Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 03:11:26 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>, Robert Withrow <bwithrow@baynetworks.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AMD/NFS problems with 3.0 Message-ID: <19981122031126.C8758@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <199811201503.KAA25644@spooky.rwwa.com>; from Robert Withrow on Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 10:03:59AM -0500 References: <199811182229.RAA25694@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com> <199811201503.KAA25644@spooky.rwwa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> All of my *AMD* problems were cured by upgrading to the latest > version: am-utils-6.0b2s3. Sounds really good to me. I may wait a little bit to see if the Columbia people move that version out of the `snapshots' directory. I would be very interested to hear if others find that am-utils-6.0b2s3 at ftp://shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu//pub/am-utils/ does better for them than am-utils-6.0b1. > I'd like to suggest that 2.2.8 and 3.next upgrade to, at least, the 6.0 > beta stream instead of the alpha code that is in there now. Amd will not be updated in 2.2.8 as it is too big a change for the 2.2.x branch at this point. 3.0 went to the beta code Nov 14th. But I did forget to change the version number that is printed out until just recently. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981122031126.C8758>