From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 25 12:13:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95C7320 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com (mail-oa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41671CAA for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l6so4880159oag.7 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 04:13:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluelife.at; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ulWjXQokjMHxbhWrcpmSXgtqY6JgP+gYKGzYR5yaT4M=; b=V1Xs6h9qvOZwX/0UO/gL3dIxOO9TNatxwkL57Un6Z/0At6+GFS7W1cEEVvHJhZW/3E Sr72i1i6H7A7heKFcGv0EZNZho5hoFGepBvPtc1rFZI6GKBpuug2atPf/JA8FhFVmLhE od9ACQ7CLXJgdRRuL/dR7WiSME8or73XnpuGY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ulWjXQokjMHxbhWrcpmSXgtqY6JgP+gYKGzYR5yaT4M=; b=fzJobGxydx+NKz7FLXqb5aY8ubE1P2D8RmxCtcZHj4kaPeIF0S9MFtGlgqQF7vDFv7 huIIeP/hy5PEpcvfI+iinwCBbukJ7bMF/VRCkCSRuWKzLpMDrot0tpOD66ocGWU2NdHt gXcGLi5nSVkAWYNbWcGXU7xVaFz+m9NyFGagfY8kM5qVjJ11m04faFz8kg4O7pkLrbTY 2zmQDeqVLL5iiwhNcGhrWQlb91bDiEqUdN7Agwr0i67OWGaWyqZp89Oj7WXxfgCme6qC fEZu8zXd8KSCU5YDH25X5dco8kMHLPok7Nhw58xaQKIboWgm647UB5Fsreq+wfaoHq5V ssHw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmetxBGb1lSAizm2YFT9pWHuO+Fv4rUQvFi1YxCg7fgLeGE9v7plx2XfSSFmVt1lw5yE0HS MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.123.10 with SMTP id lw10mr6806648oeb.24.1390652020084; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 04:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.154.2 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 04:13:39 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [46.207.4.26] Received: by 10.76.154.2 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 04:13:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:13:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= To: Aryeh Friedman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Big Lebowski , ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:13:43 -0000 Am 25.01.2014 02:12 schrieb "Aryeh Friedman" : > > > > > I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization list > > very closely, and the matter I've touched here is not my doubt on which > > technology I should use, but rather a complaint on the state of jails > > related tools directly leading to the delays in handling of ports related > > PR's. I know the technology alternatives, I am decided to jails for a > > reason, and I also know your work on the web interface focusing on bhyve, > > but its not about it. > > > > My point is writing scripts for VM's is easier (nothing more then copy the > master and then do a normal make install/portmaster on the port of you > choice [better to run them one at a time I have found). When I get into > port testing I usually have 3 VM's on the host working on compiling and 1 > for development. I have yet to find a good way to have 4 jails running as > independentlu. This thread has taken a different direction at some point so I want to throw in another view. We already have all that build testing stuff around for various FreeBSD versions with enough hardware resources and production ready and free for all. It's called redports.org and I have even already created scripts that monitor the gnats database for ports PRs with patches, fetch them, apply them to the redports repository and schedule jobs for it. So it is all there and the reason why it isn't running already are political ones because I also proposed to automatically send followup mails to the PR with the buildlog status. http://code.google.com/p/redports/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fscripts