Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 13:29:58 -0800 (PST) From: -Vince- <vince@apollo.COSC.GOV> To: Robert Sanders <rsanders@mindspring.com> Cc: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finger problem going from 2.1R to -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960115132915.20064p-100000@apollo.COSC.GOV> In-Reply-To: <199601152121.QAA29362@interbev.mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Jan 1996, Robert Sanders wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 1996 16:09:53 -0500, "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> said: > > >> Maybe this can be committed to the tree... > > > No. (There is another, completely different, kernel fix.) > > Yeah, the T/TCP changes just recently got put into the tree. I guess > the importance of T/TCP for this is that it can save, what, one round > trip per finger connection? What confuses me is that, though I > haven't read rfc1644 or the kernel source, I thought that T/TCP would > properly cope with hosts that didn't want to cooperate. > > Otherwise, it seems that the default settings for both rfc* sysctl > options should be off. TCP extensions just seem to cause trouble for > the Average Joe. Yep, atleast on Xyglogics Annex Terminal servers it does... Cheers, -Vince- vince@COSC.GOV - GUS Mailing Lists Admin - http://www.COSC.GOV/~vince UC Berkeley AstroPhysics - Electrical Engineering (Honorary B.S.) Chabot Observatory & Science Center - Board of Advisors Running FreeBSD - Real UN*X for Free! Linda Wong/Vivian Chow/Hacken Lee/Danny Chan/Priscilla Chan Fan Club Mailing Lists Admin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960115132915.20064p-100000>