From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Apr 21 09:57:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB28B177B7 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com (mail-wm0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C74B61E05; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id e201so16262587wme.2; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:57:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KvheXtgXjPTnUJrHUHz2+KmbSSvdaoVCMB0pJkYKwWs=; b=G+VZ8aZV2M3fq2pBHGOCo1MmtLvMf/is3n+DLSHxqvEs5NARsmFRH9lQKaMQ9mglvm 6ocD0iCJEZpyC+yPcvYDK0Ohxk9ylkrN9pObD/S8ITnvY/ncUdtP7vHmNdcuspfqSvxT McspOrOwtMvj2G0XHlbRrRvv8v45udF2DgJoCeYv6mEq4RyXHp+I58qlEQkJoxm+mlGG +lsNXmtv2/DaxHMOIktYueziLLEB0B60QRG/8odgfYX6mz8Q6eZiEOLM3Vg3Gx9unVFz DcEcfXYu7p9z2Ha7PnpS+vQTUbI6lt7TquZoq/RIN2Jv/mQGBENNJhKiXe8h60XPa6cF kiLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KvheXtgXjPTnUJrHUHz2+KmbSSvdaoVCMB0pJkYKwWs=; b=Zbjdw+U9DLTOWjjw+n4dVzX9FNyIYSDvuK+8kokkEZRo2WHm6AQ18sOliBPq8Ii1PP tdWQwbMCe8JySaPCpcbsXeSOVZfm279Umt1uF/utbElL2IRYzhZHmcv7laKpcpuXQNzy GcmhlfySAiHze3LWTAZ3nfbdjEkX3gE8Pq1t2oVcGUf8/cORFKUeBDFpbJi+CfC+orq8 eoKGMamnM6c9Coxgqchn4Z/be5REqiFbIleiYAcGx9+9P6MIh7sXzp6THPM/k4+5VPo0 ZXb/GhnJj1dVnMihNeowFXqUaC8tmRqcd8L6P6/KoEsEDEqFTf+woM0Y2QAxtl+TwMTR 8NCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX14H5m+eFJGxPkY0AuNxkjWUVczyW4tNzLSJBD503GmMbeaA5fLtWciN+HJSk9KQ== X-Received: by 10.28.144.20 with SMTP id s20mr14830356wmd.12.1461232630463; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brick (evp155.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.20.213.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jr8sm1999434wjb.15.2016.04.21.02.57.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:57:06 +0200 From: Edward Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?Napiera=C5=82a?= To: dan_partelly Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Nathan Whitehorn , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160421095706.GA57206@brick> Mail-Followup-To: dan_partelly , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Nathan Whitehorn , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <5716AD65.8070007@shrew.net> <5716FA70.4080604@freebsd.org> <571765BB.3050908@quip.cz> <79117ce18bd3332c7df3e55e12a161b4@rdsor.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79117ce18bd3332c7df3e55e12a161b4@rdsor.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:57:12 -0000 On 0420T1545, dan_partelly wrote: [..] > Another example is the autofs mounter. The prject was marked as complete > by FreeBSD foundation in 2014. Last I tried it to autmount removable > devices, it left directory after directory in the autofs managed directory. > This is known behavior. Yup. The problem here is that it's quite hard to fix, there's a risk of breaking existing functionality, and the problem is largely cosmetic. > It also did not worked as it should ??? (show it > manage removable media correctly ) changing CD/DVD media disks. Presumably > In could have somehow manage it to work by making yet another scaffolding > of scripts as a questionable glue between devd and automounters. That if > devd receives media change notifications. I dont know. If not I could patch > the kernel, yeah. But it is just much to simple to not bother at all and > use OSx. Huh, never heard about that. I'd expect the existing mechanism to handle that case just fine. Could you submit a PR? [..]