From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Dec 3 10:57:16 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 3 10:57:14 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16E137B400; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:57:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eB3IxI759692; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:59:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:59:18 +0100 (CET) From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-firewall@freebsd.org Subject: IPFIREWALL or IPFILTER? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear Sirs. I asked this question prior and it's coming up again. FreeBSD comes with two firewall systems/ IP filtering kernel facilities. At this moment we use IPFW to filter but I saw many updates for IPF in the last period. Can anyone tell me the benefits of both systems? What is the real FreeBSD native filtering code and which one is the fastest one? Maybe ist is a foolish question, but behind this there is a lot of manitanance stuff ... Thanks in advance, Oliver - MfG O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA IT Netz- und Systembetreuung Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 D-55099 Mainz BRD/Germany Tel: +496131/3924662 Tel: +496131/3924152 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message