From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 30 01:24:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115CD16A417 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:24:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03B613C448 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C981CC8B; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:24:15 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, darryl@osborne-ind.com Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:24:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <9C06997C9F0547E781FB1197659DA499@Europa> In-Reply-To: <9C06997C9F0547E781FB1197659DA499@Europa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801300224.13966.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Next steps X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:24:16 -0000 On Tuesday 29 January 2008 23:11:35 Darryl Hoar wrote: > >>If you play games or use other apps that make processes grow beyond > >> 512MB, > > you > > >>also need to set kern.defdsiz and kern.maxdsiz in /boot/loader.conf to a > > more > > >>desirable value (if you can spare the physical ram). > > I have 2GB RAM in this box, so I'm OK on physical ram. But there will be > no game playing on this server. Pending what's more important: - could set process size to 768M or 1G and let mysql eat it (faster cached queries, can handle sorting better without using tmp files). - don't increase it, instead use more forks on the webserver But this is tuning for high loads, really. Outof the box for small office internal usage, it shouldn't need tuning. The max data size for a process is just something you run into sooner rather then later. -- Mel