Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:16:59 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: peter.orlowski@physik.tu-berlin.de Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?! Message-ID: <4283736B.10805@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <20050512060034.GA25077@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> References: <8b6eae96050510071037d3b6e4@mail.gmail.com> <4280C277.4030904@jim-liesl.org> <27C1250C-9BFD-4FA8-876C-09DF5504B058@isncom.com> <4280EE3C.8050505@jim-liesl.org> <20050511095142.GA12629@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> <428243EA.9070707@jim-liesl.org> <20050512060034.GA25077@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Orlowski wrote: >>At this point, I'm thinking that as far as S/W RAID goes in FreeBSD, the >>"R" is pretty meaningless > > Well, "R" does not mean "redundant" but "realtime backup" ;-(. BTW., what is the status of RaidFrame on FreeBSD? I remember some time ago people were working on integrating it into 5.x or so? I have good experience with Raidframe on NetBSD, and less good with vinum on FreeBSD so I'd be delighted if Raidframe could make it into FreeBSD (and work equally well, of course). mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4283736B.10805>