From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 11 22:51:05 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBE831C5
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 22:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67C6176D
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 22:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4BMp3t5077388
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Mon, 11 May 2015 15:51:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host
 c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be
 yuri.doctorlan.com
Message-ID: <55513256.2030900@rawbw.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:51:02 -0700
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" <pvoigt@uos.de>
CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?
References: <20150509125643.0bda93e6@kirk.drpetervoigt.private>
 <554EEBB5.8010304@rawbw.com>
 <20150511202110.34e6e29c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private>
 <55510C22.9050900@rawbw.com>
 <20150512000259.32a44ec4@kirk.drpetervoigt.private>
In-Reply-To: <20150512000259.32a44ec4@kirk.drpetervoigt.private>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 22:51:05 -0000

On 05/11/2015 15:02, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> I changed to base openssl after fighting with latest port openssl.
> As reported by several people
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198788

You can also downgrade security/openssl port locally to the last known 
version, and then rebuild postfix, and the rest, locally without 
packages. Local builds currently generally produce better results 
compared to poudriere builds because they are more likely to avoid 
openssl problem.

Yuri