
 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F8EB2205;
 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q57so1318137wes.40
 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=8f/Oj96iwEahwmBrH/BzTHmkwI1tLiHX4KmezepewpA=;
 b=leCgr0LSFOiFPHOJFlajy9pEHTNB9D6/XltSmgZqog7DolxC7rOzI5mtbJ7qZ9crDj
 up0aDzu6vWSjPcT5p8tTAcy7yFWiJz8glPg9SYfTFEMD6OAiNcNNQghDyrDZwmF7UFZb
 ueXC5QwNWUhNBLHKCkAqZ+qxyPMyyG2onsOnSBNKspP59JbeTxj43sDgPuMPowEkClau
 R7WidsnpGt4Ulqp7MYLtXnA76jysUecxZXsIMpYO6MQ5r+V5p2ZyxT2V5CAv3ywqrHxr
 DGWd93WqlO0bE+yDgXgJzNB7PwZCBqEkqz0SwKQ/57V7o0md2NWcO75MR9ih3sDIg96p
 LZRQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.211.206 with SMTP id ne14mr1418094wic.30.1377851999551; 
 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.146.2 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130830031424.GF32399@FreeBSD.org>
References: <521D03AE.3050709@sics.se> <20130828040505.GD32399@FreeBSD.org>
 <521DF184.7030308@sics.se> <20130828150310.GR4574@glebius.int.ru>
 <20130830031424.GF32399@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:39:59 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fECn5I70WsDBXKhSJDo2GP3ZyBc
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokcQOhAE6y_=J1uzPHneSF+jYSpdo+wdf7Gd0h36pRHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: suspend/resume on Lenovo X1 (regression from reports on wiki)
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: Laura Marie Feeney <lmfeeney@sics.se>,
 "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>,
 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:40:02 -0000

On 29 August 2013 20:14, Sergey A. Osokin <osa@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:03:10PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >   Laura,
> >
> >   Now bad news :) Last major Xorg update in ports, which happened couple
> > of months ago, introduced a regression: xorg performs very slowly after
> > resume. If the server process is restarted, then a new one performs okay.
>
> Agree with Gleb.  Kind of a slowness exist after resume.
>
>
Can y'all grab some basic, naive benchmarks (disk, CPU) and compare them
before/after a suspend/resume cycle?



-adrian