From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 01:22:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1130216A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary@pattersonsoftware.com) Received: from mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BAB43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:22:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gary@pattersonsoftware.com) Received: from 203-206-97-36.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO sonic.pattersonsoftware.com) ([203.206.97.36]) by mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 09:21:59 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,208,1157299200"; d="scan'208"; a="658526525:sNHT18682594" Received: by sonic.pattersonsoftware.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7508A33C28; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:21:58 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:21:58 +1000 From: Gary Newcombe To: phatfish@gmail.com Message-ID: <20060924012158.GA44535@sonic.pattersonsoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing to a custom location with buildworld/DESTDIR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:22:02 -0000 On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:08:42 +0100 "Chris" wrote: > I have an encrypted disk setup where i want to install a fresh system using > buildworld/buildkernel on my current install. I looked around and it seems > that the bellow commands should do what i want. But I'm not sure if it is > the best way to do it, or if the procedure is out of date (I'm running 6.1). > cd /usr/src > setenv DESTDIR /mnt/root > make buildworld && make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > cd /usr/src/etc; make distribution Hi Chris, That's all I do, but you'll need to install world and kernel too. Cheers Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 02:53:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A032E16A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3590143D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-66-142-190-185.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.142.190.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19658114314 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:54:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:53:18 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <188DD322AA361E26DFC311B9@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========5DC5F6C85DA5260C78C4==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Device polling - worthwhile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:53:21 -0000 --==========5DC5F6C85DA5260C78C4========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I've been reading about device polling. I'm wondering if it's worth doing = on a busy website (4,000,000+ hits/month, 45GB+ bandwidth use). I=20 understand what polling is and how it queues traffic as opposed to the=20 "old-fashioned" interrupt method, but do you really gain performance-wise? = Are there any pitfalls to enabling it in the kernel? (I understand you=20 can enable/disable it using ifconfig.) Any gotchas regarding tuning?=20 (This is a production website. I don't want to cause problems that are=20 hard to figure out.) If it matters, I'm running 6.1 RELEASE, GENERIC kernel, Broadcomm GIG=20 NICs, 3.2GHz processor, 2GB of memory, apache 1.3.* Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========5DC5F6C85DA5260C78C4==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 04:33:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDB616A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:33:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FAB43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A6B5F71; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iTRpfHRA9bUj; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4645C6E; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <45160A98.9010500@mac.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:28 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <188DD322AA361E26DFC311B9@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <188DD322AA361E26DFC311B9@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Device polling - worthwhile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:33:29 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > I've been reading about device polling. I'm wondering if it's worth > doing on a busy website (4,000,000+ hits/month, 45GB+ bandwidth use). I > understand what polling is and how it queues traffic as opposed to the > "old-fashioned" interrupt method, but do you really gain > performance-wise? Are there any pitfalls to enabling it in the kernel? > (I understand you can enable/disable it using ifconfig.) Any gotchas > regarding tuning? (This is a production website. I don't want to cause > problems that are hard to figure out.) > > If it matters, I'm running 6.1 RELEASE, GENERIC kernel, Broadcomm GIG > NICs, 3.2GHz processor, 2GB of memory, apache 1.3.* If your NIC can do interrupt moderation, and most GB NICs will, that already provides most of the advantages of device polling without as much CPU overhead. Polling is best suited for routers and firewalls and very simple services like NTP. If this is a production website, you clearly should experiment with polling on another system until you are satisfied that you can make it work OK for your needs, right...? -- -Chuck PS: 4 million hits/month is about 1-2 hits per second, and about 2 KB/sec of bandwidth on average. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 05:49:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EB516A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3D943D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78B6B9CE; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NJrEa-orVdwY; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C4CB984; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45161C70.4070106@aeternal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:36 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schulz References: <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com> In-Reply-To: <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions Subject: Re: Zabbix Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:49:40 -0000 Hello David, David Schulz wrote: > The /usr/ports/net-mgmt/zabbix Port consists out of two components, > Server and Agent. I would like to install the Agent only, so it shouldnt > need all these large dependencies such as mysql etc, but i cant figure > out how to do that. I skimmed trough the Makefile, and it mentions > things about ZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY , but i can figure out how to turn that > knob. Can anyone tell me please? usually reading Makefile in the port directory can reveal the knob. In this case just use: make ZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY=yes install or, as has been proposed by Norberto Meijome, -DZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY. Also, if you use portupgrade, please add following to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf MAKE_ARGS section: 'net/mgmt/zabbix' => 'ZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY=yes', as portupgrade will need to know that you've used this knob in first install, so it would not install whole zabbix on the upgrade run. Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 05:52:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768CB16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009DC43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19289B9CE; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuQju2-B1yfd; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26254B984; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45161D12.2070900@aeternal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:18 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Trevor References: <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com> <20060922155323.710aeb62@localhost> <4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Zabbix Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:22 -0000 Hello Charles, Charles Trevor wrote: > If done this way portupgrade et al shouldnt revert to building the > full package, which they seem to if you use a make flag to build the > client portion only. As to avoid this issue of portupgrade not knowing the make flags used during first install, there is /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file with its MAKE_ARGS section, where you can define this and portupgrade will know the make flags to be used during upgrade process. Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 07:10:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA73316A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org (havoc.unixathome.org [66.154.98.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAEF43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480BA564BF for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from havoc.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (havoc.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaTmfTT9m6xA for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5D8F4564B8; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060924071004.5D8F4564B8@havoc.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-09-03 - 2006-09-23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:10:49 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 4-Sep : Monitor your 3Ware battery backup unit (BBU) Why not monitor your battery? http://freebsddiary.org/3ware-netsaint-plugin-addenda.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 07:21:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9313216A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from mail.duras.ro (mail.duras.ro [86.105.56.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D1043D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:21:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id B061818741E for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:21:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.duras.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18278-03 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:21:14 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [86.105.56.194] (ma.plimb.cu.barca.prin.padure.ro [86.105.56.194]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EE1187285 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:21:14 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <451631C4.6040200@duras.ro> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:20:36 +0300 From: Mihai Tanasescu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (RedHat) at duras.ro Subject: Openbgpd TCP-MD5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:21:18 -0000 Hello, Does anyone know if TCP-MD5 is working with OpenBGP on Freebsd ? I've got a Freebsd 6.1 system (6.1-RELEASE-p5) on which I've tried both openbgpd and openbgpd-devel. The system has a test session now with a Cisco 3750 equipment. On the OpenBGPD machine I have setup the Cisco neighbor with the tcp md5sig password option. On the Cisco machine I have setup the OpenBGPD neighbor with the password option. Upon starting the session the OpenBGPD machine reported pfkey setup failed. I used setkey to add the following (after adding FAST_IPSEC and TCP-MD5 in the kernel): add ip-openbgpd ip-cisco-bgp tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "password I used"; On the Cisco device if I issue a show logg I can see: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from ip-openbgpd(179) to ip-cisco(15581) (RST) Also the OpenBGPD FreeBSD system displays: kernel: tcp_signature_compute: SADB lookup failed for ip-cisco Help wanted:) if possible Thanks, Mihai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 09:13:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F4D16A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F062643D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:13:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8O9Co6d060743; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:12:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8O9Co6d060743 Message-ID: <45164C0C.5010406@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:12:44 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Schuller References: <200609240036.12322.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> In-Reply-To: <200609240036.12322.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:13:11 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1931/Sun Sep 24 08:51:08 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf + ipv6 + keep state - any known issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:13:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter Schuller wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am using pf on a 6.1 machine. I have a tunneling interface (gif0) for= my=20 > IPv6 feed. The problem I am having is connecting to myself in spite of = > firewalling. >=20 > I am allowing traffic on port 22 to my public ipv6 address. I am also a= llowing=20 > all outgoing traffic on the tunneling interface, with 'keep state'. >=20 > ping6:ing myself works, but connecting to port 22 does not. The intial = SYN=20 > gets through and is responded to by an ACK, but that ACK is seemingly=20 > dropped. This inspite of the fact that 'pfctl -s state' shows a tracked= =20 > connection for the relevant port pair. >=20 > I can work around it by allowing all packets from my own IP on the tunn= eling=20 > interface, but as far as I know this should not be required. That is,=20 > connection tracking should be working even for local connections on a=20 > particular interface - correct? >=20 > Note that connecting to port 22 works perfectly from outside IP:s (I ha= d=20 > someone external verify this) without any special casing of the rules. = That=20 > is, I only have the usual rules for allowing the incoming packets to po= rt 22,=20 > and the rule allowing outgoing packets with 'keep state'. The fact that= this=20 > allows successful establishment to port 22 by an external party suggest= s to=20 > me that I have not made some trivial misstake in the rule - yet connect= ions=20 > to myself do not work. >=20 > My question is whether there are any known issues that this sounds like= - or=20 > of course if there is some reason why this is not supposed to work by d= esign. Are you using antispoofing rules on your external interface? If you've g= ot something like this in your ruleset: antispoof log quick for $ext_if Then it will expand into a series of rules containing the following when = you load them: block drop in log quick on ! em0 inet from 12.34.56.72/29 to any Where 12.34.56.72/29 is the address of the network your external interfac= e (em0) is attached to. (Although the example I show is for IPv4, exactly = the same applies for IPv6) End result is that you cannot connect to a service= listening on your external IP from the box itself, because that does not result in inbound packets traversing the em0 interface. And it's a 'quic= k' rule, so you can't override it by adding a more specific rule later in th= e ruleset. In general, use antispoof for the loopback as a standard part of any rule= set you write. Antispoof on other interfaces should be considered carefully = and only applied where necessary. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFFkwS8Mjk52CukIwRCFHSAJ9Rcl+cwoYgvWrr/uE9gUajpeulnQCfdt4l n8lwxDyMuUdHSrXRqD/DN3U= =NhqM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 09:23:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26F616A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hawkeye@netvision.net.il) Received: from mxout1.netvision.net.il (mxout1.netvision.net.il [194.90.9.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4616243D6A for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:23:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hawkeye@netvision.net.il) Received: from MARTY ([217.132.103.200]) by mxout1.netvision.net.il (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with SMTP id <0J6300LHSBFCCI70@mxout1.netvision.net.il> for questions@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:37 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:26:46 +0200 From: "m.shenven" To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1255 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: question: How to use SERIAL PORT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:23:40 -0000 uhclem@FreeBSD.org> < serial and UART Tutorial, by Frank Durda > Sirs, Where on the Internet can I details of: How to program a WINDOWS XP computer so that in will input/output to an external device through its SERIAL PORT? ANY information you can supply, would bew greatly appreciated ! m.shenven hawkeye@netvision.net.il From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 10:16:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEB616A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bloodyveins@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DCF43D53 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:16:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bloodyveins@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so355320uge for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:16:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NE4nYg5atfWnnIGDEAG5OXDEIni6PMZKtEPhVIth/95zBITr9oDcXOnKIkRf0kmAjKPsR0IjxuCR3Jta5KDQXiECVKqPs9XxttASG5QsTXBJADbKwKy3rDa2fUDF918AzEZRAIwRS2EiKLzHlKoWXrfmys+I2i6ZswISHjk7348= Received: by 10.66.220.17 with SMTP id s17mr2370019ugg; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.89.13 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58ebaa710609240316q7b63c7e7w76618655f1e9ac85@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:16:42 +0700 From: "Mike Fern" To: m.shenven In-Reply-To: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question: How to use SERIAL PORT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:16:44 -0000 >On 9/24/06, m.shenven wrote: > uhclem@FreeBSD.org> > < serial and UART Tutorial, by Frank Durda > > Sirs, > Where on the Internet can I details of: How to program a > WINDOWS XP computer so that in will input/output to an external device through its SERIAL PORT? > > ANY information you can supply, would bew greatly appreciated ! > m.shenven > hawkeye@netvision.net.il afaik, there should be plenty of. in visual basic you can use mscomm object to utilize the serial port. in general, you can query "how to communicate with windows COM port". by the way, i think this is a freebsd list, not window$ :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 12:52:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4C16A51C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F311D43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2053132pye for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=ll5q7sGabc50n/U4yZ+Q/+pNHeXpIJdb+T/A5SXbyJeLRbKvOD3z4o5N43f7J2BvsH14sVk7oanaMSGN6gaq5QLcvxjtRNaRRYCpmz9dtUOGn//gAyy/VzbJkUWlnP0KbEzVGan20ZWJZLp/1EHDvvcY8eT/jvsJj6YKTRjvwK4= Received: by 10.35.123.10 with SMTP id a10mr5441323pyn; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ansarmm2 ( [70.49.102.200]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm1325499nzo.2006.09.24.05.52.26; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: "'Ansar Mohammed'" , "'Robert Davison'" , Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:52:35 -0400 Message-ID: <001c01c6dfd8$4f64e4a0$0405a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: Acbe9hREUpR2lkrpEduySwAUUSJIlgAS1GBQAAZ/HvQAHyw0sA== Cc: Subject: RE: Thin Terminals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:52:29 -0000 > Does it dance the Sun Ray dance, or are we back to rolling our own? > > Ceri Huh? Clearly, its not as attractive as a Sun Ray. But I dunno about dancing and rolling.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 13:39:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9E616A522 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BD443D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id a10so230298qbd for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:39:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=PidxFkxZVjXQB7UsG9acfuGezxnI35xOZGz3F8C5ydTxrcDNEqABgmTFKgYBY6ovbWG2UhRbz4bs/4Q9Ug8XOYJ8xvbZZvxcBpWpV/oFZfPN06pFpygv3I0Dcwb7L//qhoXMrrE2QQgZCK2dOggEQCMP/iByEBMDxgH4XEnHXi4= Received: by 10.35.72.1 with SMTP id z1mr6065490pyk; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.12 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:39:21 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Steve Roome" In-Reply-To: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 74dde3fbea22beeb Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Radeon >R300 3d support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:39:23 -0000 On 9/23/06, Steve Roome wrote: > Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and > newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's > been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. > > So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org > port, or when that will be updated. xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:11:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A86B16A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6236543D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:11:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GRUhc-0001o9-0r for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:11:28 +0200 Received: from c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.85.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:11:28 +0200 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:11:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonathan Arnold Date: 24 Sep 2006 07:10:01 -0400 Lines: 26 Message-ID: <86irjd8qra.fsf@PCBSD.localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Sender: news Subject: Dual Monitor problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:11:38 -0000 I'm using FreeBSD 6.1 (by way of PC-BSD 1.2) and I'm trying to get my ATI x850 card to work with dual monitors. I have the xorg.conf set up correctly (see my blog post on the long hard battle to get that beachhead secured here: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/archives/000744.html ) but now I've run into further resistance and I can't seem to work around it. Soon after I get running using the dual monitors, the whole machine just freezes. This always happens, and usually while KDE is putting up its tip dialog box. I've tried using a different window manager (like fluxbox) but that didn't seem to help. Soon after logging in, the whole machine freezes solid. Anything else I can try? What sorts of things can I tweak? I run just fine if I don't do that dual monitor thing. You can see more or less what my xorg.conf file looks like on my blog post. I don't see any errors anywhere, including Xorg.0.log or .xsession-errors, or anything else in /var/log. The whole machine just freezes up. -- Jonathan Arnold Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD blog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:12:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06C416A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DBila@care.org.mz) Received: from gate.care.org.mz (cust251-2.netcabo.co.mz [196.46.2.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046DE43D5C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DBila@care.org.mz) Received: from gate.care.org.mz (localhost.care.org.mz [127.0.0.1]) by gate.care.org.mz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BED061C65 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:45:06 +0200 (CAT) Received: from care.org.mz (unknown [192.168.40.60]) by gate.care.org.mz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C6B61C2C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:45:05 +0200 (CAT) Received: from WorldClient by care.org.mz (MDaemon.PRO.v8.0.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000268232.msg for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:32 +0200 Received: from [192.168.40.130] via WorldClient with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:28 +0200 From: "David Bila" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-Mailer: WorldClient 8.0.3 X-Authenticated-Sender: DBila@care.org.mz X-Spam-Processed: mail.care.org.mz, Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:32 +0200 (not processed: spam filter disabled) X-MDRemoteIP: 127.0.0.1 X-Return-Path: DBila@care.org.mz X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: mail.care.org.mz, Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:33 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: NFS configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:36 -0000 Dear All, Im triyng to get NFS installed in one of my FreeBSD server so I can share some folders on it and be able to save documents on the shared folders remotely. I did all the configuration both in the server and the client. When I try to mount the exported folders I get a message saying Permission Dined. I did check the export file under /etc, the client I was trying to mount from is listed. What I might be missing? Thank you in advance for your help. David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:13:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE1216A47C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.101.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D246943D7B for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 22644 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 14:13:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ag/j8HxgrKfg6a4O5rQ6QM/gi6VDZVohGT/9oZVHJ72uOB8W4VJKYovfq8Gj6epqjFSDXV4W8H05MjUmIHs1ZdgNgrFhCw0TEatlMNx/sMOls5TFNHvUeevyODA0ffQmPnqZXLMUplKG4GtgSaPKrWZpcNYzArpOZPMSdMhNZ9M= ; Message-ID: <20060924141308.22642.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [75.15.29.212] by web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:13:08 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:13:08 -0700 (PDT) From: backyard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: freebsd 6.1 floppy installation problem - boot loader finds only 16MB, but I have 256 MB - and it hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:13:26 -0000 --- Voštenák Vladimír wrote: > Hi > > I have an old HP NETSERVER PRO 2xpentium pro, 256 MB > ram, > and I tried to install the actual FREEBSD 6.1 there. > I made 3 > floppies: boot, kernel1 and kernel2. When it starts > booting from > the boot floppy, the loader show I only have 16 MB > of RAM > (instead 256MB I have there). Then it asks for > kernel1 and 2 > disk, and boot disk again. It gives me also the > entry FREEBSD > display with countdown - to choose boot type - > default, no > acpi, secure etc. I tried it all, but it alwaysl > hangs after about 5 > second after any choice. So I must just reboot. I > think it is just > because the lack of RAM, because, I think it > requirets at least 24 > MB of RAM. > I have found something about this on the web, that > it is > necessary options "MAXMEM=n" to use all the RAM, > because old > BIOSes shows just first 16 MB or so, but I am just > doing the > installation. So how can I modify the kernel on the > floppies to > use such option during the installation from > floppies? Or should I > install from other media???Please can you help me > with > this??????How can I make the installation boot > floppy see all the > RAM I have? > Thank you very much for your reply. > > Greetings > > Vladimír Voštenák > make sure you don't have OS/2 compatability mode in your BIOS turned on. That will limit a system to 16 megs of RAM. I haven't played with an HP Netserver but I have several Kayaks that run things fine with about the same aged bios. -brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:21:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3B116A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat13.inode.at [62.99.145.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F33943D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.139] (port=2676 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-11.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GRUrP-0006NH-GR; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:21:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4516946A.1000900@inode.at> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:21:30 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bila References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:21:38 -0000 David Bila wrote: > Dear All, > > Im triyng to get NFS installed in one of my FreeBSD server so I can share > some folders on it and be able to save documents on the shared folders > remotely. I did all the configuration both in the server and the client. > When I try to mount the exported folders I get a message saying Permission > Dined. I did check the export file under /etc, the client I was trying to > mount from is listed. What I might be missing? Have you restarted mountd and nfsd after you added the hosts and mount points? (are you aware that you can only share whole mountpoints?) When you type mount, does it say "NFS exported" for the partitions you've made available? -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:08:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFA816A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6289E43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:08:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GRVaf-000Ejn-Sn; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:41 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:24 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Ansar Mohammed , 'Robert Davison' , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Thin Terminals Thread-Index: Acbe9hREUpR2lkrpEduySwAUUSJIlgAS1GBQAAZ/HvQAHyw0sAAEzSoH In-Reply-To: <001c01c6dfd8$4f64e4a0$0405a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Thin Terminals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:08:45 -0000 On 24/9/06 13:52, "Ansar Mohammed" wrote: >> Does it dance the Sun Ray dance, or are we back to rolling our own? >> >> Ceri > > > Huh? > Clearly, its not as attractive as a Sun Ray. But I dunno about dancing and > rolling.. Does it work with Sun Ray server? Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:28:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EEE16A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FE743D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: (qmail 14126 invoked by uid 0); 24 Sep 2006 15:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.6?) (216.186.148.249) by smtp3.knology.net with SMTP; 24 Sep 2006 15:28:14 -0000 In-Reply-To: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> References: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5CD221BD-242E-4155-BC87-5ECFB7F5FD64@HiWAAY.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:28:11 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Re: question: How to use SERIAL PORT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:16 -0000 On Sep 24, 2006, at 5:26 AM, m.shenven wrote: > uhclem@FreeBSD.org> > < serial and UART Tutorial, by Frank Durda > > Sirs, > Where on the Internet can I details of: How to program a > WINDOWS XP computer so that in will input/output to an external > device through its SERIAL PORT? > > ANY information you can supply, would bew greatly appreciated ! > m.shenven > hawkeye@netvision.net.il First download and install the serial port driver CDs found here: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.1/ The above driver is much simpler to use than the serial port routines that come in Windows. Additional benefit is that code written to the FreeBSD driver works almost unchanged in MacOS X. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:29:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BC316A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFE443D5D for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so1573804nfc for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p8BMZpXsG5H+oxzYcjMO4KMjrcJ2JoDyYRHFgWz2biqqP7S6JlyupSY+lbLA9EBgTUpN1YAACDWezXKAGhyx5JxQgiLOIbtIhsAjzsK0E2JZCMhWOnHR6/yKwGohqDr0zlN0fDXkZI6hqGQ+9R9whUeYqpdJ+nnJ6RF/tUP6RPI= Received: by 10.49.29.3 with SMTP id g3mr387280nfj; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.63.18 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:56 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: RJ45 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD locale and sympa X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:29:08 -0000 On 9/22/06, RJ45 wrote: > > Hello, > I installed sympa5 from the FreeBSD ports collection. > I am running FreeSBD 6.1 > > The problem is that the main sympa web interface does not show me the > language options, so I cannot choose a language, and also the language > menu is filled of spaces, empty spaces. > Also I can't even set a default language, only en_US works. > IS there any problem related to FreeBSD gettext ? > > anyone had this problem using sympa 5.2.1 on FreeBSD ? > I see the same behavior, but it's not a reqired feature for me so I haven't bothered trying to fix it. But IIR, there is an error in my sympa log that looks relevant; I don't remember the error but check your logs. -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:54:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F7C16A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CC643D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67792E03D for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4516AA0B.5020209@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:53:47 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: USB based webcam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:54:57 -0000 Hi: I have a laptop with a built in webcam: ugen0: Vimicro Corp. USB2.0 Web Camera, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 Since this goes on the generic usb device, I guess there is no driver. Is this supported? Do I need to download a driver somewhere or will webcam software provide it? Secondly, what software is recommended to make this useful? Thansk, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 17:14:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095DE16A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6069543D5A for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:14:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (waterbury-gen2cuda1-68-68-137-59.albyny.adelphia.net [68.68.137.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rawb.net) by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8B3CF172E1 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Rob Gabaree Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:14:27 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: "kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604787 usec for pid 16 (yarrow)" messages.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:14:32 -0000 I see that in /var/log/messages I am getting messages like the following... Sep 24 13:08:36 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604849 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:36 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604842 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:38 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604787 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:38 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604787 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:40 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604719 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:40 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604719 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:42 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604665 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:42 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604665 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) It always happens to pid 16 (yarrow). I tried reinstalling the system as well and it still shows up. It doesn't always appear however; I just went two days without the message. I don't really know what is causing it? Anyone have any opinions? It is a SuperMicro PDSMi motherboard, Intel Pentium D 930 CPU. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 17:45:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8A816A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890C843D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:45:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2134869pye for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=pcy/cz042DC9GPiSP76fFA/sfddLdBoCTQ+QvrxylcWev3VWz84cBZTEZiaXpXMIG3NUKy8mRwd61gQ3TU+UPDhptyrK8dnv0MVdrNoc9xFzA9alnN2rv8PoPVU+orGbD6enTZ1S6CYzGuyNxrqlPnCjBchpegHyid/XaWjs7RM= Received: by 10.65.249.10 with SMTP id b10mr3137753qbs; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609241045l6a21b270s7a385599c190c86d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:45:42 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192" Subject: Problems with X mouse pointer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:45:44 -0000 ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, After an year of successful using of FreeBSD, a friend of mine asked me to install it on her laptop. The laptop is Pestigio Visconte 120 with Intel 855 chipset. I installed FreeBSD 6.1 and run X with only one problem. The mouse pointer in X is not a normal arrow, but a white big square. I can use the mouse - the pointer, although a square, responds to moves and clicks. I googled and I found some threads about "redglass" and "whiteglass" themes and I have them in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/icons. Could you please help me in adjusting the pointer in the X environment? I also enabled the mouse in the text terminals and it works fine - the pointer is an arrow. I am attaching /etc/X11/xorg.conf and /etc/rc.conf (with network information masked) for completeness and uname -a gives: FreeBSD ****.**** 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 Thank you very much for your help in advance. Regards Ivan -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=xorg.conf Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_eshq0cwg Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xorg.conf" U2VjdGlvbiAiU2VydmVyTGF5b3V0IgoJSWRlbnRpZmllciAgICAgIlgub3JnIENvbmZpZ3VyZWQi CglTY3JlZW4gICAgICAwICAiU2NyZWVuMCIgMCAwCglJbnB1dERldmljZSAgICAiTW91c2UwIiAi Q29yZVBvaW50ZXIiCglJbnB1dERldmljZSAgICAiS2V5Ym9hcmQwIiAiQ29yZUtleWJvYXJkIgpF bmRTZWN0aW9uCgpTZWN0aW9uICJGaWxlcyIKCVJnYlBhdGggICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIv WDExL3JnYiIKCU1vZHVsZVBhdGggICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvbW9kdWxlcyIKCUZvbnRQYXRo ICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2ZvbnRzL2N5cmlsbGljLyIKCUZvbnRQYXRoICAgICAi L3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2ZvbnRzL21pc2MvIgoJRm9udFBhdGggICAgICIvdXNyL1gxMVI2 L2xpYi9YMTEvZm9udHMvVFRGLyIKCUZvbnRQYXRoICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2Zv bnRzL1R5cGUxLyIKCUZvbnRQYXRoICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2ZvbnRzL0NJRC8i CglGb250UGF0aCAgICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy83NWRwaS8iCglGb250UGF0 aCAgICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy8xMDBkcGkvIgpFbmRTZWN0aW9uCgpTZWN0 aW9uICJNb2R1bGUiCglMb2FkICAiZGJlIgoJTG9hZCAgImRyaSIKCUxvYWQgICJleHRtb2QiCglM b2FkICAiZ2x4IgoJTG9hZCAgInJlY29yZCIKCUxvYWQgICJ4dHJhcCIKCUxvYWQgICJmcmVldHlw ZSIKCUxvYWQgICJ0eXBlMSIKRW5kU2VjdGlvbgoKU2VjdGlvbiAiSW5wdXREZXZpY2UiCglJZGVu dGlmaWVyICAiS2V5Ym9hcmQwIgoJRHJpdmVyICAgICAgImtiZCIKRW5kU2VjdGlvbgoKU2VjdGlv biAiSW5wdXREZXZpY2UiCglJZGVudGlmaWVyICAiTW91c2UwIgoJRHJpdmVyICAgICAgIm1vdXNl IgoJT3B0aW9uCSAgICAiUHJvdG9jb2wiICJTeXNNb3VzZSIKCU9wdGlvbgkgICAgIkRldmljZSIg Ii9kZXYvc3lzbW91c2UiCglPcHRpb24JICAgICJaQXhpc01hcHBpbmciICI0IDUgNiA3IgpFbmRT ZWN0aW9uCgpTZWN0aW9uICJNb25pdG9yIgoJSWRlbnRpZmllciAgICJNb25pdG9yMCIKCVZlbmRv ck5hbWUgICAiTW9uaXRvciBWZW5kb3IiCglNb2RlbE5hbWUgICAgIk1vbml0b3IgTW9kZWwiCkVu ZFNlY3Rpb24KClNlY3Rpb24gIkRldmljZSIKICAgICAgICAjIyMgQXZhaWxhYmxlIERyaXZlciBv cHRpb25zIGFyZTotCiAgICAgICAgIyMjIFZhbHVlczogPGk+OiBpbnRlZ2VyLCA8Zj46IGZsb2F0 LCA8Ym9vbD46ICJUcnVlIi8iRmFsc2UiLAogICAgICAgICMjIyA8c3RyaW5nPjogIlN0cmluZyIs IDxmcmVxPjogIjxmPiBIei9rSHovTUh6IgogICAgICAgICMjIyBbYXJnXTogYXJnIG9wdGlvbmFs CiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIk5vQWNjZWwiICAgICAgICAgICAgCSMgWzxib29sPl0KICAg ICAgICAjT3B0aW9uICAgICAiU1djdXJzb3IiICAgICAgICAgICAJIyBbPGJvb2w+XQogICAgICAg ICNPcHRpb24gICAgICJDb2xvcktleSIgICAgICAgICAgIAkjIDxpPgogICAgICAgICNPcHRpb24g ICAgICJDYWNoZUxpbmVzIiAgICAgICAgIAkjIDxpPgogICAgICAgICNPcHRpb24gICAgICJEYWM2 Qml0IiAgICAgICAgICAgIAkjIFs8Ym9vbD5dCiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIkRSSSIgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgCSMgWzxib29sPl0KICAgICAgICAjT3B0aW9uICAgICAiTm9EREMiICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAJIyBbPGJvb2w+XQogICAgICAgICNPcHRpb24gICAgICJTaG93Q2FjaGUiICAgICAg ICAgIAkjIFs8Ym9vbD5dCiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIlh2TUNTdXJmYWNlcyIgICAgICAg CSMgPGk+CiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIlBhZ2VGbGlwIiAgICAgICAgICAgCSMgWzxib29s Pl0KCUlkZW50aWZpZXIgICJDYXJkMCIKCURyaXZlciAgICAgICJpODEwIgoJVmVuZG9yTmFtZSAg IkludGVsIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uIgoJQm9hcmROYW1lICAgIjgyODUyLzg1NUdNIEludGVncmF0ZWQg R3JhcGhpY3MgRGV2aWNlIgoJQnVzSUQgICAgICAgIlBDSTowOjI6MCIKRW5kU2VjdGlvbgoKU2Vj dGlvbiAiU2NyZWVuIgoJSWRlbnRpZmllciAiU2NyZWVuMCIKCURldmljZSAgICAgIkNhcmQwIgoJ TW9uaXRvciAgICAiTW9uaXRvcjAiCglTdWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAg MCAwCgkJRGVwdGggICAgIDEKCUVuZFN1YlNlY3Rpb24KCVN1YlNlY3Rpb24gIkRpc3BsYXkiCgkJ Vmlld3BvcnQgICAwIDAKCQlEZXB0aCAgICAgNAoJRW5kU3ViU2VjdGlvbgoJU3ViU2VjdGlvbiAi RGlzcGxheSIKCQlWaWV3cG9ydCAgIDAgMAoJCURlcHRoICAgICA4CglFbmRTdWJTZWN0aW9uCglT dWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAgMCAwCgkJRGVwdGggICAgIDE1CglFbmRT dWJTZWN0aW9uCglTdWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAgMCAwCgkJRGVwdGgg ICAgIDE2CglFbmRTdWJTZWN0aW9uCglTdWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAg MCAwCgkJRGVwdGggICAgIDI0CglFbmRTdWJTZWN0aW9uCkVuZFNlY3Rpb24KCg== ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=rc.conf Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_eshq3fqg Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rc.conf" CiMgLS0gc3lzaW5zdGFsbCBnZW5lcmF0ZWQgZGVsdGFzIC0tICMgRnJpIFNlcCAyMiAyMjo0OToz NSAyMDA2CiMgQ3JlYXRlZDogRnJpIFNlcCAyMiAyMjo0OTozNSAyMDA2CiMgRW5hYmxlIG5ldHdv cmsgZGFlbW9ucyBmb3IgdXNlciBjb252ZW5pZW5jZS4KIyBQbGVhc2UgbWFrZSBhbGwgY2hhbmdl cyB0byB0aGlzIGZpbGUsIG5vdCB0byAvZXRjL2RlZmF1bHRzL3JjLmNvbmYuCiMgVGhpcyBmaWxl IG5vdyBjb250YWlucyBqdXN0IHRoZSBvdmVycmlkZXMgZnJvbSAvZXRjL2RlZmF1bHRzL3JjLmNv bmYuCmJsYW5rdGltZT0iMzAwIgpmb250OHgxND0iY3AxMjUxLTh4MTQiCmZvbnQ4eDE2PSJjcDEy NTEtOHgxNiIKZm9udDh4OD0iY3AxMjUxLTh4OCIKa2V5bWFwPSJiZy5waG9uZXRpYy5jdHJsY2Fw cyIKbGludXhfZW5hYmxlPSJZRVMiCm1vdXNlY2hhcl9zdGFydD0iMyIKbW91c2VkX2VuYWJsZT0i WUVTIgpzYXZlcj0iZGFlbW9uIgpzc2hkX2VuYWJsZT0iWUVTIgp1c2JkX2VuYWJsZT0iWUVTIgoK bW91c2VkX2VuYWJsZT0iWUVTIgoKaWZjb25maWdfcmwwPSJESENQIgpob3N0bmFtZT0iKioqKi4q KioqIgo= ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 18:42:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CCD16A47B for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenant@fastmail.fm) Received: from mail-relay-1.tiscali.it (mail-relay-1.tiscali.it [213.205.33.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E74C43D77 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:42:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greenant@fastmail.fm) Received: from [192.168.8.3] (84.222.59.219) by mail-relay-1.tiscali.it (7.3.110.2) id 44EEFEAE001EBA60; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4516D1A0.5080201@fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:40 +0200 From: Alberto Rizzi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajm References: <20060916094959.GA16396@lakshmi.susmita.org> <20060916095735.GA43895@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20060916143221.GA14164@powerfull.bsd> In-Reply-To: <20060916143221.GA14164@powerfull.bsd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making simple colorful block diagrams for presentations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:42:49 -0000 ajm ha scritto: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:57:35AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 03:20:00PM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I want a simple tool that can be used for preparing block diagrams and >>> arrows, that is all. I want to be able to use few colors, that is all. >>> >>> Please don't suggest openoffice or kde. I want something simple. >>> >> graphics/xfig might be worth looking at. >> >> >> -- >> >> Erik Trulsson >> ertr1013@student.uu.se > > > try also graphics/tgif > or graphics/dia -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:09:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4640316A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CA343D55 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:09:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 7C2A34AC8C; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B37C4AC48 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:09:24 -0000 Hi all, I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but restrict him to his home directory. I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to get it working. I have also read up on protftpd + ssl, and configuring it to lock users into their home directories. What would all of you recommend as a viable secure solution to this? Thanks! -Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:23:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A69B16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F56143D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:23:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2158827pye for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TcmrIooAKp7Xa0KSleHQflsqlABk1kFSRHo5jiccprn9aW93F465irZto1nbYCDERqJ5oK5xwzXPF96kQmQEBdWr5+Vma29ySEDbFmy7uZCH5Re62f60DOv9F/w3h0ViMrBtvgLUbYx0Vm8MMcS7zTd0ttpFC0050u0FmWJD3So= Received: by 10.64.131.4 with SMTP id e4mr41854qbd; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609241223n453147c7vaf550ca844dea99f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:23:08 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <89ce7f740609241045l6a21b270s7a385599c190c86d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <89ce7f740609241045l6a21b270s7a385599c190c86d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problems with X mouse pointer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:23:12 -0000 On 9/24/06, Ivan Rambius Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > After an year of successful using of FreeBSD, a friend of mine asked > me to install it on her laptop. The laptop is Pestigio Visconte 120 > with Intel 855 chipset. > > I installed FreeBSD 6.1 and run X with only one problem. The mouse > pointer in X is not a normal arrow, but a white big square. I can use > the mouse - the pointer, although a square, responds to moves and > clicks. I googled and I found some threads about "redglass" and > "whiteglass" themes and I have them in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/icons. Could > you please help me in adjusting the pointer in the X environment? > > I also enabled the mouse in the text terminals and it works fine - the > pointer is an arrow. > > I am attaching /etc/X11/xorg.conf and /etc/rc.conf (with network > information masked) for completeness and uname -a gives: > FreeBSD ****.**** 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 > 04:42:56 UTC 2006 > root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 > > Thank you very much for your help in advance. > > Regards > Ivan > Hello, I found the solution by accident. I enabled the following option Option "SWcursor" "True" in Section "Device" in xorg.conf, then I restarted X and the mouse pointer was fine. Regards Ivan -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:25:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA3716A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F4C43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE36FB995; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C4eYp4DmE2xe; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89ADB97B; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4516DBB6.3020701@aeternal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:25:42 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Juszczak References: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:25:47 -0000 Hello Matt, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but > restrict him to his home directory. > > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to > get it working. > > I have also read up on protftpd + ssl, and configuring it to lock users > into their home directories. > > What would all of you recommend as a viable secure solution to this? First of all, scp (scponly) is not a FTP service. Nevertheless both options are just fine. Proftpd is able to "jail" users inside their dirs. Settings required in proftpd.conf: DefaultRoot ~ [group] where ~ are their specified homedirs and group is optional (members of that group will be jailed to their homedirs, others will be able to browse everywhere, if group is not used, everybody using proftpd will be jailed). Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:26:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3557716A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8477A43D5E for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:22459 helo=http.aseed.net) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GRZcp-000NCE-Hu; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:51 +0000 Received: from amandla (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B5258297; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:27:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:50 +0200 From: albi To: Matt Juszczak Message-Id: <20060924212650.e5f20531.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> References: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:59 -0000 On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Matt Juszczak wrote: > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but > restrict him to his home directory. > > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to > get it working. and what do you mean "can't seem to get it working" ? with scponly you also have a chroot-option, if your user is the only scponly user, then the top-dir in the chroot-scponly setup could be his home-dir (disclaimer, i've successfully used scponly, but only read documentation about chroot-scponly, not used that yet) -- grtjs, albi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:29:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96A616A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523E743D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:29:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so376570uge for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=QTGP3H2Y603uRg8xFwgQ9s8PjfGoCNgew3VlMlQdefjh+pZlkyX1pNPzaHVUdyXZpQ6APPzcOCT1IuVXhbJJJbvcbT4kLlZFfGFZ/2qDWqZa7JkrMsdZaSKFmeLWedgif0+wOFCyIej2VuH647uPUlpv4xPwmHS1bPjZbv/yOR8= Received: by 10.66.249.11 with SMTP id w11mr2714502ugh; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.224.6 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:29:42 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:29:56 -0000 Hi list, 512 MB of Ram, 1024 MB of swap, 6.1-STABLE After some time my system begins swapping, which is normal. The weird thing is that swapping goes on even after closing the memory consuming programs. here's the output of top(1): Mem: 103M Active, 37M Inact, 107M Wired, 6656K Cache, 60M Buf, 240M Free Swap: 1024M Total, 106M Used, 918M Free, 10% Inuse Why the swapped pages don't get recalled back to main mamory (which has sufficient free space for them), freeing the swap device and thus speeding the system up? Thanx for any explanation, Regards, -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:44:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8008516A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E13F43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k8OJioPW063333; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:44:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:44:50 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20060924194450.GD73717@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:44:51 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 24), Pietro Cerutti said: > 512 MB of Ram, 1024 MB of swap, 6.1-STABLE > > After some time my system begins swapping, which is normal. > The weird thing is that swapping goes on even after closing the memory > consuming programs. > > here's the output of top(1): > > Mem: 103M Active, 37M Inact, 107M Wired, 6656K Cache, 60M Buf, 240M Free > Swap: 1024M Total, 106M Used, 918M Free, 10% Inuse I se no swapping here (that would show up as "###K In, ###K Out" on the swap line). You have swap space in use but not actively used. > Why the swapped pages don't get recalled back to main mamory (which > has sufficient free space for them), freeing the swap device and thus > speeding the system up? Once the kernel decides to swap a page, that area of swap is reserved until the process exits, even if the kernel pulls the data back from swap. That way if memory gets low again, the kernel knows it can quickly discard the in-RAM copy of the data (since there's already a copy in swap). Processes likely to have pages swapped out are getty&login proceses for unused ttys, lpd, sshd and other long-running daemons, etc. There's no reason to pull those pages back into RAM because you're more likely to need that RAM for something else. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:53:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACFD16A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E080443D62 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:53:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront02.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.56]) by mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 21:52:57 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:52:57 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.27.112] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:52:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:52:47 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 19:52:56.0988 (UTC) FILETIME=[08005DC0:01C6E013] Subject: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:53:05 -0000 Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not possible. The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, but receiving ... Any help appreciated, regards oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 20:02:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8800316A601 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat07.inode.at [62.99.145.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2539143D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.139] (port=3002 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-07.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GRaAw-0002B2-Rp; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:02:06 +0200 Message-ID: <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:02:05 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:02:08 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. > > I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is > working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not > possible. > > The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall > disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, > but receiving ... > > Any help appreciated, Are you connceted directly to the net or over a router / server with nat? If it's not directly you have to forward ports to the client pc for direct connections (like file sending) -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 20:28:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B9016A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FED343D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so379140uge for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:28:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lnSr5hXTNf3k8fCYmsnHY1hum0SrZjeu7c0JX+TC/DcvJEnQD4GAC/eZhjL4ToyFELDPNm5oSmI8u11V0knls6iYLm5scZ+9IbS2T73W3hIxMJY3MSVEz71ZPdQOvJGZmBJ3lPXfM4IFHjHTav0oo2BYref7ukhg556lcEpVvjw= Received: by 10.67.89.5 with SMTP id r5mr2745574ugl; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.224.6 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:28:30 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "Dan Nelson" In-Reply-To: <20060924194450.GD73717@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060924194450.GD73717@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:28:33 -0000 On 9/24/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > Once the kernel decides to swap a page, that area of swap is reserved > until the process exits, even if the kernel pulls the data back from > swap. That way if memory gets low again, the kernel knows it can > quickly discard the in-RAM copy of the data (since there's already a > copy in swap). Thanx for the insight... > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 20:42:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589D16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ajmm@portugalmail.pt) Received: from aragorn.portugalmail.pt (aragorn.portugalmail.pt [195.245.179.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9A243D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ajmm@portugalmail.pt) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aragorn.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id C496CCD5F; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:25 +0100 (WEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at portugalmail.pt Received: from aragorn.portugalmail.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aragorn.portugalmail.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFeh6YUf5Gso; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:25 +0100 (WEST) Received: from galadriel.portugalmail.pt (galadriel.portugalmail.pt [195.245.179.73]) by aragorn.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A83CD31; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:25 +0100 (WEST) Received: by galadriel.portugalmail.pt (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0B6E5DC250; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:31:29 +0100 (WEST) Received: from 85.138.132.105 ( [85.138.132.105]) as user ajmm@portugalmail.pt@imap.portugalmail.pt by webmail3.portugalmail.pt with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:31:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1159126289.4516dd118b4f6@webmail3.portugalmail.pt> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:31:29 +0100 From: ajmm@portugalmail.pt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 X-Originating-IP: 85.138.132.105 Cc: ohartman@uni-mainz.de Subject: Hitachi disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:28 -0000 Hi! I saw your posts with title "Performance issue amd64". I don't know if this could help, but I'm having the same problem with ICH5 SATA controller and the same Hitachi drives on linux. I cannot activate DMA, and bandwidth is lesser than 10MB/s. I could not solve the problem, until now. BTW, with "any" other drives, the problem does not exist. Antonio Marques __________________________________________________________ Continua a preferir gastar mais? Compare o preço da sua ligaçăo ŕ Internet http://acesso.portugalmail.pt/compare From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:05:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D033D16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC543D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (kline@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k8OL501o034131 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:05:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k8OL50Sv034130 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:05:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:05:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20060924210500.GA34045@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: some apps very slow under Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:05:02 -0000 Guys, This may/may not prove the superiority of BSD over the Linux kernel, dunno. Maybe you can help me figure out what I need to tune; or (*sob*) lighten my load on ethos. I've got three of the 4 default workspaces full of apps. Mostly xterms or "gnome-terminals". I have 1G RAM, a huge disk, a 2800 AMD chip, yet realplay is *very* slow to respond. It's time-counter changes only ever 8 seconds and when I cover part or all, it takes several seconds to fill back in. Is this a bug in xorg or in realplay or what? Last night I closed realplay and began having similar problems with one of the terminals. I have run CTWM for years so am used to a lightweight wm. I haven't checked to see if gnome/kde-LITE are available. That may be the problem. I am reluctant to post this to the ubuntuforums because I've already asked enough idiot questions ... (Sure, I do the same here, but I know you guys:-) I could close all my xterms and see, but it took hours to get things configured just the way I want! tia, you'n's, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:12:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5799E16A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasonartz@yahoo.com) Received: from web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE2A943D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jasonartz@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 98575 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 21:12:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JAZRqeroQ+LMh1S833ywQ8uDdxc+lrHaxN+yIgVSlRqSI+qkA8EpEy/GmAAZQYMhbxT9wDFmQVvybPG61PhlTicV0BgMK3PCoffaFYN2I69y0blgBd0mpUVT9mFVCbtlsTWCWbQqkSA3XvSfP86POJfUs/wxvwrZ+hqYwadVq5Q= ; Message-ID: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.67.98.178] by web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:24 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Artz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:12:25 -0000 --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Jason Artz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but I > only > > have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to > get > > 6.1 instead of 5.3 via FTP (under "Options, > Release > > name"), but I read that using an old sysinstall to > > install a new version is a bad idea. I cannot > figure > > out how to obtain a new sysinstall without making > boot > > floppies (I have no floppy drive nor a CDRW). Can > I > > install 5.3 and then somehow upgrade via FTP to > 6.1? > > Or download the new sysinstall to my 5.3 > installation, > > run it, and install 6.1 instead? What's the best > > method? > > Can you just download the 6.1 iso disks and make new > installer disks? > > Otherwise, you can install 5.3 and use cvsup to > upgrade to 6.1 > through a source upgrade. Just follow the > instructions carefully. Is there a way to do a binary install instead of downloading all the new sources and compiling them as an upgrade? I don't have a floppy or CDRW drive so I cannot burn new installer disks. I am stuck with 5.3 installer disks. It seems that there should be a way for me to do a fresh, binary install of 6.1 from 5.3. What if someone sent me a copy of 6.1s sysinstall and I ran it from the 5.3 environment? Would that allow me to do a proper, fresh 6.1 install via FTP? I have tried installing 6.1 with my sysinstall and it will not boot. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:18:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C47016A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBFA43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (waterbury-gen2cuda1-68-68-137-59.albyny.adelphia.net [68.68.137.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rawb.net) by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E56711749B for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:29 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Rob Gabaree Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:27 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:31 -0000 Hi, I have a remote server that I don't plan on using for email as I have another server to handle that. My question is.. is it a bad idea to _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? Right now /etc/ rc.conf has: sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" But I checked /var/log/maillog and saw about 5 archives of messages that looked like this: Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8I719YD078452: k8O71858063140: return to sender: Cannot send message for 5 days Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8O71858063140: to=postmaster, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=49386, relay= [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? Thanks for any help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:18:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5A416A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DF243D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5951A3C1F; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 092AA51221; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:32 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jason Artz Message-ID: <20060924211832.GA48175@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:34 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Jason Artz wrote: > Is there a way to do a binary install instead of > downloading all the new sources and compiling them as > an upgrade? Sort of. You can do it by hand if you're careful (the install files -- base.aa, etc -- are just .tar.bz2 files cut up into chunks which you can recombine and extract with cat | tar), but you'll need to take care to avoid overwriting things like /etc that you may care about. Kris --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFFvYoWry0BWjoQKURAtpwAJ4jiT1Asg7mYEGYog1plthqK8eIEQCdHSbo mHtukwEGdLX3Pr6flwM52SI= =RQIo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:33:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE58916A415 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B87B43D53 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:33:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront01.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 23:33:41 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:33:18 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.27.112] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:33:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4516F999.2080309@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:33:13 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajmm@portugalmail.pt References: <1159126289.4516dd118b4f6@webmail3.portugalmail.pt> In-Reply-To: <1159126289.4516dd118b4f6@webmail3.portugalmail.pt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 21:33:18.0491 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D18CEB0:01C6E021] Cc: ohartman@uni-mainz.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hitachi disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:33:43 -0000 ajmm@portugalmail.pt wrote: > =20 > =20 > Hi! =20 > =20 > I saw your posts with title "Performance issue amd64". I don't know if = this =20 > could help, but I'm having the same problem with ICH5 SATA controller a= nd the =20 > same Hitachi drives on linux. I cannot activate DMA, and bandwidth is l= esser=20 > than 10MB/s. I could not solve the problem, until now. BTW, with "any" = other=20 > drives, the problem does not exist. =20 > =20 > Antonio Marques =20 > __________________________________________________________ > Continua a preferir gastar mais? > Compare o pre=E7o da sua liga=E7=E3o =E0 Internet > http://acesso.portugalmail.pt/compare > =20 I did not dig deeper into that problem - due to the lack of suitable=20 hardware. Bonnie shows about 55 MB/s sustained performance, sometimes=20 higher, burst reaches 117 MB/s. With the old disks, both values were=20 about 25 MB/s higher. I doubt this is only a partition layout related=20 issue. The average performance droped remarkable, especially while=20 compiling world. At the Hitachi website I did not find any hint about issues with several = controllers or especially with SATA PseudoRAID like nForce4 offers, hope = this can be fixed anyway and it's a simple firmware issue. Checking the disks via the Hitachi brewn drive fitness tool gives no=20 suspicious data, mode is SATA II/300, no accoustic or energy management=20 and so on ... I would appreciate any solvage, if you have one! Well, in your case, I would check whether your drive is in SATA 150 mode = (factory setting) or SATA 300, as I know the ICH5 is only SATA 150 and=20 drives with problems switching to SATA 150 while in SATA 300 could cause = problems. Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:38:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DB416A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8136C43D69 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront01.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 23:38:04 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:38:04 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.27.112] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:38:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4516FAB7.3050102@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:37:59 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Armin Pirkovitsch References: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> In-Reply-To: <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 21:38:04.0463 (UTC) FILETIME=[B78CABF0:01C6E021] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:09 -0000 Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. >> >> I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is >> working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not >> possible. >> >> The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall >> disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, >> but receiving ... >> >> Any help appreciated, >> > > Are you connceted directly to the net or over a router / server with nat? > If it's not directly you have to forward ports to the client pc for > direct connections (like file sending) > > My box at home is connected to the net via a DSL router. The box has a 192.168.xxx.xxx Ip, and therefore, I think you sketched the problem the right way. Is there a way to do this automatically via pf(1)? It would be weird to forward each connection, most of them DHCP obtained IPs, by hand. Sorry, I'm not very familiar with that stuff ... Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:38:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F4116A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxsf31.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf31.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA1B43D6A for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxip36a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip36a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.251]) by mxsf31.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8OLcYL9024321 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:38:34 -0400 Received: from 71-92-102-230.dhcp.knwk.wa.charter.com (HELO yak.mseubanks.net) ([71.92.102.230]) by mxip36a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 17:38:33 -0400 From: Michael Eubanks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:38:31 -0700 Message-Id: <1159133911.746.23.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Patches for jail support of multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mse_software@charter.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:37 -0000 On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 12:51 -0700, Chris wrote: > Are there any official patches to support multiple IPs in jails or > would I be limited to taking a chance with the few 6.1 patch files > I've found on the net. I searched the UPDATING on HEAD and for > anything that might be related but found nothing. Everything I could > google on the subject led me to sources that didn't appear to be > related to the project. I'm suspicious of using patches being > developed outside of the freebsd community yet I'd really hoped to > move to a completely jailed OS for our servers. Is it just too soon > to be looking for this capability in a production capacity? I suppose you could alias your primary network interface, then use a simple firewall with multiple divert sockets for address translation, thereby forwarding packets to a single jail IP (possible with multiple jail ports open). -Michael S. Eubanks mse_software@charter.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:39:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520DE16A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: from web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.53.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F350543D86 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 38513 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 21:39:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GsGsenb9PueJe5nwSOiSopqcP3mlrnXp0CAvsk1ymzD2loHVOKMcJbBCeGWno5SuI0Fhp632MUHBavo67fYIHuJS3TN9/dJ/ZJSqcBBrpeo/ZJdeX5ECccjPoVI/PnV7liZVpZjoXX0eyQ5+uknWfCLpfmtW5CTxh/WT17PwYg4= ; Message-ID: <20060924213926.38511.qmail@web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Received: from [74.107.110.13] by web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:39:26 EDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:39:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael S To: Rob Gabaree , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:39:38 -0000 I have the same four lines in rc.conf, but that is because I installed postfix. If you want to disable it completely, you'd use sendmail_enable="NONE", but you wouldn't be able receive messages sent by crontab, syslogd, etc. Michael --- Rob Gabaree wrote: > Hi, > > I have a remote server that I don't plan on using > for email as I have > another server to handle that. My question is.. is > it a bad idea to > _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? > Right now /etc/ > rc.conf has: > > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" > > But I checked /var/log/maillog and saw about 5 > archives of messages > that looked like this: > > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8I719YD078452: > k8O71858063140: > return to sender: Cannot send message for 5 days > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8O71858063140: > to=postmaster, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=49386, relay= > [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > So what should I do? Should I just have > "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / > etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is > disabled? That way > messages could be sent without the above errors? Or > what? > > Thanks for any help. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:42:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FEE16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwc@stilyagin.com) Received: from puffy.asicommunications.com (puffy.asicommunications.com [216.9.200.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D76743D58 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwc@stilyagin.com) Received: from zloy.stilyagin.com (71-35-25-152.phnx.qwest.net [71.35.25.152]) by puffy.asicommunications.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8OLgnAG005229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:42:50 -0700 (MST) Received: (from dwc@localhost) by zloy.stilyagin.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8OLgmbf007184; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:42:48 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:42:48 -0700 From: Darrin Chandler To: Rob Gabaree Message-ID: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:51 -0000 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:18:27PM -0400, Rob Gabaree wrote: > > So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / > etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way > messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? You should allow the system to send out it's mail. And it should go somewhere meaningful (i.e., to you). And you should read it. All my systems send me mail every day, and I scan through it to make sure everything is okay. That's what those messages are for. :) So, yes. You should disabled incoming, but allow submit, etc. You can also firewall off incoming instead or in addition. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:49:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642D16A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat02.inode.at [62.99.145.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B595F43D76 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:49:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.139] (port=13760 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-02.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GRbqW-0007dJ-JM; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4516FD52.2040203@inode.at> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:49:06 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> <4516FAB7.3050102@mail.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <4516FAB7.3050102@mail.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:49:10 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: >> O. Hartmann wrote: >> >>> Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. >>> >>> I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is >>> working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not >>> possible. >>> >>> The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall >>> disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, >>> but receiving ... >>> >>> Any help appreciated, >>> >> >> Are you connceted directly to the net or over a router / server with nat? >> If it's not directly you have to forward ports to the client pc for >> direct connections (like file sending) >> >> > My box at home is connected to the net via a DSL router. The box has a > 192.168.xxx.xxx Ip, and therefore, I think you sketched the problem the > right way. Is there a way to do this automatically via pf(1)? It would > be weird to forward each connection, most of them DHCP obtained IPs, by > hand. Sorry, I'm not very familiar with that stuff ... Well the portforward has to be done on the router, and the clients need to know which ports they "own" on the inet ip. It's part of the file sending protocol (at least icq and irc work that way) So a portforward table which defines which ports are forwarded to which ip is imho the only option. -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1026016A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706E843D53 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.26]) by bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:59:34 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:59:33 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.150.204.60] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20060924212650.e5f20531.albi@scii.nl> From: "Marwan Sultan" To: matt@atopia.net Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:32 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 21:59:33.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[B80F9030:01C6E024] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:35 -0000 Hi Matt! If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot and thats all!! if the file does not exist. then create it. add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any upper level of shell. have fun, Marwan Sultan System Administrator. >On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but > > restrict him to his home directory. > > > > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to > > get it working. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57116A415 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5F943D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.144]) by mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8OM5obW002989 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:05:51 -0400 Received: from 71-92-102-230.dhcp.knwk.wa.charter.com (HELO yak.mseubanks.net) ([71.92.102.230]) by mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 18:05:51 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,210,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="87794390:sNHT26092356" From: Michael Eubanks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:05:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1159135548.746.34.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Patches for jail support of multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mse_software@charter.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 -0000 On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 12:51 -0700, Chris wrote: > Are there any official patches to support multiple IPs in jails or > would I be limited to taking a chance with the few 6.1 patch files > I've found on the net. I searched the UPDATING on HEAD and for > anything that might be related but found nothing. Everything I could > google on the subject led me to sources that didn't appear to be > related to the project. I'm suspicious of using patches being > developed outside of the freebsd community yet I'd really hoped to > move to a completely jailed OS for our servers. Is it just too soon > to be looking for this capability in a production capacity? > Just a quick addition. I don't think you'd even need multiple divert sockets unless you have multiple interfaces on the external and/or internal sides. Depends on what your setup looks like and what you're trying to accomplish. -Michael S. Eubanks mse_software@charter.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:16:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0F616A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from mx4.x15.net (mx4.x15.net [69.55.237.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ED143D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from j1.x15.net [63.196.213.76] by mx4.x15.net with ESMTP id 608060222X1GRcH4000I8N76; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:34 +0000 Message-ID: <451703A3.6030000@voidcaptain.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:16:03 -0700 From: Pete Slagle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Gabaree References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:35 -0000 Rob Gabaree wrote: > I have a remote server that I don't plan on using for email as I have > another server to handle that. My question is.. is it a bad idea to > _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? Yes. You probably want to allow the server to send you administrative mail that it generates itself, but not let it receive any from outside. To do that: (1) Use the default settings for sendmail by not specifying any . Delete all lines containing "sendmail" from /etc/rc.conf. This will allow outgoing mail only. (2) Put a line in /etc/aliases that defines who receives root's e-mail for the server. Point it to your actual e-mail address. For example, root: my_addy@example.com (3) Reboot. That's it. Now the box can send you it's status information, but it won't listen for any incoming mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:24:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0814516A47C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eagletree@hughes.net) Received: from n126.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1070.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB5743D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eagletree@hughes.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n126.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 4516BEE50000AB01 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:18 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <1159133911.746.23.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> References: <1159133911.746.23.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <524D5EFE-0D42-49A1-9D94-FDED36827396@hughes.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:24:13 -0700 To: freeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: Patches for jail support of multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:25 -0000 On Sep 24, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Michael Eubanks wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 12:51 -0700, Chris wrote: >> Are there any official patches to support multiple IPs in jails or >> would I be limited to taking a chance with the few 6.1 patch files > I suppose you could alias your primary network interface, then use a > simple firewall with multiple divert sockets for address translation, > thereby forwarding packets to a single jail IP (possible with multiple > jail ports open). > Thank you, that does sound like an interesting approach. The application is maintain the multiple IP Addresses for the sites though the sites actually share much code and data. I also attempted using multiple jails all pointing to the same file system but was naturally discouraged by the jail configuration to do so as this seems to violate the concept. Seems wasteful of memory too. I will try the divert method next using a single jail. Thank you again for the reply. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:33:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E1E16A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CB643D66 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:33:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (waterbury-gen2cuda1-68-68-137-59.albyny.adelphia.net [68.68.137.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rawb.net) by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 21FB1174F4 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> References: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rob Gabaree Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:33:23 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:33:34 -0000 Thanks. What I did was remove all lines except `sendmail_enable="NO"` and in / etc/mail/aliases, I setup the root alias to goto my real email address: root user@mydomain.com I setup my firewall to block incoming/outgoing email on ports 21/25 as well, so no one on the outside can access mail services. It seems to be working correctly, as I received mail as it was ran to my @mydomain.com email. Does this seem ok? Did I do anything wrong? Thanks, rob On Sep 24, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:18:27PM -0400, Rob Gabaree wrote: >> >> So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / >> etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way >> messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? > > You should allow the system to send out it's mail. And it should go > somewhere meaningful (i.e., to you). And you should read it. > > All my systems send me mail every day, and I scan through it to make > sure everything is okay. That's what those messages are for. :) > > So, yes. You should disabled incoming, but allow submit, etc. You can > also firewall off incoming instead or in addition. > > -- > Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group > dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ > http://www.stilyagin.com/ | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:38:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9F516A415 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthieu.michaud@epita.info) Received: from marge.cload.net (marge.cload.net [88.191.31.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B1643D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:38:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthieu.michaud@epita.info) Received: (qmail 87584 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2006 22:38:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO moe.cload.net) (192.168.2.16) by 0 with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 22:38:33 -0000 From: Matthieu Michaud To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: EPITA SRS 2007 - Adaptive Hacking Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:38:31 +0200 Message-Id: <1159137511.81627.5.camel@moe.cload.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: michael.cadilhac@gmail.com Subject: make behavior with obj directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:38:36 -0000 i was noticed this behavior using make on freebsd and netbsd : ohmer@moe$ cat Makefile all: pwd ohmer@moe$ make pwd /usr/home/ohmer ohmer@moe$ mkdir obj ohmer@moe$ make pwd /usr/home/ohmer/obj it seems a hard coded make behavior so it rather looks like a feature than a bug. why is that ? -- Matthieu Michaud EPITA SRS 2007 - Adaptive Hacking From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:56:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F9716A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from whatawonderfulworldweliveintoo@yahoo.com) Received: from web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E417743D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:56:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whatawonderfulworldweliveintoo@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 27404 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 22:56:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6I0zaNq9UBiRW/FfEtHj0Y1B93W0CEEpUVCiNpFFvqeQyDPKIABuUOjftU872NeFooAeXSSFKx6tdVNXCFiAM9u894+hk2C4RVoGtQrcWT0r4rFNYCCvXQx9BzO3iQPvZBjLdrbtHtdrC6C1A8e4d/G66Kjc2CARmmge/rYp5KY= ; Message-ID: <20060924225654.27402.qmail@web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.15] by web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:56:54 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:56:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Ted Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Problem w/ py-ldap Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:56:55 -0000 Hi; I've installed the py-ldap from the ports doing the "make install clean" dance. Everything seemed to proceed smoothly. However, when I fired up my python interpreter and entered "import ldap" it didn't recognize the module. So something went wrong and I don't know what :( I did get this from the installation. Is it a problem? ===> Registering installation for py24-ldap2-2.2.0 cyrus-sasl-2.1.22: "/usr/ports/1" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete openldap-sasl-client-2.3.27: "/usr/ports/1" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete py24-ldap2-2.2.0: "/usr/ports/1" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete If not, what is the problem? TIA, Ted2 --------------------------------- Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:59:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B889416A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016C543D67 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.161.40]) by bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:59:56 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:59:56 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:54 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com From: "Jack Stone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:59:54 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 22:59:56.0387 (UTC) FILETIME=[2748CB30:01C6E02D] Subject: Recompiling base sendmail with another DB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:59 -0000 I've wanted to test the use of some of snertsoft's milters, but they require a Berkley DB-4.1+ I believe instead of the 1.85 used by the base system's sendmail. Somewhere I read about recompiling sendmail, which then would allow me to comile with a different DB choice. The steps are below. Where would I add the option for a different DB...??? # cd /usr/src/lib/libsm # make obj && make depend && make # cd /usr/src/lib/libsmutil # make obj && make depend && make # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/ # make obj && make depend && make && make install # cd /etc/mail # make all install restart Thanks, Jack _________________________________________________________________ Share your special moments by uploading 500 photos per month to Windows Live Spaces http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.get.live.com/spaces/features From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 23:42:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E489A16A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2983E43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:42:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 69972 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2006 23:42:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1cwz3qOaOMb5ckowAbspk4Yqsd4DxCaoToP+jrnjCim1YCnMFaU9IHBITwzYXsVzJ0gJn0Llba5FyaJMPzQoh0U3j0N0qBQPnXycHVWt7T8JReDSrtkaDhZ/KY+BrM1ozvEVm6mErnRcKYTM3qpgojIj1tae9WRaNPr+BM9AU74= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net@70.142.248.62 with plain) by smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2006 23:42:39 -0000 Message-ID: <45171839.9020804@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:43:53 -0500 From: Robert C Wittig User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Gabaree References: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:42:42 -0000 Rob Gabaree wrote: > Thanks. > > What I did was remove all lines except `sendmail_enable="NO"` and in > /etc/mail/aliases, I setup the root alias to goto my real email address: > > root user@mydomain.com > > I setup my firewall to block incoming/outgoing email on ports 21/25 as > well, so no one on the outside can access mail services. > > It seems to be working correctly, as I received mail as it was ran to my > @mydomain.com email. > > Does this seem ok? Did I do anything wrong? I run OpenBSD on my mailservers, but I expect that the sendmail works basically the same. In /etc/rc.conf or its FreeBSD equivalent, check the sendmail line to see if it references localhost.cf or sendmail.cf localhost.cf will permit internal mail on the machine, so that root can send messages to your everyday UID, etc., but will not permit mail to be sent to or received from, the Internet, or other machines in you LAN. sendmail.cf will permit full Internet email, but even this will not permit Internet email, unless your machine has a fully Qualified Domain Name, which is registered with your domain registrar, and has the Registrar's MX setting configured properly. -- -wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/ . http://robertwittig.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 23:47:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E0016A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (justnosweat.net [80.126.252.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B987343D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:47:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by justnosweat.net (8.13.6/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k8P1pVWw043063 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:51:32 GMT (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from localhost (justins@localhost) by justnosweat.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id k8P1pUoD043060 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:51:31 GMT (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:51:30 +0000 (UTC) From: justin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060925013537.I43034@justnosweat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on justnosweat.net Subject: lpd hewlett packard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:47:44 -0000 Hello, I`m trying to configure my hp deskjet 520 and i`m running into some trouble. The handbook says it all has to do with the interupt driven configuration, it does not work with some new hp printers. I have to switch to the polled mode. "If you want polled mode, remove in your /boot/device.hints file, the following line: hint.ppc.0.irq="N"". Then they say i have to rebuild my kernel. Now i ask myself what the /boot/device.hints file has to do with my kernel. What sort of file is /boot/device.hints and why do i have to rebuild my kernel. Thanks inadvance, Justin. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 00:50:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C87116A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.101.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C565243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:49:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 58282 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Sep 2006 00:49:59 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JGXcEavv2+Ns/tF/xTyCTRX7gffNMpkZYc5QrzRZ9G+C3gCSa3ThrQNiiRcRtFFHltjBXNnkA5k0gW4q2A8ic6YoE26QoxFWMEGSCOXd50gy1YCXXLB05IfEJHQnx6BqhXvBRcqMsT+v31pPH/sCbew3VcGoggGNJRVekvKK+5o= ; Message-ID: <20060925004959.58280.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [75.28.151.79] by web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:49:59 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:49:59 -0700 (PDT) From: backyard To: Jason Artz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:50:00 -0000 --- Jason Artz wrote: > > > --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" > wrote: > > > > > On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Jason Artz wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but > I > > only > > > have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to > > get > > > 6.1 instead of 5.3 via FTP (under "Options, > > Release > > > name"), but I read that using an old sysinstall > to > > > install a new version is a bad idea. I cannot > > figure > > > out how to obtain a new sysinstall without > making > > boot > > > floppies (I have no floppy drive nor a CDRW). > Can > > I > > > install 5.3 and then somehow upgrade via FTP to > > 6.1? > > > Or download the new sysinstall to my 5.3 > > installation, > > > run it, and install 6.1 instead? What's the > best > > > method? > > > > Can you just download the 6.1 iso disks and make > new > > installer disks? > > > > Otherwise, you can install 5.3 and use cvsup to > > upgrade to 6.1 > > through a source upgrade. Just follow the > > instructions carefully. > > Is there a way to do a binary install instead of > downloading all the new sources and compiling them > as > an upgrade? I don't have a floppy or CDRW drive so > I > cannot burn new installer disks. I am stuck with > 5.3 > installer disks. It seems that there should be a > way > for me to do a fresh, binary install of 6.1 from > 5.3. > > > What if someone sent me a copy of 6.1s sysinstall > and > I ran it from the 5.3 environment? Would that allow > me to do a proper, fresh 6.1 install via FTP? I > have > tried installing 6.1 with my sysinstall and it will > not boot. > > Anyone have any ideas? > > Thanks, > Jason > > _______________________________________________ I thought if you went to the options in sysinstall and go to the part that says Release Name and it likely is going to say 5.3-RELEASE change that to 6.1-RELEASE and then do an ftp install. You should get the newer version of the system. I have used this to install 5.4-CURRENT in th past from 5.4 bootdisks. I would have to assume it should work for a newer release as the distribution is packed the same. I know this is how one would have sysinstall choose an arbirtrary custom built installation of FreeBSD from say an NFS mount. -brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 01:22:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE1616A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s10.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s10.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1493143D4C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:22:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.161.12]) by bay0-omc3-s10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:21:59 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:21:59 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:21:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Jack Stone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:21:58 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2006 01:21:59.0307 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF572DB0:01C6E040] Subject: RE: Recompiling base sendmail with another DB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:22:00 -0000 >From: "Jack Stone" >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Recompiling base sendmail with another DB >Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:59:54 -0500 > >I've wanted to test the use of some of snertsoft's milters, but they >require a Berkley DB-4.1+ I believe instead of the 1.85 used by the base >system's sendmail. > Nevermind, I found my answer... no easy way. Thanks & sorry for the premature question. Jack _________________________________________________________________ Search—Your way, your world, right now! http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/searchlaunch/?locale=en-us&FORM=WLMTAG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 01:24:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12BF16A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD66243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:24:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D961A3C1F; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C925451309; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:24:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:24:57 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: backyard Message-ID: <20060925012457.GA51321@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060925004959.58280.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060925004959.58280.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jason Artz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:24:59 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:49:59PM -0700, backyard wrote: > I thought if you went to the options in sysinstall and > go to the part that says Release Name and it likely is > going to say 5.3-RELEASE change that to 6.1-RELEASE > and then do an ftp install. You should get the newer > version of the system. I have used this to install > 5.4-CURRENT in th past from 5.4 bootdisks. I would > have to assume it should work for a newer release as > the distribution is packed the same. Nope, as the OP correctly states this will often not work. Your old release can't know all the special steps required to update to a newer release (files to not overwrite, etc). Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFFy/oWry0BWjoQKURAnzhAJ9hI0vUnQ9K5cHPEc+pbIhPWpoEWwCeIgpT q38qjL9wDh0EdQXhVN20liw= =TeQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 02:18:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A2916A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E343D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:18:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8P2HBUF074629; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:17:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8P2H70q074628; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:17:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:17:07 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Rob Gabaree Message-ID: <20060925021706.GA74471@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:18:27 -0000 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:18:27PM -0400, Rob Gabaree wrote: > Hi, > > I have a remote server that I don't plan on using for email as I have > another server to handle that. My question is.. is it a bad idea to > _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? Right now /etc/ > rc.conf has: > > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" > What you have disables incoming Email, but sstill lets the system send out Email. That is good, because the system sends notices about various things and you might want to send something from it sometimes - such as sending a file to yourself or whatever but without receiving anything. So, unless there is a very compelling reason, leave it the way it is. ////jerry > But I checked /var/log/maillog and saw about 5 archives of messages > that looked like this: > > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8I719YD078452: k8O71858063140: > return to sender: Cannot send message for 5 days > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8O71858063140: to=postmaster, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=49386, relay= > [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / > etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way > messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? > > Thanks for any help. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 06:12:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5D916A417 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA90543D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8P6BoFs009695; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:11:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8P6BoFs009695 Message-ID: <45177321.2070903@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:11:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert C Wittig References: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> <45171839.9020804@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <45171839.9020804@sbcglobal.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:12:11 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1934/Mon Sep 25 05:28:46 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Rob Gabaree , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:12:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert C Wittig wrote: > Rob Gabaree wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> What I did was remove all lines except `sendmail_enable=3D"NO"` and in= >> /etc/mail/aliases, I setup the root alias to goto my real email addres= s: >> >> root user@mydomain.com >> >> I setup my firewall to block incoming/outgoing email on ports 21/25 as= >> well, so no one on the outside can access mail services. >> >> It seems to be working correctly, as I received mail as it was ran to >> my @mydomain.com email. >> >> Does this seem ok? Did I do anything wrong? >=20 > I run OpenBSD on my mailservers, but I expect that the sendmail works > basically the same. >=20 > In /etc/rc.conf or its FreeBSD equivalent, check the sendmail line to > see if it references localhost.cf or sendmail.cf >=20 > localhost.cf will permit internal mail on the machine, so that root can= > send messages to your everyday UID, etc., but will not permit mail to b= e > sent to or received from, the Internet, or other machines in you LAN. >=20 > sendmail.cf will permit full Internet email, but even this will not > permit Internet email, unless your machine has a fully Qualified Domain= > Name, which is registered with your domain registrar, and has the > Registrar's MX setting configured properly. Uh -- the way OpenBSD deals with sendmail is a bit different to the way FreeBSD does. Under FreeBSD, rc.conf settings are used to prevent sendmail from listening on any network interfaces than the loopback. Otherwise exactly the same sendmail.cf would be used for either case. FreeBSD also has all of the machinery required to rebuild the .cf files from the .mc files setup and available directly from /etc/mail. The system defaults to creating $(hostname).mc and $(hostname).submit.mc files if none exist already and then turning those into sendmail.cf and submit.cf Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFF3Mm8Mjk52CukIwRCCg+AJ4o4gI9683r7ztvAjvIEDsn19xGGgCfb1OJ 9R6eE4EBqxUpA4Daj0jQ3SY= =ivGD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 06:27:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966E716A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5544E43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D11024AC45; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:27:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEAA4AC43; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:27:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:27:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: Marwan Sultan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060925022702.T55176@saturn.atopia.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:27:41 -0000 Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hi Matt! > > If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then > the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot > and thats all!! > if the file does not exist. then create it. > > add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any > upper level of shell. > > have fun, > Marwan Sultan > System Administrator. > >> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >> Matt Juszczak wrote: >> >> > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >> > restrict him to his home directory. >> > >> > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >> > get it working. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517000f901501537419863! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 07:21:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9469C16A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB1F43D64 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C3D623658A0; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1473658CD; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE7F398D3; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4517838C.6090703@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:48 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: corwin@aeternal.net References: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> <4516DBB6.3020701@aeternal.net> In-Reply-To: <4516DBB6.3020701@aeternal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matt Juszczak , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:21:58 -0000 Martin Hudec wrote: > Hello Matt, > > DefaultRoot ~ [group] > > where ~ are their specified homedirs and group is optional (members of > that group will be jailed to their homedirs, others will be able to > browse everywhere, if group is not used, everybody using proftpd will be > jailed). > > Martin pure-ftpd does this too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 07:35:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9005B16A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA2F43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:35:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1768331wxd for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:35:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=hx/ZzsR76ldQcM0q1UX3xNn/OM9N52R+CGXRxM8LoQ92P8qN7bheHMf/nDyFNTjtI3P9CDRnpmeZBquQ3LOPy+dYLWiO6LpeWOLlM933BSopl4Bw3CmOuX8bS3g6dNs9NQDWlB00XxCubeX6IdyzKagumHN8Sw5Do2CoExNHp0Y= Received: by 10.90.100.6 with SMTP id x6mr1146392agb; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.25.17 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:35:07 +0900 From: "azhar freebsd" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-question@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:35:09 -0000 hi can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. uname -a FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 [root@belagelo]~#emacs azhar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 08:23:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2CD16A403 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lomakin@softclub.by) Received: from mail.gis.com.by (mail.gis.com.by [193.232.248.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36D7143D55 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lomakin@softclub.by) Received: (qmail 26341 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2006 08:24:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scras) (postmaster@softclub.by@195.222.87.10) by mail.gis.com.by with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 08:24:24 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by scras (Kerio MailServer 6.1.3) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:23:08 +0300 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:23:07 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?Q?=C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=E8=E9_=DE=2E_=CB=EE=EC=E0=EA=E8=ED?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.60.07) Professional Organization: SoftClub X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1445160694.20060925112307@softclub.by> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Howto zebra,balansing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?Q?=C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=E8=E9_=DE=2E_=CB=EE=EC=E0=EA=E8=ED?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:23:54 -0000 Hi! I made vpn (ipsec) on FreeBSD 6.1. For providing uninterrupted network performance, I made reserve channel connection with ADSL modem, added routes, installed zebra package. But during testing the reserve channel connection is not UP after basic cha= nnel gets DOWN. Diagram: gif0(ipsec) +----------------+ net1 / \ net2 -------+ +-------- \ / \ / + ADSL----ADSL+ My zebra settings: ! ! Zebra configuration saved from vty ! 2006/09/14 14:06:20 ! hostname Router password ***** enable password ***** log file /var/log/zebra/zebra.log ! ! interface xl0 !ip address 192.168.166.107/24 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast ! interface ed0 ! ip address 192.168.1.1/24 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast=20 ! interface gif0 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast ! ip route 192.168.165.0/24 gif0 ip route 192.168.165.0/24 ed0 ip route 192.168.166.0/24 xl0 ! line vty ! My ospf settings: ! ! Zebra configuration saved from vty ! 2006/09/14 16:46:34 ! hostname ospfd password ***** log file /var/log/zebra/ospfd.log ! interface xl0 ! interface ed0 ! interface gif0 ip ospf network point-to-point ! router ospf ospf router-id 192.168.166.107 network 0.0.0.0/0 area 0.0.0.0 network 192.168.166.0/24 area 0 network 192.168.165.0/24 area 0 redistribute connected redistribute static line vty ! Help me, please. Eugene Lomakin. mailto:lomakin@softclub.by From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 09:16:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937E616A415 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A555B43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id a10so305095qbd for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:16:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dmW/CcaN0ptv8GxPy53yKVMsiodkMwMXmNWeVZZkKSxWHD3y/WJHwX8wdalTWWXEt0LKl4JMN6W7n+VSAUyRWE+qXJe8WuqhNE0HCEG03DT7AMu+oUZz8z/XwL/sR3okxlIN+Qk5TUassbxsX/HsMy9JRCPjD62XBfbcthHOn6E= Received: by 10.35.10.17 with SMTP id n17mr7960616pyi; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.12 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:16:31 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "azhar freebsd" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: bd16cd1a98703e5e Cc: freebsd-question@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:33 -0000 On 9/25/06, azhar freebsd wrote: > hi > can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. > > uname -a > FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep > 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 > root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 > [root@belagelo]~#emacs When X-STABLE between X.Y and X.(Y+1) gets close to X.(Y+1), we call it X.(Y+1)-PRERELEASE instead of X.Y-STABLE. We're expecting 6.2 this November. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 10:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D916A403 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.7.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF34D43D73 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.nl with local; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:10:54 +0200 id 0003980A.4517AB2E.00003485 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:10:54 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20060925101054.GA13421@lothlorien.nagual.nl> References: <20060925022702.T55176@saturn.atopia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060925022702.T55176@saturn.atopia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:10:56 -0000 On 25 Sep Matt Juszczak wrote: > If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories > using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. > Is there anyway? Short answer: NO and that's OK for a protocol based on ssh. Your users can pass the bounderies of their homedirectories if they're logged in too, can they not? And ssh is nothing more than kind of a remote login; a bit more secure than rlogin was (is) -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ Solaris 10 6/06 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 10:48:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6596416A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF5E343D55 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:48:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2006 10:48:49 -0000 Received: from lns-bzn-55-82-255-182-167.adsl.proxad.net (EHLO [192.168.0.43]) [82.255.182.167] by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 12:48:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #23426003 Message-ID: <4517B414.4040600@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:48:52 +0200 From: "felix.schalck" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Smart Link PCI modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:48:51 -0000 Hi, Did anybody managed to get an integrated smart link modem working under freebsd 6.x ? thanks for help, Felix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 11:42:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EE816A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E4143D78 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from asahi-net.jp (l204142.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [218.219.204.142]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECCC15B13; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:41:31 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:41:31 +0900 From: Watanabe Kazuhiro To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20060925114131.BECCC15B13@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Cc: Vo?ten?k Vladim?r Subject: Re: freebsd 6.1 floppy installation problem - boot loader finds only 16MB, but I have 256 MB - and it hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:42:02 -0000 Hi. At Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:49:20 +0200, Vo?ten?k Vladim?r wrote: > I have an old HP NETSERVER PRO 2xpentium pro, 256 MB ram,=20 > and I tried to install the actual FREEBSD 6.1 there. I made 3=20 > floppies: boot, kernel1 and kernel2. When it starts booting from=20 > the boot floppy, the loader show I only have 16 MB of RAM=20 > (instead 256MB I have there). Then it asks for kernel1 and 2=20 > disk, and boot disk again. It gives me also the entry FREEBSD=20 > display with countdown - to choose boot type - default, no=20 > acpi, secure etc. I tried it all, but it alwaysl hangs after about 5=20 > second after any choice. So I must just reboot. I think it is just=20 > because the lack of RAM, because, I think it requirets at least 24=20 > MB of RAM. > I have found something about this on the web, that it is=20 > necessary options "MAXMEM=3Dn" to use all the RAM, because old=20 > BIOSes shows just first 16 MB or so, but I am just doing the=20 > installation. So how can I modify the kernel on the floppies to=20 > use such option during the installation from floppies? Or should I=20 > install from other media???Please can you help me with=20 > this??????How can I make the installation boot floppy see all the=20 > RAM I have? > Thank you very much for your reply. >=20 > Greetings >=20 > Vladim=EDr Vo=B9ten=E1k Choose "6. Escape to loader prompt" from the boot menu and enter the two lines to the loader(8) prompt: set hw.physmem=3D256M boot See loader(8) for details. It's the same thing that you specify "MAXMEM=3D256M" to your kernel configulation file. --- Watanabe Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 11:58:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7DA16A4A7 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven.brogame@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF2943D62 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:55:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.brogame@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2456959pye for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:55:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oGSQyFc1zbZWqriafWuxHwxvUw1VFawm0W56rr6A0Q5UPqJXQDf45vbfMiMVIyNUE5IgO3jAvWujdpJaZx0fbvDbq5cVIe2v4L13u3YHu/n4ullzobUCRMgEUtBaByyhk+pAc9pq0EosJfk08V8sFn3v7KB1K4Pb0q/w9ncdE1U= Received: by 10.35.72.1 with SMTP id z1mr8176928pyk; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.45.9 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10cbaf0f0609250455h4a3c737aw5f0138abc2dca535@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:55:54 +0800 From: steven To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Need help, some thing goes with wrong with Bridge-networking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:58:20 -0000 Dear Sir: Those days i tried build an in-line firewall, I take freebsd as a good operation system because it is safety and stabilty, but i came with trouble when i follow the handbook to bridge the two Ethernet Card, the book(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bridging.html) says that i should recomplie the kernel to add options BRIDGE into it, however, after compiling the new kernel, typing comamds including "sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1","sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge.config=rl0,rl1", the bridge seems out of working, and my fressbsd system version is 6.1, those two network card is not assign any static ipv4 address, Can you tell me why it comes intn that, dieing to hrear from your answer, and i'm appriciate for it. yours steven From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:15:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BE516A47E for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: from smtp.eu.tiauto.com (smtp.eu.tiauto.com [195.127.176.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F370C43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: by euex01.resource.tiauto.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:14:56 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Gouverneur, Thomas" To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:14:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:15:10 -0000 Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 To: Marwan Sultan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hi Matt! > > If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then > the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot > and thats all!! > if the file does not exist. then create it. > > add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any > upper level of shell. > > have fun, > Marwan Sultan > System Administrator. > >> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >> Matt Juszczak wrote: >> >> > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >> > restrict him to his home directory. >> > >> > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >> > get it working. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517000f901501537419863! > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:37:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6948116A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7B9943D6A for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 6964 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AEt6ER/4k962J9hoqc4IZNAJeeJbsdql4u7vQ/QsKkj/AP4hnuPobdAxTmW7nqtWZzhywZ1gBqGxnANw3ks+H2Tf5zx6hIMp6Udj/RCYyWuR9RVWwKwRFsb/cgU13bAGjsUDC+DN08BHMwYQySIQXbn4zsSNm+Zc/MoVhrntTgE= ; Message-ID: <20060925123711.6962.qmail@web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.131.52.1] by web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 GMT Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Aguiar Magalhaes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: portupgrade doens't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:18 -0000 Hi list, I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the portupgrade doesn't work. ---> Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1' (archivers/arc) ---> Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make flags: BATCH=yes script: openpty: No such file or directory and so go on Could you help me? Aguiar _______________________________________________________ Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora! http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:41:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB36C16A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr (obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr [194.254.165.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A499743D78 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from [192.168.70.222] (addoo.math.univ-paris13.fr [194.254.165.54]) by obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA97E1CCC; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4517C9A2.7060303@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:20:50 +0200 From: Le Cocq Michel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060831) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aguiar Magalhaes References: <20060925123711.6962.qmail@web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060925123711.6962.qmail@web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade doens't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:41:39 -0000 Have you done a "portsnap fetch update" before ? Aguiar Magalhaes a écrit : >Hi list, > >I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the >portupgrade doesn't work. > >---> Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1' >(archivers/arc) >---> Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make >flags: BATCH=yes >script: openpty: No such file or directory > >and so go on > >Could you help me? > >Aguiar > > > >_______________________________________________________ >Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora! >http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/ > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:55:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDC716A49E for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from c.mx.poklib.org (c.mx.poklib.org [64.72.87.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1A643D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:55:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from [192.168.1.249] (port=62382 helo=mail.poklib.org) by c.mx.poklib.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.62; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRpzp-000LL2-QV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:41 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.218] by mail.poklib.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRpzs-000Gg8-RB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:44 -0400 X-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.88.4/1942 on c.mx.poklib.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4517D1D0.3080703@poklib.org> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:44 -0400 From: "B. Cook" Organization: Adriance Memorial Library User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RcvHost: [192.168.1.218] X-RcvFor: X-Auth-Id: X-AntiVirus: No Virus Found X-MIME-Character-set: ISO-8859-1 Subject: When to use SUID Perl (5.8.x)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:55:50 -0000 Hello, Just wondering what do you need suid perl for? I run a webserver for staff users, and have had no real need for it, and considering removing it. I think it goes to back the days when SA (possibly?) needed it and I just cp'd the make.conf across boxes over the years.. :) it is a security risk having it? Is the risk that if the webserver/webserver-app gets comprimised the user could use perl? Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:39:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FA916A403 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: from web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.53.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E34FF43D58 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Sep 2006 12:39:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6q3Y4wH2cjQT0szOAihxiFVuuV63I/Xe3pabJd5mWdaEbG8cJuU8TEKIQLwkbudihp5ypy0Y4R0i042m6ScrDuvwomIBS/GJlQRPTW/HNOwLmZEnyLkl+Gqwv7HYGzNJWxqn1AFaG/YdCTvauFMdn4Z1601j42Wft68W6It1lOg= ; Message-ID: <20060925123908.20989.qmail@web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.65.68.246] by web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:39:08 PDT Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael S To: FreeBSD Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:06:05 +0000 Subject: calendar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael S List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:39:09 -0000 Good day all. Where does one get an updated calendar.judaic? Mine seems to be out of sync. Thanks in advance. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 13:34:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3726416A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F7843D64 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:34:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 52AE94AC91; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511914AC8B; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:34:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: "Gouverneur, Thomas" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060925093407.E10466@saturn.atopia.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:34:41 -0000 rssh supports chroots it seems, but no way to actually tie them to their home dir. -Matt On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Gouverneur, Thomas wrote: > > Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh > > > Regards, > > -- > Thomas Gouverneur > Junior UNIX Administrator > TI Automotive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak > Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 > To: Marwan Sultan > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory > > Well... > > If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using > SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. > > I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can > connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. > > Is there anyway? > > -Matt > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > >> Hi Matt! >> >> If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then >> the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file > /etc/ftpchroot >> and thats all!! >> if the file does not exist. then create it. >> >> add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see > any >> upper level of shell. >> >> have fun, >> Marwan Sultan >> System Administrator. >> >>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >>> Matt Juszczak wrote: >>> >>>> I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >>>> restrict him to his home directory. >>>> >>>> I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >>>> get it working. >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! >> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517c88b8285209328925! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 13:45:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129F816A47C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: from smtp.eu.tiauto.com (smtp.eu.tiauto.com [195.127.176.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A6543ED5 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:40:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: by euex01.resource.tiauto.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Gouverneur, Thomas" To: 'Matt Juszczak' Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:39:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:45:39 -0000 Correct, but you can still use it into a chroot. Consider: http://www.sdri.co.jp/rssh/CHROOT_en.html Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -----Original Message----- From: Matt Juszczak [mailto:matt@atopia.net] Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 15:35 To: Gouverneur, Thomas Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory rssh supports chroots it seems, but no way to actually tie them to their home dir. -Matt On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Gouverneur, Thomas wrote: > > Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh > > > Regards, > > -- > Thomas Gouverneur > Junior UNIX Administrator > TI Automotive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak > Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 > To: Marwan Sultan > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory > > Well... > > If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using > SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. > > I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can > connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. > > Is there anyway? > > -Matt > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > >> Hi Matt! >> >> If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then >> the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file > /etc/ftpchroot >> and thats all!! >> if the file does not exist. then create it. >> >> add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see > any >> upper level of shell. >> >> have fun, >> Marwan Sultan >> System Administrator. >> >>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >>> Matt Juszczak wrote: >>> >>>> I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >>>> restrict him to his home directory. >>>> >>>> I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >>>> get it working. >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! >> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517c88b8285209328925! > The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 14:05:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435AD16A494 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD72443E3A for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:05:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so436184uge for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GwirGn3+p0F1evZS1gbayVuC95D7Qu13CYn++tubV2n0c6fgd0sf3XaWlNXjckpJ0MKliysQTWPNxHtT1+pyJj5RIh2Oh4I9+ZMPZZUJ+ho10d4UUyT4SHr5qL1J85B0k3DDSdc/eEQ39TK5SYnHa/8XmQC5Y2h6zZ2o3YEKcco= Received: by 10.67.103.7 with SMTP id f7mr3373971ugm; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.224.6 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:04:52 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: justin , "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20060925013537.I43034@justnosweat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060925013537.I43034@justnosweat.net> Cc: Subject: Re: lpd hewlett packard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:05:26 -0000 On 9/25/06, justin wrote: > > Hello, Hello, > Now i ask myself what the /boot/device.hints file has to do with my > kernel. > What sort of file is /boot/device.hints and why do i have to rebuild my > kernel. man device.hints(5) > Thanks inadvance, > Justin. -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 14:34:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA99B16A415 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@pepcross.com) Received: from mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59BF43D4C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@pepcross.com) Received: from mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.47]) by mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2006 15:34:05 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AQAAAG+DF0WBT4ojAQECBwIMBwYd Received: from 88-106-206-226.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.106.206.226]:62971 helo=mail.pepcross.com) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GRrWx-000CU3-KJ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:33:59 +0000 Received: by mail.pepcross.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:33:55 +0100 From: "Steve Roome" Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:33:55 +0100 To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20060925143355.GA1110@zebedee.home> References: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Radeon >R300 3d support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:34:09 -0000 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:39:21PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 9/23/06, Steve Roome wrote: > >Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and > >newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's > >been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. > > > >So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org > >port, or when that will be updated. > > xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some > basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. What do you mean by basic support ? My PCIE X700 now has semi working 3D acceleration - glx and working dri working well enough to play with a few OpenGL apps, I've gone so far as to actually set some of the reallyslick screensavers up - and most work okay, well, not all, some of them whine about the odd issue, but there is limited 3D acceleration here. The 6.9 in the ports gave me only 2D acceleration, as expected, no DRI no glx etc. So, which version of 7.x is coming into the ports, and what version of the ati driver will be coming in with it ? Ta, Steve Roome From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 14:53:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D101816A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yarosh@4web.pl) Received: from sauron.4web.pl (sauron.4web.pl [193.239.206.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429DA43D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yarosh@4web.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sauron.4web.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72378A0D0 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:49:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (net133-186.4web.pl [194.63.133.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sauron.4web.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CA38A03C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4517ED4C.6030106@4web.pl> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:00 +0200 From: jarek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned: 4WEB.PL AntiVir/AntiSpam Scanner Cc: Subject: freeBSD official font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:53:03 -0000 hi can you tell me what is name of "freeBSD" font? i would like to do some artworks to promote freebsd and i beadly need this font bye -- Pozdrawiam, Jarek Berecki From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:14:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF23E16A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6488343D64; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:14:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8PFCpI9078358; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:12:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8PFCpvd078357; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:12:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:12:51 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: azhar freebsd Message-ID: <20060925151251.GB78251@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-question@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:14:09 -0000 On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:35:07PM +0900, azhar freebsd wrote: > hi > can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. Just what it says. It is a FreeBSD 6.2 that has not been officially released yet. The present official release is 6.1. The 6.2 release is coming soon and is being worked on actively. You can install it for testing or development or somewhat risky production use. It is sort of a beta release. ////jerry > > uname -a > FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep > 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 > root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 > [root@belagelo]~#emacs > > > azhar > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:26:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272B16A416 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBF843D60 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:23145 helo=remailer.aseed.net) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GRsLR-000MXc-HH for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:09 +0000 Received: from mail.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by remailer.aseed.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 39508E2537 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <11b6672e61bc26570f3cb9c407d80af1@aseed.net> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:26:20 +0200 From: "albi" To: X-Mailer: Hastymail 1.5 x-priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: albi@scii.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:15 -0000 hi, i don't like sendmail very much, but have been happily using postfix=20 for years now, on a freebsd mailserver with jails i was wondering whether the following is possible : - all incoming email goes to 1 jail which only runs sendmail + milter and blocks all email with .gif attachments - sendmail then let's through all other emails with some transport-map which doesn't need individual aliases (per user) - other jails (separate jail for lists and email) accept the email via postfix can sendmail do this ? or is there other mailserver-software which can block gif and hand over all email to other jails with postfix i'm asking this for the following reasons : - i have a jail with postfix+mysql+spamassassin+maildrop, esp. the maildrop-part took me many many hours to figure out, (turned out that courier maildrop default mysql-support was dropped in favour for courier authdaemon+mysql-support) it's working fine now, so i prefer not to add more to this jail, but i'd like to stop .gif-images attached now - it looks like postfix needs per user aliases for transport-situation to virtual domains (or am i missing something ?) possible or not good ? thanks in advance for useful info! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:31:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263BD16A417 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arindam.mukerjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981E443D79 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arindam.mukerjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2528645pye for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:31:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=aU8Ap4M5aGp4mBcSv9kjtMuZq9ml0gns8AZhwwr5XK1ZTxEMb8qok/qgdXpG0of+0QCsQt8Td9ziyFfAxMiMztAp2Nn2Qmd7QDQe9yTRz2KRyyQCVZZ91gfu9rbySe2ryjnyRHJZ2P+EM4X7M6yaHXOrlR0IFswlNAPDmRbdOsw= Received: by 10.35.78.9 with SMTP id f9mr7990678pyl; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.13.5 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:01:10 +0530 From: Arindam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:31:29 -0000 I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from such efforts already expended. It would be great if you could give some idea through examples. Cheers, Andy -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:37:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B1C16A417 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:37:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from c.mx.poklib.org (c.mx.poklib.org [64.72.87.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BFB43D7B for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from [192.168.1.249] (port=62540 helo=mail.poklib.org) by c.mx.poklib.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.62; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRsVq-000Juf-Tj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.218] by mail.poklib.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRsVu-000Cra-0p for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:58 -0400 X-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.88.4/1942 on c.mx.poklib.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4517F79A.40003@poklib.org> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:58 -0400 From: "B. Cook" Organization: Adriance Memorial Library User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RcvHost: [192.168.1.218] X-RcvFor: X-Auth-Id: X-AntiVirus: No Virus Found X-MIME-Character-set: ISO-8859-1 Subject: Exim As MTA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:37:08 -0000 I am running Exim as a sendmail replacement, and I keep getting a "Message failure - message too big" in my inbox for root. (looks like from daily run output) A message that you sent was longer than the maximum size allowed on this system. It was not delivered to any recipients. ------ This is a copy of your message, including all the headers. ------ No more than 100K characters of the body are included. it is soo large b/c of all the rejected mail: I do want to see the mail due to the messages in the queue.. but how do I get it not to show me rejected mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:58:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDED16A416 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1875D43D70 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:58:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k8PFwero013905; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:58:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:58:39 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Arindam Message-ID: <20060925155839.GF73717@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:58:46 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 25), Arindam said: > I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question > on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. > > Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] > double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How > does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. Different comparison operators, basically, and faster than [ because it doesn't have to fork /bin/[ . > You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from > such efforts already expended. They're all documented in the manpage ("ksh93" for the shells/ksh93 ports), under Conditional Expressions. Compare them with the "test" manpage. It looks like FreeBSD's test command does most of what ksh does, except for the wildcard matching of =, which is handy but can be emulated with a case statement :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 16:10:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1D716A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB5743D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8PGA0U8060795; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:10:00 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060925110339.021a7c68@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:09:42 -0500 To: Arindam , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:20 -0000 The [[ ]] operators are for compound tests, the [ ] operator is for simple tests. In ksh newer than 6/3/86 the [[ ]] makes the [ ] obsolete. Example of [[ ]]: [[ foo > bar && $PWD -ef . ]] && print foobar foobar That is from the kornshell book co-written by David Korn. By the way, I use ksh for my root's shell and it works fine. -Derek At 10:31 AM 9/25/2006, Arindam wrote: >I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question >on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. > >Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] >double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How >does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. > >You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from >such efforts already expended. > >It would be great if you could give some idea through examples. > >Cheers, >Andy >-- >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 16:53:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1761816A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D9343D58 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2552145pye for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:53:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=THmSLYkn84GltdFwYqUqXtkNIk23vuaETOlRkN6/1jtl5NJ68NogcKgridfiaT/rQq2AthNXwxAw9IemAP+sxT2ZK/i7JvWEQ7F9us50osBENOXIT5fJGSXdWwI2Rwk0Ys6ZpCA2psofaR1DqbbGyN2ELVUhFmHCaIDu9FlCdow= Received: by 10.35.17.12 with SMTP id u12mr8134278pyi; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.12 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:52:55 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Steve Roome" In-Reply-To: <20060925143355.GA1110@zebedee.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> <20060925143355.GA1110@zebedee.home> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3fbba1503253e555 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Radeon >R300 3d support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:04 -0000 On 9/25/06, Steve Roome wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:39:21PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 9/23/06, Steve Roome wrote: > > >Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and > > >newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's > > >been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. > > > > > >So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org > > >port, or when that will be updated. > > > > xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some > > basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. > > What do you mean by basic support ? My PCIE X700 now has semi working > 3D acceleration - glx and working dri working well enough to play with > a few OpenGL apps, I've gone so far as to actually set some of the > reallyslick screensavers up - and most work okay, well, not all, some > of them whine about the odd issue, but there is limited 3D acceleration > here. I mean, FWIW, that 6.9 has basic support for 3D on my 9550. 6.8 doesn't and I heard that 7.0 has much better support. > The 6.9 in the ports gave me only 2D acceleration, as expected, no DRI > no glx etc. > > So, which version of 7.x is coming into the ports, and what version of > the ati driver will be coming in with it ? 7.1, the one that's bundled. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 19:13:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84A816A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3B543D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8PJDuh7035337; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:13:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340" Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:13:56 +0200 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D12A1@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question Thread-Index: Acbgt0At84c0Q5/GSSmp30G/Cq5jgAAHuqXg From: "Philippe Lang" To: , X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Cc: Subject: RE: sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:13:59 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > hi, > > i don't like sendmail very much, but have been happily using > postfix for years now, > > on a freebsd mailserver with jails i was wondering whether > the following is possible : > > - all incoming email goes to 1 jail which only runs > sendmail + milter and blocks all email with .gif attachments > - sendmail then let's through all other emails with some transport-map > which doesn't need individual aliases (per user) > - other jails (separate jail for lists and email) accept the email > via postfix > > can sendmail do this ? or is there other mailserver-software > which can block gif and hand over all email to other jails > with postfix > > i'm asking this for the following reasons : > > - i have a jail with postfix+mysql+spamassassin+maildrop, > esp. the maildrop-part took me many many hours to figure out, > (turned out that courier maildrop default mysql-support was dropped > in favour for courier authdaemon+mysql-support) > it's working fine now, so i prefer not to add more to this jail, > but i'd like to stop .gif-images attached now > - it looks like postfix needs per user aliases for transport-situation > to virtual domains (or am i missing something ?) > > possible or not good ? Hi, Is there a specific reason why you absolutely want to keep sendmail? Why don't you do everything with postfix, and a content filtering tool you haven't mentioned: amavis? Jails runs all of the software you mentioned just fine. Just remember to bind on the IP of your jail. --------------- Philippe Lang Attik System ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCCAocw ggHwoAMCAQICEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MDYyMjE3MzE0NloXDTA3MDYyMjE3MzE0 NlowZzENMAsGA1UEBBMETGFuZzERMA8GA1UEKhMIUGhpbGlwcGUxFjAUBgNVBAMTDVBoaWxpcHBl IExhbmcxKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAOfvCPREDwfIbzsNRoyBDoSOWfI2NNWdRRMJXuj5ldF22gSQ 6MiXFUjt4HlRIwPb8x13hrv89GW/SmLjFThxf7NKZ8dPTZzp4ZlvrQBRAYhSuTQOJ8azyzruZu54 Ak7fa3pz26Q3B8kg4knZBz3O9Q4K1tK8AEdjNQpyDg/iDdzjAgMBAAGjOTA3MCcGA1UdEQQgMB6B HHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF AAOBgQAAzz+I6MrhWjbfWSgngW/DthHvXiTR6x0cCeb4T5mBb5dgueqgLnrh/2blsbCQuLWh0URe /1l/QQ2dY2elG3PEDPv9cCl/LcwsCsE1Nj3bGM4gdVx9crYvTw5dyyUuDq1KShV3uziE+o5Lyfx4 qWRYd6/yIBDVarohdpL8J0DJczCCAy0wggKWoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05NjAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDEy MzEyMzU5NTlaMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANRp19SwlGRbcelH2AxRtupykbCEXn0tDY97Et+FJXUodDpC LGMnn5V7S+9+GYcdhuqj3bnOlmQawhRuRKx85o/oTQ9xH0A4pgCjh3j2+ZSGXq3qwF5269kUo11u enwMpUtVfwYZKX+emibVars4JAhqmMex2qOYkf152+VaxBy5AgMBAAGjEzARMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQF MAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAx+ySfk749ZalZ2IqpPBNEWDQb41gWGGsJrtSNVwIzzD7 qEqWih9iQiOMFw/0umScF6xHKd+dmF7SbGBxXKKs3Hnj524ARx+1DSjoAp3kmv0T9KbZfLH43F8j JgmRgHPQFBveQ6mDJfLmnC8Vyv6mq4oHdYsM3VGEa+T40c53ooEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5o wHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH 5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8v Y3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYw KQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NW IXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIC+DCCAvQCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdgwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwOTI1MTkxMzUyWjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUNbUn3B3niW0rkiPEXdJbDBjm+gcwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggqhkiG9w0D BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw BwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJJtAj+Azn3wIrMIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRAC CzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJ JtAj+Azn3wIrMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGACOX5qyCHhfjiM9Akf4XgLGZbsIOOrn0WedUS5qCa h3LDNZG0BrOdYWFKRcV92/eOH6Re93ssezYrnupSMatslt85RU5tgYVtVEk5bnS6zmhflqsvUbLd YC+rEg8W6SH7y370K0mQTswE/Y3OTA7QydXbYEAmXjJ4rUwOwpwk+F0AAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 19:42:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD66F16A416 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from mx4.x15.net (mx4.x15.net [69.55.237.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A117643D4C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from j1.x15.net [63.196.213.76] by mx4.x15.net with ESMTP id 608060222X1GRwLZ000EJK1a; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:42:33 +0000 Message-ID: <4518310A.8000308@voidcaptain.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:42:02 -0700 From: Pete Slagle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "B. Cook" References: <4517F79A.40003@poklib.org> In-Reply-To: <4517F79A.40003@poklib.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Exim As MTA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:42:33 -0000 B. Cook wrote: > I am running Exim as a sendmail replacement, and I keep getting a > "Message failure - message too big" in my inbox for root. (looks like > from daily run output) > I do want to see the mail due to the messages in the queue.. but how do > I get it not to show me rejected mail? To set the maximum message size the Exim will process, put something like message_size_limit = 50M return_size_limit = 1M in Exim's configuration file, /usr/local/etc/exim/configure See http://exim.org/ for full details. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 21:13:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3158316A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6358B43D64 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:13:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 58801 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2006 21:28:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.251?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 21:28:12 -0000 Message-ID: <451846E4.1080807@123.com.sv> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:15:16 -0600 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_Amaya?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: system gets panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:13:12 -0000 Hi list, I have a HP dx5150 SFF system with FreeBSD 6.1 Release running on it. The system worked fine the first 4 weeks, after that, the server begun to reboot while it was booting, and two or three times 5 minutes after booting. The error message said: panic: softdep_setup_inomapdep: found inode ... rebooting after 15 segs. Do you know what´s going on here? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 21:09:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1316A417 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aronesimi@yahoo.com) Received: from web58410.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58410.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CE2143D68 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:09:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aronesimi@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 13430 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Sep 2006 21:09:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QHr+m5BHzyVfBKsuydLQsyYMu/KJB3S1REEaYKKvT2vQ5uuwHbFhbLCZF0pkfcaXU9p9v+lI/qLgY+bicX26URf5JOLv+VEJBghMGU66sKkkIZoYPh7Qlyd+RZ2wP4lcPkd7kOIZueZrvPlCGX5ljzFVy33Po9rtcLyZGjthdIo= ; Message-ID: <20060925210936.13428.qmail@web58410.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.94.196.84] by web58410.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:09:36 PDT Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:09:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Arone Silimantia To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:01:27 +0000 Subject: GBDE on top of SSHFS (on top of rsync.net) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:09:41 -0000 I am successfully using sshfs with my offsite backup provider, rsync.net. I used these instructions: http://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/freebsd_sshfs.html and have my remote filesystem mounted locally. I decided that I would like to create a 4 GB GBDE image and place it on the mounted offsite-filesystem, and then mount that ... which is a mount on top of a mount, but theoretically it should work. But it doesn't. When I issue the command: gbde init /dev/md0 -i -L /etc/gbde/md0 and save the file in the vi editor, making no changes, I get this error after entering my password: Enter new passphrase: Reenter new passphrase: gbde: write: Input/output error # So I am mainly just curious - has anyone ever mounted a GBDE on top of an sshfs mounted filesystem ? Thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 22:05:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B50B16A47B for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E2D43D76 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:05:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F188C46C6C; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:05:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:05:25 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Natalie Sugako In-Reply-To: <44493478.000001.07075@mfront8.yandex.ru> Message-ID: <20060925230413.G65154@fledge.watson.org> References: <44493478.000001.07075@mfront8.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: build audit kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:05:35 -0000 On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Natalie Sugako wrote: > I want to use audit events on FreeBSD6.1-BETA4. I read that I must build > kernel with option: options AUDIT (FreeBSD handbook). But config > (/usr/sbin/config) find next error: unknown option "AUDIT" Maybe, option was > renamed? Help me, PLS! Thanks FYI: Support for audit has now been merged to the 6-STABLE branch for inclusion in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in the next month. The 6.1-BETA1 image includes basic audit support; it will be significantly refined and updated in 6.1-BETA2 next week. The handbook chapter has else been extended to cover audit in more detail. Thanks, Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 22:14:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E785316A415; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7D543D60; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:14:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684AF10E5F5; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:14:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Hr9QI68iT1w; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3000F10E5C9; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:14:51 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <834080680.20060926001451@rulez.sk> To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20060925230413.G65154@fledge.watson.org> References: <44493478.000001.07075@mfront8.yandex.ru> <20060925230413.G65154@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Natalie Sugako , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: build audit kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:15:00 -0000 Hello Robert, Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 12:05:25 AM, you wrote: > FYI: Support for audit has now been merged to the 6-STABLE branch for > inclusion in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in the next month. The 6.1-BETA1 image > includes basic audit support; it will be significantly refined and updated in > 6.1-BETA2 next week. The handbook chapter has else been extended to cover > audit in more detail. s/6.1-BETA/6.2-BETA/g :-) -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 22:16:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B9D16A415 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616E443D76 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (kline@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k8PMFtWD042154; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:15:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k8PMFt80042153; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:15:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:15:54 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20060925221554.GA42110@thought.org> References: <20060924210500.GA34045@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060924210500.GA34045@thought.org> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: some apps very slow under Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:16:00 -0000 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:05:00PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > Guys, > > This may/may not prove the superiority of BSD over the Linux > kernel, dunno. Maybe you can help me figure out what I > need to tune; or (*sob*) lighten my load on ethos. > > I've got three of the 4 default workspaces full of apps. > Mostly xterms or "gnome-terminals". I have 1G RAM, a huge > disk, a 2800 AMD chip, yet realplay is *very* slow to respond. > It's time-counter changes only ever 8 seconds and when I > cover part or all, it takes several seconds to fill back in. > > Is this a bug in xorg or in realplay or what? Last night I > closed realplay and began having similar problems with one of the > terminals. I have run CTWM for years so am used to a lightweight > wm. I haven't checked to see if gnome/kde-LITE are available. > That may be the problem. > > I am reluctant to post this to the ubuntuforums because I've > already asked enough idiot questions ... (Sure, I do the > same here, but I know you guys:-) > > I could close all my xterms and see, but it took hours to get > things configured just the way I want! > Well, he said, replying to his ownpost, the trouble/(bug??) was in the "Windows" click-on in the gnome-config apps. I had the proper selection. It jst never responded until I clicked an un-clicked.... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 23:21:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE89416A403 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weijer@asacomputers.com) Received: from asacomputers.com (mail.asacomputers.com [209.10.224.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5076743D5E for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:21:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from weijer@asacomputers.com) Received: from ASADesktop01 (crimson.asacomputers.com [209.10.224.9]) by asacomputers.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id k8PNLDhZ031714 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:21:16 -0700 Message-ID: <002501c6e0f9$69b6e430$fa00a8c0@ASADesktop01> From: "Weijer" To: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:22:04 -0700 Organization: ASA Computers Inc MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Weijer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:21:18 -0000 Can anyone tell me if Freebsd 5.4 amd64 support file system more than = 4TB ? I have a system disk and a raid 5 connected to a 3ware controller, = installed system, but only see 96 GB on the 4 TB raid 5. Anyone can help = me? -------------------------------------------- My mailbox is spam-free wi= th ChoiceMail, the leader in personal and corporate anti-spam solutions.= Download your free copy of ChoiceMail from www.digiportal.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 00:28:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF03D16A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web83107.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web83107.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.101.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3654443D5F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:28:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 35696 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Sep 2006 00:28:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=adZkhDsClLVnwYcl8ts9BxKzYEjJoOhpf+RsRsW1/oGeJMNDV6VEMfc49fBCN5bmSpvMPwmIgu6epjhWi5whdukhJZrOHMZYpLroskbioFs0fhKtAe6MpFdPOTsfWgHJqXOYLmpluROV//AIZ+ByfZF50a+WygYtqY0M3Np6Td4= ; Message-ID: <20060926002821.35694.qmail@web83107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [75.28.151.79] by web83107.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:28:21 PDT Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:28:21 -0700 (PDT) From: backyard To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <002501c6e0f9$69b6e430$fa00a8c0@ASADesktop01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:28:22 -0000 --- Weijer wrote: > Can anyone tell me if Freebsd 5.4 amd64 support file > system more than 4TB ? > I have a system disk and a raid 5 connected to a > 3ware controller, installed system, but only see 96 > GB on the 4 TB raid 5. Anyone can help me? > -------------------------------------------- > My mailbox is spam-free with ChoiceMail, the leader > in personal and corporate anti-spam solutions. > Download your free copy of ChoiceMail from > www.digiportal.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html would answer your questions I believe -brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 00:29:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001EC16A40F; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD7443D83; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:29:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB8D46C6B; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:29:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:29:42 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Daniel Gerzo In-Reply-To: <834080680.20060926001451@rulez.sk> Message-ID: <20060926012926.T73166@fledge.watson.org> References: <44493478.000001.07075@mfront8.yandex.ru> <20060925230413.G65154@fledge.watson.org> <834080680.20060926001451@rulez.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Natalie Sugako , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: build audit kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:29:45 -0000 On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 12:05:25 AM, you wrote: > >> FYI: Support for audit has now been merged to the 6-STABLE branch for >> inclusion in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in the next month. The 6.1-BETA1 image >> includes basic audit support; it will be significantly refined and updated >> in 6.1-BETA2 next week. The handbook chapter has else been extended to >> cover audit in more detail. > > s/6.1-BETA/6.2-BETA/g :-) Indeed! Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 01:03:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C0516A412 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8BD43D5F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:03:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8Q13GU9033705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:03:16 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id k8Q13Uig084976; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:03:30 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:03:30 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200609260103.k8Q13Uig084976@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: bcook@poklib.org In-reply-to: <4517D1D0.3080703@poklib.org> (bcook@poklib.org) References: <4517D1D0.3080703@poklib.org> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When to use SUID Perl (5.8.x)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:03:33 -0000 Hi, > Just wondering what do you need suid perl for? To run a Perl script that needs to get root privileges. > it is a security risk having it? It is always a risk to have a powerfull tool installed when you don't need it. If a security bug is discovered in Perl, one could be able to become root without you wanting it. > Is the risk that if the webserver/webserver-app gets comprimised the > user could use perl? It depends on whatyou are running on your server. If you don't need setuid perl, do not install it :)) Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 01:07:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFB816A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F8D43D88 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:07:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24] (may be forged)) by small.pukruppa.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8P36AEb082593; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:06:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:06:09 +0200 (CEST) From: "P.U.Kruppa" To: Erik Norgaard In-Reply-To: <4516AA0B.5020209@locolomo.org> Message-ID: <20060925050318.E1745@small.pukruppa.net> References: <4516AA0B.5020209@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB based webcam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:07:31 -0000 On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Hi: > > I have a laptop with a built in webcam: > > ugen0: Vimicro Corp. USB2.0 Web Camera, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 > > Since this goes on the generic usb device, I guess there is no driver. > > Is this supported? Do I need to download a driver somewhere or will webcam > software provide it? > > Secondly, what software is recommended to make this useful? Perhaps you should try freebsd-usb freebsd-mobile (see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1 /books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL) ? Regards, Uli. Peter Ulrich Kruppa Wuppertal Germany From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 01:25:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E7916A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8885343D5E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GS1h9-00016k-78 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:25:11 +0200 Received: from c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.85.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:25:11 +0200 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:25:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonathan Arnold Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:24:58 -0400 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <86irjd8qra.fsf@PCBSD.localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) In-Reply-To: <86irjd8qra.fsf@PCBSD.localhost> Sender: news Subject: Re: Dual Monitor problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:25:24 -0000 Well, I didn't get much input here. How about if I generalize it a little bit? Is *anyone* currently running a late model ATI card with dual monitors? If so, could you post or email me your xorg.conf? -- Jonathan Arnold Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD blog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 02:01:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1220616A4A0 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sushant@cs.vt.edu) Received: from smtp.cs.vt.edu (tsunami.cs.vt.edu [198.82.184.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A327643D58 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:01:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sushant@cs.vt.edu) Received: from cs.vt.edu (typhoon.cs.vt.edu [198.82.184.21]) by smtp.cs.vt.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09537698020 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:00:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hc652a840.dhcp.vt.edu (hc652a840.dhcp.vt.edu [198.82.168.64]) by webmail.cs.vt.edu (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:00:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20060925220057.hqu0378bjk04gccg@webmail.cs.vt.edu> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:00:57 -0400 From: Sushant Sharma To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-VT_CS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-VT_CS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-8.3, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, BAYES_00 -5.00) X-VT_CS-MailScanner-From: sushant@cs.vt.edu Subject: Dummynet Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:01:04 -0000 Hi all, I have installed dummynet on a machine-2 which I am using to introduce delay between the packets that I'll be sending from machine-1 to machine-3. I am using ping to confirm that ICMP/TCP packets are getting delayed. I know both UDP/TCP fall under ip, so UDP packets should also be getting delayed but just to confirm, do you guys know of any utility that I can use to check if UDP packets are also getting delayed. ipfw shows pipe 1 and queue 1 as pipe 1 ip from any to any queue 1 ip from any to any I am running linux on machine-1 and machine-3. TIA -Sushant ps: please cc the reply to me also as I am not subscribed to the list. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 04:44:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6277C16A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A5A43D58 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:44:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59779B995 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:44:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AX-TQ5nqM0fy for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:44:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [155.208.254.37] (brurel5.hp.com [155.208.254.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987EDB984 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:44:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4518B028.6000104@aeternal.net> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:44:24 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'FreeBSD Questions' Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dovecot port not compiling with mysql support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:44:29 -0000 Hello all, as I am experiencing serious performance degradation while using dovecot (extremely high cpu usage), I've tried to recompile it without kqueue support as it seems to be the root cause (this issue is being solved in dovecot maillist), but I am getting error while wanting to compile with MySQL support in driver-mysql.c (please see below for more information). Is there someone experiencing the same issue? Or should I file pr? thanks, Martin Hudec RELEVANT INFORMATION ==================== 1.) config options MySQL support enabled, kqueue support disabled. 2.) output from make all ... Making all in lib-sql if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include -std=gnu99 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -MT driver-mysql.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/driver-mysql.Tpo" -c -o driver-mysql.o driver-mysql.c; then mv -f ".deps/driver-mysql.Tpo" ".deps/driver-mysql.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/driver-mysql.Tpo"; exit 1; fi driver-mysql.c: In function `driver_mysql_parse_connect_string': driver-mysql.c:234: error: `ulong' undeclared (first use in this function) driver-mysql.c:234: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once driver-mysql.c:234: error: for each function it appears in.) driver-mysql.c:234: error: syntax error before numeric constant *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7/src/lib-sql. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7. *** Error code 1 ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 05:38:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC31916A416 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@cruzweb.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [63.240.77.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9876C43D5A for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:38:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@cruzweb.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-68-61-214-252.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.61.214.252]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20060926053820012002g51ie>; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:38:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4518BCCE.5050902@cruzweb.net> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:38:22 -0400 From: John Cruz Organization: Cruz Web Development User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Creating New Users over Telnet/SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@cruzweb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:38:34 -0000 So a friend of mine is interested in creating a FreeBSD telnet/SSH box for people in his networking class to screw with. He said he wants to do something like what happens when you telnet into sdf.*lonestar.org *and if you're a new user you just type new and go from there, but I've never done this or looked into it, so I was wondering if any of you had any ideas on how to do this. Basically, User telnets to the server. if they have a username and password, they put it in. If they don't, then they are taken to a place where they can create a new account (on lonestar, it says it's taking you to a "NEWUSER mkacct server" to do this then asks me to put in FEP commands for creating shell accounts) It gives you the options and disclaimer and such and you have to agree then choose a username. Then it asks you more questions like zip code and password and such and it finally creates your user account, you can then log in to the system. Lonestar is using netBSD, we are going to use FreeBSD 6.1 Any info on how to accomplish this is greatly appreciated. -John Cruz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 06:56:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BE616A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr (obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr [194.254.165.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B2543D4C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:56:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from [192.168.70.222] (addoo.math.univ-paris13.fr [194.254.165.54]) by obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F81E1CA7; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4518CA35.5010103@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:35:33 +0200 From: Le Cocq Michel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060831) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_Amaya?= References: <451846E4.1080807@123.com.sv> In-Reply-To: <451846E4.1080807@123.com.sv> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system gets panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:56:27 -0000 the only thing i can say is for me if i had a such message with "inode" i should try in first a fsck. César Amaya a écrit : > Hi list, > > I have a HP dx5150 SFF system with FreeBSD 6.1 Release running on it. > The system worked fine the first 4 weeks, after that, the server begun > to reboot while it was booting, and two or three times 5 minutes > after booting. The error message said: > > panic: softdep_setup_inomapdep: found inode > ... > rebooting after 15 segs. > > Do you know what´s going on here? > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 07:09:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4F516A416 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:09:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nge@cs.hmc.edu) Received: from turing.cs.hmc.edu (turing.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CD143D76 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:09:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nge@cs.hmc.edu) Received: from knuth.cs.hmc.edu (knuth.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.100]) by turing.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F895327F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by knuth.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 26983) id 3E2146689A; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by knuth.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B053439934 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:09:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Eldredge X-X-Sender: nate@knuth.cs.hmc.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Missing cd0 device node X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:09:53 -0000 Hi all, In the course of various screwing around with my ATAPI CDROM device (including some dvd ripping and playing that got aborted at odd moments), I got the following messages: Sep 25 20:50:07 vulcan kernel: acd0: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly Sep 25 20:50:07 vulcan kernel: acd0: timeout waiting to issue command Sep 25 20:50:07 vulcan kernel: acd0: error issuing SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE command Sep 25 20:50:07 vulcan kernel: acd0: TIMEOUT - REQUEST_SENSE retrying (1 retry left) Sep 25 20:50:18 vulcan kernel: acd0: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly Sep 25 20:50:18 vulcan kernel: acd0: timeout waiting to issue command Sep 25 20:50:18 vulcan kernel: acd0: error issuing ATA PACKET command Sep 25 20:50:18 vulcan kernel: acd0: TIMEOUT - REQUEST_SENSE retrying (0 retries left) Sep 25 20:50:29 vulcan kernel: acd0: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly Sep 25 20:50:29 vulcan kernel: acd0: timeout waiting to issue command Sep 25 20:50:29 vulcan kernel: acd0: error issuing ATA PACKET command Sep 25 20:50:29 vulcan kernel: acd0: FAILURE - REQUEST_SENSE timed out Sep 25 20:50:29 vulcan kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): lost device Sep 25 20:50:29 vulcan kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): removing device entry Sep 25 20:50:29 vulcan kernel: (probe0:ata0:0:0:0): Lost target 0??? Sep 25 20:50:45 vulcan kernel: acd0: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly Sep 25 20:50:45 vulcan kernel: acd0: timeout waiting to issue command Sep 25 20:50:45 vulcan kernel: acd0: error issuing ATA PACKET command Sep 25 20:50:45 vulcan kernel: acd0: FAILURE - TEST_UNIT_READY timed out I also have atapicam in use for DVD burning, and I now find that /dev/cd0 is missing, and I can't figure out how to get it back. "camcontrol rescan all" completes successfully, and I have vulcan# camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 () But I can't seem to do anything with the device: vulcan# camcontrol inquiry cd0 camcontrol: cam_lookup_pass: CAMGETPASSTHRU ioctl failed cam_lookup_pass: No such file or directory cam_lookup_pass: either the pass driver isn't in your kernel cam_lookup_pass: or cd0 doesn't exist vulcan# camcontrol inquiry 1:0 camcontrol: cam_open_btl: no passthrough device found at 1:0:0 All the relevant devices are in my kernel, and always have been: # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives #device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering device atapicam # emulate ATAPI devices as SCSI ditto via CAM # needs CAM to be present (scbus & pass) # SCSI Controllers # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) #device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) #device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) I also tried restarting /etc/rc.d/devfs and devd without effect, as well as "cdcontrol reset", and "camcontrol reset all". Any suggestions on how to recover my cd0 device so I can use it again? I suspect rebooting would fix it, but I would rather avoid rebooting this machine as it handles a number of important tasks. Thanks in advance. I'd appreciate a personal CC on any replies, if convenient, so I don't miss them in my digest. -- Nate Eldredge nge@cs.hmc.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 07:34:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C3C16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from son_jaya@yahoo.com) Received: from web54409.mail.yahoo.com (web54409.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6430143D67 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:34:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from son_jaya@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 67657 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Sep 2006 07:34:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=q9Fpv+aWXFTUwt+4GqcFlTtxYwMy4QMbQ03nTTxI653UVBQbyw/Ybm63uip/KLV6V937t5XBy59qR1xLei0ETlpLMo40A2wqxxz+6HOyaeqr1uikwOsd2V9Srs9mXrHGUyWfFxTQSKG1xbtWsAN4gf8NQuKS821v8FWRlPSh52g= ; Message-ID: <20060926073412.67655.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [219.83.67.178] by web54409.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:34:12 PDT Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:34:12 -0700 (PDT) From: sonjaya To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Limit p2p with pf n altq X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:34:14 -0000 Dear all any one here have some sample script to limit connection for p2p ( edonkey , kazza , etc ) with pf also how to limit some ip not port with pf . sory if my question so newbie thx My Regard's SONJAYA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 09:09:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C5716A417 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: from web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.182.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C096B43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:09:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 58285 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Sep 2006 09:09:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tqQaW11t/qaLKDOd+mt6JncXqYvryR2tv2P2pl3Ot8tTRR4liFPq39BTGq5coMaDCWtpx/voJytkWjNkCrJyXBNU2IPY2TJPMGvDV/LRJbekdoM83mU8TuWyflrXh7yVB6wkY83V22WgmeA/OaJDlxe5Q0oe7ncUMDuv2x7clow= ; Message-ID: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [81.57.37.99] by web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:05 CEST Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Desmond Coughlan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:09:07 -0000 Hi, I hope that I'm not sending this to the wrong list, or that the question hasn't already been answered. I'm trying to install 6.1-RELEASE onto a Pentium-3. I had a lot of trouble creating the diskettes, but after changing the floppy drive, no problem. Now, when I do the install, I have two hard drives, and configure them as follows... disk0 150M / 512M /etc 512M /etc 512M /var 1024M /bin 4096M /usr 1024M swap disk1 4096M /forums 4096M /mail 4096M /sql 1024M swap I go through the installation, via ftp, and then set the root password. Oh, and the 'FreeBSD boot manager' is the option I choose, when configuring the disks. When I reboot, this is what I see ... Manual root filesystem specification : Mount using filesystem eg ufs:da0s1a ? List valid disk boot devices Abort manual imput ... and that's it. Nothing else. The machine just sits there. Is there something I've missed ? We've tried the same install on three different machines, using three different motherboards, and four different hard drives. Something is wrong, either with the installation media, or else with our method of going about it. Oh, and I tried installing 5.5 on the same machines, with the same result. FreeBSD rocks; I've used it for a long time on many different machines, and this is the first time that this has happened. Could someone suggest a solution? The people with whom I'm installing this, are starting to whisper the word 'Linux', and it's giving me nightmares.... :( Thanks. D.C --------------------------------- Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. Cliquez ici. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 10:24:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA9116A412 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA5D43D77 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:24:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.146] (helo=anti-virus03-09) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GSA74-0008FB-30; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:24:30 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GSA70-0001MI-Kb; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:24:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4518FFD9.70208@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:24:25 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Desmond Coughlan References: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:24:54 -0000 Desmond Coughlan wrote: >Hi, > I hope that I'm not sending this to the wrong list, or that the question hasn't already been answered. > > This is the right list. If you want to know if something similar has been answered before then try searching the archives which you can find from www.freebsd.org or just try google on freebsd plus some relevant keywords. > > I'm trying to install 6.1-RELEASE onto a Pentium-3. > > I had a lot of trouble creating the diskettes, but after changing the floppy drive, no problem. Now, when I do the install, I have two hard drives, and configure them as follows... > > disk0 > 150M / > 512M /etc > 512M /etc > > 1024M /bin > /etc and /bin cannot be separate filesystems. What made you think this was sensible? I barely use 150Mb for / + /etc +/bin and only because I seem to have kept about 6 different kernels :-) So using 512Mb for / including /etc would be fine and leave lots of space. Even 128Mb would do given the apparent smallness of your disks. Honestly, your whole partitioning scheme looks odd to me. > 4096M /forums > 4096M /mail > 4096M /sql > With small disks why split the space up like this at all? Dump everything into one extra partition e.g. /home and make directories for mail sql and forums under that. Then it doesn't matter which of these ends up growing the largest - they all have the benefit of having as much expansion space as possible and space doesn't get wasted when one of your partitions sits at 5% full while the others grow to 90% full, for example. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 10:26:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F2016A500 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7109643DB0 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:26:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k8QAQiEY015266; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:26:44 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:23:37 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060925220057.hqu0378bjk04gccg@webmail.cs.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060925220057.hqu0378bjk04gccg@webmail.cs.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609261323.38104.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Sushant Sharma Subject: Re: Dummynet Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:27:00 -0000 On Tuesday 26 September 2006 05:00, Sushant Sharma wrote: > Hi all, > I have installed dummynet on a machine-2 which I am using to introduce > delay between the packets that I'll be sending from machine-1 to machine-3. > I am using ping to confirm that ICMP/TCP packets are getting delayed. I > know both UDP/TCP fall under ip, so UDP packets should also be getting > delayed but just to confirm, do you guys know of any utility that I can use > to check if UDP packets are also getting delayed. Use traceroute. Or you could run tcpdump on both ingress and egress interfaces and check the timestamps. netcat can send udp packets, bash can(if it's built this way) cat >/dev/udp/192.168.0.1/snmp for example Or you could simply trust dummynet/ipfw. They work:) HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 10:30:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE14616A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from skapet.datadok.no (skapet.datadok.no [194.54.107.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F301743D67 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:29:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no ([194.54.103.98] helo=amidala.datadok.no.bsdly.net ident=peter) by skapet.datadok.no with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GSABY-00021Z-6x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:29:08 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060926073412.67655.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:29:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060926073412.67655.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com> (sonjaya's message of "Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:34:12 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <877izqyl8u.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Limit p2p with pf n altq X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:30:15 -0000 > also how to limit some ip not port with pf . you set up your queues, then assign traffic to them via your pass rules. Your pass rules can use whichever criteria you like, ie altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth 10Mb queue { def, mostofmybandwidth, notalot } queue def bandwidth 20% cbq(default borrow red) queue mostofmybandwidth 77% cbq(default borrow red) { most_lowdelay, most_bulk } queue most_lowdelay priority 7 queue most_bulk priority 7 queue notalot 3% cbq [...] block all pass from $localnet to any port $allowedports keep state queue mostofmybandwidth pass from $iptostarve to any port $allowedports keep state queue notalot - you get the idea. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" 20:11:56 delilah spamd[26905]: 146.151.48.74: disconnected after 36099 seconds From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 10:30:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF3916A4E2 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C2943DEA for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:29:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFEE2E037; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:29:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45190101.4060909@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:29:21 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Desmond Coughlan References: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:30:28 -0000 Desmond Coughlan wrote: > Hi, > I hope that I'm not sending this to the wrong list, or that the question hasn't already been answered. > > I'm trying to install 6.1-RELEASE onto a Pentium-3. > > I had a lot of trouble creating the diskettes, but after changing the floppy drive, no problem. Now, when I do the install, I have two hard drives, and configure them as follows... > > disk0 > 150M / > 512M /etc > 512M /etc > 512M /var > 1024M /bin > 4096M /usr > 1024M swap > > disk1 > 4096M /forums > 4096M /mail > 4096M /sql > 1024M swap > > I go through the installation, via ftp, and then set the root password. Oh, and the 'FreeBSD boot manager' is the option I choose, when configuring the disks. > > When I reboot, this is what I see ... > > Manual root filesystem specification > : Mount using filesystem eg > ufs:da0s1a > ? List valid disk boot devices > Abort manual imput > > ... and that's it. > > Nothing else. The machine just sits there. > > Is there something I've missed ? We've tried the same install on three different machines, using three different motherboards, and four different hard drives. Something is wrong, either with the installation media, or else with our method of going about it. Oh, and I tried installing 5.5 on the same machines, with the same result. > > FreeBSD rocks; I've used it for a long time on many different machines, and this is the first time that this has happened. > > Could someone suggest a solution? The people with whom I'm installing this, are starting to whisper the word 'Linux', and it's giving me nightmares.... :( Don't create a separate /bin and /etc partition, there is no need, and 512M is far sufficient for both /, /etc and /bin. I would guess the problem is that when you boot / is mounted, but no rc script is found as it is in /etc, as well as the fstab with info on what to mount where. Further, all the startup scripts are shell scripts and requires /bin/sh - including mountcritlocal that mounts your partions. Obviously this work because /bin is not mounted. A common partioning would be / swap /var /usr /home /tmp You want that /tmp partition because any disk errors on in /tmp are not fatal, but if it's on the / partition then you may have a system unable to boot. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 10:56:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F1C16A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C686C43D7B for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:56:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0322E037; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:56:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4519076F.5090104@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:56:47 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard References: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <45190101.4060909@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <45190101.4060909@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Desmond Coughlan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:56:54 -0000 Erik Norgaard wrote: > Don't create a separate /bin and /etc partition, there is no need, and > 512M is far sufficient for both /, /etc and /bin. > > I would guess the problem is that when you boot / is mounted, but no rc > script is found as it is in /etc, as well as the fstab with info on what > to mount where. > > Further, all the startup scripts are shell scripts and requires /bin/sh > - including mountcritlocal that mounts your partions. Obviously this > work because /bin is not mounted. ^ insert "won't" here. -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 11:16:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C834116A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sanya-spb@list.ru) Received: from mx7.mail.ru (mx7.mail.ru [194.67.23.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4E143D7E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:16:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sanya-spb@list.ru) Received: from [62.141.119.51] (port=35149 helo=[192.168.0.167]) by mx7.mail.ru with asmtp id 1GSAvf-000Cor-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:16:47 +0400 From: sanya To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:14:30 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20060925220057.hqu0378bjk04gccg@webmail.cs.vt.edu> <200609261323.38104.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <200609261323.38104.nvass@teledomenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609261514.30926.sanya-spb@list.ru> Subject: mount_msdosfs 240G X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sanya-spb@list.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:16:52 -0000 Hello I have a problem with mounting big fat32 partition. ----------------- % mount_msdosfs /dev/ar0s1 /mnt mount_msdosfs: /dev/ar0s1: Invalid argument ----------------- in syslog: kernel: mountmsdosfs(): disk too big, sorry where I mistaken? Thanks, sanya ---- FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 11:21:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C091316A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alistair.sutton@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F77243D68 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:21:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alistair.sutton@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so168020nfc for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:21:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AsMpdyT5KfQcOS0XHDLoEX9z66mHQ48dWCo9LL150Vj++f43GI2Tvhgo8FnICHSfh4j0ALuBFamik5fOfI12hscgGg2a739GNmPsf8He7H69d2+IVVSToiklcmu5LNaH70WzS6bWOmebltuz95jQWz5d5/YY4TqRW0Nj1LOvTA0= Received: by 10.49.75.2 with SMTP id c2mr874938nfl; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.163.13 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:21:12 +0100 From: "Alistair Sutton" To: sanya-spb@list.ru In-Reply-To: <200609261514.30926.sanya-spb@list.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060925220057.hqu0378bjk04gccg@webmail.cs.vt.edu> <200609261323.38104.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <200609261514.30926.sanya-spb@list.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_msdosfs 240G X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:21:18 -0000 On 26/09/06, sanya wrote: > Hello > > I have a problem with mounting big fat32 partition. > ----------------- > % mount_msdosfs /dev/ar0s1 /mnt > mount_msdosfs: /dev/ar0s1: Invalid argument > ----------------- > > in syslog: > kernel: mountmsdosfs(): disk too big, sorry > > where I mistaken? I had a similar problem when trying to mount a 180G USB drive. Recompiling my kernel with the MSDOSFS_LARGE option allowed me to mount the drive. HTH, Al -- WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 11:38:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A86A16A47E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B393843DDA for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:36:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2887779pye for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=SI7w5bHvc8CC8QboHa1YNQdD/KB6tHkaS4Ctl5988hgtUvkF127pnhTqZ+pC0ewS9otjFpFj5Se0Hng0j3QotKxD/3fIuBQmv7X+9AhClo9j+wleb+PeHUVJYc2KETLwWcxi3RxWgA6qpeWJ6Nn+3PHgy2F6fzJx2FBI+U7u2g4= Received: by 10.65.249.10 with SMTP id b10mr2905490qbs; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609260436r41dade3dyc60f330fff66b0ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:36:06 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2826_31528245.1159270566845" Subject: How to load iwi firmware at boot time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:38:25 -0000 ------=_Part_2826_31528245.1159270566845 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I have an Acer TravelMate 4060 laptop with FreeBSD 6.1 running on it. I have Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200BG wireless network card which I use successfully. I have the following iwi related entries in rc.conf: ## Intel Wireless Adapter settings iwi_enable="YES" iwi_interfaces="iwi0" iwi_mode="bss" ifconfig_iwi0="ssid **** DHCP" This used to bring up my iwi0 interface at boot time and I had a working internet connection after the machine had booted. However, this morning I did "make world" (attaching cvsup files for the kernel and ports for completeness). The iwi firmware was not loaded at boot time and the following messages are given: $ dmesg | grep iwi iwi0: mem 0xb0101000-0xb0101fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6 iwi0: Reserved 0x1000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xb0101000 iwi0: bpf attached iwi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:ce:0c:45:a1 iwi0: bpf attached iwi0: bpf attached iwi0: [MPSAFE] iwi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps iwi0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps iwi0: Please load firmware I have to manually load the firmrare invoking the following commands as root: # iwicontrol -i iwi0 -d /boot/firmware -m bss # ifconfig iwi0 up Could you please advise me how I can load automatically the firmware during boot time? Regards Ivan P.S. Here is the output of uname -a: FreeBSD ****.**** 6.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Tue Sep 26 13:13:00 EEST 2006 root@****.****:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com ------=_Part_2826_31528245.1159270566845 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=cvsupfile Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_esk7fwp9 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="cvsupfile" KmRlZmF1bHQgaG9zdD1jdnN1cDgudXMuRnJlZUJTRC5vcmcKKmRlZmF1bHQgcHJlZml4PS91c3IK KmRlZmF1bHQgYmFzZT0vdmFyL2RiCipkZWZhdWx0IHJlbGVhc2U9Y3ZzCipkZWZhdWx0IGRlbGV0 ZSB1c2UtcmVsLXN1ZmZpeAoqZGVmYXVsdCBjb21wcmVzcwoqZGVmYXVsdCB0YWc9UkVMRU5HXzZf MQoKc3JjLWFsbApkb2MtYWxsCg== ------=_Part_2826_31528245.1159270566845 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=portsupfile Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_esk7g7ma Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="portsupfile" IyAkRnJlZUJTRDogc3JjL3NoYXJlL2V4YW1wbGVzL2N2c3VwL3BvcnRzLXN1cGZpbGUsdiAxLjMz LjIuMSAyMDA1LzExLzA5IDEwOjE1OjIwIHBhdiBFeHAgJAojCiMgVGhpcyBmaWxlIGNvbnRhaW5z IGFsbCBvZiB0aGUgIkNWU3VwIGNvbGxlY3Rpb25zIiB0aGF0IG1ha2UgdXAgdGhlCiMgRnJlZUJT RC1jdXJyZW50IHBvcnRzIGNvbGxlY3Rpb24uCiMKIyBDVlN1cCAoQ1ZTIFVwZGF0ZSBQcm90b2Nv bCkgYWxsb3dzIHlvdSB0byBkb3dubG9hZCB0aGUgbGF0ZXN0IENWUwojIHRyZWUgKG9yIGFueSBi cmFuY2ggb2YgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQgdGhlcmVmcm9tKSB0byB5b3VyIHN5c3RlbSBlYXNpbHkKIyBh bmQgZWZmaWNpZW50bHkgKGZhciBtb3JlIHNvIHRoYW4gd2l0aCBzdXAsIHdoaWNoIENWU3VwIGlz IGFpbWVkCiMgYXQgcmVwbGFjaW5nKS4gIElmIHlvdSdyZSBydW5uaW5nIENWU3VwIGludGVyYWN0 aXZlbHksIGFuZCBhcmUKIyBjdXJyZW50bHkgdXNpbmcgYW4gWCBkaXNwbGF5IHNlcnZlciwgeW91 IHNob3VsZCBydW4gQ1ZTdXAgYXMgZm9sbG93cwojIHRvIGtlZXAgeW91ciBDVlMgdHJlZSB1cC10 by1kYXRlOgojCiMJY3ZzdXAgcG9ydHMtc3VwZmlsZQojCiMgSWYgbm90IHJ1bm5pbmcgWCwgb3Ig aW52b2tpbmcgY3ZzdXAgZnJvbSBhIG5vbi1pbnRlcmFjdGl2ZSBzY3JpcHQsIHRoZW4KIyBydW4g aXQgYXMgZm9sbG93czoKIwojCWN2c3VwIC1nIC1MIDIgcG9ydHMtc3VwZmlsZQojCiMgWW91IG1h eSB3aXNoIHRvIGNoYW5nZSBzb21lIG9mIHRoZSBzZXR0aW5ncyBpbiB0aGlzIGZpbGUgdG8gYmV0 dGVyCiMgc3VpdCB5b3VyIHN5c3RlbToKIwojIGhvc3Q9Q0hBTkdFX1RISVMuRnJlZUJTRC5vcmcK IwkJVGhpcyBzcGVjaWZpZXMgdGhlIHNlcnZlciBob3N0IHdoaWNoIHdpbGwgc3VwcGx5IHRoZQoj CQlmaWxlIHVwZGF0ZXMuICBZb3UgbXVzdCBjaGFuZ2UgaXQgdG8gb25lIG9mIHRoZSBDVlN1cAoj CQltaXJyb3Igc2l0ZXMgbGlzdGVkIGluIHRoZSBGcmVlQlNEIEhhbmRib29rIGF0CiMJCWh0dHA6 Ly93d3cuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvZG9jL2hhbmRib29rL21pcnJvcnMuaHRtbC4KIwkJWW91IGNhbglv dmVycmlkZSB0aGlzIHNldHRpbmcgb24gdGhlIGNvbW1hbmQgbGluZQojCQl3aXRoIGN2c3VwJ3Mg Ii1oIGhvc3QiIG9wdGlvbi4KIwojIGJhc2U9L3Zhci9kYgojCQlUaGlzIHNwZWNpZmllcyB0aGUg cm9vdCB3aGVyZSBDVlN1cCB3aWxsIHN0b3JlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uCiMJCWFib3V0IHRoZSBjb2xs ZWN0aW9ucyB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0cmFuc2ZlcnJlZCB0byB5b3VyIHN5c3RlbS4KIwkJQSBzZXR0aW5n IG9mICIvdmFyL2RiIiB3aWxsIGdlbmVyYXRlIHRoaXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaW4KIwkJL3Zhci9k Yi9zdXAuICBFdmVuIGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgQ1ZTdXBwaW5nIGEgbGFyZ2UgbnVtYmVyIG9mCiMJCWNv bGxlY3Rpb25zLCB5b3Ugd2lsbCBiZSBoYXJkIHByZXNzZWQgdG8gZ2VuZXJhdGUgbW9yZSB0aGFu CiMJCX4xTUIgb2YgZGF0YSBpbiB0aGlzIGRpcmVjdG9yeS4gIFlvdSBjYW4gb3ZlcnJpZGUgdGhl CiMJCSJiYXNlIiBzZXR0aW5nIG9uIHRoZSBjb21tYW5kIGxpbmUgd2l0aCBjdnN1cCdzICItYiBi YXNlIgojCQlvcHRpb24uICBUaGlzIGRpcmVjdG9yeSBtdXN0IGV4aXN0IGluIG9yZGVyIHRvIHJ1 biBDVlN1cC4KIwojIHByZWZpeD0vdXNyCiMJCVRoaXMgc3BlY2lmaWVzIHdoZXJlIHRvIHBsYWNl IHRoZSByZXF1ZXN0ZWQgZmlsZXMuICBBCiMJCXNldHRpbmcgb2YgIi91c3IiIHdpbGwgcGxhY2Ug YWxsIG9mIHRoZSBmaWxlcyByZXF1ZXN0ZWQKIwkJaW4gIi91c3IvcG9ydHMiIChlLmcuLCAiL3Vz ci9wb3J0cy9kZXZlbCIsICIvdXNyL3BvcnRzL2xhbmciKS4KIwkJVGhlIHByZWZpeCBkaXJlY3Rv cnkgbXVzdCBleGlzdCBpbiBvcmRlciB0byBydW4gQ1ZTdXAuCgojIERlZmF1bHRzIHRoYXQgYXBw bHkgdG8gYWxsIHRoZSBjb2xsZWN0aW9ucwojCiMgSU1QT1JUQU5UOiBDaGFuZ2UgdGhlIG5leHQg bGluZSB0byB1c2Ugb25lIG9mIHRoZSBDVlN1cCBtaXJyb3Igc2l0ZXMKIyBsaXN0ZWQgYXQgaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9kb2MvaGFuZGJvb2svbWlycm9ycy5odG1sLgoqZGVmYXVsdCBo b3N0PWN2c3VwOC5GcmVlQlNELm9yZwoqZGVmYXVsdCBiYXNlPS92YXIvZGIKKmRlZmF1bHQgcHJl Zml4PS91c3IKKmRlZmF1bHQgcmVsZWFzZT1jdnMgCipkZWZhdWx0IHRhZz0uCipkZWZhdWx0IGRl bGV0ZSB1c2UtcmVsLXN1ZmZpeAoKIyBJZiB5b3Ugc2VlbSB0byBiZSBsaW1pdGVkIGJ5IENQVSBy YXRoZXIgdGhhbiBuZXR3b3JrIG9yIGRpc2sgYmFuZHdpZHRoLCB0cnkKIyBjb21tZW50aW5nIG91 dCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGxpbmUuICAoTm9ybWFsbHksIHRvZGF5J3MgQ1BVcyBhcmUgZmFzdCBl bm91Z2gKIyB0aGF0IHlvdSB3YW50IHRvIHJ1biBjb21wcmVzc2lvbi4pCipkZWZhdWx0IGNvbXBy ZXNzCgojIyBQb3J0cyBDb2xsZWN0aW9uLgojCiMgVGhlIGVhc2llc3Qgd2F5IHRvIGdldCB0aGUg cG9ydHMgdHJlZSBpcyB0byB1c2UgdGhlICJwb3J0cy1hbGwiCiMgbWVnYS1jb2xsZWN0aW9uLiAg SXQgaW5jbHVkZXMgYWxsIG9mIHRoZSBpbmRpdmlkdWFsICJwb3J0cy0qIgojIGNvbGxlY3Rpb25z LApwb3J0cy1hbGwKCiMgVGhlc2UgYXJlIHRoZSBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIGNvbGxlY3Rpb25zIHRoYXQg bWFrZSB1cCAicG9ydHMtYWxsIi4gIElmIHlvdQojIHVzZSB0aGVzZSwgYmUgc3VyZSB0byBjb21t ZW50IG91dCAicG9ydHMtYWxsIiBhYm92ZS4KIwojIEJlIHN1cmUgdG8gQUxXQVlTIGN2c3VwIHRo ZSBwb3J0cy1iYXNlIGNvbGxlY3Rpb24gaWYgeW91IHVzZSBhbnkgb2YgdGhlCiMgb3RoZXIgaW5k aXZpZHVhbCBjb2xsZWN0aW9ucyBiZWxvdy4gcG9ydHMtYmFzZSBpcyBhIG1hbmRhdG9yeSBjb2xs ZWN0aW9uCiMgZm9yIHRoZSBwb3J0cyBjb2xsZWN0aW9uLCBhbmQgeW91ciBwb3J0cyBtYXkgbm90 IGJ1aWxkIGNvcnJlY3RseSBpZiBpdAojIGlzIG5vdCBrZXB0IHVwIHRvIGRhdGUuCiNwb3J0cy1i YXNlCiNwb3J0cy1hY2Nlc3NpYmlsaXR5CiNwb3J0cy1hcmFiaWMKI3BvcnRzLWFyY2hpdmVycwoj cG9ydHMtYXN0cm8KI3BvcnRzLWF1ZGlvCiNwb3J0cy1iZW5jaG1hcmtzCiNwb3J0cy1iaW9sb2d5 CiNwb3J0cy1jYWQKI3BvcnRzLWNoaW5lc2UKI3BvcnRzLWNvbW1zCiNwb3J0cy1jb252ZXJ0ZXJz CiNwb3J0cy1kYXRhYmFzZXMKI3BvcnRzLWRlc2t1dGlscwojcG9ydHMtZGV2ZWwKI3BvcnRzLWRu cwojcG9ydHMtZWRpdG9ycwojcG9ydHMtZW11bGF0b3JzCiNwb3J0cy1maW5hbmNlCiNwb3J0cy1m cmVuY2gKI3BvcnRzLWZ0cAojcG9ydHMtZ2FtZXMKI3BvcnRzLWdlcm1hbgojcG9ydHMtZ3JhcGhp Y3MKI3BvcnRzLWhlYnJldwojcG9ydHMtaHVuZ2FyaWFuCiNwb3J0cy1pcmMKI3BvcnRzLWphcGFu ZXNlCiNwb3J0cy1qYXZhCiNwb3J0cy1rb3JlYW4KI3BvcnRzLWxhbmcKI3BvcnRzLW1haWwKI3Bv cnRzLW1hdGgKI3BvcnRzLW1ib25lCiNwb3J0cy1taXNjCiNwb3J0cy1tdWx0aW1lZGlhCiNwb3J0 cy1uZXQKI3BvcnRzLW5ldC1pbQojcG9ydHMtbmV0LW1nbXQKI3BvcnRzLW5ld3MKI3BvcnRzLXBh bG0KI3BvcnRzLXBvbGlzaAojcG9ydHMtcG9ydHVndWVzZQojcG9ydHMtcHJpbnQKI3BvcnRzLXJ1 c3NpYW4KI3BvcnRzLXNjaWVuY2UKI3BvcnRzLXNlY3VyaXR5CiNwb3J0cy1zaGVsbHMKI3BvcnRz LXN5c3V0aWxzCiNwb3J0cy10ZXh0cHJvYwojcG9ydHMtdWtyYWluaWFuCiNwb3J0cy12aWV0bmFt ZXNlCiNwb3J0cy13d3cKI3BvcnRzLXgxMQojcG9ydHMteDExLWNsb2NrcwojcG9ydHMteDExLWZt CiNwb3J0cy14MTEtZm9udHMKI3BvcnRzLXgxMS1zZXJ2ZXJzCiNwb3J0cy14MTEtdGhlbWVzCiNw b3J0cy14MTEtdG9vbGtpdHMKI3BvcnRzLXgxMS13bQo= ------=_Part_2826_31528245.1159270566845-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 11:39:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D2316A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: from web27207.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web27207.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.182.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2794C43DB9 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:39:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 32138 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Sep 2006 11:39:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pxXZBJVjmEvCjKoc3WGIZPsVer3N9PVfviXbaPhhrTl0bqtA6t3napYzn+Kz6aArCiA2n4pCJol5jHVj1/utlSO3npe3jsvogZU6HquyN930N7WBg14UUI+01BH8YEXJcIvHQ6yCGZen1+/LGkkyywPsbFQpt7p/qMayUdP992g= ; Message-ID: <20060926113920.32135.qmail@web27207.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [81.57.37.99] by web27207.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:39:20 CEST Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Desmond Coughlan To: Erik Norgaard In-Reply-To: <4519076F.5090104@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE : Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:39:59 -0000 Fanastic... the thing was staring me in the face all along! I shan't be able to try another install until tomorrow morning, but I have a feeling that you guys have put your finger on the problem!! Thanks! D. --------------------------------- Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. Cliquez ici. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 12:14:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB0616A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E2743D7E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:14:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 992 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2006 12:14:35 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Sep 2006 12:14:35 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 879DC2842D; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:14:34 -0400 (EDT) To: Michael S References: <20060925123908.20989.qmail@web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:14:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060925123908.20989.qmail@web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com> (Michael S.'s message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <441wpyeset.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: calendar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:14:36 -0000 Michael S writes: > Where does one get an updated calendar.judaic? Mine seems to be out of sync. Nobody's maintaining that file these days. Because the holidays are scheduled on a whole different calendar, they need to be recalculated every year. A tool that actually understands the Hebrew calendar would avoid this problem to some extent; see the calendar functions in emacs for an example. Please feel free to submit the annual updates for the file... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 12:40:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B621616A585 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listuser@mb-itconsulting.com) Received: from smtp-out.kontent.com (smtp-out001.kontent.com [81.88.40.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84F943D78 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listuser@mb-itconsulting.com) Received: from [192.168.0.121] (xdsl-87-78-5-67.netcologne.de [87.78.5.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out.kontent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B096937C199 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:40:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45191FB2.9040906@mb-itconsulting.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:40:18 +0200 From: Martin Brecher User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050809) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: X11 clipboard problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:40:29 -0000 Hello, - I have the following problem: box1 : FreeBSD 6.2-BETA with Xorg box2 : FreeBSD 4.11 with XFree 4.3 When I ssh from box1 into box2 using X11Forwarding and launch an application, for example Mozilla, on box2, I cannot copy and paste between the applications running on box1 and the application(s) running on box2. The clipboard just doesn't work. (AFAIK I have never encountered this problem before, but I will try this with one of my old SparcStations soon.) A search on Google revealed that this has happened to a few people on non-BSD systems, too; but I could not find any information on how to solve this, nor any work-around. Any tips or hints? Greetings, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 13:00:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D2816A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sec05@webstyle.ch) Received: from zaphod.webstyle.ch (zaphod.webstyle.ch [212.103.68.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAEC643D49 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:00:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sec05@webstyle.ch) Received: (qmail 7306 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2006 13:00:13 -0000 Received: from [192.168.254.208] ([212.60.61.188]) by zaphod.webstyle.ch ([212.103.68.4]) with ESMTP via TCP; 26 Sep 2006 13:00:13 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:00:20 +0200 From: Security Mailinglists To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060926145545.7ED9.SEC05@webstyle.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.26 [en] Subject: HP DL380 G5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sec05@webstyle.ch List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:00:17 -0000 Hi, Did someone already test freeBSD on the new Hewlett Packard DL380 G5 Servers with 2 or more CPUs in it? cheers Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 13:38:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B89D16A416 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D88E143D66 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:38:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: (qmail 70303 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2006 13:38:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gondolin.mikestammer.com) (mikestammer@sbcglobal.net@75.2.247.121 with login) by smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2006 13:38:18 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gondolin.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2C94D for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:38:18 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mikestammer.com Received: from gondolin.mikestammer.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gondolin.middleearth.mikestammer.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7T2X0B8Gu-oS for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:38:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eric) by gondolin.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF5131 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:38:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <45192D48.6090308@mikestammer.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:38:16 -0500 From: Eric User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'FreeBSD Questions' References: <4518B028.6000104@aeternal.net> In-Reply-To: <4518B028.6000104@aeternal.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: dovecot port not compiling with mysql support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:38:24 -0000 Martin Hudec wrote: > Hello all, > > > as I am experiencing serious performance degradation while using dovecot > (extremely high cpu usage), I've tried to recompile it without kqueue > support as it seems to be the root cause (this issue is being solved in > dovecot maillist), but I am getting error while wanting to compile with > MySQL support in driver-mysql.c (please see below for more information). > > Is there someone experiencing the same issue? Or should I file pr? i believe they just checked in an update to rc7 for dovecot with the fix for high kqueue loads yesterday. Update your ports tree and you should see it. The check in notes specifically mentioned the kqueue fix. as to the MySQL, not sure there as i dont use it with dovecot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 14:40:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C59B16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:40:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don.munyak@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D7743D58 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:40:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don.munyak@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2255956wxd for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Y1QDY218irc6FRIQOWM45rSCU/l06pnMXb0Jk3/FpnqzgIKy4xJipQduufP/Y09OgR4AehUG7w2dY4eOKzuWZDiVgLVec1YFbTlElUNMhabZJ2knHt1PDRbX3YX5ZgvCifWT8zKUcMgjEuYBL+HbI4+j1QlqD/jGPw7m4KcEI3M= Received: by 10.90.93.6 with SMTP id q6mr1197502agb; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.106.10 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:40:45 -0400 From: "Don Munyak" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: ezjails, jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:40:46 -0000 re: ezjails, jails Hopefully a quick question. I am researching using EZJails from http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/ But a little confused by the jail concept. I think I need to setup two jails, one(1) for email services and one(1) for www services, on a single server. q. If I am running a webserver for more than one(1) domain, should I be using a single jail for each domain, or is one jail needed for 'ALL' www processing ? q. If I am using a jail for each domain, does this imply loading apache+php+mysql, for each www jail ? q. Likewise with email and multiple domains, does multiple domains = multiple email jails, as well as multiple copies of smtp, pop3, webmail ?? q. Email and WWW services both require MySQL. Would I be installing MySQL 'x' number of times? What I want to do is he following: We are a small company, so email traffic is minial..ie. less than 500 messages per day. Likewise, www traffic is also minimal. I want to build a single server to be located at a co-location facility. This server would support both email and www services. The email services would be built using instructions from http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster.shtml ...that being stuff like qmail, RBL, spamassassin, clamav...etc We have 5 separate domains for email services The www services would be functionally similiar to LAMP We have 5 separate domains for www I would greatly appreciate any links or advice towards achiving my goals. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 14:53:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC75216A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from computertech27@ne.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655BB43D78 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from computertech27@ne.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.2.74] (cpe-66-65-213-14.nycap.res.rr.com [66.65.213.14]) by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QErBvF007476 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:53:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <45193E72.7020309@ne.rr.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:51:30 -0400 From: Mathew Stahl User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: Subject: freeBSD 6.1 how to setup network file sharing on my home network between a win xp box and my BSD Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:53:14 -0000 Hi, I am a BSD newbie. I have used linux for years from Redhat 7.0 to 9.0 and SuSE 9.1 to 10.1. I was able to setup samba very easily on redhat 9.0 and below but could never get it to work on SuSE and I just installed FreeBSD 6.1 on my dell laptop and I am wondering if any one has any tips on how to set it up (correctly) so I can share files between my win xp Desktop and my BSD laptop over a wireless network connection. Anyhelp would be greatly appreciated!! Thank you in advance, Mathew Stahl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:03:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979FC16A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B949A43D82 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QF2GWY082970; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:02:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8QF2FVU082969; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:02:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:02:15 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Desmond Coughlan Message-ID: <20060926150215.GA82870@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:03:52 -0000 On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:09:05AM +0200, Desmond Coughlan wrote: > Hi, > I hope that I'm not sending this to the wrong list, or that the question > hasn't already been answered. > > I'm trying to install 6.1-RELEASE onto a Pentium-3. > > I had a lot of trouble creating the diskettes, but after changing the > floppy drive, no problem. Now, when I do the install, I have two hard > drives, and configure them as follows... > > disk0 > 150M / > 512M /etc > 512M /etc > 512M /var > 1024M /bin > 4096M /usr > 1024M swap > > disk1 > 4096M /forums > 4096M /mail > 4096M /sql > 1024M swap > > I go through the installation, via ftp, and then set the root password. > Oh, and the 'FreeBSD boot manager' is the option I choose, when configuring > the disks. This exact same question and situation was on the list about a week ago from someone else. You should check out recent archives. Anyway, my guess was that you must not make /etc a separate file system. It should remain as part of / (root). When the installation is going on, the system is really working from a different root and kernel and everything - one from the floppy or CD or in a 'memory' file system. That includes a special separate /etc directory. After the install, when the system is booting, it first mounts only root in a special Read Only state. It takes a wild guess that root is in partition 'a' of the boot slice - which is required so it is a true guess. But, then it tries to do a remount rw and to read /etc/fstab and maybe some other files to find out what to do for the rest of the boot, but since only root is mounted, it cannot find /etc/fstab because /etc is not mounted. So, you need to leave etc as part of root. This was initially a shot in the dark suggestion by me when this problem was posted a week ago, but the previous poster with that problem wrote back and said redoing the partitioning without a separate /etc solved the problem for him. So, my suggestions on the above are to get rid of the separate /etc partitions and to increase your /var to at least double. I also noted that you have '/etc' listed twice, but I was assuming that is a typo. If not, well, you can't do that - have two partitions mounted at the same mount point - at least not and still make use of both of them. ////jerry ps. You do not need 512 MB for /etc. Mine uses up only about 1.6 MB > > When I reboot, this is what I see ... > > Manual root filesystem specification > : Mount using filesystem eg > ufs:da0s1a > ? List valid disk boot devices > Abort manual imput > > ... and that's it. > > Nothing else. The machine just sits there. > > Is there something I've missed ? We've tried the same install on three different machines, using three different motherboards, and four different hard drives. Something is wrong, either with the installation media, or else with our method of going about it. Oh, and I tried installing 5.5 on the same machines, with the same result. > > FreeBSD rocks; I've used it for a long time on many different machines, and this is the first time that this has happened. > > Could someone suggest a solution? The people with whom I'm installing this, are starting to whisper the word 'Linux', and it's giving me nightmares.... :( > > Thanks. > > D.C > > > > --------------------------------- > D?couvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/R?ponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos exp?riences. Cliquez ici. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:08:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F2516A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: from smtpout05-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout05-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C3B743D6D for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: (qmail 23546 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2006 15:08:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (67.32.30.234) by smtpout05-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.221) with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2006 15:08:42 -0000 In-Reply-To: <45193E72.7020309@ne.rr.com> References: <45193E72.7020309@ne.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <32E67412-A6A5-4852-8DE1-4F81D29C96BC@hackmiester.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "hackmiester (Hunter Fuller)" Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:08:39 -0500 To: Mathew Stahl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: freeBSD 6.1 how to setup network file sharing on my home network between a win xp box and my BSD Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:08:45 -0000 Install it using ports (read the handbook). On 26 September 2006, at 09:51, Mathew Stahl wrote: > Hi, > I am a BSD newbie. I have used linux for years from Redhat 7.0 to > 9.0 and SuSE 9.1 to 10.1. I was able to setup samba very easily on > redhat 9.0 and below but could never get it to work on SuSE and I > just installed FreeBSD 6.1 on my dell laptop and I am wondering if > any one has any tips on how to set it up (correctly) so I can share > files between my win xp Desktop and my BSD laptop over a wireless > network connection. Anyhelp would be greatly appreciated!! > > Thank you in advance, > > Mathew Stahl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) yknow when you go to a party, and everyones hooked up except one guy and one girl and so they look at each other like.. do we have to? intel & nvidia must be lookin at each other like that right now Phone Voice: +1 251 589 6348 Fax: Call the voice number and ask. Email General chat: hackmiester@hackmiester.com Large attachments: hackmiester@gmail.com SPS-related stuff: hfuller@stpaulsmobile.net IM AIM: hackmiester1337 Skype: hackmiester31337 YIM: hackm1ester Gtalk: hackmiester MSN: hackmiester@hackmiester.com Xfire: hackmiester From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:14:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7627916A4E1 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C020243D90 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QFCX9c083012; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:12:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8QFCWA4083011; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:12:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:12:32 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Desmond Coughlan Message-ID: <20060926151232.GB82870@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:14:05 -0000 On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:09:05AM +0200, Desmond Coughlan wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to install 6.1-RELEASE onto a Pentium-3. > > I had a lot of trouble creating the diskettes, but after changing the floppy drive, no problem. Now, when I do the install, I have two hard drives, and configure them as follows... > > disk0 > 150M / > 512M /etc > 512M /etc > 512M /var > 1024M /bin > 4096M /usr > 1024M swap > > disk1 > 4096M /forums > 4096M /mail > 4096M /sql > 1024M swap > > I go through the installation, via ftp, and then set the root password. Oh, and the 'FreeBSD boot manager' is the option I choose, when configuring the disks. > > When I reboot, this is what I see ... Oh, I just noticed you did that with /bin too. That must be left as part of root as well. It contains binaries that the system may/will need to use during the boot process or when the system is in single user mode and only root is mounted. So, also leave /bin in root. Also, /bin doesn't need to be nearly that big. Mine uses up only 900 KB of space - that is Kilo bytes, not even megabytes. No other installs put things in /bin. It is reserved for those essential binaries for minimal service while bringing up or fixing a problem with a system. /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin are where other things get installed. See 'man hier' for a more complete description on how the directory structure is laid out and used in FreeBSD. So, don't reserve space for /bin. Give that extra GByte to either /var or /usr. ////jerry > Manual root filesystem specification > : Mount using filesystem eg > ufs:da0s1a > ? List valid disk boot devices > Abort manual imput > > ... and that's it. > > Nothing else. The machine just sits there. > > Is there something I've missed ? We've tried the same install on three different machines, using three different motherboards, and four different hard drives. Something is wrong, either with the installation media, or else with our method of going about it. Oh, and I tried installing 5.5 on the same machines, with the same result. > > FreeBSD rocks; I've used it for a long time on many different machines, and this is the first time that this has happened. > > Could someone suggest a solution? The people with whom I'm installing this, are starting to whisper the word 'Linux', and it's giving me nightmares.... :( > > Thanks. > > D.C > > > > --------------------------------- > D?couvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/R?ponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos exp?riences. Cliquez ici. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130DC16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE8B43D70 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:24:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QFMw0R083059; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:22:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8QFMsQn083058; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:22:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:22:54 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Desmond Coughlan Message-ID: <20060926152254.GC82870@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060926090905.58283.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:24:39 -0000 On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:09:05AM +0200, Desmond Coughlan wrote: > Hi, > I hope that I'm not sending this to the wrong list, or that the question hasn't already been answered. > > I'm trying to install 6.1-RELEASE onto a Pentium-3. > > I had a lot of trouble creating the diskettes, but after changing the floppy drive, no problem. Now, when I do the install, I have two hard drives, and configure them as follows... > > disk0 > 150M / > 512M /etc > 512M /etc > 512M /var > 1024M /bin > 4096M /usr > 1024M swap > > disk1 > 4096M /forums > 4096M /mail > 4096M /sql > 1024M swap I just noticed yet another thing. You do not have a /tmp partition. Although it is not essential to have a separate /tmp, it is a good thing because many thing write to it, often unexpectedly and if it happens to grow fast, it could fill up root and cause the system to hang. So, putting it in its own separate partition helps protect the rest of the system if some process starts to run away with things. So, my over all suggestions are now. Get rid of the separate /etc and /bin partitions. Leave them in root. Then give the 512 MB to /tmp and the 1024 MB to /var. I also notice that you do not create an obvious place for user's home directories. Maybe you do not expect to have regular user accounts, so that is OK. But, if you do, it is often a good idea to create a large partition for those to keep them somewhat isolated for the general operation of the system. I usually make a separate /home partition. I wonder what you intend to do with a 4 GB /mail partition. If it is for user accounts to keep mail, then maybe that should instead be the /home partition to contain users' accounts home directories. Just a thought. Sheesh, if I would read more carefully the first time, I could save some retyping and network traffic. But, I get so many Emails that I have to try and rush through them. Anyway, good luck, ////jerry > > I go through the installation, via ftp, and then set the root password. Oh, and the 'FreeBSD boot manager' is the option I choose, when configuring the disks. > > When I reboot, this is what I see ... > > Manual root filesystem specification > : Mount using filesystem eg > ufs:da0s1a > ? List valid disk boot devices > Abort manual imput > > ... and that's it. > > Nothing else. The machine just sits there. > > Is there something I've missed ? We've tried the same install on three different machines, using three different motherboards, and four different hard drives. Something is wrong, either with the installation media, or else with our method of going about it. Oh, and I tried installing 5.5 on the same machines, with the same result. > > FreeBSD rocks; I've used it for a long time on many different machines, and this is the first time that this has happened. > > Could someone suggest a solution? The people with whom I'm installing this, are starting to whisper the word 'Linux', and it's giving me nightmares.... :( > > Thanks. > > D.C > > > > --------------------------------- > D?couvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/R?ponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos exp?riences. Cliquez ici. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:30:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2933816A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C0B43DAD for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:29:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1GSEsD-000PJt-Tn; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:29:30 -0600 In-Reply-To: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> References: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-100-588742928; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <6C691926-15F6-44BC-AC6B-3D362D560801@shire.net> From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:29:29 -0600 To: Don Munyak X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ezjails, jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:30:03 -0000 --Apple-Mail-100-588742928 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hi On Sep 26, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Don Munyak wrote: > re: ezjails, jails > > Hopefully a quick question. I am researching using EZJails from > http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/ > > But a little confused by the jail concept. > > I think I need to setup two jails, one(1) for email services and > one(1) for www services, on a single server. That will work > > q. If I am running a webserver for more than one(1) domain, should I > be using a single jail for each domain, or is one jail needed for > 'ALL' www processing ? Up to you. Each jail requires its own IP address. There are things that people do with jails with private IPs and packet forwarding and stuff, but to keep it simple, consider that each jail needs an IP address (public). If you have lots of them, and if each domain is something someone else runs, or is based on totally different SW, then you might consider separating them. If you own and run each domain and they use a similar SW menu, then you may just run them out of one jail using apache virtual hosts. > > q. If I am using a jail for each domain, does this imply loading > apache+php+mysql, for each www jail ? Yes. There are ways to share but until you are comfortable with jails and what you are doing, it is easier to just load each one up separately. We run a ton of jails, one for each customer, and we share SW across them in our own "/usr/public" read only area with each jail having its own /usr/local/etc but to get it to work requires some configuration work and understanding how it all works and some other trickery... > > q. Likewise with email and multiple domains, does multiple domains = > multiple email jails, as well as multiple copies of smtp, pop3, > webmail ?? You could but in most cases there is no reason to do that. Run them all in 1 jail using one set of SW. Set up your SMTP server to support multiple domains (I recommend exim). > > q. Email and WWW services both require MySQL. Would I be installing > MySQL 'x' number of times? Depends on how the SW accesses mysql but you can run multiple mysql DBs out of one installation... Chad > > What I want to do is he following: > > We are a small company, so email traffic is minial..ie. less than 500 > messages per day. > Likewise, www traffic is also minimal. > I want to build a single server to be located at a co-location > facility. > This server would support both email and www services. > > The email services would be built using instructions from > http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster.shtml > ...that being stuff like qmail, RBL, spamassassin, clamav...etc > We have 5 separate domains for email services > The www services would be functionally similiar to LAMP > We have 5 separate domains for www > > I would greatly appreciate any links or advice towards achiving my > goals. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net --Apple-Mail-100-588742928-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:30:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97CF16A4D1 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE1243D95 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8QFTrAU080336; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:29:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060926101822.021c39b0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:29:34 -0500 To: john@cruzweb.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <4518BCCE.5050902@cruzweb.net> References: <4518BCCE.5050902@cruzweb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Creating New Users over Telnet/SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:30:36 -0000 You can gather the information with a shell script and send the arguments to pw which you can run via sudo. However you will need to replace the normal process running the login (telnetd or sshd) and pass the login information to that daemon or create a new user depending on the input data. -Derek At 12:38 AM 9/26/2006, John Cruz wrote: >So a friend of mine is interested in creating a FreeBSD telnet/SSH box for >people in his networking class to screw with. He said he wants to do >something like what happens when you telnet into >sdf.*lonestar.org *and if you're a new user you just type new and go from >there, but I've never done this or looked into it, so I was wondering if >any of you had any ideas on how to do this. > >Basically, > >User telnets to the server. if they have a username and password, they put >it in. If they don't, then they are taken to a place where they can create >a new account (on lonestar, it says it's taking you to a "NEWUSER mkacct >server" to do this then asks me to put in FEP commands for creating shell >accounts) > >It gives you the options and disclaimer and such and you have to agree >then choose a username. > >Then it asks you more questions like zip code and password and such and it >finally creates your user account, you can then log in to the system. > >Lonestar is using netBSD, we are going to use FreeBSD 6.1 > >Any info on how to accomplish this is greatly appreciated. > >-John Cruz >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:31:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7164716A4B3 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odilist@sonic.net) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0982A43D80 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from odilist@sonic.net) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (69-12-157-6.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [69.12.157.6]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k8QFVWib005784 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:31:32 -0700 From: Oliver Iberien To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:31:32 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609260831.32610.odilist@sonic.net> Subject: KDE and libflashplayer - help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:31:33 -0000 I've followed the instructions at http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php. libmap.conf contains: [/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/libflashplayer.so] libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.2 libdl.so.2 pluginwrapper/flash7.so libz.so.1 libz.so.3 libm.so.6 libm.so.4 libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/flash7.so And (having looked through this list's archives) ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/flashplayer.xpt /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins/flashplayer.xpt But konqueror doesn't see a plugin either in the /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/ or /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/ folders. Firefox does nothing. And there I am stuck. What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:54:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD41216A47C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech.junk@verizon.net) Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3988243D5C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:54:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech.junk@verizon.net) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([71.255.112.144]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J6700LKMIHDMJRB@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:46:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:46:29 -0400 From: sean To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060824) Subject: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:54:57 -0000 Can anyone recommend a pdf editor, hopefully one in ports? I just need to change a line in an existing file. Thanks Sean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 15:56:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20C916A412 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [65.122.236.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07C743DCE for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:56:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from Anne (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [65.122.236.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04228 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:56:32 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060926090533.083a2a88@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:32:40 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Best way to "renice" a process by name? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:56:54 -0000 I'm working with a machine that's operating as a NAT router and recursive DNS resolver and is also running the Squid disk cache. Squid, in turn, spawns the "diskd" daemon, which does disk accesses on behalf of Squid. When Squid spawns diskd, it gives it a priority level 6 greater than itself. In other words, if Squid is launched normally, it gets a priority of 2 (normal) while diskd gets a priority of -4 (very high). Unfortunately, diskd is not an efficient user of CPU (it seems to be polling for I/O completion) and is starving other processes on the machine (for example, natd) which need to operate in near real time. I'd like to keep diskd running on that machine, because having disk access done by a separate process is very efficient -- even more so if the system uses SMP. But I need to re-prioritize Squid and diskd to keep the rest of the machine functional. In particular, I'd like to nice Squid down by 1 (so that natd and named have priority over it) and have diskd run at standard priority (so that it can't starve other processes). This will keep diskd at a higher priority than Squid itself, which in turn will hopefully prevent message queues from overflowing. Reducing Squid's priority is simple; I can just edit the script that starts Squid so that /usr/bin/nice is used to invoke it. But taming diskd is more difficult, because diskd is a child process of Squid. I have to make sure it has started (which may require a delay loop), find out its PID, and then "renice" it by whatever increment is required to get it to the system's standard priority (2 by convention). Is there a "renice by name" utility for FreeBSD (sort of an equivalent of "killall")? I could gin one up, but since this seems like something that people would want to do frequently, find it hard to believe that someone hasn't already written one. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 16:04:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5791316A416 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: from web27215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web27215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.182.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80C9043D55 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:04:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 77320 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Sep 2006 16:04:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EqGYvZ5jOcJU9W4T8fR2UTezE6a8LnaTeA9XXbI5hL9dZzRfsXPkPZCDSVBE/JnZHAc7ySVoUOzLNPUjgrsCVywXf8cUweyg1yu6ojKlIB0SeSuCJadVV9CrQXKrgjLBGQAkxYtd68PhDaQA39BATN6sASQlT/ybRCfp2p2Hay8= ; Message-ID: <20060926160445.77318.qmail@web27215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [82.123.40.180] by web27215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:04:45 CEST Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:04:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Desmond Coughlan To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20060926152254.GC82870@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE : Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:04:47 -0000 No need to apologise (I should apologise for snipping everything to which I reply, but I'm using IE and it puts all those hypertext junkie things in...), as the mistake was mine. You might have noticed that I listed two /etc slices ... in fact, one of them was supposed to read '/tmp'. I also screwed up the sizes, but I suppose that that isn't so important..... Oh, and I forgot to include '/home'. There are undoubtedly some more errors... :) For info, just so you get an idea of what I want to do: we're trying to build a mail server for this non-profit organisation. There are currently 120 persons who will have a mail account. That number will grow to 200 at the most. Then once that's up and running, I fancy giving them a forum space, along the lines of .. hum.. let me try to find a similar one on the Internet .... Try this ... http://www.developpez.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=37 So on the second disk drive, which is around.. 20GB, IIRC, we want /mail, /sql and /forums, and maybe 512M of swap. On the first, system files etc. and swap. I used to tinker around with postgreSQL, so that'll be what we'll be using. How does that sound? D. --------------------------------- Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. Cliquez ici. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 16:05:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C3516A47E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n054.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1118.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8639243D53 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:05:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n054.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 45193A7900006E10; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:04:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> References: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:04:46 -0700 To: Don Munyak X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ezjails, jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:05:12 -0000 On Sep 26, 2006, at 7:40 AM, Don Munyak wrote: > > I think I need to setup two jails, one(1) for email services and > one(1) for www services, on a single server. > I asked this question in a different way the other day (see thread "Patches for jail support of multiple IP...") and received a good answer on how to set up a single jail to support multiple IP addresses (as our domains and sites currently use) and servers. I'm in the process of doing this using nat and divert within the "host" right now, because I'm trying to avoid having multiple copies of all these programs running in multiple jails. I'm trying to model our jail environment after our non-virtual current environment. I'm not sure that is the best way. My answers are as a noob to FreeBSD jails and just what I've found thus far, I hope it's not inaccurate. It looks like one could do anything, yet if you are using jails for security, "anything", such as sharing between jails or the host, might compromise why you are putting in jails in the first place and everything I'm doing is for security reasons or I'd forget jails. > q. If I am running a webserver for more than one(1) domain, should I > be using a single jail for each domain, or is one jail needed for > 'ALL' www processing ? > Are the domains on separate IPs? If not, one jail suffices for all rather easily. If they are on different IPs, you either need multiple jails or will need to receive packets for all IPs on the "host" environment and rewrite them to land on a single IP used by the jail. Then use NamedVirtualHost in httpd.conf to separate them back out. I'm currently only 3/4 of the way done because of the lack of information on using natd in this way (it's normally used for private IP space and there are no examples of this backward use). There is a reason why you may want multiple jails for different websites. One CGI vulnerability on one site risks the other sites. If you have the memory on your server, separating the websites into different jails reduces the risk of cross-site hacking. This is extremely situational depending on who you have maintaining the different websites and how careful they are in their configuration and practices. If you control everything and know the code then obviously you "trust the web developer ;-)" and a single jail will be easier to manage. > q. If I am using a jail for each domain, does this imply loading > apache+php+mysql, for each www jail ? > Yes from a standpoint of loading, if you use multiple jails. You can set it up such that the source and ports are shared by using mount_nullfs, then after installation, drop the mount such that no changes to the binaries can be made. But the actual execution is separate (though for mysql it doesn't have to be, see below) and will duplicate the memory footprint. Seemed wasteful to me so I'm opting to funnel all IPs into one by the time it hits the jail and thus have only a single jail. To explain what I observed, when I built the jail, part of the process is to enter the jail, go (jailed-)root and build the applications needed, like apache or mysql. If I were running a copy of (for example) httpd within the jail and one within the host (or a different jail), they would be two separate installations and separate executing copies in memory. One could make them the same installation but the links would be a nightmare plus you increase the number accesses you make possible to the host environment. This seems like nullifying some of the value of the jail. From what I could see, there is no way obvious to share the in- RAM executable nor would this be desirable. If I'm wrong, I hope someone corrects me. > q. Likewise with email and multiple domains, does multiple domains = > multiple email jails, as well as multiple copies of smtp, pop3, > webmail ?? > Same as previous question. But the method of putting mail into one IP is far different. I don't have the application to do this because all mail for all domains already comes into one IP. If I move our mail server to this machine, it will have a separate jail because we separate mail, dns and websites on different servers already and the isolation seems prudent. > q. Email and WWW services both require MySQL. Would I be installing > MySQL 'x' number of times? Yes if you use multiiple jails with discrete instances of mysql server. You could set up a separate jail to run the mysql server and service the mysql clients on the other jail(s), think... "separate database backend as a separate jail on a different IP". If you setup a single jail and put the server within that jail this would also keep it down to one copy. I am not familiar with ez-jail but found it a breeze to create jails using man jail combined with other web how-tos. man jail is inaccurate in how you install world and I would look to the other resources on the web for more current information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 16:24:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8679116A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don.munyak@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8786343D86 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:24:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don.munyak@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so867511wri for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TK+qqwES47z/g9FhgxSh8qZa6V7D6p5tXikQf50pwM+uw+GtGusM/JLYzmx98rte/eKdQqBY96nvsJnvxnZto/rqQtdfXsYj3zu50KU5V4tQmK1Q0aVGwwYOczjerCah3hOSeU3w4c8AgT8hkxtrnbF7R5gSYhSF1xAs0aSbEaE= Received: by 10.90.84.17 with SMTP id h17mr1042609agb; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.106.10 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6207f7d90609260924k1abf5c9amf0565daa90216bf6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:24:28 -0400 From: "Don Munyak" To: Chris In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ezjails, jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:24:30 -0000 Thanks a bunch Chad and Chris. Good stuff to digest. Chris, If you have some links to good howto's and don't mind posting, I'd be greatful Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 16:28:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0964416A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7CF43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B892E037; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:28:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4519550F.70206@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:27:59 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Desmond Coughlan References: <20060926160445.77318.qmail@web27215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060926160445.77318.qmail@web27215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jerry McAllister , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE : Re: problem installing on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:28:18 -0000 Desmond Coughlan wrote: > So on the second disk drive, which is around.. 20GB, IIRC, we want /mail, /sql and /forums, and maybe 512M of swap. On the first, system files etc. and swap. I used to tinker around with postgreSQL, so that'll be what we'll be using. > > How does that sound? 1) You will find maintenance easier if you stick to default location for storing stuff, so mount your partitions on those mountpoints: By default user's mboxes goes in /var/mail, databases in /var/db. 2) You might then consider making your second disk dedicated to /var entirely rather than fragment in multiple partitions. 3) I recall on your original list you had swap on both disks, this may or may not have any impact on performance compared to just one swap on the first disk. I would do something like this: ad0s1: / 128MB swap 512MB /usr 6144MB /tmp 512MB ad1s1: /home 4092MB /share 4092MB /var 4092MB The /share is non-default, I like to have this for groups. Say your organisation have various working groups, files belonging to those should not reside in users home-dir, but rather be shared among all members. The above has some further advantages: on the second disk is all the data users create, you can wipe ad0 in a reinstall if needed, there you only need to restore config-files in /etc and /usr/local/etc. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 16:37:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE1316A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:37:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C6643D45 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:37:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E6F13D76E; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53A4013C828; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526C713C80B; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060926090533.083a2a88@lariat.net> Message-ID: <20060926114326.J27863@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060926090533.083a2a88@lariat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to "renice" a process by name? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:37:03 -0000 > I'm working with a machine that's operating as a NAT router and recursive DNS > resolver and is also running the Squid disk cache. Squid, in turn, spawns the > "diskd" daemon, which does disk accesses on behalf of Squid. When Squid > spawns diskd, it gives it a priority level 6 greater than itself. In other > words, if Squid is launched normally, it gets a priority of 2 (normal) while > diskd gets a priority of -4 (very high). > > Unfortunately, diskd is not an efficient user of CPU (it seems to be polling > for I/O completion) and is starving other processes on the machine (for > example, natd) which need to operate in near real time. > > I'd like to keep diskd running on that machine, because having disk access > done by a separate process is very efficient -- even more so if the system > uses SMP. But I need to re-prioritize Squid and diskd to keep the rest of the > machine functional. In particular, I'd like to nice Squid down by 1 (so that > natd and named have priority over it) and have diskd run at standard priority > (so that it can't starve other processes). This will keep diskd at a higher > priority than Squid itself, which in turn will hopefully prevent message > queues from overflowing. > > Reducing Squid's priority is simple; I can just edit the script that starts > Squid so that /usr/bin/nice is used to invoke it. But taming diskd is more > difficult, because diskd is a child process of Squid. I have to make sure it > has started (which may require a delay loop), find out its PID, and then > "renice" it by whatever increment is required to get it to the system's > standard priority (2 by convention). Is there a "renice by name" utility for > FreeBSD (sort of an equivalent of "killall")? I could gin one up, but since > this seems like something that people would want to do frequently, find it > hard to believe that someone hasn't already written one. Google is your friend :) http://www.google.com/search?q=reniceall very first link. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:01:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6501916A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n120.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1074.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FA843D90 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:01:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n120.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 4519428F000087D5; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:01:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <6207f7d90609260924k1abf5c9amf0565daa90216bf6@mail.gmail.com> References: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> <6207f7d90609260924k1abf5c9amf0565daa90216bf6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:00:51 -0700 To: "Don Munyak" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ezjails, jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:01:39 -0000 On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Don Munyak wrote: > > Chris, If you have some links to good howto's and don't mind posting, > I'd be greatful I found the first link to be very helpful in building my own jail setup script. It was invaluable to be able to repeatedly build it from scratch... adjust things, tear down (reboot, chflag binaries, rm -r jaildir) and start over. I gleaned some good stuff from the other one too. As you repeatedly set up the jails, you start understanding the virtualization and begin to rethink what you were planning. I really recommend doing it if your deadlines allow 10 hours of playing (I'm a bit slow ;-)). Bear in mind that the most understandable guides on the web all seem to be dated and adjustment is necessary. Also, I've yet to find any targeted guides on specifically what to do with natd once you've diverted the IPs but it would appear to be similar to how people use natd to support private IP space but just stays within the machine. I'm flying blind there so I have nothing to provide. Here are the jail links. http://www.section6.net/wiki/index.php/ Creating_a_FreeBSD_Jail#Getting_services_to_not_listen_to_.2A http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2006/03/09/jails-virtualization.html? page=1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:20:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C8B16A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF8D43D62 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B5DB995 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:20:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtjltwyMHgG7 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:20:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D45B9A0 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:20:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45196140.5040900@aeternal.net> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:20:00 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'FreeBSD Questions' References: <4518B028.6000104@aeternal.net> <45192D48.6090308@mikestammer.com> In-Reply-To: <45192D48.6090308@mikestammer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: dovecot port not compiling with mysql support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:20:11 -0000 Hello Eric, Eric wrote: > i believe they just checked in an update to rc7 for dovecot with the fix > for high kqueue loads yesterday. Update your ports tree and you should > see it. The check in notes specifically mentioned the kqueue fix. It's okay, but issue with compiling is reoccuring. Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:25:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592F416A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nge@cs.hmc.edu) Received: from turing.cs.hmc.edu (turing.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824E743D5E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:25:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nge@cs.hmc.edu) Received: from knuth.cs.hmc.edu (knuth.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.100]) by turing.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3D95326E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by knuth.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 26983) id E88746689A; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by knuth.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92B5439934 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Eldredge X-X-Sender: nate@knuth.cs.hmc.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Missing cd0 device node X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:25:08 -0000 I forgot to mention, this is on 6.1-RELEASE-p4/amd64. Also, the /dev/acd0 node remains in existence and seems to work fine. On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Nate Eldredge wrote: > Hi all, > > In the course of various screwing around with my ATAPI CDROM device > (including some dvd ripping and playing that got aborted at odd moments), I > got the following messages: ... [see original message] > I also have atapicam in use for DVD burning, and I now find that /dev/cd0 is > missing, and I can't figure out how to get it back. "camcontrol rescan all" > completes successfully, and I have > > vulcan# camcontrol devlist > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 () .... (see original message) -- Nate Eldredge nge@cs.hmc.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:35:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC48416A40F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.schuller@infidyne.com) Received: from hyperion.scode.org (hyperion.scode.org [85.17.42.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D0D43D55 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:35:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter.schuller@infidyne.com) Received: from localhost (www.scode.org [85.17.42.115]) by hyperion.scode.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE7523947E; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:35:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Schuller To: Matthew Seaman Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:35:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200609240036.12322.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> <45164C0C.5010406@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <45164C0C.5010406@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609261935.09003.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf + ipv6 + keep state - any known issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:35:23 -0000 > Are you using antispoofing rules on your external interface? If you've got > something like this in your ruleset: > > antispoof log quick for $ext_if > > Then it will expand into a series of rules containing the following when > you load them: Thank you for responding! No, this is not the issue. I *am* performing antispoof on my physical interface, but not on the tunnel interface. After some further investigation my current theory is that I have run into the trouble with pf and a packet traversing an interface twice. Having a 'keep state' on the *incoming* direction results in a state entry according to pfctl. But no state entry for the 'keep state' in the outgoing direction. The result being that while packets coming into port 22 are allowed and state set up, but the responding packets (to some random source port) are NOT allowed because the outgoing direction yielded no state entry. I am not sure what the behavior is supposed to be with a packet traversing the same interface twice, except I have seen references to the effect of "don't be stupid, don't do that, get another NIC" (for the typical firewall/gateway case). Except in this case that does not apply, even if you agree with the sentiment to begin with. Can anyone confirm or deny whether "double" traversal *IS* supposed to work without difficulties/special cases on current versions of pf/FreeBSD? Thanks! -- / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller ' Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey@scode.org E-Mail: peter.schuller@infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:40:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6322E16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com (outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com [64.136.20.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A76ED43D55 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from webmail38.nyc.untd.com (webmail38.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.178]) by smtpout03.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABCTU3RRAUNCWKJ for (sender ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:39:59 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRJv51TsnClqGNwmz0JeXg8xZXNn9IsX6qw== Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by webmail38.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id L28AETN8; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:39:29 PDT Received: from [67.84.52.37] by webmail38.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:38:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.84.52.37] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:38:58 GMT To: msherman77@yahoo.com X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20060926.103929.14831.892040@webmail38.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 3:4:52648584 X-MAIL-INFO: 09c38a0f472b7ffe8f02b3bfdbde739b47bfa7fbda2b3be3 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.141.27.178|webmail38.nyc.untd.com|webmail38.nyc.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: calendar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:40:07 -0000 On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Michael S wrote > Good day all. > Where does one get an updated calendar.judaic? Mine seems to be out of > sync. > Thanks in advance. > Michael On the internet, google "Jewish calendar", try it both with the quotes and without them (I forget which one I used, but I think with is better)= . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:48:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733E616A519 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D308943D4C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:48:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so962574nzn for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZreuWKdtq3lWWVTobJMC/ZtElNsb6A6r8rNc79eX+CtjeLhY1kUCCUIgYbX1nwXrmbS0S983IB9dAnMF753La5vH515vYgioW2bU90vleolVeLBZxL4wvyoxGheFIJZhTM5FFvTUAxne1j8JL/b1qy3IlwHQGF0T95O1bjrawh0= Received: by 10.64.193.9 with SMTP id q9mr3533156qbf; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609261048n120f3fa7x82a6269335674020@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:48:11 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <89ce7f740609260436r41dade3dyc60f330fff66b0ee@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <89ce7f740609260436r41dade3dyc60f330fff66b0ee@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How to load iwi firmware at boot time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:48:13 -0000 Hello, On 9/26/06, Ivan Rambius Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > I have an Acer TravelMate 4060 laptop with FreeBSD 6.1 running on it. > I have Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200BG wireless network card which I use > successfully. I have the following iwi related entries in rc.conf: > > ## Intel Wireless Adapter settings > iwi_enable="YES" > iwi_interfaces="iwi0" > iwi_mode="bss" > ifconfig_iwi0="ssid **** DHCP" > > This used to bring up my iwi0 interface at boot time and I had a > working internet connection after the machine had booted. > > However, this morning I did "make world" (attaching cvsup files for > the kernel and ports for completeness). The iwi firmware was not > loaded at boot time and the following messages are given: > > $ dmesg | grep iwi > iwi0: mem 0xb0101000-0xb0101fff irq 17 > at device 4.0 on pci6 > iwi0: Reserved 0x1000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xb0101000 > iwi0: bpf attached > iwi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:ce:0c:45:a1 > iwi0: bpf attached > iwi0: bpf attached > iwi0: [MPSAFE] > iwi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps > iwi0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps > 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps > iwi0: Please load firmware > > I have to manually load the firmrare invoking the following commands as root: > # iwicontrol -i iwi0 -d /boot/firmware -m bss > # ifconfig iwi0 up > > Could you please advise me how I can load automatically the firmware > during boot time? > > Regards > Ivan > > P.S. Here is the output of uname -a: > FreeBSD ****.**** 6.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Tue Sep 26 > 13:13:00 EEST 2006 root@****.****:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > i386 I was able to fix it. I created an executable script located at /etc/start_if.iwi0. It contains the following line: iwicontrol -i iwi0 -d /boot/firmware -m bss This script is executed at boot time and it loads the firmware. Thank you for the nice docs althought scattered in the Web. Regards Ivan -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:53:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8326616A417 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@tania.servebbs.org) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5D343D7C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@tania.servebbs.org) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1929E5A9 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:53:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tania.servebbs.org (pool-71-247-49-170.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.247.49.170]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822D8367903 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:53:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob Organization: TamaraB To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:52:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609261352.38059.bob@tania.servebbs.org> Subject: Tared by TAR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:53:14 -0000 Please forgive me if this is all due to my newbie status. I HAVE RTFM!, and that is essentially my problem. I use tar daily, to make a file-backup of /usr/home. I put a tape in the dat (DDS3) drive before I go to bed, and in the morning put it into the 30 day rotation box. I have recently moved from Linux, to FreeBSD. And pretty much copied my scripts from the old Linux box to the new BSD one. A veritable joy I might add! AThis is so much better!!! I went nuts, and got tar'ed and feathered with TAR. I have always used tar with the -M option (--multi-volume) which allows you to span more than one tape on a big ta archiver; but you won't find this -M option in BSD's TAR! Nor will you find a proper man page, for BSD's port of gtar (gnutar) which I THIINK is equivalent to Linux's tar. What I ended up doing is a BADF HACK! I copyiny my old linux tar.1.gz manpage to gtar on my new system. HOWEVER, this man page from my old Linux system may, or may not not be correct, given the fact that BSD giggers the makefile with it's own patches for every "make install", and when you make gtar from "/usr/ports/archivers/gtar" you do NOT get a manpage! BAD! BAD! BAD! Bug??? The differences between bsdtar, and gnutar are quite IMMENSE! Being a stickler, and constant user of, proper documentation, I am just a bit lost here! Help! Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:06:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8111516A538 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: from web27211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web27211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.182.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44EB243D60 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:06:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 15549 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Sep 2006 18:06:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VC117Xj8LmYdfEBsDQbQRvZ4Q8ayKu9P8RfeGjkiV9AvZKI1aXODHi6yPfo9uaVpfEDtLBVRT7A7ZuXjT6EibcPbGUZ7Zy6kMp/Fuh1aFQxYadX3RMKfHorNGUI0waFFwZH2n9jNlsTfEzxtu50Ajvtjpf3+eHWob7NHd6MWxjY= ; Message-ID: <20060926180613.15547.qmail@web27211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [86.212.72.43] by web27211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:06:12 CEST Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:06:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Desmond Coughlan To: freebsd mailing list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: calenders .. silly question ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:06:16 -0000 The thread on calendars has got me thinking.... The 'non-profit' organisation I mentioned, is a school. Here in France (and no doubt in dozens of other countries), many universities have constructed 'virtual campuses'. By that, I mean that the student logs in, he has not only his grades, but his timetable (classes, seminars etc), and he can send and receive e-mail to and from his tutors. Can this be done under FreeBSD (that was the 'silly' part of the question) ? Any pointers to where I can start learning about that stuff? Setting up the MX is the most urgent, but afterwards, we can start to have fun with SQL, forums, campuses etc? Thanks. D. --------------------------------- Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. Cliquez ici. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:07:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247ED16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B015343D5D for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:07:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from [10.155.100.8] (82.53.161.43) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.2.072.1) (authenticated as vdemart1@tin.it) id 450A852C00D47496 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:07:19 +0200 From: vittorio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:07:15 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609262007.15800.vdemart1@tin.it> Subject: ipfw, ftp and wget X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:07:22 -0000 I'm using ipfw as firewall. What rules should I add to use both wget and ftp from my box only towards the internet through my iwi0? (I found the following lines for ftp but they don't seem to work: .............................................................. ipfw add 45 allow tcp from any to any 21 in setup keep-state ipfw add 46 allow udp from any to any 21 in setup keep-state) Vittorio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:23:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9011216A415 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from smtp8.server.rpi.edu (smtp8.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1872343D45 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp8.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8QINchh029442; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:23:39 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060926090533.083a2a88@lariat.net> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060926090533.083a2a88@lariat.net> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:23:37 -0400 To: Brett Glass , questions@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Cc: Subject: Re: Best way to "renice" a process by name? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:23:41 -0000 At 9:32 AM -0600 9/26/06, Brett Glass wrote: > >Is there a "renice by name" utility for FreeBSD (sort of an >equivalent of "killall")? I could gin one up, but since this seems >like something that people would want to do frequently, find it hard >to believe that someone hasn't already written one. FreeBSD added the `pgrep' command sometime ago. Your renice-by-name script would turn into something like: renice +2 `pgrep diskd` (I have not tested that, and you might want to embellish it by adding some of the other options to the `pgrep' command) -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:25:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81B316A412 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don.munyak@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0320443D76 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don.munyak@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2315512wxd for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TXE+j5H6iwm4ZTuuqODoyjmzmM3qIdY08Sx8waCnnr6qV2TSOUBNfGKIsx5oJUZKqZu0S8IPnL/1KlJVyNxvIwBhmc5kWJzcaaKBegI0QbcVeebmyNSl/6axrUrn8vFfa1yBZGzC5i6PmBuUwQ/uJUADID7R3yJwn53pcDV9cgs= Received: by 10.90.29.15 with SMTP id c15mr1190900agc; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.106.10 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6207f7d90609261125n816d634i7c321c282f381b33@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:25:46 -0400 From: "Don Munyak" To: Chris In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> <6207f7d90609260924k1abf5c9amf0565daa90216bf6@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ezjails, jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:25:49 -0000 Thanks, I have no actual deadline. Just something I want/need to do in the near future. The tearing down and restarting is also something I was planning on. Somewhat off-topic, but have you thought about using vmware, specifically vmplayer. There have been many a propellar-head that have reverse engineered the process of creating vmware templates. There are several places on the web that you can either create a blank template or download a preconfigured template. Then just install the OS. You can even link the virtual CD drive to an ISO image so that during the startup of the image, the VM is running from what it thinks is a live cd. This is how I am doing some of my practice build/tear down stuff here some of my links http://www.easyvmx.com/ http://www.easyvmx.com/tutorial.html http://www.ffnn.nl/pages/articles/linux =85 eation.php http://www.virtualization.info/2005/12/ =85 mware.html http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000153064739/ http://sanbarrow.com/ http://www.brunofreitas.com/portal/viewtopic.php?t=3D41 Thanks again Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:30:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A331416A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED8543D86 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k8QIU6nm099371; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:30:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:30:06 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Bob Message-ID: <20060926183006.GB45831@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200609261352.38059.bob@tania.servebbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609261352.38059.bob@tania.servebbs.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tared by TAR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:30:07 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 26), Bob said: > Please forgive me if this is all due to my newbie status. I HAVE > RTFM!, and that is essentially my problem. > > I use tar daily, to make a file-backup of /usr/home. I put a tape in > the dat (DDS3) drive before I go to bed, and in the morning put it > into the 30 day rotation box. > > I have recently moved from Linux, to FreeBSD. And pretty much copied > my scripts from the old Linux box to the new BSD one. A veritable joy > I might add! AThis is so much better!!! > > I went nuts, and got tar'ed and feathered with TAR. I have always > used tar with the -M option (--multi-volume) which allows you to span > more than one tape on a big ta archiver; but you won't find this -M > option in BSD's TAR! Nor will you find a proper man page, for BSD's > port of gtar (gnutar) which I THIINK is equivalent to Linux's tar. > > What I ended up doing is a BADF HACK! I copyiny my old linux tar.1.gz > manpage to gtar on my new system. > > HOWEVER, this man page from my old Linux system may, or may not not > be correct, given the fact that BSD giggers the makefile with it's > own patches for every "make install", and when you make gtar from > "/usr/ports/archivers/gtar" you do NOT get a manpage! BAD! BAD! BAD! > Bug??? The differences between bsdtar, and gnutar are quite IMMENSE! Hey, don't blame us! If you look at the extracted tar-1.15.1 directory, you'll note that they don't even /provide/ a manpage, so there's not much we can do here. :( You'll have to use the info docs, or do as you did and copy an older gnutar manpage from another system. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:30:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5223016A522 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (justnosweat.net [80.126.252.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DAF43D5D for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:29:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by justnosweat.net (8.13.6/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k8QKXas4010493 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:33:37 GMT (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from localhost (justins@localhost) by justnosweat.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id k8QKXaJX010490 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:33:36 GMT (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:33:35 +0000 (UTC) From: justin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060926201455.U3311@justnosweat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on justnosweat.net Subject: HP deskjet 520 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:30:08 -0000 Hello, I am trying to configure my printer but i`m running into some trouble. The hand books talks about the polled and the interrupt driven mode. Some hp printers got problems with the interupt driven mode on the parallel port. The hand book comes with a sollution allthought they say that in some cases it`s not enough. I`ve did the thinge in order to come into the pollede mode but still my printer is not working. Does any one know what i can do more to come into the polled mode. The printer is printing some lines and then it blocks, weird. Thanks, justin. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:41:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6500616A4E7 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C2C43D5D for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:41:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.142] (helo=anti-virus02-09) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GSHrb-0008OO-Rm; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:41:03 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GSHeG-0005Ks-OE; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:27:16 +0100 Message-ID: <45197104.1020208@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:27:16 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob References: <200609261352.38059.bob@tania.servebbs.org> In-Reply-To: <200609261352.38059.bob@tania.servebbs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tared by TAR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:41:12 -0000 Bob wrote: >I went nuts, and got tar'ed and feathered with TAR. I have always used tar >with the -M option (--multi-volume) which allows you to span more than one >tape on a big ta archiver; but you won't find this -M option in BSD's TAR! >Nor will you find a proper man page, for BSD's port of gtar (gnutar) which I >THIINK is equivalent to Linux's tar. > > The manual page for gtar on FreeBSD 5.4 is about 30% longer than the one on a random Linux system I looked at, and looks like a proper man page to me. It mentions -M. Linux tar *is* gtar, though the specific version will of course vary between different Linuxes and different FreeBSDs. That aside, try "info tar" for full blown gory details of gnu tar. Also, for incremental backups, dump is easy to use, handles multi-tape archives and incrementals, and works on Live filesystems; but it does only work at the level of a filesystem not random directories. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 18:29:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CCA16A47B for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ednan171@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s8.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s8.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB92243D7F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:29:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ednan171@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([207.46.8.81]) by bay0-omc2-s8.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:29:00 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:28:52 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 207.46.8.123 by by117fd.bay117.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:28:47 GMT X-Originating-IP: [69.115.89.150] X-Originating-Email: [ednan171@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ednan171@hotmail.com From: "Edward and Nancy Powers" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:28:47 -0400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2006 18:28:52.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[9DC8DB70:01C6E199] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:09:59 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:29:03 -0000 I am new to UNIX, and would like to download FreeBSD to familiarize myself with UNIX commands and the UNIX environment. I would like something fairly easy to install and maintain. I do not want to replace Windows, but would like to switch between Windows and FreeBSD. Is it possible to do this with FreeBSD? Ed Powers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 19:22:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F5D16A417 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A805043D79 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id k8QJMLUT003301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:22:29 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8QJMrqX003195; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:22:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k8QJMqcT003194; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:22:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:22:52 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20060926192252.GG1863@gothmog.pc> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060926090533.083a2a88@lariat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060926090533.083a2a88@lariat.net> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.656, required 5, AWL -0.26, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.00) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to "renice" a process by name? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:22:56 -0000 On 2006-09-26 09:32, Brett Glass wrote: > I'm working with a machine that's operating as a NAT router and > recursive DNS resolver and is also running the Squid disk cache. > Squid, in turn, spawns the "diskd" daemon, which does disk accesses on > behalf of Squid. When Squid spawns diskd, it gives it a priority level > 6 greater than itself. In other words, if Squid is launched normally, > it gets a priority of 2 (normal) while diskd gets a priority of -4 > (very high). > > Unfortunately, diskd is not an efficient user of CPU (it seems to be > polling for I/O completion) and is starving other processes on the > machine (for example, natd) which need to operate in near real time. > > I'd like to keep diskd running on that machine, because having disk > access done by a separate process is very efficient -- even more so if > the system uses SMP. But I need to re-prioritize Squid and diskd to > keep the rest of the machine functional. In particular, I'd like to > nice Squid down by 1 (so that natd and named have priority over it) > and have diskd run at standard priority (so that it can't starve other > processes). This will keep diskd at a higher priority than Squid > itself, which in turn will hopefully prevent message queues from > overflowing. > > Reducing Squid's priority is simple; I can just edit the script that > starts Squid so that /usr/bin/nice is used to invoke it. But taming > diskd is more difficult, because diskd is a child process of Squid. I > have to make sure it has started (which may require a delay loop), > find out its PID, and then "renice" it by whatever increment is > required to get it to the system's standard priority (2 by > convention). Is there a "renice by name" utility for FreeBSD (sort of > an equivalent of "killall")? I could gin one up, but since this seems > like something that people would want to do frequently, find it hard > to believe that someone hasn't already written one. Maybe something like this helps? $ echo renice -n +10 -p `echo \`pgrep httpd\` | sed -e 's/ /,/g'` renice -n +10 -p 1023,656,655,654,653,652,610 $ There is always a fair chance you might attempt to renice a process which just happened to die, but this should be ok, unless you start seeing PIDs being recycled too fast :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 19:31:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BD716A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamlsd@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0154443D55 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamlsd@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2333335wxd for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=JVX1d6CibiOrj4QWPTuwlwTg6XmR+ZiMlYuoKIToW4EYYvXyetpE0VMQapXp7AsSQpnGvaZxIJvhB4O8xN4j6NfA1xejeg/R7gZU6Kxg4BeyQi3zokVZQsqzA7fxSnqjg7uEd2lBF9yDCit01VaKBHKTJXpvfBNubMg/aywDCe4= Received: by 10.70.19.20 with SMTP id 20mr2216866wxs; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?130.245.126.51? ( [130.245.126.51]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h20sm5675972wxd.2006.09.26.12.31.19; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:31:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <19861fba0609231315t49deb0fax3856129d56e143bd@mail.gmail.com> References: <19861fba0609231315t49deb0fax3856129d56e143bd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <54c03837545dd0d9834b057e17666b64@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Martin Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:31:24 -0400 To: Jeffrey Katz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624) Sender: Adam Martin Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: nested labels X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:31:33 -0000 Jeffery, On 2006 Sep 23 , at 16:15, J65nko wrote: > On 9/21/06, Jeffrey Katz wrote: >> I have hit the limit of 8 disklabels per slice. Supposedly, one can >> create lables within a label, thus overcoming this limit. I googled >> everything but could only find references to gpt-- nothing about >> nested >> labels or partitions. Can anyone detail the steps involved in >> setting up >> nested labels or partitions? There was some previous discussion in this thread about the merits of multiple partitions, and why one would need so many. I will not delve into a long discussion on this; suffice it to say that there are many valid reasons to create more than 8 partitions on one disc, and that these reasons are usually unique to the site in question. If a system administrator feels that he needs more division of storage, he likely has a good reason. > A slice can have 8 labels, a disk can have 4 slices, so 4 x 8 labels = > 32 labels > Deduct from those 32 the reserved "c" and possibly "b" and you still > have a lot to spare ;) Although, the above, using PC partitions with nested BSD labels within, is a viable solution, and can be used safely with sysinstall, to give you a nice GUI (well, not gui, but menu at least) to work with the partitions; the biggest problem here, and the reason I stopped doing this, is that you have to know in advance how many meta-partitions you want, and what sizes they are. For example, my old 160 GB disc was divided into a 32 GB and a "remainder" PC partition. Those each had 7 major partitions therein. (You can use partitions a and b for filesystems. It's just convention that we use a and b for root and swap.) As this can be done safely, and straightforward from the sysinstall program, I won't go into details here. What you can also do is use the bsdlabel(8) program on any slice. In FreeBSD, geom labels devices very simply, and sensibly. E.G.: /dev/ad0s1hs2def is a valid device name. Granted it is a very absurd case, but it illustrates how one can use it. In geom, any PC partitions are appended as "sN" where N is 1 thru 4 for primary partitions, and 5 thru (unknown?) for logical partitions. In the case of bsdlabel (disklabel) partitions, they receive letters a thru h. In the above example, the primary master disc's first primary partition has a bsdlabel, which the last partition of it has a PC partition table within, which has a primary partition in slot two. That nested PC partition has a BSD partition, with a partition in slot d, which has more BSD sub-labels. (Need I go on, with this pathological example?) In summary, you can make bsdlabels, inside of a partition (PC or BSD). This is done by just running bsdlabel -w on the partition in which you wish to create the sub-partitions. (bsdlabel -w /dev/ad0s1h, for example) You can then create unlimited levels of partitions. Remember that after running bsdlabel -w, you must run bsdlabel -e, to edit the partition. Do not forget to create filesystems in the partitions (newfs -UO2 for UFS 2 with softupdates.) As far as conventions, I prefer to put the "extended" partition into slot a, and set its type to "unknown." In cases where slot a is taken by a root partition, I use slot h. I find that sticking to this convention helps keep me organized when employing this technique. Regards, -- Adam David Alan Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 19:48:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F1D16A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A2B43D7E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:22549 helo=http.aseed.net) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GSIuA-0003Xk-Lm; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:47:46 +0000 Received: from amandla (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CC55829D; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:47:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:47:42 +0200 From: albi To: "Edward and Nancy Powers" Message-Id: <20060926214742.d4350b1b.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:48:11 -0000 On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:28:47 -0400 "Edward and Nancy Powers" wrote: > > I am new to UNIX, and would like to download FreeBSD to familiarize > myself with UNIX commands and the UNIX environment. I would like > something fairly easy to install and maintain. I do not want to > replace Windows, but would like to switch between Windows and > FreeBSD. > > Is it possible to do this with FreeBSD? imho fastest and easiest is to use a live-cd e.g. : http://www.freesbie.org/ -- grtjs, albi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 20:14:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1DA16A412 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221DC43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:14:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 31844 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2006 20:29:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.251?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2006 20:29:46 -0000 Message-ID: <45198AB5.9040507@123.com.sv> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:16:53 -0600 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_Amaya?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Le Cocq Michel References: <451846E4.1080807@123.com.sv> <4518CA35.5010103@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> In-Reply-To: <4518CA35.5010103@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system gets panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:14:44 -0000 Le Cocq Michel wrote: > the only thing i can say is for me if i had a such message with "inode" > i should try in first a fsck. > > César Amaya a écrit : > > >> Hi list, >> >> I have a HP dx5150 SFF system with FreeBSD 6.1 Release running on it. >> The system worked fine the first 4 weeks, after that, the server begun >> to reboot while it was booting, and two or three times 5 minutes >> after booting. The error message said: >> >> panic: softdep_setup_inomapdep: found inode >> ... >> rebooting after 15 segs. >> >> Do you know what´s going on here? >> Thanks! >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Actually, there was a problem with the disk partitions, they wasn´t properly unmounted. I did fsck -y to every partition and problem resolved. Atte. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 20:17:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1D216A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16EE43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:16:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id k8QKFxSJ097447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:15:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id k8QKFxuo097446 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA18193; Tue, 26 Sep 06 13:06:15 PDT Date: Tue, 26 Sep 06 13:06:15 PDT From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) Message-Id: <10609262006.AA18193@pluto.rain.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: can't assign resources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:17:09 -0000 Do I need to do anything about these lines near the end of the dmesg? unknown: can't assign resources (memory) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (irq) unknown: can't assign resources (port) The box is a Dell Optiplex GX1, and it does seem to be working OK, but I suppose this may indicate that something is not configured properly. ========================== complete dmesg ========================== Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #3: Mon Sep 25 21:49:18 PDT 2006 perryh@fbsd61:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (447.69-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 201326592 (192 MB) avail memory = 187494400 (178 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 cpu0 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pir0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xcce0-0xccff irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 15.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pci2: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xcc00-0xcc7f mem 0xff000000-0xff00007f irq 11 at device 17.0 on pci0 miibus0: on xl0 xlphy0: <3Com internal media interface> on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:b0:d0:28:ad:4f pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xcffff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (memory) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (irq) unknown: can't assign resources (port) Timecounter "TSC" frequency 447691600 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 157066MB at ata0-master UDMA33 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 20:21:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3091416A407 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from alnrmhc11.comcast.net (alnrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.225.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8B243D49 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:21:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060926202129b11008ar5ne>; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:21:29 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:19:59 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200609262007.15800.vdemart1@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <200609262007.15800.vdemart1@tin.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609261519.59125.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: vittorio Subject: Re: ipfw, ftp and wget X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:21:30 -0000 On Tuesday 26 September 2006 20:07, vittorio wrote: > I'm using ipfw as firewall. > What rules should I add to use both wget and ftp from my box only > towards the internet through my iwi0? > > (I found the following lines for ftp but they don't seem to work: > .............................................................. > ipfw add 45 allow tcp from any to any 21 in setup keep-state > ipfw add 46 allow udp from any to any 21 in setup keep-state) > > Vittorio You want to allow traffic out. The keep state will take care of allowing responses back in. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 21:43:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD7016A417 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ograbme@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A546543D5A for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ograbme@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2369078wxd for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:43:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BcXXk44TZX7rnqag7ZSrqK1jZnsgLb6pusQJ8KQ3x3AcDlKu1R11uwwB1rKoiclFiqvkaVLTv216tIgpt7F/ERUiY/iqKfvcwr2VUAgjjyp+vGLFtib3d3ae18Faqp6MKd5X7JHe1cWMjU9AN6aM/OUUg4/loFhVDMfK2g5itA0= Received: by 10.70.14.9 with SMTP id 9mr1553525wxn; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server ( [68.211.215.149]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 12sm3105753wrl.2006.09.26.14.43.20; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:47:28 -0400 From: ograbme X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.11.02) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <921515612.20060926174728@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Has anyone on this list set up an internet connection using a Westell WireSpeed ADSL modem? If so, please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ograbme List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:43:24 -0000 let me know what gotcha's, if any, I should be aware of. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 21:44:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D691F16A417 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AE043D97 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:44:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QLhGxd084083; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:43:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8QLhGil084082; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:43:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:43:16 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Edward and Nancy Powers Message-ID: <20060926214316.GA83997@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:44:46 -0000 On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:28:47PM -0400, Edward and Nancy Powers wrote: > > I am new to UNIX, and would like to download FreeBSD to familiarize > myself with UNIX commands and the UNIX environment. I would like > something fairly easy to install and maintain. I do not want to > replace Windows, but would like to switch between Windows and FreeBSD. > > Is it possible to do this with FreeBSD? Yes it is. It will take some learning. The environment and complete mindset is very different from MS. Really, it is more server oriented where MS is more application oriented. In other words FreeBSD provides a platform for you to build what you want on it, but doesn't say much about the applications. That is up to you. On the other hand, MS gives you a bunch of applications and doesn't let you very near the platform. So, MS makes a lot of decisions and assumptions for you and you have little choice about them. FreeBSD UNIX makes almost no assumptions and forces you to make all your own decisions - some of which you will not be accustomed to seeing. But, with all that difference in point of view, with FreeBSD you can build a very good and servicable desktop system that is reliable and relatively secure as well as have a top level server system if you plan to provide any computing services such as Email or web service, etc. The first thing to do is to try and wade through the FreeBSD handbook that is available online from the FreeBSD web site. There are a number of links to it on that site. Don't worry if you do not understand it all from the start/first reading. Just absorb what you can and learn where you can go back to to find various pieces of information. Then, do a little more serious work on the parts that are a step by step set of things to do to install and configure FreeBSD. Then, download a copy of the latest full release ISO (presently 6.1) and install it and start experimenting. At this time you will become intimately familiar with the handbook and the man pages and probably some of the online publications at sites such as onlamp.com Play with it for a while - week/month whatever your patience will endure - and then rethink things out a bit and do another install. By that time, the next release may be out, so download it and make a CD for the install. Most of the things you will change are how you divide up the disk for various things and which extra things from ports you really want to install. For example, some of the games read pretty good, but really aren't worth trying to play or you may want to skip some of the really extreme security stuff or might want to add more security. You might want to change your X-windows manager and/or desktop utility choices. I don't even bother to install KDE or Gnome any more because I really don't want that much desktop junk. I like simpler Afterstep better. It gives me good working windows and supports my browser, XPDf, etc and I really hate having stuff tied in to the browser that I want to run separately, such as Email. Anyway, you will be better able to make these kinds of choices after you have played with it for a while. Installation at first looks difficult and confusing. It is not so bad once you have been through it. Most of all those choices are not really relavant and you learn to look past what you do not need. Following a good step by step procedure such as the handbook or in FreeBSD Unleashed or The Complete FreeBSD books is the way to get through it the first couple of times. Just don't get caught up in the authors whime and prejudices. They all have favorites and axes to grind that may not be the favored choice for you. You will catch on to which things as you experiment and learn. ////jerry > > > Ed Powers > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 21:46:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B966416A690 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:46:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2A643D7C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B692E024; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:46:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45199F80.70707@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:45:36 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Desmond Coughlan References: <20060926180613.15547.qmail@web27211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060926180613.15547.qmail@web27211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd mailing list Subject: Re: calenders .. silly question ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:46:47 -0000 Desmond Coughlan wrote: > The thread on calendars has got me thinking.... > > The 'non-profit' organisation I mentioned, is a school. > > Here in France (and no doubt in dozens of other countries), many universities have constructed 'virtual campuses'. By that, I mean that the student logs in, he has not only his grades, but his timetable (classes, seminars etc), and he can send and receive e-mail to and from his tutors. > > Can this be done under FreeBSD (that was the 'silly' part of the question) ? > > Any pointers to where I can start learning about that stuff? Setting up the MX is the most urgent, but afterwards, we can start to have fun with SQL, forums, campuses etc? Honestly, I think you will have a hard time getting any useful answers: Your question is vague and broad and posting under a completely different topic is not helping. Before asking the "how" question, you gotta understand the problem you want to solve - that is first, figure out what is the problem: - how many users? - how will you manage users? - who will manage users? - how will users access services? - from where will users access services? - routing? - firewall? - does the infrastructure exist to provide access to services? - network? wireless? dns? etc. - how often will users access services? - how much data will be handled by the servers? - what hardware is required to support the expected traffic? ... and on and on. Once you have a clear idea of that you can start asking more concrete questions: - which MTA? - how do I setup that MTA? - what MDA? can the MTA work as MDA? - how do I setup that MDA? etc. So, I recommend you rethink your problem and make it clear what you want to achieve in your next post - under a suitable subject... Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 21:48:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4334516A412 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6231643D78 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QLlX1e084137; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:47:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8QLlXFJ084136; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:47:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:47:33 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Edward and Nancy Powers Message-ID: <20060926214733.GB83997@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:48:58 -0000 On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:28:47PM -0400, Edward and Nancy Powers wrote: > > I am new to UNIX, and would like to download FreeBSD to familiarize > myself with UNIX commands and the UNIX environment. I would like > something fairly easy to install and maintain. I do not want to > replace Windows, but would like to switch between Windows and FreeBSD. > > Is it possible to do this with FreeBSD? Note, you will probably also see posts of people's favorite thing to push in response to your question as well as possibly some people trying to tell you not to bother with FreeBSD is you are happy with MS-Win even though you specifically say you want to learn\ about UNIX. Take it all with a grain or tub of salt and try out any of the suggestions you want, but don't think they are canonical information. They are just peoples whims and preferences and are no more or less valid than yours after you have experimented a little. Have fun, ////jerry > > > Ed Powers > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 23:03:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4D916A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3840943D46 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2390225wxd for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Oq8fvNaX8NLcAfkgCphbMXyGnnPPdTN7A26dyTXEmb58SazzNRUyjOKdd6vo4QMyy4cEBJREzYXkBQQ5cV83pFRCoHj5ak3ep+mI6GC3Oyy+uHCHFDvN6LR/cvMt/LbINdpL/79LmnWYTLnKXEU4oWtxHHUSO0SDZKtBXzFj0os= Received: by 10.90.120.13 with SMTP id s13mr3192agc; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.100.9 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0609261603he44aea4g5e83d9dc4e5feb02@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:03:40 -0700 From: "Josh Carroll" Sender: josh.carroll@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <921515612.20060926174728@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <921515612.20060926174728@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 11ee13f6b65bea7c Cc: ograbme Subject: Re: Has anyone on this list set up an internet connection using a Westell WireSpeed ADSL modem? If so, please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:03:41 -0000 I use a Westell 6100 without problems with FreeBSD. It is setup in bridge mode and works great. I wrote some software (http://wdiag.sourceforge.net) if you want to query the DSL line stats/etc. Depending which model you have, it might work for you (36R516, 2200, and 6100 series are all supported). Josh On 9/26/06, ograbme wrote: > > let me know what gotcha's, if any, I should be aware of. > > Thanks in advance. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 23:49:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8CB16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ograbme@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9366143D46 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:49:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ograbme@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2248wxd for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:49:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O61NYUcOkliOFSH+IcTDUzRFxOaLFAHK/DQ7ts65YKD1cGUUDpTi4zAVsfoTSTjKF5+Lwxe4tSyK2CWrYkp07xFvtRPaOF3wN9Ls+xkfRF3Zit7fbaW9R8RI848ElDH0owpAgIM+Qu8Tr9AZufOQNq8+RXLUrTZUvZjW0VOtTkU= Received: by 10.70.74.7 with SMTP id w7mr137978wxa; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server ( [72.152.64.169]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 33sm45265wra.2006.09.26.16.49.20; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:53:30 -0400 From: ograbme X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.11.02) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <36433246.20060926195330@gmail.com> To: "Josh Carroll" In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0609261603he44aea4g5e83d9dc4e5feb02@mail.gmail.com> References: <921515612.20060926174728@gmail.com> <8cb6106e0609261603he44aea4g5e83d9dc4e5feb02@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Has anyone on this list set up an internet connection using a Westell WireSpeed ADSL modem? If so, please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ograbme List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:49:23 -0000 Hello Josh, Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 7:03:40 PM, you wrote: JC> I use a Westell 6100 without problems with FreeBSD. It is setup in JC> bridge mode and works great. JC> I wrote some software (http://wdiag.sourceforge.net) if you want to JC> query the DSL line stats/etc. Depending which model you have, it might JC> work for you (36R516, 2200, and 6100 series are all supported). Thanks for your response. I'll take a look at the software you mentioned. My Westell is a 2200 model made in 2004. Overall I've been pleased with it, but have not used it with a FreeBSD or Linux box before. Based upon your experience, I'm fairly sure it will work great with FreeBSD! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 01:45:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3261B16A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7577043D53 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:45:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 18603 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 11:45:36 +1000 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO localhost) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 11:45:36 +1000 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:45:29 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Don Munyak" Message-ID: <20060927114529.475e9cf4@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6207f7d90609261125n816d634i7c321c282f381b33@mail.gmail.com> References: <6207f7d90609260740i8bd9b9oac15f6b06cd3a339@mail.gmail.com> <6207f7d90609260924k1abf5c9amf0565daa90216bf6@mail.gmail.com> <6207f7d90609261125n816d634i7c321c282f381b33@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ezjails, jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:45:38 -0000 On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:25:46 -0400 "Don Munyak" wrote: > Somewhat off-topic, but have you thought about using vmware, > specifically vmplayer. Latest versions of vmware do not run on FreeBSD as the host (as guest is ok). there is a vmware workstationg in ports, but it's an old version and you need a (possibly old?) linux license for vmware workstation. It *should* be possible to run the vmdk with qemu, though I'm not sure it's a vmdk you create with vmplayer. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Lots of people who complained about us receiving the MBE received theirs for heroism in the war -- for killing people. We received ours for entertaining other people. I'd say we deserve ours more." John Lennon I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 01:48:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151A216A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CA143D49 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:48:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 18723 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 11:48:20 +1000 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO localhost) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 11:48:20 +1000 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:48:17 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" Message-ID: <20060927114817.1cfc505e@localhost> In-Reply-To: <89ce7f740609260436r41dade3dyc60f330fff66b0ee@mail.gmail.com> References: <89ce7f740609260436r41dade3dyc60f330fff66b0ee@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to load iwi firmware at boot time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:48:22 -0000 On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:36:06 +0300 "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" wrote: > I have to manually load the firmrare invoking the following commands as root: > # iwicontrol -i iwi0 -d /boot/firmware -m bss > # ifconfig iwi0 up > > Could you please advise me how I can load automatically the firmware > during boot time? loads automatically everything just fine here: running 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #7: Tue Sep 26 09:55:41 EST 2006 here I have iwi and firmware built into the kernel. I also installed the port iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_1 Intel PRO/Wireless 2200 Firmware Kernel Module simply doing ifconfig iwi0 up loads everything needed. Works too if adding it to the rc.conf (I prefer not to have it on startup, that's all). _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "I'm not afraid of dying, I just don't want to be there when it happens." Woody Allen I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 01:50:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E4F16A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n054.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1105.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5789443D81 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:50:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n054.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 4519C87D000028C1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:49:59 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Chris Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:49:50 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: rewrite of multiple incoming IPs into a single IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:50:01 -0000 I have spent the day trying to get multiple IP addresses rewritten to a single address using IPFW and NATD. Is there a simple way to do this. If I put natd on the public interface, it grabs it and the system hangs at boot. Is there an interface for keeping the packets local to the system where divert can pass them, natd rewrite them and reinsert them into ipfw? The application is what I asked about two days ago, funneling multiple external websites on different addresses into a single jail that works of Apache's NameVirtualHost. Thought it was the easy part but so far it's the only part that is not working, the jail and apache work great. I think I need a divert rule that goes to an internal interface (tun0?) and be able to start natd on that interface. I actually tried tun0 but it was not recognized (I'm not configuring for ppp). It would seem that if I can get over this hurdle, I could use the redirect_address within natd to perform the magic I need. Please tell me if I'm trying to do something absurd or if this should be directed to a different list. Thanks Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 02:14:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3028D16A417 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iqgrande@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1161043D4C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:14:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iqgrande@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so41538wxd for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:14:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=p62L0g9zOyI6sr9SIcVNhBGYThgP5fd67GxGKEerZRAR7xXEyeM24nTmSKVHu/dkqN+7KlyFMjuFKeVh2DRnjtgBOm7hlI73BcYPnqjjYUOLs4Xo+IFpHgFcDSqzcW2gjy/meeOlgpLlAd3XUYKAazqcv/pxyBwGxLWJu98TtmE= Received: by 10.90.118.10 with SMTP id q10mr26915agc; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.5? ( [67.191.189.255]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 10sm168192wrl.2006.09.26.19.14.22; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:14:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> References: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anthony Agelastos Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:14:20 -0400 To: tech.junk@verizon.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:14:26 -0000 On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:46 AM, sean wrote: > Can anyone recommend a pdf editor, hopefully one in ports? What you can do is use the command pdf2ps (should install with Ghostscript if memory serves) to convert the PDF into PostScript. PostScript is plain text, so you can edit it with any text editor (vim, emacs, ee, nedit, pico/nano, etc.) or just use sed to change your line (sed 's/oldline/newline/g' file.ps > newfile.ps). Then, when the new PostScript file has been created, just re-create the pdf with ps2pdf. I know this is not very elegant, but it works for small changes. -Anthony > > I just need to change a line in an existing file. > > Thanks > Sean > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 05:05:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD45916A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672AA43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:05:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2798FB9AB for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:06:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgpTIPgef2oS for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:06:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [155.208.254.100] (gvarel4.hp.com [155.208.254.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB22B9A2 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:06:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451A069A.4090709@aeternal.net> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:05:30 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'FreeBSD Questions' References: <4518B028.6000104@aeternal.net> <45192D48.6090308@mikestammer.com> <45196140.5040900@aeternal.net> In-Reply-To: <45196140.5040900@aeternal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: dovecot port not compiling with mysql support [solved] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:05:34 -0000 Hello all, Martin Hudec wrote: > It's okay, but issue with compiling is reoccuring. yesterday Martin Werner provided me with fix to this issue. Though it's a mysql issue in 5.0.x [1] , one can workaround it [2] when compiling dovecot with mysql support. [1] http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=22227 [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/103691 kind regards, Martin Hudec From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 05:22:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28A416A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ck98ljm@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E290143D49 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ck98ljm@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so397825nfc for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:22:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=LHi7h7sJrm6h6cAK2/llg76J/t5r1b8abuZc2h7DvmmkPdVRVjTR8599NVomqs05Uvp+2qHw4hX7HeX+qosMi9frqL/2aC7dphhuCuF9ZLpEjtKCHAD/OvpUbi3rqV3YqiW6lkRIe/PwWLfw/1p6y8IAvgqQhJb5swXC+zLyN34= Received: by 10.82.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr4998buc; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.130.14 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:22:44 +0800 From: "JianMing Liu" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: I have a promble when i install FlashMediaServer2b for Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:22:46 -0000 *because the FlashMediaServer2b now still not support the freebsd ,so i have to install the FlashMediaServer2b for Linux under my freebsd6.1 system,my installation's infomation is under below:* Please enter 'y' or 'n'. Do you agree with the license agreement? (y/n): y Macromedia Flash Media Server 2.0 requires approximately 25MB of disk space. The installer will install Macromedia Flash Media Server 2.0 in the following directory Default [/opt/macromedia/fms]: /usr/local/MFS2 The Macromedia Flash Media Server communicates on the IANA-assigned port of 1935, which is the port most Flash applications expect. Please enter the Macromedia Flash Media Server port Default [1935]: Please enter the port to use for the Admin service. You can only specify one admin port. Default [1111]: The administrative user name and password you provide here is required to use the Macromedia Flash Media Server Management Console for administration, monitoring, and debugging. Please enter the administrative username: test Please enter the administrative password: Confirm password: When the Macromedia Flash Media Server service is started, the service can be run as a user other than "root". The server would change to this user when the server is started and has acquired its ports. Please enter the user that the Macromedia Flash Media Server service will run as Default user [nobody]: test Please enter a valid user group for the "test" user: wheel Do you want the Macromedia Flash Media Server service to run as a daemon? (y/n) Default [y]: Do you want to start the Macromedia Flash Media Server after the installation is done? (y/n) Default [y]: ----------- Install Action Summary ----------- Installation directory = /usr/local/MFS2 FMS Server Port = 1935 FMS Admin Server Port = 1111 Administrative username = test Administrative password = (suppressed) FMS owner = test FMS service user = test FMS service user group = wheel FMS run as daemon = Yes Start FMS = Yes Proceed with the installation? (y/n/q): y *Installing Macromedia Flash Media Server files...* *Configuring Macromedia Flash Media Server...* *Adding "fms" service.* *Setting default admin to "fms".* *chgrp: test: Invalid argument* *./installFMS: /sbin/chkconfig: not found* *Setting autostart for "fms".* *Server:fms command:start* *getconf: no such configuration parameter `GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION'* *./server: 49: Syntax error: Bad substitution* *Admin server:fmsadmin command:start* *./adminserver: 40: Syntax error: Bad substitution* * * *The Macromedia Flash Media Server installation is complete.* I have install the Linux_base-rh-9,but still have such mistake . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 05:51:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E06116A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arek@wup-katowice.pl) Received: from poczta.wup-katowice.pl (poczta.wup-katowice.pl [213.216.67.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8398C43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:51:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arek@wup-katowice.pl) Received: by poczta.wup-katowice.pl (Postfix, from userid 1130) id 387887E81E; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.250] (arek.wup-katowice.pl [213.216.67.82]) by poczta.wup-katowice.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA5E7E819 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:53:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451A10B9.1060604@wup-katowice.pl> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:48:41 +0200 From: Arek Czereszewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Videoconferencing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: arek@wup-katowice.pl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:51:14 -0000 Hello, Is anybody have any idea for videoconferencing server on FreeBSD? Best if this could work with jabber server. Clients are MS windows and FreeBSD. Regards Arek -- Arek Czereszewski arek (at) wup-katowice (dot) pl "UNIX is like a wigwam: no windows, no gates, apache inside." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 08:27:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF94416A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5636643D45 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:27:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k8R8RUEY028585; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:27:30 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:24:19 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <4518BCCE.5050902@cruzweb.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20060926101822.021c39b0@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20060926101822.021c39b0@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609271124.19682.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: john@cruzweb.net, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: Creating New Users over Telnet/SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:27:57 -0000 On Tuesday 26 September 2006 18:29, Derek Ragona wrote: [snip] > However you will need to replace the normal process running the login > (telnetd or sshd) and pass the login information to that daemon or > create a new user depending on the input data. No, you can force a default shell without modifications. Check out login.conf(5) and shell variable. However, the original post implies little FreeBSD experience. Why do you want to automate such a procedure? You said it's going to be for a networking class, that is a limited a number of users, right? sdf is a public access Unix system and has to do this automatically, you don't have to. smj@sdf.lonestar is a seasoned administrator, who has tampered the OS in a number of ways. Just my 2 cents, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 10:04:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3615E16A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A858C43D4C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so152298wxd for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:04:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tXD14oIwTp6BskJ0EJ7+88elbQPKEcobkPBxLntNxReZFxJC0buryszFzBUkj45XvdCeaJgvoW7/Gdb1kUuPXRnJg8DkP9N3WNpxm5Hdx7W1oaFMeVBJ0ZgzwrEZt+xMhymy1QoEUYcR8E0F7TcaUOb2qbeBKcD6bkYlViMa/0g= Received: by 10.90.52.18 with SMTP id z18mr91348agz; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.25.17 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:04:53 +0900 From: "azhar freebsd" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060925151251.GB78251@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060925151251.GB78251@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:04:55 -0000 2006/9/26, Jerry McAllister : > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:35:07PM +0900, azhar freebsd wrote: > > > hi > > can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. > > Just what it says. > It is a FreeBSD 6.2 that has not been officially released yet. > The present official release is 6.1. The 6.2 release is coming > soon and is being worked on actively. You can install it for > testing or development or somewhat risky production use. It is > sort of a beta release. > > ////jerry > > > > > uname -a > > FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep > > 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 > > root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 > > [root@belagelo]~#emacs > > > > > > azhar > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" thank u for your reply . is there any way to get back the normal freebsd version . i am facing a lot of problems that i think its because of this version .like i cant install any package by sysinstall through ftp . azhar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 10:09:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121C616A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1140543D5A for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:09:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so153225wxd for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:09:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=t9ZGsosywa9IWTS84QdXdU2bxy1b4kpGtmtEArd5cETtQHNQuJSbHvjDbN6tPvOI3LxmegSyMLglln5J3KWvjs06DcdLM8wm3SoBjEeougufMTGlAGL5Pk3ki592OXrNHGt9Cfz7koC9OTnA5iTf4o9Cpy7snKDj18XaGgWOXB4= Received: by 10.90.34.9 with SMTP id h9mr90730agh; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.25.17 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:09:20 +0900 From: "azhar freebsd" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:09:22 -0000 2006/9/25, Andrew Pantyukhin : > > On 9/25/06, azhar freebsd wrote: > > hi > > can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. > > > > uname -a > > FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep > > 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 > > root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 > > [root@belagelo]~#emacs > > When X-STABLE between X.Y and X.(Y+1) gets close to > X.(Y+1), we call it X.(Y+1)-PRERELEASE instead of > X.Y-STABLE. We're expecting 6.2 this November. thank u for your reply . is there any way to get back the normal freebsd version . i am facing a lot of problems that i think its because of this version .like i cant install any package by sysinstall through ftp . azhar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 11:03:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A25916A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FE543D7D for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:03:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B57E2E024; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:03:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451A5A62.10307@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:02:58 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: azhar freebsd References: <20060925151251.GB78251@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:03:18 -0000 azhar freebsd wrote: >> > uname -a >> > FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep >> > 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 >> > root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 >> > [root@belagelo]~#emacs > > thank u for your reply . is there any way to get back the normal freebsd > version . i am facing a lot of problems that i think its because of this > version .like i cant install any package by sysinstall through ftp . If you are experiencing a lot of problems, then consider reporting them, the 6.2 version will be the next STABLE release. Reverting back to the exact snapshot of your previous system is imposible unless you know the date of that snapshot. If you have been tracking RELENG_6 you have gradually been updating your system to present which will soon become 6.2. You can get the 6.1 RELEASE with security patches by changing the tag in the supfile to RELENG_6_1. Without further details on the problems you experience, I doubt your problems relate to the version - I experience no problems at all. They may relate to errors occurred during the update of your system or the source. Did you rebuild/install both kernel and world? Did you follow the instructions running mergemaster? Try updating your sources and rebuild again. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 11:48:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A20416A415 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9499643D46 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:48:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so178638wxd for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:48:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nElvjo4cxe0XtmN4KowqulOV0ryO3LTJW1ksTjP9AdtOw7U20XSt2tNVYfDp4E5Hx6ooxOlKms5N27H7kKniuTpYY3til1N8xl/peHM+QsO74ao3b1ipATtHT6G6oc6iXkxsqoEa6ZX918jEn10DqbrYXwyFZ5mqtGwk6eZfjf8= Received: by 10.70.117.1 with SMTP id p1mr569935wxc; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.103? ( [68.48.94.77]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h9sm765616wxd.2006.09.27.04.48.26; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <451A6509.2040506@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:48:25 -0400 From: Eric Mesa User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: fpconst...ports broken...other alternatives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:48:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I just submitted a bug report for py-fpconst being broken in ports. What are my alternatives for getting this installed and still being recognized by py-soappy within ports? (When I try to install soappy, it checks if fpconst is installed. Thanks! - -- Eric Mesa ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com Note: All emails from this address should have a GPG signature. If you have the proper setup you can use this to confirm my identity and that the email was not changed in transit. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFGmUIPvU+8ApmWXIRAn1fAKCCVPcEv3xv+VWZFe3ScRLBnR4PGgCdEsUn KKZ3pnFvDdG7PMOv00nNe1A= =j4jR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 12:39:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4CC16A416 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4892543D5C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BF713A847 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:39:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E26CFC501 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:39:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GSYh7-0001oy-00 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:39:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:39:21 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20060927123921.GA6760@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 08:32:28 up 163 days, 9:35, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Replace worksation, now can't ssh to older machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:39:24 -0000 My trusty lon suffering FreeBSD workstation at work died (hardware), and I am in the process of replacig it. The current iss I have is that I have several older HP-UX achines that I need to be able to ssh to. I can't remeber exactly how I set these machines up (it was years agao), but they seem to have some restrictions as to what machines can ssh to them. I can't sem to get the new FreeBSD machine to be accepted by them. The are running: OpenSSH_2.5.1p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090600f I added the id_rsa.pub and identity.pub lines to the ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file on one of the HP-UX machines, but when Itry to conect with verbose mode urned on, I get: ssh -v phse6 OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-20050903, OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Connecting to phse6.meadwestvaco.com [170.85.106.131] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/identity type 0 debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/id_rsa type 1 debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_2.5.1p1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_2.5.1p1 pat OpenSSH_2.5.0p1*,OpenSSH_2.5.1p1* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-20050903 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client 3des-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server 3des-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST_OLD(2048) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host 'phse6.meadwestvaco.com' is known and matches the DSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/stan/.ssh/known_hosts:195 debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering public key: /home/stan/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: Trying private key: /home/stan/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). Any sugestionsas to what to check next? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 12:45:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0423E16A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d1945@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79F4543D79 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:45:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from d1945@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 78110 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 12:45:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=swXRHFvjxB1BL4dNutw6rGjMcRUWa9+ZZOdbgKIBlB3GEXReigZukllk8TUwtWR+0wbVjqbXAQL63Jqbs+eueGkQLJGtXS2kOFeAjTHrOVvsf7JQd6S9+Ci0K8wiaWyTmO3sIlFThNjhe+AmQK0+h8oKxUN+ymVClCN+0dnkPN8= ; Received: from unknown (HELO home) (d1945@sbcglobal.net@69.104.191.121 with login) by smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 12:45:50 -0000 Received: by home (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:45:50 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:45:49 -0700 From: George Allan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060927124549.GA568@home> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:45:56 -0000 On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:47:56PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Anthony Agelastos wrote: >> On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:46 AM, sean wrote: >>> Can anyone recommend a pdf editor, hopefully one in ports? >> >> What you can do is use the command pdf2ps (should install with >> Ghostscript if memory serves) to convert the PDF into PostScript. >> PostScript is plain text, so you can edit it with any text editor >> (vim, emacs, ee, nedit, pico/nano, etc.) or just use sed to change >> your line (sed's/oldline/newline/g' file.ps >> >>> newfile.ps). Then, when the new PostScript file has been created, >>> just re-create the pdf with ps2pdf. I know this is not very elegant, >>> but it works for small changes. >> > It sure is a itch that I can't scratch that there's no tool that does > this with a fancy GUI. It is something I've wanted many times. Maybe it's time to reconsider the nature of that itch? PDF was never meant to be edited (except peripherally), and most definitely not in the sense that you're thinking. Consider it a FINAL "print" format, like an image that's long since left the photographer, his studio and his camera and now exists only as a JPG on a hard drive. If you're looking for fancy GUI applications, then you're talking about the usual desktop publishing tools from Adobe (Framemaker, Pagemaker, etc.) that can (and typically do) generate a PDF as a final step after the work has been done using their native formats. If you're using *nix, then typically you'll be using LaTeX, etc. as the "authoring" tool, and similarly be generating the final postscript or PDF when you're done. The basic equation is TEXT + MARKUP -> OUTPUT Most people who are in the habit of using or relying on "word processing" programs (where the editing part is mixed up with the final product) make the same mistake of pursuing mythical PDF "editing" or "conversion" tools that don't exist. It's an understandable mistake, but it's also worth pointing out that in the publishing world, no one takes word processors seriously or uses their output, except in some cases as an accomodation for people who didn't know any better, and similarly weren't aware of how bad the output quality really was. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 12:56:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD46916A494 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from smarthost2.sa.chariot.net.au (smarthost2.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7B143D60 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:56:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.qld.chariot.net.au (mail.qld.chariot.net.au [203.87.95.166]) by smarthost2.sa.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9AB9E36A for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:26:23 +0930 (CST) Received: from localhost (avs4.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.10]) by mail.qld.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACDF4E890 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:56:23 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail.qld.chariot.net.au ([203.87.95.166]) by localhost (avs4.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10951-01-99 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:26:00 +0930 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (static-203-87-66-248.qld.chariot.net.au [203.87.66.248]) by mail.qld.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561004E87E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:56:23 +1000 (EST) From: Warren Liddell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:00:09 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609272300.09999.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at chariot.net.au Subject: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:56:26 -0000 Im running FreeBSD 7.0-Current fresh install, upgraded from 6-STABLE portupgrade and world worked fine .. then today after a cvsup .. portupgrade errors with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" Anyone got any ideas as to why ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 13:17:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAE816A492 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DFA43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GSZIE-0006nl-GW; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:17:49 +0100 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.33]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GSZH4-0007ND-86; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:16:33 +0100 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8RDE4J8018495; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:14:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from shterenl@localhost) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8RDE4VI018494; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:14:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk: shterenl set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:14:03 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: George Allan Message-ID: <20060927131403.GA18332@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> <20060927124549.GA568@home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060927124549.GA568@home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:55 -0000 > Maybe it's time to reconsider the nature of that itch? PDF was never > meant to be edited (except peripherally), and most definitely not in the > sense that you're thinking. Consider it a FINAL "print" format, like an > image that's long since left the photographer, his studio and his camera > and now exists only as a JPG on a hard drive. > Agreed. But what if I'm writing a paper for a scientific journal in latex on my freebsd and my coauthors just can't be persuaded to use anything that's not already exist on their windows PCs? I find the results of latex2html or latex2rtf of poor quality (even for editing purposes), i.e. lots of errors, problems with references, etc. Maybe I need to learn how to use these tools better. Lately I was sending them pdfs and got in reply some pdfs that can only be viewed properly with the latest acrobat, and their comments are only visible on the screen anyway and cannot at all be printed. So what do I do? More broadly, what is the solution for cross- platform (*nix - windows - vms) editing of a complex document, with lots of maths, line plots and raster images? anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:16:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE3516A4A0 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ED3B43E52 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:15:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: (qmail 30227 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 15:29:29 -0000 Received: from 85233229074.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO dansknet.dk) (85.233.229.74) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 15:29:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:17:20 +0200 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060927161720.796963b3@dansknet.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Working with DocBook on FreeBSD nothing but problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:16:33 -0000 Hi For some strange reason I no longer can convert my .fo files to .pdf using "fop". All I get is this.. $ fop -d mytext.fo mytext.pdf [DEBUG] Input mode: [DEBUG] FO [DEBUG] fo input file: mytext.fo [DEBUG] Output mode: [DEBUG] pdf [DEBUG] output file: mytext.pdf [DEBUG] OPTIONS [DEBUG] no user configuration file is used [default] [DEBUG] debug mode on [DEBUG] dump configuration [DEBUG] quiet mode on [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser [INFO] base directory: file:/usr/home/rico/cvs/doc/mytext/ [INFO] FOP 0.20.5 [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser [INFO] building formatting object tree [INFO] setting up fonts [ERROR] property - "background-position-horizontal" is not implemented yet. [ERROR] property - "background-position-vertical" is not implemented yet. Error creating background image: Error while recovering Image Informations (http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/images/draft.png) : Operation timed out [ERROR] property - "background-position-horizontal" is not implemented yet. [ERROR] property - "background-position-vertical" is not implemented yet. [INFO] JAI support was not installed (read: not present at build time). Trying to use Jimi instead Error creating background image: Error creating FopImage object (http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/images/draft.png) : Jimi image library not available [ERROR] property - "background-position-horizontal" is not implemented yet. [ERROR] property - "background-position-vertical" is not implemented yet. Then it just freezes. Normally I can convert eventhough the above errors are shown, but now I can't. I can't seem to figure out what it is doing standing there. Could anyone please shed some light on this issue. I am seriously thinking about not using DocBook anymore and just going back to Open Office. There are so many complications during conversion IMHO. Best regards Rico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:16:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9983B16A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EB643D8B for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:16:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E62E118; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:16:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451A87CB.9060808@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:16:43 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Liddell References: <200609272300.09999.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200609272300.09999.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:16:56 -0000 Warren Liddell wrote: > Im running FreeBSD 7.0-Current fresh install, upgraded from 6-STABLE > portupgrade and world worked fine .. then today after a cvsup .. portupgrade > errors with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" > > Anyone got any ideas as to why ? in which order did you world/portupgrade? if you first portupgraded then updated world then I would expect such an error as cvsup may have been built against old libs. Anyway, you should have a new cvsup client at hand, csup, which is part of base (it's in RELENG_6 also). Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:22:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D6716A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:22:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (starfish.geekisp.com [216.168.135.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F81843D5E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:22:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 4580 invoked by uid 1003); 27 Sep 2006 14:22:39 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 14:22:39 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8REMcjI014868; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:22:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id k8REMc1h004643; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:22:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:22:38 -0400 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: Rico Secada Message-ID: <20060927142237.GD1059@ayvali.org> References: <20060927161720.796963b3@dansknet.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060927161720.796963b3@dansknet.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Working with DocBook on FreeBSD nothing but problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:22:41 -0000 * Rico Secada [2006-09-27 16:17:20 +0200]: > [ERROR] property - "background-position-horizontal" is not implemented > yet. > > Then it just freezes. I vaguely remember this happening to me when I wasn't checked for validity against the DocBook DTD. Putting "xmllint --valid foo.xml" into the build scripts worked out nicely. Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:44:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CC316A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from c2bthomr04.btconnect.com (c2bthomr04.btconnect.com [194.73.73.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81A443D72 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from meridiansystems.co.uk (host81-139-203-17.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.203.17]) by c2bthomr04.btconnect.com (MOS 3.7.4b-GA) with ESMTP id FSN69205; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:38:11 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:34:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D194@msl01.msl.local> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C6E24A.5CD22110" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Thread-Topic: Running applications on freebsd which currently run on SCO Openserver. thread-index: AcbiQfzOvJz7ufB2Sv61ZdTD8p1onw== From: "Jim Borland" Importance: normal Priority: normal To: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Running applications on freebsd which currently run on SCO Openserver. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C6E24A.5CD22110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have an application which is written in cobol and runs on SCO Openserver, we moved from Interactive Unix to SCO many years ago without any problem. =20 Is it possible to just copy the executables ( the compiler, some utility programs etc. ) onto a freebsd machine? I have tried but they don't run! =20 Any help would be appreciated. =20 Thanks, Jim Borland. -------------------------------------------------------- Jim Borland Unit 2 Wallace Studios 27 Wallace Avenue LisburnBT27 4AE mail: JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk www: www.meridiansystems.co.uk tel: +44 (0)28 9260 5060 fax: +44 (0)28 9264 0700 mob:=20 -------------------------------------------------------- This message contains confidential information and is intended only for = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org. If you are not = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org you should not disseminate, distribute or = copy this e-mail. Please notify JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk = immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and = delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be = guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be = intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or = contain viruses. Jim Borland therefore does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a = result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please = request a hard-copy version. -------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C6E24A.5CD22110-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:44:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD5016A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from c2bthomr04.btconnect.com (c2bthomr04.btconnect.com [194.73.73.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D834443D77 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from meridiansystems.co.uk (host81-139-203-17.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.203.17]) by c2bthomr04.btconnect.com (MOS 3.7.4b-GA) with ESMTP id FSN69249; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:38:14 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:43:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D195@msl01.msl.local> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C6E24B.BB1C3390" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Thread-Topic: Systems Administration Tool thread-index: AcbiQ1uUyKswINmuTw6blbeGdFWgfw== Importance: normal From: "Jim Borland" Priority: normal To: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Systems Administration Tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C6E24B.BB1C3390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Is there any kind of systems administration tool on freebsd to enable the configuration of such things as printers and users? Is there a graphical user interface? =20 Thanks, Jim. -------------------------------------------------------- Jim Borland Unit 2 Wallace Studios 27 Wallace Avenue LisburnBT27 4AE mail: JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk www: www.meridiansystems.co.uk tel: +44 (0)28 9260 5060 fax: +44 (0)28 9264 0700 mob:=20 -------------------------------------------------------- This message contains confidential information and is intended only for = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org. If you are not = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org you should not disseminate, distribute or = copy this e-mail. Please notify JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk = immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and = delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be = guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be = intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or = contain viruses. Jim Borland therefore does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a = result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please = request a hard-copy version. -------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C6E24B.BB1C3390-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:49:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D7A16A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from skyhawk.kjsl.com (skyhawk.kjsl.com [69.36.241.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E12243D7F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from [64.102.196.31] (dhcp-64-102-196-31.cisco.com [64.102.196.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: javier) by skyhawk.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08E6B8162; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:49:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D195@msl01.msl.local> References: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D195@msl01.msl.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Javier Henderson Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:49:10 -0400 To: "Jim Borland" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Systems Administration Tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:14 -0000 On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Jim Borland wrote: > Hi, > Is there any kind of systems administration tool on freebsd to enable > the configuration of such things as printers and users? Is there a > graphical user interface? Look at the webmin port. -jav From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:54:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0E616A47E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E5443D79 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:54:41 -0400 id 0005643C.451A90B1.00013441 Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 10:52:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:54:41 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Jim Borland" Message-Id: <20060927105441.298235cd.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D195@msl01.msl.local> References: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D195@msl01.msl.local> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Systems Administration Tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:54:45 -0000 In response to "Jim Borland" : > Hi, > Is there any kind of systems administration tool on freebsd to enable > the configuration of such things as printers and users? Is there a > graphical user interface? Have a look at webmin. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 14:55:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EC616A575 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CCF43D4C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:55:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F4E5F15; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:55:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4o7wgvzheBMI; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:55:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F46A5F04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:55:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451A90D0.4050904@mac.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:55:12 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Borland References: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D195@msl01.msl.local> In-Reply-To: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D195@msl01.msl.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Systems Administration Tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:55:20 -0000 Jim Borland wrote: > Hi, > Is there any kind of systems administration tool on freebsd to enable > the configuration of such things as printers and users? Certainly. You can run sysinstall again and do "post-installation configuration" with that tool, or you can run adduser or other tools directly. > Is there a graphical user interface? Yes-- some people like webmin, for example. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 15:11:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB35216A415 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@cruzweb.net) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.200.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686D043D68 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@cruzweb.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-68-61-214-252.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.61.214.252]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <200609271510550110060934e>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:06 +0000 Message-ID: <451A9483.2010200@cruzweb.net> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:10:59 -0400 From: John Cruz Organization: Cruz Web Development User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikos Vassiliadis References: <4518BCCE.5050902@cruzweb.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20060926101822.021c39b0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <200609271124.19682.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <200609271124.19682.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: Creating New Users over Telnet/SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@cruzweb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:07 -0000 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On Tuesday 26 September 2006 18:29, Derek Ragona wrote: > [snip] > No, you can force a default shell without modifications. > Check out login.conf(5) and shell variable. > > However, the original post implies little FreeBSD experience. > Why do you want to automate such a procedure? > You said it's going to be for a networking class, that is a limited > a number of users, right? > > sdf is a public access Unix system and has to do this automatically, > you don't have to. smj@sdf.lonestar is a seasoned administrator, > who has tampered the OS in a number of ways. > > Just my 2 cents, Nikos > > That's basically what I was asking, could this be something easily done with a script that could be a fun learning experience, or would it require major OS customization and wouldn't be worth the time or trouble. Thanks for your input, Nikos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 15:11:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F3E16A416 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: from smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E623243D69 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: (qmail 22955 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 15:11:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (67.32.30.240) by smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.17) with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2006 15:11:38 -0000 In-Reply-To: <921515612.20060926174728@gmail.com> References: <921515612.20060926174728@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5E144517-AB79-4647-B053-AB75AEEC306E@hackmiester.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "hackmiester (Hunter Fuller)" Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:11:32 -0500 To: ograbme X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has anyone on this list set up an internet connection using a Westell WireSpeed ADSL modem? If so, please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:42 -0000 On 26 September 2006, at 16:47, ograbme wrote: > > let me know what gotcha's, if any, I should be aware of. I have. I set it to router mode. Make sure you have it set to that. Then you can simply use DHCP and get your IP and have internets. > > Thanks in advance. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) yknow when you go to a party, and everyones hooked up except one guy and one girl and so they look at each other like.. do we have to? intel & nvidia must be lookin at each other like that right now Phone Voice: +1 251 589 6348 Fax: Call the voice number and ask. Email General chat: hackmiester@hackmiester.com Large attachments: hackmiester@gmail.com SPS-related stuff: hfuller@stpaulsmobile.net IM AIM: hackmiester1337 Skype: hackmiester31337 YIM: hackm1ester Gtalk: hackmiester MSN: hackmiester@hackmiester.com Xfire: hackmiester From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 15:20:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBBA16A415 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EE343D58 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:20:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so234741wxd for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:20:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=tY81xhROAYL0U05aX3lTh0Ple88sAGg9Gy922cfbNyOow4JkonO5E1zcoEWuwnlMtcQh3EEcve3HwBUFcLyh1am2n3FPJfDdJHIaUV6av1EmPryyS3JQMKxHX92XxpxQcRl/gZE0Bhm3DqSNQ+jHCbHdGntzcXbDAbLD8D+KZaE= Received: by 10.70.113.16 with SMTP id l16mr859794wxc; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.117.8 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70063950609270820p4f104d71gae306bdf3de98ddb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:20:46 -0400 From: "Marty Landman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: intermittent boot problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:20:48 -0000 I've got a new FBSD 5.3 release install on an old Compaq pII-233 w/ 128M ram. What I get when the boot fails is "tx underrun -- using store and forward mode" repeating infinitely. Now that a reboot has succeeded here's what dmesg shows for dc0: dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0x1400-0x14ff mem 0x40900000-0x409000ff irq 11 at device 4.0 on pci0 miibus0: on dc0 lxtphy0: on miibus0 lxtphy0: 100baseFX, 100baseFX-FDX, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:40:3e:9b dc0: if_start running deferred for Giant dc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Any idea on what is going wrong and how I can fix it? Marty -- Web Installed Formmail - http://face2interface.com/formINSTal/ Webmaster's BBS - http://bbs.face2interface.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 15:29:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0BA16A4A0 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B682243DEA for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:27:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so236372wxd for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:26:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=T8shfqUXblaYiQ5nxoKhpKwyiPsSlwvOmNvhixq2mBT3wwpUfSb8C2PbxegRDeaaUoojok7DsbHVbwSI5AC2RovHV+CmrDA/VF63Di2vdpKI3WEOy2ZaTMQVrs9Uk6yjl8LsH+Vw3Doj0YigqQIK27FIcqk85ZANiHSQsBf+DFs= Received: by 10.70.47.19 with SMTP id u19mr885164wxu; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.117.8 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70063950609270826l35f7d310s63417deaf268060a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:26:54 -0400 From: "Marty Landman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <70063950609270820p4f104d71gae306bdf3de98ddb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <70063950609270820p4f104d71gae306bdf3de98ddb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: intermittent boot problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:29:16 -0000 Sorry there's a bit more info available for my problem: $ dmesg | grep dc0 dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0x1400-0x14ff mem 0x40900000-0x409000ff irq 11 at device 4.0 on pci0 miibus0: on dc0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:40:3e:9b dc0: if_start running deferred for Giant dc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state $ On 9/27/06, Marty Landman wrote: > > I've got a new FBSD 5.3 release install on an old Compaq pII-233 w/ 128M > ram. What I get when the boot fails is > > "tx underrun -- using store and forward mode" > > repeating infinitely. > > Now that a reboot has succeeded here's what dmesg shows for dc0: > > dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0x1400-0x14ff mem > 0x40900000-0x409000ff irq 11 at device 4.0 on pci0 > miibus0: on dc0 > lxtphy0: on miibus0 > lxtphy0: 100baseFX, 100baseFX-FDX, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, > 100baseTX-FDX, auto > dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:40:3e:9b > dc0: if_start running deferred for Giant > dc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > > Any idea on what is going wrong and how I can fix it? > > > Marty > > -- > Web Installed Formmail - http://face2interface.com/formINSTal/ > Webmaster's BBS - http://bbs.face2interface.com/ -- Web Installed Formmail - http://face2interface.com/formINSTal/ Webmaster's BBS - http://bbs.face2interface.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 15:30:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC9216A90B for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BED43D8A for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so55083wri for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:30:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BstkpQJNja7JMCHF8P7j3Mo8T0EG4FjCDgMNxcYwQIpyA5UmYexdNiAdoTOffqyweF+iYRXiZOAwR1/WGie0UoNsBdUgGJhEfREebARs9tcXEAXnMRuyNsqnmUwMpsD77WZg+XWe7fhkTtqr3tb8zd2oZlwO7D0xtKaQsf1TbGM= Received: by 10.90.116.6 with SMTP id o6mr305334agc; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609270830o54a038f7x4f54aa0a57b08300@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:30:09 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: "Oliver Iberien" In-Reply-To: <200609260831.32610.odilist@sonic.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200609260831.32610.odilist@sonic.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE and libflashplayer - help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:30:17 -0000 Hello, On 9/26/06, Oliver Iberien wrote: > I've followed the instructions at > http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php. libmap.conf contains: > > [/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/libflashplayer.so] > libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.2 > libdl.so.2 pluginwrapper/flash7.so > libz.so.1 libz.so.3 > libm.so.6 libm.so.4 > libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/flash7.so > > And (having looked through this list's archives) > > ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/flashplayer.xpt /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins/flashplayer.xpt > > But konqueror doesn't see a plugin either in > the /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/ > or /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/ folders. Firefox does nothing. And > there I am stuck. What am I doing wrong? I also tried the same steps and had the same problem: konqueror does not find the flash plugin. Regards Ivan -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 16:08:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F1616A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D6243D79 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:08:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED675F56; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:08:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EZnTAX-c5oz; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:07:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F4D5C6D; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:07:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451AA1DD.8030000@mac.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:07:57 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Landman References: <70063950609270820p4f104d71gae306bdf3de98ddb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70063950609270820p4f104d71gae306bdf3de98ddb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intermittent boot problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:08:03 -0000 Marty Landman wrote: > I've got a new FBSD 5.3 release install on an old Compaq pII-233 w/ 128M > ram. What I get when the boot fails is > > "tx underrun -- using store and forward mode" > > repeating infinitely. > > Now that a reboot has succeeded here's what dmesg shows for dc0: > > dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0x1400-0x14ff mem You've got an Asante/Kingston/Linksys PNIC clone of the DEC 21x4x "Tulip" chipset. I've had four out of five of those cards die within two years. If upgrading to 5-STABLE or 6.2 BETA doesn't fix it, consider replacing the NIC with something else: The dc driver programs 82c168 and 82c169 PNIC chips to use the store and forward setting for the transmit start threshold by default. This is to work around problems with some NIC/PCI bus combinations where the PNIC can transmit corrupt frames when operating at 100Mbps, probably due to PCI DMA burst transfer errors. The 82c168 and 82c169 PNIC chips also have a receiver bug that sometimes manifests during periods of heavy receive and transmit activity, where the chip will improperly DMA received frames to the host. The chips appear to upload several kilobytes of garbage data along with the received frame data, dirtying several RX buffers instead of just the expected one. The dc driver detects this condition and will salvage the frame; however, it incurs a serious performance penalty in the process. The PNIC chips also sometimes generate a transmit underrun error when the driver attempts to download the receiver filter setup frame, which can result in the receive filter being incorrectly programmed. The dc driver will watch for this condition and requeue the setup frame until it is transfered successfully. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 16:10:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403D016A4DE for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7524143D9B for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:10:21 -0400 id 00056439.451AA26D.00014237 Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 12:08:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:10:20 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Jim Borland" Message-Id: <20060927121020.015ae806.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D19D@msl01.msl.local> References: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D19D@msl01.msl.local> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Systems Administration Tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:10:30 -0000 In response to "Jim Borland" : > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@collaborativefusion.com] > Sent: 27 September 2006 15:55 > To: Jim Borland > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Systems Administration Tool > > In response to "Jim Borland" : > > > Hi, > > Is there any kind of systems administration tool on freebsd to enable > > the configuration of such things as printers and users? Is there a > > graphical user interface? > > Have a look at webmin. > > Bill, > How do I look at webmin? > Regards, > Jim. There are a number of things for you to learn: 1) Postings that start on mailing lists stay on mailing lists. It's considered rude to single out someone to pump them for additional information. 2) Your email client is broken. It does not properly "quote" previous emails. Notice how your response and mine have the same number of ">". This can usually be fixed via configuration options. 3) You top-posted. Please do a google search on top-posting to understand the reasons why it is bad, I'm not going to repeat them all here. 4) Folks who can't do their own research usually don't last very long in the OSS world. I'm not saying that to be rude, it's just my personal observation. It's understandable not to know where to start, but a comment such as "have a look at webmin" should give you enough to feed to a search engine that you wouldn't need to ask a one-line question like you did. So, your next step is to get some practice with a search engine and at least get past the simple questions on webmin. We'll be happy to help out with details or problems. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 17:04:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503D16A4F1 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n120.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1081.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C5043DA9 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:01:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n120.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 451A9B4700005A36 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:00:48 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:00:35 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: rewrite of multiple incoming IPs into a single IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:04:31 -0000 On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:49 PM, Chris wrote: > I have spent the day trying to get multiple IP addresses rewritten > to a single address using IPFW and NATD. Is there a simple So as not to leave a hanging post in case someone else searches on this issue, I'm going to answer myself. I am now successfully using natd to internally rewrite multiple IPs to a single jail and then back to their real address, it does seem to be identical to configuring a private IP network but instead of an interface, I'm using the alias_address bound to the primary interface. Within the jail, NameVirtualHost is able to service the various sites by name through http client/server banter. This will not work if someone uses unregistered sites unless host tables are created for the http clients due to the jailed httpd responding from the default site. This makes the jail very useful to me without disrupting the environment of the companies web space and the human ramifications that can cause. If there is a superior way to do this, please correct me. I also now realize, this should have been posted to FreeBSD-IPFW, apologies. (note, these private IPs are really simulating my public IPs) Addresses on bge0 host IP 192.168.1.222 host alias and jail IP 192.168.1.223 second host alias 192.168.1.224 (simulates a different public address to be served by the jail after rewriting to 223) IPFW Pertinent Commands divert 8668 ip from any to any via bge0 (packets all follow this path) allow tcp from any to 192.168.1.223 dst-port 80 setup (packets are rewritten on the way in and follow this path to jail) allow ip from 192.168.1.223 to 192.168.1.0/24 (packets coming from the outside on 223 return on this path) allow ip from 192.168.1.224 to 192.168.1.0/24 (packets coming from the outside on 224 return on this path) NATD commands alias_address 192.168.1.223 redirect_address 192.168.1.223 192.168.1.224 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 17:26:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8985A16A4A7 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efrenba@yahoo.es) Received: from web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.176.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA36943D7D for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:26:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efrenba@yahoo.es) Received: (qmail 46457 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Sep 2006 17:26:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RVg2EV15MXxLRsGjUbZYWrUXdUFKU/p3QUccn9L5vMwiGX8IFPOA0RZu5qjEj21N7sYh9L90xyY+CcgJcGrWTFFOrk/ajwWkKCky8Wha69wlMWt0EqCyReA+mND33C9LExNcBqxUtktEEJkUCk4EhLssqnntE0HDL8sXS48jbWM= ; Message-ID: <20060927172641.46455.qmail@web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.55.168.195] by web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:26:41 CEST Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:26:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Efren Bravo To: freeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Restore OS user, help!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:26:43 -0000 Hi, I've installed a new freeBSD server and my question is if I copy the /home/* files and /etc/passwd file, then I restart it, the server assume all the users declared into the passwd file or should I do something else? Thanks... Efren Bravo. ----- Fight back spam! Download the Blue Frog. http://www.bluesecurity.com/register/s?user=ZWZyZW5iYQ%3D%3D ______________________________________________ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 17:37:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A79216A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dprobd02.vailsys.com (dprobd02.vailsys.com [63.149.73.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5E543D58 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:37:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dfsfbd06.vail (dfsfbd06.vail [192.168.129.190]) by dprobd02.vailsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79C88A5C8C; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:37:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dfwdamian.vail [192.168.129.233]) by dfsfbd06.vail (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C30323EB9; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:37:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dwiest@localhost.vail [127.0.0.1]) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8RHSafo014231; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:28:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from dwiest@localhost) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8RHSYrV008533; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:28:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dfwdamian.vail: dwiest set sender to dwiest@vailsys.com using -f Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:28:33 -0500 From: Damian Wiest To: Chris Message-ID: <20060927172833.GA23474@dfwdamian.vail> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: rewrite of multiple incoming IPs into a single IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:37:23 -0000 On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:49:50PM -0700, Chris wrote: > I have spent the day trying to get multiple IP addresses rewritten to > a single address using IPFW and NATD. Is there a simple way to do > this. If I put natd on the public interface, it grabs it and the > system hangs at boot. Is there an interface for keeping the packets > local to the system where divert can pass them, natd rewrite them and > reinsert them into ipfw? The application is what I asked about two > days ago, funneling multiple external websites on different addresses > into a single jail that works of Apache's NameVirtualHost. Thought it > was the easy part but so far it's the only part that is not working, > the jail and apache work great. I think I need a divert rule that > goes to an internal interface (tun0?) and be able to start natd on > that interface. I actually tried tun0 but it was not recognized (I'm > not configuring for ppp). It would seem that if I can get over this > hurdle, I could use the redirect_address within natd to perform the > magic I need. > > Please tell me if I'm trying to do something absurd or if this should > be directed to a different list. > > Thanks > Chris If I understand your problem correctly, you're trying to host multiple websites, each with its own IP address, on one server. Why not use IP aliasing (see ifconfig(8)) with multiple instances of Apache? For example, in rc.conf add some lines like: ifconfig_bge0="inet 208.64.173.114 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_bge0_alias0="inet 208.64.173.116 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 208.64.173.127" ifconfig_bge0_alias1="inet 208.64.173.118 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 208.64.173.127" You'll then need to run an instance of Apache for each ip address. This assumes that each website's IP is in the same network. With the setup I've described above, you could also use nat to direct packets to one of your IPs. From what you've described, I don't see how you'll ever receive packets addressed for the other IPs since you're not handling arp. -Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 17:42:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCED16A47B for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DB043D83 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:42:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C4113D772; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:48:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 01FC413D771; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:48:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D0113D76E; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:48:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:48:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Efren Bravo In-Reply-To: <20060927172641.46455.qmail@web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060927124643.I75250@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <20060927172641.46455.qmail@web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: Restore OS user, help!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:42:41 -0000 > I've installed a new freeBSD server and my > question is if I copy the /home/* files and > /etc/passwd file, then I restart it, the server > assume all the users declared into the passwd > file or should I do something else? You'll also want to copy over... /etc/group /etc/master.passwd /etc/spwd.db /var/mail/ /var/cron/tabs (there might be some others, but I think that should do it. man passwd to see what other files it mentions) And make sure when you copy /home/* you preserve permissions... -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 17:54:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE5C16A4DD for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n054.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1109.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E278543DC3 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:53:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n054.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 4519C87D00029F8F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:53:39 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20060927172833.GA23474@dfwdamian.vail> References: <20060927172833.GA23474@dfwdamian.vail> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:53:26 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: rewrite of multiple incoming IPs into a single IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:54:22 -0000 On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Damian Wiest wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:49:50PM -0700, Chris wrote: >> I have spent the day trying to get multiple IP addresses rewritten to >> a single address using IPFW and NATD. Is there a simple way to do > > If I understand your problem correctly, you're trying to host multiple > websites, each with its own IP address, on one server. Why not use IP > aliasing (see ifconfig(8)) with multiple instances of Apache? For > example, > in rc.conf add some lines like: The difficulty comes in using a jail without applying non-supported hacks to allow for multiple IP addresses. I think I blew it by not putting that in this post. The intent to create a single jail supporting multiple legacy sites with their own IPs, was to avoid duplicating the memory footprint of httpd and other services by running a jail for each IP. One can go to a single IP for all the sites, but that may incur resistance that has nothing to do with the technical aspects. It appears the natd solution I posted is working in test anyway. Thank you and sorry I didn't clarify completely on the original post. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 18:32:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8450F16A494 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xj2106@columbia.edu) Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F50743D5C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:32:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xj2106@columbia.edu) Received: from presario.homeunix.org (dyn-pupin-171-119.dyn.columbia.edu [128.59.171.119]) (user=xj2106 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8RIVu0l010627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:01 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> <20060927124549.GA568@home> <20060927131403.GA18332@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Xiao-Yong Jin Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:31:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060927131403.GA18332@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> (Anton Shterenlikht's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:14:03 +0100") Message-ID: <86zmclqhyu.fsf@presario.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 128.59.29.6 Subject: Re: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:32:02 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht writes: >> Maybe it's time to reconsider the nature of that itch? PDF was never >> meant to be edited (except peripherally), and most definitely not in the >> sense that you're thinking. Consider it a FINAL "print" format, like an >> image that's long since left the photographer, his studio and his camera >> and now exists only as a JPG on a hard drive. >> > > Agreed. But what if I'm writing a paper for a scientific journal > in latex on my freebsd and my coauthors just can't be persuaded to > use anything that's not already exist on their windows PCs? I find > the results of latex2html or latex2rtf of poor quality (even for > editing purposes), i.e. lots of errors, problems with references, > etc. Maybe I need to learn how to use these tools better. > > Lately I was sending them pdfs and got in reply some pdfs that can > only be viewed properly with the latest acrobat, and their comments > are only visible on the screen anyway and cannot at all be printed. > > So what do I do? More broadly, what is the solution for cross- > platform (*nix - windows - vms) editing of a complex document, with > lots of maths, line plots and raster images? I think any kind of mark-up file format that is open will do. Such as LaTeX. Graphics is the hard part, any way. Xiao-Yong > anton > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 19:10:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2D916A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gtsy@mail.ru) Received: from mx6.mail.ru (mx6.mail.ru [194.67.23.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9656443D46 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gtsy@mail.ru) Received: from [87.240.6.158] (port=29263 helo=savs.home) by mx6.mail.ru with esmtp id 1GSenp-000GPC-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:10:41 +0400 From: "Stroganov A. V." To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:11:21 +0400 Message-Id: <1159384281.5279.15.camel@savs.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Passive ftp? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gtsy@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:10:46 -0000 Greetings I've a LAN server (also a router) with vsftpd running on it. According to logs, everything is fine (OK DOWNLOAD). But some windows users say that they are loosing connection or session. They can't change folders at once, only with a few tries. Also they can't download folders with many files. I tested ftp with IE, Firefox, gftp and so on, and didn't find any problems. Should I allow passive ftp connections? And could you give me a link (found some in google, but all of them are different and useless) or some ipfw sample with passive connection settings? I tried to configure vsftpd to use passive mode on port range 50000-60000 and allowed any to any 50000-60000 in ipfw, but natd also uses these ports so they can't be from any to any. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 19:29:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984D616A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.emre.sahin@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9DA43D4C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from i.emre.sahin@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so78992uge for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:29:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=goVKdbeEKXrTCslfsAHHCxbvANEZRsUrLeZpAxoV52emY8ABRjxTAkowF3d1jalJELnDAPXADSRR+k9zdRPucshFsL5l8/RNemJhhpwB4fp6IRTRF5VfJ9UC86HzPIYLdO+jJ5AiIcTfxS+iSvq8LPVpPo1tB+semQgxTeLORrY= Received: by 10.67.117.18 with SMTP id u18mr882032ugm; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.32.14 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:55 +0300 From: "Emre Sahin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <86zmclqhyu.fsf@presario.homeunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> <20060927124549.GA568@home> <20060927131403.GA18332@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <86zmclqhyu.fsf@presario.homeunix.org> Subject: Re: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:29:56 -0000 On 9/27/06, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht writes: > [...] > > > > Lately I was sending them pdfs and got in reply some pdfs that can > > only be viewed properly with the latest acrobat, and their comments > > are only visible on the screen anyway and cannot at all be printed. > > > > So what do I do? More broadly, what is the solution for cross- > > platform (*nix - windows - vms) editing of a complex document, with > > lots of maths, line plots and raster images? > > I think any kind of mark-up file format that is open will do. > Such as LaTeX. Graphics is the hard part, any way. > > Xiao-Yong > Maybe not here, but in some cases pdftohtml in http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdftohtml/ may help. HTML seems to be the most easily edited format across platforms, yet it is not for printing on paper. For math, MathML support or inline images may be a solution. Ah! By the way, you can see LyX at www.lyx.org. It's like a front-end to LaTeX. The version in the ports is 1.3.x, which is a bit older. (But will give you the idea.) It has a Windows version running on top of MikTeX and the version in the ports works on tetex. It's not perfect for a Word addict and may need some tutorial reading, yet much comfortable than plain LaTeX. Best. Emre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 20:54:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BBF16A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A366C43D6E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:54:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8RKqqxG088960; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:52:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8RKqqEc088959; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:52:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:52:52 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: azhar freebsd Message-ID: <20060927205252.GB88783@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060925151251.GB78251@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:54:18 -0000 On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 07:04:53PM +0900, azhar freebsd wrote: > 2006/9/26, Jerry McAllister : > > > >On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:35:07PM +0900, azhar freebsd wrote: > > > >> hi > >> can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. > > > >Just what it says. > >It is a FreeBSD 6.2 that has not been officially released yet. > >The present official release is 6.1. The 6.2 release is coming > >soon and is being worked on actively. You can install it for > >testing or development or somewhat risky production use. It is > >sort of a beta release. > > > >////jerry > > > >> > >> uname -a > >> FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep > >> 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 > >> root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 > >> [root@belagelo]~#emacs > >> > >> > >> azhar > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > thank u for your reply . is there any way to get back the normal freebsd > version . i am facing a lot of problems that i think its because of this > version .like i cant install any package by sysinstall through ftp . If it is really a problem with version 6.2, you might have to do a fresh install of 6.1 and then cvsup to RELENG_6.1 rather than STABLE or CURRENT. So far as I know, though, 6.2 is very reliable now. So, maybe it might help to pursue the actual problems you are having more. It may be that you would have the same problems in 6.1 or even 5.5. So, you might want to ask questions about the specific problems you are having in 6.2. ////jerry > > azhar > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:07:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4584D16A4E8 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6372543D7E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:06:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8RL4tTh089023; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:04:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8RL4tqA089022; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:04:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:04:55 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Efren Bravo Message-ID: <20060927210455.GC88783@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060927172641.46455.qmail@web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060927172641.46455.qmail@web25225.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: Restore OS user, help!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:07:04 -0000 On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Efren Bravo wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed a new freeBSD server and my > question is if I copy the /home/* files and > /etc/passwd file, then I restart it, the server > assume all the users declared into the passwd > file or should I do something else? You will then need to run pwd_mkdb(8) on the /etc/passwd file for anything to work. ////jerry > > Thanks... > > Efren Bravo. > ----- > Fight back spam! Download the Blue Frog. > http://www.bluesecurity.com/register/s?user=ZWZyZW5iYQ%3D%3D > > ______________________________________________ > LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. > Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?ntimo por minuto. > http://es.voice.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:26:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B9016A47C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA2943D68 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8RLPN1D070991 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:25:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E28C.31FF46B0" Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:25:23 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D12CF@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SSH connection cut during dump on tape Thread-Index: AcbiWkJSfqNbIQe2So2hje7SE4KroQAIE+5A From: "Philippe Lang" To: "freeBSD" X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Subject: SSH connection cut during dump on tape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:26:53 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E28C.31FF46B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, While doing a backup on an HP Ultrium LTO1 tape, my ssh connection froze, and since then, I'm not able to use the tape device anymore. xeon# mt -f /dev/nsa0 rewind mt: /dev/nsa0: Device busy xeon# dump -0uaL -f /dev/nsa0 /dev/da0s1a DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Sep 27 23:21:56 2006 DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1a (/) to /dev/nsa0 DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories] DUMP: estimated 56238 tape blocks. DUMP: Cannot open output "/dev/nsa0". DUMP: Do you want to retry the open?: ("yes" or "no") Is there a way to reset the tape device without rebooting the server? I'm using the 6.0 version. --------------- Philippe Lang Attik System ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E28C.31FF46B0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCCAocw ggHwoAMCAQICEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MDYyMjE3MzE0NloXDTA3MDYyMjE3MzE0 NlowZzENMAsGA1UEBBMETGFuZzERMA8GA1UEKhMIUGhpbGlwcGUxFjAUBgNVBAMTDVBoaWxpcHBl IExhbmcxKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAOfvCPREDwfIbzsNRoyBDoSOWfI2NNWdRRMJXuj5ldF22gSQ 6MiXFUjt4HlRIwPb8x13hrv89GW/SmLjFThxf7NKZ8dPTZzp4ZlvrQBRAYhSuTQOJ8azyzruZu54 Ak7fa3pz26Q3B8kg4knZBz3O9Q4K1tK8AEdjNQpyDg/iDdzjAgMBAAGjOTA3MCcGA1UdEQQgMB6B HHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF AAOBgQAAzz+I6MrhWjbfWSgngW/DthHvXiTR6x0cCeb4T5mBb5dgueqgLnrh/2blsbCQuLWh0URe /1l/QQ2dY2elG3PEDPv9cCl/LcwsCsE1Nj3bGM4gdVx9crYvTw5dyyUuDq1KShV3uziE+o5Lyfx4 qWRYd6/yIBDVarohdpL8J0DJczCCAy0wggKWoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05NjAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDEy MzEyMzU5NTlaMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANRp19SwlGRbcelH2AxRtupykbCEXn0tDY97Et+FJXUodDpC LGMnn5V7S+9+GYcdhuqj3bnOlmQawhRuRKx85o/oTQ9xH0A4pgCjh3j2+ZSGXq3qwF5269kUo11u enwMpUtVfwYZKX+emibVars4JAhqmMex2qOYkf152+VaxBy5AgMBAAGjEzARMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQF MAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAx+ySfk749ZalZ2IqpPBNEWDQb41gWGGsJrtSNVwIzzD7 qEqWih9iQiOMFw/0umScF6xHKd+dmF7SbGBxXKKs3Hnj524ARx+1DSjoAp3kmv0T9KbZfLH43F8j JgmRgHPQFBveQ6mDJfLmnC8Vyv6mq4oHdYsM3VGEa+T40c53ooEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5o wHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH 5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8v Y3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYw KQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NW IXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIC+DCCAvQCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdgwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwOTI3MjEyNTE4WjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUANKTp9xgCHkGYgFvuhghAjIU8uswZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggqhkiG9w0D BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw BwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJJtAj+Azn3wIrMIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRAC CzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJ JtAj+Azn3wIrMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAtMFIgjJUMnpJP7+bTzOYOLVHLFyXDW6TT/vf/CVV fU4Ep8lc9EED2qYA4UQGy69fQEszVH1DZHEaxHtBjCywcjSkokCp6cEt6Qm1b+zG+DMC/VWBhOzS JmRNO47JkFOSb2PHZYEm1SBdJ3sZ26MWrvfHc4hwuLwQBCmyI2QxzpIAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E28C.31FF46B0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:28:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710E216A531 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [195.115.46.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A8F43E00 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FB128CBE for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:26:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.2 (20060627) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7euc+pTstvJ0 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:26:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.16.1.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37C828CBD for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:26:12 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <040DEB3B-4120-4A2D-A04D-73467607E8E5@todoo.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Liste FreeBSD From: bsd Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:25:46 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Filtering peer to peer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:28:16 -0000 Hello, I am looking for a solution that will allow me to filter peer-to-peer =20= activity on my network. I already have a router that do a bunch of filtering / firewalling. I would like to filter specific trafic from peer-to-peer. I was thinking of Squid ? But I don't know if It will be able to filter p-t-p correctly ?? Any other idea ? Please let me know. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:32:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153E116A4F8 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE6543DA1 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD355F04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YxqPPWvbHtTY; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808945C6E; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D12CF@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> References: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D12CF@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <35046995-B775-47F2-BB67-010144944D7B@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:35 -0400 To: Philippe Lang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: SSH connection cut during dump on tape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:55 -0000 On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Philippe Lang wrote: > While doing a backup on an HP Ultrium LTO1 tape, my ssh connection > froze, and since then, I'm not able to use the tape device anymore. Presumably there is another instance of dump or whatever is still running; try to kill -INT or kill -9 it. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:43:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F9E16A4F3 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976CA43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC48E388C32 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:43:51 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:40:23 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========CFFC3A58BA6A9A6E82C2==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:43:54 -0000 --==========CFFC3A58BA6A9A6E82C2========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline What's the best way to sync files locally? I'm running rsync over ssh to backup files from a server. Now I'm setting=20 up a new server, so I rsynced to it as well. The files end up in a subdir=20 of my home directory, because my account is being used for the rsync. I've = been using cp -R to put them in the right place on the server and the chmod = and chown to get the perms right, but I'm thinking there has to be a way to = sync the files locally so that only the ones that have changed or are new=20 have to be copied to the right place. I can use find to set the perms, but I'm not sure how to sync the files.=20 This is unix, so there's got to be a built-in utility that does this, but I = can't seem to find it. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========CFFC3A58BA6A9A6E82C2==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:44:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180FC16A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C9843D49 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:44:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8RLi5H8071147 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:44:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C6E28E.D0A474F0" Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:44:05 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D12D0@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SSH connection cut during dump on tape Thread-Index: AcbifMDioeXnSlpwTQKVJ0YkKO/EQwAAKVFg From: "Philippe Lang" To: "freeBSD" X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Subject: RE: SSH connection cut during dump on tape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:44:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C6E28E.D0A474F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: >> While doing a backup on an HP Ultrium LTO1 tape, my ssh connection >> froze, and since then, I'm not able to use the tape device anymore. > > Presumably there is another instance of dump or whatever is > still running; try to kill -INT or kill -9 it. Works just fine, thanks. I just had to kill processes in the right order. --------------- Philippe Lang Attik System ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C6E28E.D0A474F0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCCAocw ggHwoAMCAQICEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MDYyMjE3MzE0NloXDTA3MDYyMjE3MzE0 NlowZzENMAsGA1UEBBMETGFuZzERMA8GA1UEKhMIUGhpbGlwcGUxFjAUBgNVBAMTDVBoaWxpcHBl IExhbmcxKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAOfvCPREDwfIbzsNRoyBDoSOWfI2NNWdRRMJXuj5ldF22gSQ 6MiXFUjt4HlRIwPb8x13hrv89GW/SmLjFThxf7NKZ8dPTZzp4ZlvrQBRAYhSuTQOJ8azyzruZu54 Ak7fa3pz26Q3B8kg4knZBz3O9Q4K1tK8AEdjNQpyDg/iDdzjAgMBAAGjOTA3MCcGA1UdEQQgMB6B HHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF AAOBgQAAzz+I6MrhWjbfWSgngW/DthHvXiTR6x0cCeb4T5mBb5dgueqgLnrh/2blsbCQuLWh0URe /1l/QQ2dY2elG3PEDPv9cCl/LcwsCsE1Nj3bGM4gdVx9crYvTw5dyyUuDq1KShV3uziE+o5Lyfx4 qWRYd6/yIBDVarohdpL8J0DJczCCAy0wggKWoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05NjAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDEy MzEyMzU5NTlaMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANRp19SwlGRbcelH2AxRtupykbCEXn0tDY97Et+FJXUodDpC LGMnn5V7S+9+GYcdhuqj3bnOlmQawhRuRKx85o/oTQ9xH0A4pgCjh3j2+ZSGXq3qwF5269kUo11u enwMpUtVfwYZKX+emibVars4JAhqmMex2qOYkf152+VaxBy5AgMBAAGjEzARMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQF MAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAx+ySfk749ZalZ2IqpPBNEWDQb41gWGGsJrtSNVwIzzD7 qEqWih9iQiOMFw/0umScF6xHKd+dmF7SbGBxXKKs3Hnj524ARx+1DSjoAp3kmv0T9KbZfLH43F8j JgmRgHPQFBveQ6mDJfLmnC8Vyv6mq4oHdYsM3VGEa+T40c53ooEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5o wHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH 5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8v Y3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYw KQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NW IXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIC+DCCAvQCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdgwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwOTI3MjE0NDA0WjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUwpbB0f2LYNuU0mSi23rpR/h7PNwwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggqhkiG9w0D BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw BwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJJtAj+Azn3wIrMIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRAC CzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJ JtAj+Azn3wIrMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAEHUzapmDvEsw12JevfhVYpIdmXoL7cl3x2+6ADHe UaZNzQ8h2U9HhLVFWUv1lNFukgNuitKq7d8emvTyaCozsNZaJvoDcFSaiLr4nvVY5zTcxzCKL/Ev SSqIiIV3O5vbNiWwG9zSK0TbMLkGG/V/SU8ssldEiPkcm4Xv3rFSOJcAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C6E28E.D0A474F0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:55:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3A516A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DBA43D72 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:55:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so92364uge for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Ap56F6Z7Xd+pqDMFzluPSa+dZDdBqXBvIdxnwLe53FgxRfL2WDoUbdVbfGZSc97YAORRqgBupkR613QXobPRu4LbztDmmursb3DqmGonmF7CB7IGprWPvBBf3GgO0Xgy+epEXBWA73ygSjq6ta6vAa+dSUJO3xGgMPbH0sdiaeM= Received: by 10.66.244.10 with SMTP id r10mr473956ugh; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.86.4 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20609271455v6c1bf420g25ebcb105d263985@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:55:41 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: ndis + Linksys WPC54Gv3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:55:43 -0000 I have just picked up this card for my notebook. On this site: http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2006/02/linksys-wpc54g-with-freebsd-yesterday.html it is reported to work. I have inserted the card, the status light on it blinks green then goes off. I ran ndis and generated the driver as specified, kldloaded the wlan_wep module, followed by ndis, followed by the card driver. After that I checked dmesg - the card did not appear (nothing with ndis or the card driver name). No errors came from kldload, and there was no ndis entry in /dev or /dev/net What's the next step in diagnostics? I'm runing FreeBSD 6.1 on i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:04:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B3B16A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD5043D5D for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:04:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823635F0C; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:04:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdeT57259n5P; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:04:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD845D92; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:04:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1F9B1CC4-D164-4FEF-AEE0-05AA1F7DDEA8@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:04:40 -0400 To: Paul Schmehl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:04:43 -0000 On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > What's the best way to sync files locally? > > I'm running rsync over ssh to backup files from a server. rsync (as root) works just fine to perform local copies preserving permissions and symlinks and so forth. Other people use a tar pipeline, or dump/restore, or cpio... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:04:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659F616A4C2 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906EF43D8B for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:04:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k8RM4d7i060465; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:04:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:04:39 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20060927220439.GC45831@dan.emsphone.com> References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:04:53 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 27), Paul Schmehl said: > What's the best way to sync files locally? > > I'm running rsync over ssh to backup files from a server. Now I'm > setting up a new server, so I rsynced to it as well. The files end > up in a subdir of my home directory, because my account is being used > for the rsync. I've been using cp -R to put them in the right place > on the server and the chmod and chown to get the perms right, but I'm > thinking there has to be a way to sync the files locally so that only > the ones that have changed or are new have to be copied to the right > place. As long as your rsync path has a leading /, it should start at the root filesystem. e.g. "rsync mydir otherserver:mydir" creates ~/mydir , "rsync mydir otherserver:/mydir" creates /mydir (assuming you have permission). > I can use find to set the perms, but I'm not sure how to sync the > files. This is unix, so there's got to be a built-in utility that > does this, but I can't seem to find it. You could use rsync to do this, but It'd probably be easier to get your remote rsync to drop the files in the right directory in the first place. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:15:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F1316A492 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E5B43D77 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386B138934C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:14:32 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:11:04 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1F9B1CC4-D164-4FEF-AEE0-05AA1F7DDEA8@mac.com> References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1F9B1CC4-D164-4FEF-AEE0-05AA1F7DDEA8@mac.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========0535FAB7E0AAA70D8623==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:53 -0000 --==========0535FAB7E0AAA70D8623========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 18:04:40 -0400 Charles Swiger=20 wrote: > On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> What's the best way to sync files locally? >> >> I'm running rsync over ssh to backup files from a server. > > rsync (as root) works just fine to perform local copies preserving > permissions and symlinks and so forth. Other people use a tar pipeline, > or dump/restore, or cpio... I wasn't aware of that. Thanks, Charles. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========0535FAB7E0AAA70D8623==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:15:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAC316A494 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FF843D78 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F55389349 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:14:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:10:34 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060927220439.GC45831@dan.emsphone.com> References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20060927220439.GC45831@dan.emsphone.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========428ABE4C430DB11419DD==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:53 -0000 --==========428ABE4C430DB11419DD========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 17:04:39 -0500 Dan Nelson=20 wrote: > > You could use rsync to do this, but It'd probably be easier to get your > remote rsync to drop the files in the right directory in the first place. > Hmmm...maybe I don't fully understand rsync. The files are from a=20 webserver and owned by www:www. The rsync runs under my account, so the=20 perms are changed to mine. Maybe there's a switch with rsync that would=20 allow me to sync directly? I'll poke around the man page. Thanks. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========428ABE4C430DB11419DD==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:15:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C539A16A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4879343D5C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232C52E024; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451AF7D1.2050905@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:14:41 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:54 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > What's the best way to sync files locally? > > I'm running rsync over ssh to backup files from a server. Now I'm setting > up a new server, so I rsynced to it as well. The files end up in a subdir > of my home directory, because my account is being used for the rsync. I've > been using cp -R to put them in the right place on the server and the chmod > and chown to get the perms right, but I'm thinking there has to be a way to > sync the files locally so that only the ones that have changed or are new > have to be copied to the right place. > > I can use find to set the perms, but I'm not sure how to sync the files. > This is unix, so there's got to be a built-in utility that does this, but I > can't seem to find it. It's really a question of reading far enough in the man-page. I have eventually arrived at the options -Cptuvaz C for CVS omissions (exclude *.bak, *.tmp, *~ etc) p for preserve permisions t for preserving time u for update (using mtime I suppose) a for archive - recursive z for compression and with that, there should be no reason to sync into a separate dir and then copy. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:27:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146BD16A4A0 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:27:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DAE43D53 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:27:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.147] (helo=anti-virus03-10) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GShsK-0005Nk-0T; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:27:32 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GShsJ-00049Z-2l; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:27:31 +0100 Message-ID: <451AFAD2.3090507@dial.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:27:30 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:27:40 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > What's the best way to sync files locally? > > I'm running rsync over ssh to backup files from a server. Now I'm > setting up a new server, so I rsynced to it as well. The files end up > in a subdir of my home directory, because my account is being used for > the rsync. I've been using cp -R to put them in the right place on > the server and the chmod and chown to get the perms right, but I'm > thinking there has to be a way to sync the files locally so that only > the ones that have changed or are new have to be copied to the right > place. > > I can use find to set the perms, but I'm not sure how to sync the > files. This is unix, so there's got to be a built-in utility that does > this, but I can't seem to find it. Well, rsync. When the paths are both local it won't use ssh since it doesn't need it. Not sure why you think the files have to end up under your home dir. Something like rsync -a --delete /path1/ /alt/path2 will make an exact copy under /alt/path2, updating only things that need it. Done as root it would do all the preservation of users, modes etc regardless of ownership. You also have --flags if you need it but it doesn't appear to work with schg flag - maybe nouulnk and variants either. Other than that you can use tar with pipes, which was the traditional method Before Rsync (TM). But obviously not very efficient for keeping a tree up-to-date. These days cp -Rp as root should also do a one-time copy but won't preserve any hard links. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:27:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA03216A4D1 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from cprobd02.vailsys.com (cprobd02.vailsys.com [63.210.102.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A505243D4C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dfsfbd06.vail (dfsfbd06.vail [192.168.129.190]) by cprobd02.vailsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2A9CE509; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dfwdamian.vail [192.168.129.233]) by dfsfbd06.vail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B45A323E9C; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dwiest@localhost.vail [127.0.0.1]) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8RHX8af029276; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:33:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from dwiest@localhost) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8RHX8vs007139; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:33:08 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dfwdamian.vail: dwiest set sender to dwiest@vailsys.com using -f Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:33:08 -0500 From: Damian Wiest To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20060927173308.GA19066@dfwdamian.vail> References: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> <20060927124549.GA568@home> <20060927131403.GA18332@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060927131403.GA18332@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: George Allan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:27:52 -0000 On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:14:03PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > Maybe it's time to reconsider the nature of that itch? PDF was never > > meant to be edited (except peripherally), and most definitely not in the > > sense that you're thinking. Consider it a FINAL "print" format, like an > > image that's long since left the photographer, his studio and his camera > > and now exists only as a JPG on a hard drive. > > > > Agreed. But what if I'm writing a paper for a scientific journal > in latex on my freebsd and my coauthors just can't be persuaded to > use anything that's not already exist on their windows PCs? I find > the results of latex2html or latex2rtf of poor quality (even for > editing purposes), i.e. lots of errors, problems with references, > etc. Maybe I need to learn how to use these tools better. > > Lately I was sending them pdfs and got in reply some pdfs that can > only be viewed properly with the latest acrobat, and their comments > are only visible on the screen anyway and cannot at all be printed. > > So what do I do? More broadly, what is the solution for cross- > platform (*nix - windows - vms) editing of a complex document, with > lots of maths, line plots and raster images? > > anton Agree on a document format? -Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:33:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9EE16A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E26443D83 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:33:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from [87.112.89.167] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GShxj-0002Vp-GJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:33:07 +0100 Message-ID: <451AFC20.2080500@jessikat.plus.net> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:33:04 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: linux recovery tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:33:09 -0000 One of my hosters says they provide a ram based linux recovery tool, but I'm actually using freebsd on the hardware so am wondering if linux knows how to mount UFS partitions? -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 23:18:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B3816A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dprobd02.vailsys.com (dprobd02.vailsys.com [63.149.73.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0C043D78 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:18:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dfsfbd06.vail (dfsfbd06.vail [192.168.129.190]) by dprobd02.vailsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1B08A5C85 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:18:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dfwdamian.vail [192.168.129.233]) by dfsfbd06.vail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E60E323E8A for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:18:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dwiest@localhost.vail [127.0.0.1]) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8RNGWMM025452 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:16:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from dwiest@localhost) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8RNGWdN024900 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:16:32 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dfwdamian.vail: dwiest set sender to dwiest@vailsys.com using -f Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:16:32 -0500 From: Damian Wiest To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060927231632.GA26096@dfwdamian.vail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Support for Execute Disable Bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:18:58 -0000 I just installed FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE on a couple of NetFRAME 1420's that include hardware support for the execute disable bit. Does FreeBSD 6.1 include support for this? -Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 23:47:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BB616A407 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n054.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1087.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1074A43D64 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:47:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n054.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 4519C87D00044251 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:46:55 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8BA05131-1448-48C5-A3F3-07E9654B658F@cbpratt.prohosting.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Chris Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:46:42 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:47:07 -0000 I felt I should ask this question before taking a drastic action. I built this new production system complete with jail (which I can recreate very quickly) and all was running perfectly under 6.2 PRERELEASE. I was planning taking a chance and going production (against common wisdom of running 6.2 PRERELEASE in production). Yesterday I decided to cvsup and rebuild one more time and discovered a glaring problem on this AMD64 Tyan s4882. It can't reboot with the reboot command or shutdown -r about 75% of the time, it hangs between the uptime output and where it states Rebooting, then requires a manual reset to get going again. This tells me I have to fall back or will create a nightmare for production use. Presuming I can live with certain driver issues on 6.1 RELEASE P6, are there any serious dangers or unique procedures in going backward, to RELENG_6_1 from RELENG_6 that suggest it would be better to just start from scratch? I've not fallen back from CURRENT to a RELEASE, this will be my first time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 00:01:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00ABF16A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6606043D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:01:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal (svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal [10.0.0.3]) by bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8S01R0o008320; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:01:27 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal with MailMarshal (v6, 1, 4, 441) id ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:01:27 +1000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:01:26 +1000 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F11EF6E9@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: pdf editor Thread-Index: AcbihaTmhrI5V58YSHyPwlYaGiLfKQACgqog From: "Murray Taylor" To: "Damian Wiest" , "Anton Shterenlikht" Cc: George Allan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:01:51 -0000 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Damian Wiest > Sent: Thursday, 28 September 2006 3:33 AM > To: Anton Shterenlikht > Cc: George Allan; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: pdf editor >=20 > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:14:03PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > Maybe it's time to reconsider the nature of that itch? PDF was=20 > > > never meant to be edited (except peripherally), and most=20 > definitely=20 > > > not in the sense that you're thinking. Consider it a=20 > FINAL "print"=20 > > > format, like an image that's long since left the=20 > photographer, his=20 > > > studio and his camera and now exists only as a JPG on a=20 > hard drive. > > > =20 > >=20 > > Agreed. But what if I'm writing a paper for a scientific journal in=20 > > latex on my freebsd and my coauthors just can't be persuaded to use=20 > > anything that's not already exist on their windows PCs? I find the=20 > > results of latex2html or latex2rtf of poor quality (even=20 > for editing=20 > > purposes), i.e. lots of errors, problems with references,=20 > etc. Maybe I=20 > > need to learn how to use these tools better. > >=20 > > Lately I was sending them pdfs and got in reply some pdfs that can=20 > > only be viewed properly with the latest acrobat, and their comments=20 > > are only visible on the screen anyway and cannot at all be printed. > >=20 > > So what do I do? More broadly, what is the solution for cross-=20 > > platform (*nix - windows - vms) editing of a complex document, with=20 > > lots of maths, line plots and raster images? > >=20 > > anton >=20 > Agree on a document format? >=20 > -Damian Use the minimalist elements of latex as a 'document markup',=20 and write in wordpad on the windows box as that seems to understand newlines, explain to them the concept of 'getting the content right first' _and then_=20 doing the fussy layout. And put all the images, and plots into jpegs=20 'for discussion' during the writing process, with appropriate document markers. Just gotta come up with a way to do the maths in a common format (again teach 'em latex, by showing them the difference if the finished product a few times for some complex equation/theorem/lemma etc) lotsa luck! BTW I have had these 'discussion' before and another argument is disk space I had a writer generate over 15Gb of documents in all the initial.=20 'required to be held' intermediate formats and finals forms.=20 along with the humungous hi res screen grabs....=20 My versions fitted on a DVD. A Makefile, the latex source, and realistic jpegs. =20 cheers mjt --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 00:03:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D1716A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odilist@sonic.net) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CCF43D6E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:03:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from odilist@sonic.net) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (69-12-157-6.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [69.12.157.6]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k8S038xt024281; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:03:08 -0700 From: Oliver Iberien To: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:03:07 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200609260831.32610.odilist@sonic.net> <89ce7f740609270830o54a038f7x4f54aa0a57b08300@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <89ce7f740609270830o54a038f7x4f54aa0a57b08300@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609271703.08011.odilist@sonic.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE and libflashplayer - help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:03:14 -0000 On Wednesday 27 September 2006 08:30, you wrote: > Hello, > > On 9/26/06, Oliver Iberien wrote: > > I've followed the instructions at > > http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php. libmap.conf contains: > > > > [/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/libflashplayer.so] > > libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.2 > > libdl.so.2 pluginwrapper/flash7.so > > libz.so.1 libz.so.3 > > libm.so.6 libm.so.4 > > libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/flash7.so > > > > And (having looked through this list's archives) > > > > ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/flashplayer.xpt > > /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins/flashplayer.xpt > > > > But konqueror doesn't see a plugin either in > > the /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/ > > or /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/ folders. Firefox does nothing. > > And there I am stuck. What am I doing wrong? > > I also tried the same steps and had the same problem: konqueror does > not find the flash plugin. > > Regards > Ivan I did manage to get Firefox going after browsing in the mailing list archive (search did not turn it up). Follow this: http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=pt_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unixlike.com.br%2F%3Fp%3D%252081 Konqueror is still not doing anything. Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 00:33:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123A716A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B1343D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 4A1D818001AC for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:42:53 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.182) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 28 Sep 2006 00:42:54 -0000 Received: by ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AB07B1CE305; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:42:52 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ahmad Arafat Abdullah" To: Chris , "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:42:51 -0800 Received: from [60.49.202.201] by ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com with http for trunasuci@mail.com; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:42:51 -0800 X-Originating-Ip: 60.49.202.201 X-Originating-Server: ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20060928004252.AB07B1CE305@ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:33:56 -0000 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Chris > To: "FreeBSD Questions" > Subject: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? > Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:46:42 -0700 >=20 >=20 > I felt I should ask this question before taking a drastic action. I=20 > built this new production system complete with jail (which I can=20=20 > recreate very quickly) and all was running perfectly under 6.2=20=20 > PRERELEASE. I was planning taking a chance and going production=20=20 > (against common wisdom of running 6.2 PRERELEASE in production).=20=20 > Yesterday I decided to cvsup and rebuild one more time and=20 > discovered a glaring problem on this AMD64 Tyan s4882. It can't=20 > reboot with the reboot command or shutdown -r about 75% of the=20 > time, it hangs between the uptime output and where it states=20 > Rebooting, then requires a manual reset to get going again. This=20 > tells me I have to fall back or will create a nightmare for=20 > production use. Presuming I can live with certain driver issues on=20 > 6.1 RELEASE P6, are there any serious dangers or unique procedures=20 > in going backward, to RELENG_6_1 from RELENG_6 that suggest it=20 > would be better to just start from scratch? I've not fallen back=20 > from CURRENT to a RELEASE, this will be my first time.=20=20 maybe u can give it a try, why not? same like my case, and it's weird.. when i upgraded my box to 6.2-PRERELEASE, something weird happens.. i can't login to my KDE ( my KDE is up and running ) using my user+pass, surprising= ly i add one more user+pass and it's can logged in! so I've decided to revert back to 6.1-RELEASE-p7 and it's back to normal! Maybe u should give it a try :) correct me if i'm wrong.. --=20 ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 00:36:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9241516A4A7 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:36:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0664F43D73 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:36:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 9AAFA180012B for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:45:16 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.62) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 28 Sep 2006 00:45:18 -0000 Received: by ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AFD371158CC; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:45:18 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ahmad Arafat Abdullah" To: "Robin Becker" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:45:18 -0800 Received: from [60.49.202.201] by ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com with http for trunasuci@mail.com; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:45:18 -0800 X-Originating-Ip: 60.49.202.201 X-Originating-Server: ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20060928004518.AFD371158CC@ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com> Cc: Subject: Re: linux recovery tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:36:19 -0000 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robin Becker" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: linux recovery tool > Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:33:04 +0000 >=20 >=20 > One of my hosters says they provide a ram based linux recovery=20 > tool, but I'm actually using freebsd on the hardware so am=20 > wondering if linux knows how to mount UFS partitions? > -- Robin Becker Yes, it does=20 --=20 ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 01:07:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D9316A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0E243D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:07:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by small.pukruppa.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8R3310c004045; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:03:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:03:00 +0200 (CEST) From: "P.U.Kruppa" To: Erik Norgaard In-Reply-To: <45199F80.70707@locolomo.org> Message-ID: <20060927045325.I3859@pukruppa.net> References: <20060926180613.15547.qmail@web27211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <45199F80.70707@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Desmond Coughlan , freebsd mailing list Subject: Re: calenders .. silly question ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:07:40 -0000 On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Desmond Coughlan wrote: >> The thread on calendars has got me thinking.... The 'non-profit' >> organisation I mentioned, is a school. Here in France (and no doubt >> in dozens of other countries), many universities have constructed 'virtual >> campuses'. By that, I mean that the student logs in, he has not only his >> grades, but his timetable (classes, seminars etc), and he can send and >> receive e-mail to and from his tutors. Can this be done under FreeBSD >> (that was the 'silly' part of the question) ? Any pointers to where I >> can start learning about that stuff? As Eric wrote there are dozens of things you have to think about. But since you only ask for a pointer: If you search Google (and our ports directory) for "Content Management Systems (CMS)" and try to install one you will get some impression what can be done. I think ports/www/mambo (PHP based) or ports/www/plone (Python based) can be set up quite easily. Regards, Uli. > Setting up the MX is the most urgent, >> but afterwards, we can start to have fun with SQL, forums, campuses etc? > > Honestly, I think you will have a hard time getting any useful answers: Your > question is vague and broad and posting under a completely different topic is > not helping. > > Before asking the "how" question, you gotta understand the problem you want > to solve - that is first, figure out what is the problem: > > - how many users? > - how will you manage users? > - who will manage users? > - how will users access services? > - from where will users access services? - routing? - firewall? > - does the infrastructure exist to provide access to services? > - network? wireless? dns? etc. > - how often will users access services? > - how much data will be handled by the servers? > - what hardware is required to support the expected traffic? > ... > and on and on. > > Once you have a clear idea of that you can start asking more concrete > questions: > > - which MTA? > - how do I setup that MTA? > - what MDA? can the MTA work as MDA? > - how do I setup that MDA? > etc. > > So, I recommend you rethink your problem and make it clear what you want to > achieve in your next post - under a suitable subject... > > Cheers, Erik > -- > Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org > X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt > Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Peter Ulrich Kruppa Wuppertal Germany From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 02:49:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AB516A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:49:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7106543D5A for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:49:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 21629 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2006 12:49:36 +1000 Received: from 210-84-63-120.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.63.120) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 12:49:36 +1000 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:49:18 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Chris Message-ID: <20060928124918.644f7639@localhost> In-Reply-To: <8BA05131-1448-48C5-A3F3-07E9654B658F@cbpratt.prohosting.com> References: <8BA05131-1448-48C5-A3F3-07E9654B658F@cbpratt.prohosting.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:49:38 -0000 On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:46:42 -0700 Chris wrote: > Presuming I can live with > certain driver issues on 6.1 RELEASE P6, are there any serious > dangers or unique procedures in going backward, to RELENG_6_1 from > RELENG_6 that suggest it would be better to just start from scratch? > I've not fallen back from CURRENT to a RELEASE, this will be my first > time. > I did then 6.2-Prerelease to 6.1-p6 to 6.2-Prerelease to 6.1p6 to 6.2 journey (with some other iterations in between ;) ). Make sure you rebuild world as well as the kernel, as some utils have changed (eg, GELI is not compatible between 6.1-p6 and 6.2 mismatches of kernel + world). On my 6.2 to 6.1 trip, I had to rebuild some libraries from ports as they were crashing (can't remember which ones now, sorry). Overall, pretty painless experience. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "He can compress the most words into the smallest idea of any man I know." Abraham Lincoln I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 03:14:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBCF16A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n054.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1083.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDB343D49 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:14:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n054.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 451B0E4B00007477 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:14:07 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20060928124918.644f7639@localhost> References: <8BA05131-1448-48C5-A3F3-07E9654B658F@cbpratt.prohosting.com> <20060928124918.644f7639@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4D434C07-F0D6-4496-B57B-8FB60A496457@cbpratt.prohosting.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:13:55 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:14:12 -0000 On Sep 27, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:46:42 -0700 > Chris wrote: > >> Presuming I can live with >> certain driver issues on 6.1 RELEASE P6, are there any serious >> dangers or unique procedures in going backward, to RELENG_6_1 from >> RELENG_6 that suggest it would be better to just start from scratch? >> I've not fallen back from CURRENT to a RELEASE, this will be my first >> time. > I did then 6.2-Prerelease to 6.1-p6 to 6.2-Prerelease to 6.1p6 to > 6.2 journey > ... > Overall, pretty painless experience. Thank you both for your responses. I'm starting the process now because the unexpected oddities seem to mount and this system should go live this week... it was so stable and I was warned about following the bleeding edge at least twice now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 04:00:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC40816A4A7 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E87C43D62 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (kline@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k8S40Lae056597 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:00:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k8S40L78056596 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:00:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:00:20 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20060928040020.GA56540@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Accessibility questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:00:39 -0000 To anyone on-list who has heard of the RFB&D , they provide 4-track cassettes (at 15/16ips) for audiobooks for the blind and dislexic. They have begun to switch to some kind of encrypted digital CD's, much more efficient that tape.. Today is the first I heard of the new CD stuff. Among the commerialware for th Mac and PeeCee at "eClipse Reader Software" (PC), "Victor Reader Soft Macintosh", and "EaseReader" (PC). Does anybody know what these utilities do? Some are over $150. If there is a freeware version in the Unix realm, would somebody kindly let me know? thanks in advance, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 05:08:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACCB16A416 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from off@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC3C43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:08:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from off@panix.com) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA14E9EA2C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:08:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (off@localhost) by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) with ESMTP id k8S58RN25248 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:08:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:08:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeffrey Katz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: re: nested labels X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:08:32 -0000 Adam Martin's discussion of nested partitions was very enlightening and useful. A nice thing about the approach is that it can be used on a "dangerously dedicated" hard drive. Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 05:23:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB9E16A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from smarthost3.sa.chariot.net.au (smarthost3.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B784A43D53 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:23:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.qld.chariot.net.au (mail.qld.chariot.net.au [203.87.95.166]) by smarthost3.sa.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090C410226C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:53:05 +0930 (CST) Received: from localhost (avs3.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.9]) by mail.qld.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF384EA10 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:23:05 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail.qld.chariot.net.au ([203.87.95.166]) by localhost (avs3.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29746-01-18 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:53:05 +0930 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (static-203-87-66-248.qld.chariot.net.au [203.87.66.248]) by mail.qld.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD9B4F8F6 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:23:04 +1000 (EST) From: Warren Liddell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:26:55 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609281526.55362.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at chariot.net.au Subject: Kopete MSN + Cam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:23:07 -0000 Is or will there ever be support to allow the viewing of Webcams from others or is it simply not possible ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 07:10:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E157F16A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamlsd@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F3743D77 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:10:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamlsd@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so478350wxd for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=GvtB+kPuUx208WQzx+gHPZzExjv2iQfuW2e7vBz5dppjREKdl4dtEmX2jebMtI1Kqjmn1Li2HjZshz5G6/guSe380HuGcwjT5RswT4yiC857VuSnZw6nLDya+ERfZFNAyIAcQiD7FzqNZwOKzXGsoQUDhCR5xH+caqpaZVv2SlM= Received: by 10.70.113.5 with SMTP id l5mr2316118wxc; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?130.245.126.51? ( [130.245.126.51]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i17sm1949868wxd.2006.09.28.00.10.28; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1e426d7180c9ec17a6c2472f1f3921c3@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Martin Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:10:27 -0400 To: Jeffrey Katz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624) Sender: Adam Martin Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nested labels X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:10:34 -0000 On 2006 Sep 28 , at 01:08, Jeffrey Katz wrote: > Adam Martin's discussion of nested partitions was very enlightening > and useful. A nice thing about the approach is that it can be used on > a "dangerously dedicated" hard drive. Well, it merely takes advantage of GEOM. You can even nest GPTs, and other things inside of BSD labels, and vice versa. The most important thing to keep in mind is that every time that you create a new "device" from partitioning a device, GEOM allows you to install partitioning tables on them, and make more "devices" from those. As can be seen from my absurd case. That said, there are many good reasons to avoid over-partitioning a drive. Data can become more difficult to organize, as various filesystems have limited space, and start filling up at different rates. Also, failures in the sectors that contain the partitioning tables will cause you to have great difficulty in reconstructing data, in the event of disc failures. Don't over abuse nested partitions. I like to keep a paper copy of the actual sizes of all the entities in my partition tables, and their offsets, and mountpoints. At least once, this knowledge has helped me recover from serious disc failure. With the advent of half-terabyte, and larger drives, we're nearing the upper bounds of 32-bit bounded filesystems, and partitioning tables. GPTs are supposedly able to handle larger volumes than 2TB. Keep an eye on the freebsd large disc project: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html Cheers, -- Adam David Alan Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 07:33:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226AB16A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9165343D60 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C5F2E024; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:33:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451B7AD3.3000107@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:33:39 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20060927220439.GC45831@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:49 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 17:04:39 -0500 Dan Nelson > wrote: >> >> You could use rsync to do this, but It'd probably be easier to get your >> remote rsync to drop the files in the right directory in the first place. >> > Hmmm...maybe I don't fully understand rsync. The files are from a > webserver and owned by www:www. The rsync runs under my account, so the > perms are changed to mine. Maybe there's a switch with rsync that would > allow me to sync directly? > > I'll poke around the man page. Thanks. 1) rsync changes behaviour depending on whether or not you include a trailing / from the man-page: rsync -av /src/foo /dest rsync -av /src/foo/ /dest/foo works the same way, (and sync locally in this example). Read the man page, there are lots of examples. 2) The options -t and -p preserve time and permissions respectively. Ownership will always change to the user running rsync unless you run as root. This has nothing to do with rsync, you can't run chown as an ordinary user. You can preserve the group if you're in that group on the destination host. 3) The files you are syncing - should they be writeable by www? For security, you may really want something like this: -rw-r----- user:www file and have user do the rsync. If you really need to have www write to the file, set group permissions +w. Personally, I have all my web-pages owned by me, and let apache access read-only. Log-files generated are owned by apache, but I don't back these up since they are continuously generated and rotated out. The config file is also only readable by apache, I don't want the risk of some exploit committing changes to the config file. It might be useful to have a separate dir where apache can store files with write permissions and owned by apache. But this depends on the web apps you deploy. IIRC to run rsync over ssh the user doing the syncing must have shell access, running your sync as root is not desirable, it MAY be preferred to have it run as www to preserve owner also, at least you can restrict access for www. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 08:13:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDEB16A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@tania.servebbs.org) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A15643D5E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@tania.servebbs.org) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC75F5A376 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:13:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tania.servebbs.org (pool-71-247-50-170.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.247.50.170]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4D6367900 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:13:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob Organization: TamaraB To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:12:44 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609280412.51064.bob@tania.servebbs.org> Subject: PortUpgrade multiple packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:13:14 -0000 Is it safe to portupgrade several packages in parallel? Open several root consoles and do a portupgrade in each one at the same time? Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 08:23:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDBF16A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat05.inode.at [62.99.145.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B2743D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:23:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.122] (port=10487 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-05.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GSrAg-0002BF-1M; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:23:06 +0200 Message-ID: <451B8666.4030909@inode.at> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:23:02 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob References: <200609280412.51064.bob@tania.servebbs.org> In-Reply-To: <200609280412.51064.bob@tania.servebbs.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PortUpgrade multiple packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:23:07 -0000 Bob wrote: > > Is it safe to portupgrade several packages in parallel? Open several root > consoles and do a portupgrade in each one at the same time? That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies (fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict) However you can tell portupgrade to install more programs which is probably not really slower than running them parallel (smp etc is excluded from this assumption) -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 08:29:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5F816A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:29:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from C2bthomr06.btconnect.com (c2bthomr06.btconnect.com [194.73.73.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A61743D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from meridiansystems.co.uk (host81-139-203-17.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.203.17]) by C2bthomr06.btconnect.com (MOS 3.7.4b-GA) with ESMTP id EYM95984; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:23:59 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:30:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D1A0@msl01.msl.local> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001A_01C6E2E0.B737FFD0" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Thread-Topic: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. thread-index: Acbi2Fc9cUp43ZneQAeJSiXtv/Mx0Q== Importance: normal Priority: normal From: "Jim Borland" To: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:29:26 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C6E2E0.B737FFD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I want to use a PC to telnet to the freeBSD server and login as root but it won't let me! Can you help? I can login as a normal user just not as root, I can't key in su to get in as superuser either. Jim. -------------------------------------------------------- Jim Borland Unit 2 Wallace Studios 27 Wallace Avenue LisburnBT27 4AE mail: JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk www: www.meridiansystems.co.uk tel: +44 (0)28 9260 5060 fax: +44 (0)28 9264 0700 mob:=20 -------------------------------------------------------- This message contains confidential information and is intended only for = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org. If you are not = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org you should not disseminate, distribute or = copy this e-mail. Please notify JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk = immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and = delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be = guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be = intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or = contain viruses. Jim Borland therefore does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a = result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please = request a hard-copy version. -------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C6E2E0.B737FFD0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 08:33:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95BC16A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@tania.servebbs.org) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA3A43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:33:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@tania.servebbs.org) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187E19E959 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:33:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tania.servebbs.org (pool-71-247-50-170.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.247.50.170]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCDC367900 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:33:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob Organization: TamaraB To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:32:53 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200609280412.51064.bob@tania.servebbs.org> <451B8666.4030909@inode.at> In-Reply-To: <451B8666.4030909@inode.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609280432.54612.bob@tania.servebbs.org> Subject: Re: PortUpgrade multiple packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:33:14 -0000 On Thursday 28 September 2006 04:23, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies > (fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict) Likely they do; Mozilla, Seamonkey, Opera, and Firefox. (all flagged in my security audit) Was hoping to do them all at once. > (smp etc is > excluded from this assumption) Yeah, running SMP, so cpu is not a problem. But bumping into deps may very well be. I have synched-up my ports tree, and have also done portupgrade -Fa so all the sources, as well as any deps are already here. However, I fear several packages may need the same dep, and all try to upgrade it at the same time.... would make a mess! I don't think portupgrade is smart enough to detect multiple upgrades, at least I have not seen any reference in the docs. Thanks! guess I will just so one a night, some of these are pretty BIG. Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 08:41:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7183816A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0395E43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:41:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C822E024; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:41:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451B8AC0.8050505@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:41:36 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Borland References: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D1A0@msl01.msl.local> In-Reply-To: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D1A0@msl01.msl.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:41:40 -0000 Jim Borland wrote: > I want to use a PC to telnet to the freeBSD server and login as root but > it won't let me! Can you help? I can login as a normal user just not as > root, I can't key in su to get in as superuser either. 1) Don't use telnet, use ssh, for security. 2) Are you in the wheel group? Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 09:17:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EEF16A416 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB7743D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:17:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GSs0d-000D9p-RS; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:16:57 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:16:55 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Ahmad Arafat Abdullah , Chris , FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? Thread-Index: Acbi3tdWFgLD407SEduXUwAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <20060928004252.AB07B1CE305@ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:17:01 -0000 On 28/9/06 01:42, "Ahmad Arafat Abdullah" wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Chris >> To: "FreeBSD Questions" >> Subject: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? >> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:46:42 -0700 >> >> >> I felt I should ask this question before taking a drastic action. I >> built this new production system complete with jail (which I can >> recreate very quickly) and all was running perfectly under 6.2 >> PRERELEASE. I was planning taking a chance and going production >> (against common wisdom of running 6.2 PRERELEASE in production). >> Yesterday I decided to cvsup and rebuild one more time and >> discovered a glaring problem on this AMD64 Tyan s4882. It can't >> reboot with the reboot command or shutdown -r about 75% of the >> time, it hangs between the uptime output and where it states >> Rebooting, then requires a manual reset to get going again. This >> tells me I have to fall back or will create a nightmare for >> production use. Presuming I can live with certain driver issues on >> 6.1 RELEASE P6, are there any serious dangers or unique procedures >> in going backward, to RELENG_6_1 from RELENG_6 that suggest it >> would be better to just start from scratch? I've not fallen back >> from CURRENT to a RELEASE, this will be my first time. > > > maybe u can give it a try, why not? same like my case, and it's weird.. > when i upgraded my box to 6.2-PRERELEASE, something weird happens.. i can't > login to my KDE ( my KDE is up and running ) using my user+pass, surprisingly > i add one more user+pass and it's can logged in! Can you report that to kde@FreeBSD.org please? We're building 6.2-BETA2 this weekend and it would be nice to fix this before 6.2-RELEASE if it's a wider issue. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 09:20:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B38E16A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from c2bthomr02.btconnect.com (c2bthomr02.btconnect.com [194.73.73.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5167843D5D for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:20:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk) Received: from meridiansystems.co.uk (merserver.meridiansystems.co.uk [81.138.178.161]) by c2bthomr02.btconnect.com (MOS 3.7.4b-GA) with ESMTP id FGX16885; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:15:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:21:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D1A2@msl01.msl.local> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Thread-Topic: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. Importance: normal Priority: normal thread-index: Acbi2g0ENCyCKnKZScOH6JJPV6niKQABGzUg From: "Jim Borland" To: Cc: Subject: RE: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:20:52 -0000 -------------------------------------------------------- Jim Borland Unit 2 Wallace Studios 27 Wallace Avenue LisburnBT27 4AE mail: JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk www: www.meridiansystems.co.uk tel: +44 (0)28 9260 5060 fax: +44 (0)28 9264 0700 mob:=20 -------------------------------------------------------- This message contains confidential information and is intended only for = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org. If you are not = freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org you should not disseminate, distribute or = copy this e-mail. Please notify JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk = immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and = delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be = guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be = intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or = contain viruses. Jim Borland therefore does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a = result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please = request a hard-copy version. -------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Erik Norgaard [mailto:norgaard@locolomo.org]=20 Sent: 28 September 2006 09:42 To: Jim Borland Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. Jim Borland wrote: > I want to use a PC to telnet to the freeBSD server and login as root=20 > but it won't let me! Can you help? I can login as a normal user just=20 > not as root, I can't key in su to get in as superuser either. 1) Don't use telnet, use ssh, for security. 2) Are you in the wheel group? Erik suggested I use ssh, I've never used ssh before and when I do it says "the connection has been refused".=20 The "root" user is in the wheel group, I have a user called "jim" which is in a group called "group" he is able to login using telnet. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 09:49:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F48316A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Susan.Lan@zyxel.com.tw) Received: from zyadd226.zyxel.com.tw (zyadd226.zyxel.com.tw [61.222.65.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1137C43D5C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Susan.Lan@zyxel.com.tw) Received: from zytwbe01.zyxel.com ([172.23.5.10]) by smtp.zyxel.com.tw with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:48:37 +0800 Received: from zytwfe01.ZyXEL.com ([172.23.5.5]) by zytwbe01.zyxel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:48:52 +0800 Received: from [172.23.17.43] ([172.23.17.43]) by zytwfe01.ZyXEL.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:48:52 +0800 Message-ID: <451B9A87.6090904@zyxel.com.tw> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:48:55 +0800 From: Blue User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2006 09:48:52.0786 (UTC) FILETIME=[4E6D0920:01C6E2E3] Subject: Does mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) support IPv6? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:49:02 -0000 Hi, all: I want to know whether mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) could possibly support IPv6. When I want to establish a PPTP connection with a PPTP server running mpd, could I use IPv6CP instead of IPv4CP to set up the PPP? If it supports, how could I configure the related parameters in the configuration files? I could only find the ipcp syntax. Best regards, blue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 10:59:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1135E16A494 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edt1023@ms17.hinet.net) Received: from msr13.hinet.net (msr13.hinet.net [168.95.4.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418FB43D68 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:59:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edt1023@ms17.hinet.net) Received: from darkstar (61-223-179-229.dynamic.hinet.net [61.223.179.229]) by msr13.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA01701 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:59:08 +0800 (CST) Received: by darkstar (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:58:50 +0800 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:58:50 +0800 From: "Edward G.J. Lee" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060928105849.GA30913@darkstar> References: <45194B55.6050609@verizon.net> <20060927124549.GA568@home> <20060927131403.GA18332@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <20060927173308.GA19066@dfwdamian.vail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060927173308.GA19066@dfwdamian.vail> Organization: GNU/Linux/*BSD Dreamer Club User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Subject: Re: pdf editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:59:17 -0000 How about PDFEdit? http://pdfedit.petricek.net/pdfedit.index_e Edward From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 11:01:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6DD16A51B for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from savage@savage.za.org) Received: from www16b.your-server.co.za (www16b.your-server.co.za [196.22.132.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7348343D58 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:01:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from savage@savage.za.org) Received: from [165.146.242.31] (helo=superman) by www16b.your-server.co.za with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GStdR-0005m5-Pq for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:01:13 +0200 From: "Chris Knipe" To: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:00:38 +0200 Message-ID: <001b01c6e2ed$566edb30$0164640a@superman> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 thread-index: Acbi7VPaQc9eWc82TEGFnn1yRrLv7Q== X-Authenticated-Sender: cknipe@savage.za.org X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.88.4/1948/Wed Sep 27 18:03:03 2006) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: OT General, RAID and Drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: savage@savage.za.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:01:20 -0000 Hi, This is just about the best mailing list that I'm subscribed to for this discussion, and I believe this was in some extend covered before (SCSI vs. SATA). I'm looking at getting some storage put together. At the moment, I have about 800GB of Fiber Channels in a JBOD configuration (Posted previously about this looking for Emulex Drivers in BSD). For interest sakes, it is running on Windows 2003 at the moment, as the only drivers I found are for Windows and Linux based systems - nothing for FreeBSD as far as Emulex goes. Now, let's talk about Disk IO *only*. I'm not too hecticly interested in transfer speeds, as even PATA has more than enough speed as far as my requirements go. The applications that I intent to run on the storage system however, will be MASSIVELY IO intensive. We're talking LARGE files ranging from 800MB to 50GB (per file), with various reads and writes inside the files. I am considering RAID3 for this with hot spares and the like. Now, given that someone can shed some light on the IO issues, I'm happy to get rid of all FC devices I have (3 x DAE's fully populated), and invest in SATA or SCSI (which will also be significantly cheaper). But, what kind of IO can you expect from SATA on RAID3? FC (which I have now), performs VERY well even with software RAID5 as far as Disk IO goes. From experience working with SCSI arrays, I know that SCSI is also a pretty good choice for Disk IO. SCSI is still however a tad expensive. Given a good PCIe 64bit SATA controller. What can be expected as far as Disk IO goes??? Will I be safe in presuming that I will get reasonable (and with that I mean, something that can be comparable to FC) IO out of such a system? If we're looking at 3TB arrays spanned over 7 or more disks, will it perform? The costs of SATA is also much less than SCSI or FC, but the MTBF for SATA seems to be something that is very much questioned in systems like this. Given the cost factor of SATA vs FC, replacing disks on SATA seems to be small change in comparison of what HBAs, FC Drives, and the link costs - so that is also a risk I'm willing to take. Google is giving me very little results as far as performance goes when comparing FC vs. SATA however. Anyone *please* some information on this??? Thanks allot, Chris. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 11:11:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E483916A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: from web27508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web27508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.177.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29EEB43D4C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coughlandesmond@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 70308 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Sep 2006 11:11:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=He1yOsM+06OIBbekzib0ufxtEao7Oaez0NgnEPbWWkiV/hsE8z1yEmIAAOSeyG2HKSRKjp39oqPU7Hd7ND+UYHAPmic9OocYdlCN6sVNT6VwjIyTVGJUpTmBDQmFodxBJ2KniV/Hkcsu3OdDm/rthxeXmmcXAqY3aVKySxWULzk= ; Message-ID: <20060928111126.70306.qmail@web27508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [81.57.37.99] by web27508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:11:26 CEST Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:11:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Desmond Coughlan To: freebsd mailing list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ACPI on Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:11:35 -0000 Me again. :-( After we'd realised that we were hitting our heads off the wall, and that the answer was in the mount points, we rushed upstairs to get an install underway. First diskette in ... second diskette .... then it asked for the boot diskette again (boot.flp). Guess what happens then... loading required module 'pci' [ spinning baton for five minutes ] Then we get to the menu with the little FreeBSD demon, and we hit ENTER to take a default install. ACPI autoload failed - no such file or directory And the machine hangs. Just like our heads ... in despair. :-( D. --------------------------------- Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. Cliquez ici. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 08:26:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F0116A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris_yates64@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s2.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s2.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CBB43D7E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:26:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris_yates64@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.174.14]) by bay0-omc2-s2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:26:29 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:26:29 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.174.200 by by103fd.bay103.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:26:27 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.37.68.73] X-Originating-Email: [kris_yates64@hotmail.com] X-Sender: kris_yates64@hotmail.com From: "Kristopher Yates" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:26:27 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2006 08:26:29.0449 (UTC) FILETIME=[CBF7AB90:01C6E2D7] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:59:26 +0000 Subject: growfs HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:26:33 -0000 Hi everyone, First of all, glad to still be running FBSD after all these years. I tried following some docs I found online in order to make my /usr partition bigger and made it all the way to growfs -s, which is where I got stuck. First of all, here was my original dilema, what I did, then a descript of where I am regarding growfs problem. System (aka firewall): Pentium60 40M RAM 2 NICS, running FBSD4.5-stable (a great firewall running 24/7 since OCT 2000.) I tried to upgrade (make buildword make installworld to 4.11-stable).. I made the new world and installed the new kernel but not quite enough space to do the last steps (mergemaster and then installworld). So I built a spare box, and installed FBSD on it. I put the hard drive from the firewall as secondary master, and a larger drive as secondary slave. * I ran dd and imaged the old drive onto the new drive old drive seagate 1.2gb new drive quantum 4.3gb * I put the new drive into the old faithful P60 (firewall). It boots up fine running 4.11-p22 and is currently online as my firewall. What is left to do: Finish the 4.11 install which ended on make kernel KERNCONF=CUSTOMKERN.. I just need to mergemaster then installworld as single user. Obviously, /usr partition (/dev/ad0s1f) is basically full w/ 8.6MB free. ** soo.. I did some fdisk magic and got stuck on the growfs (final step) in order to growfs /usr fdisk reports my 1 partition @ full size of disk but no idea how to properly use growfs. Here is what I have: cylinders=8895 heads=15 sectors/track=63 (945blks/cyl) media sector size 512 partition 1 sysid 165, start 63, size 8405712 (4104 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/head 1 / sector 1 end: cyl 1023 / head 14 / sector 63 basically I need help filling in the following blank (/dev/ad0s1f == /usr slice) # growfs -s ______ /dev/ad0s1f as shown above, fdisk sees the correct geometry as 4104MB partition but /stand/sysinstall disklabel editor sees ad0s1 as 2888MB, which is the amount of space I thought I was to be adding to /usr via growfs. Currently, my /usr slice is 975MB and really needs to grow. :) Please let me know what other info I can provide that will help you help me solve this problem. I have read man growfs and some docs online, however, I'm stuck and dont know exactly how to resolve the problem. Much thanks, Kris _________________________________________________________________ Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more…then map the best route! http://local.live.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 12:02:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4835C16A492 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prasanth.sekharan@ustri.com) Received: from mailmaa.ustri.com (mailmaapos.ustri.com [203.99.43.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C25543D55 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:01:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prasanth.sekharan@ustri.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 500) by mailmaa.ustri.com with local; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:31:52 +0530 From: prasanth.sekharan@ustri.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060928120055.4022716A671@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20060928120055.4022716A671@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:31:52 +0530 Subject: Out of Office Auto Reply: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:02:14 -0000 I will be travelling from 28th to 30th September. I will have limited access to mail during this period. Please expect a delay in response to the mails. Thanks -Prasanth Sekharan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 12:22:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6797816A416 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demonbob@systemoverload.net) Received: from mail14.opentransfer.com (mail14.opentransfer.com [69.6.255.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3EF643D73 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:22:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from demonbob@systemoverload.net) Received: (qmail 1434 invoked by uid 399); 28 Sep 2006 12:22:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main) (71.12.241.169) by mail14.opentransfer.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 12:22:25 -0000 From: "Dustin Coates" To: "'Jim Borland'" , Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:22:23 -0500 Message-ID: <006701c6e2f8$c12804f0$a9f10c47@main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D1A2@msl01.msl.local> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: Acbi2g0ENCyCKnKZScOH6JJPV6niKQABGzUgAAYYdBA= Cc: Subject: RE: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:22:28 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jim Borland Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:22 AM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. -------------------------------------------------------- Jim Borland Unit 2 Wallace Studios 27 Wallace Avenue LisburnBT27 4AE mail: JimBorland@meridiansystems.co.uk www: www.meridiansystems.co.uk tel: +44 (0)28 9260 5060 fax: +44 (0)28 9264 0700 mob: -----Original Message----- From: Erik Norgaard [mailto:norgaard@locolomo.org] Sent: 28 September 2006 09:42 To: Jim Borland Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. Jim Borland wrote: > I want to use a PC to telnet to the freeBSD server and login as root > but it won't let me! Can you help? I can login as a normal user just > not as root, I can't key in su to get in as superuser either. 1) Don't use telnet, use ssh, for security. 2) Are you in the wheel group? Erik suggested I use ssh, I've never used ssh before and when I do it says "the connection has been refused". The "root" user is in the wheel group, I have a user called "jim" which is in a group called "group" he is able to login using telnet. The best thing to do is to add the user "jim" to the wheel group, then you should be able to login as him over ssh, then su to superuser, and do virtually everything root can do. It is considered a security risk to allow root access to ssh. But it's your server. So if you want root to be able to login despite my warning. Edit "/etc/ssh/sshd_config" and find "#PermitRootLogin no", remove the hash, and change the "no" to "yes" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 12:39:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738B216A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED0A43D4C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k8SCcdEY017672; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:38:45 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: john@cruzweb.net Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:35:23 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <4518BCCE.5050902@cruzweb.net> <200609271124.19682.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <451A9483.2010200@cruzweb.net> In-Reply-To: <451A9483.2010200@cruzweb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609281535.23737.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: Creating New Users over Telnet/SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:39:09 -0000 On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:10, John Cruz wrote: > Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 September 2006 18:29, Derek Ragona wrote: > > [snip] > > No, you can force a default shell without modifications. > > Check out login.conf(5) and shell variable. > > > > However, the original post implies little FreeBSD experience. > > Why do you want to automate such a procedure? > > You said it's going to be for a networking class, that is a limited > > a number of users, right? > > > > sdf is a public access Unix system and has to do this automatically, > > you don't have to. smj@sdf.lonestar is a seasoned administrator, > > who has tampered the OS in a number of ways. > > > > Just my 2 cents, Nikos > > That's basically what I was asking, could this be something easily done > with a script that could be a fun learning experience, or would it > require major OS customization and wouldn't be worth the time or > trouble. Thanks for your input, Nikos. It's not very difficult to do. I would suggest starting your scripting adventures from something else. Something that will not have to do with system administration or something that will not be executed by unknown users with superuser power. Perhaps you can keep the script to yourself 'till you feel it's read for "production" use. You can write the script and then try to break it with invalid input... Once you would have learned where/how it breaks, you will be able to correct it. Start your reading from the sh manual page... HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 12:51:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6E716A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arussell@agrussell.com) Received: from bifrost.agrussell.com (bifrost.hos.net [204.251.33.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC8543D55 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:51:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arussell@agrussell.com) Received: from bifrost.agrussell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bifrost.agrussell.com (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8SCqC5Y020787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:52:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from arussell@agrussell.com) Received: (from arussell@localhost) by bifrost.agrussell.com (8.13.6/8.13.3/Submit) id k8SCqCRc020786 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:52:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from arussell) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:52:12 -0500 From: "A.G. Russell IV" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060928125212.GA20192@bifrost.agrussell.com> References: <41CAF31DAF5DBD4093DBD271E46C0E8704D1A2@msl01.msl.local> <006701c6e2f8$c12804f0$a9f10c47@main> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006701c6e2f8$c12804f0$a9f10c47@main> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:51:16 -0000 On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:22:23AM -0500, Dustin Coates wrote: > -----Original Message----- > > From: Erik Norgaard [mailto:norgaard@locolomo.org] > Sent: 28 September 2006 09:42 > To: Jim Borland > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Can't log in a root from anywhere but the console screen. > > Jim Borland wrote: > > I want to use a PC to telnet to the freeBSD server and login as root > > but it won't let me! Can you help? I can login as a normal user just > > not as root, I can't key in su to get in as superuser either. > > 1) Don't use telnet, use ssh, for security. > 2) Are you in the wheel group? > > Erik suggested I use ssh, I've never used ssh before and when I do it > says "the connection has been refused". > The "root" user is in the wheel group, I have a user called "jim" which > is in a group called "group" he is able to login using telnet. > > > > The best thing to do is to add the user "jim" to the wheel group, then you > should be able to login as him over ssh, then su to superuser, and do > virtually everything root can do. It is considered a security risk to allow > root access to ssh. But it's your server. So if you want root to be able to > login despite my warning. Edit "/etc/ssh/sshd_config" and find > "#PermitRootLogin no", remove the hash, and change the "no" to "yes" First, sshd is not running, that is why "the connection has been refused" messages is being seen. put "sshd_enable=yes in /etc/rc.conf. Look at /etc/defaults/rc.conf, it is your friend, and any daemon that you want to run, must have xyz_enable=yes in the /etc/rc.conf, if it conforms to the current FreeBSD mores. Also, as suggested above, add jim to the wheel group, this will allow you to su to root. Take a look at the http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ google and the above document, will answer a lot of your questions. I Can't say in strong enough terms, how "Bad" and idea it is to have root allowed for ssh, or even worse, to use telnet, especially over the Internet. Good luck, FreeBSD is how we've run our servers for years, and have been solid work horses. A.G. -- _______________________________________________________________________________ A.G. Russell IV KC5KFD The Knife Company e-mail: ag4@theknifecompany.com Phone 479-631-0055 FAX 479-631-8734 Old Klingon Saying -- 'oH majQa' yIn je bang, Qo' bang ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 13:08:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402FA16A47B for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FEB43D72 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:08:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 34so130934hui for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:08:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IpLRn7VFZG5Taz73a8ggtoS+r+L6fQI6Hi+ngkruAQXQ0kugFegCoHfHfoB2iAay6/o/P17BaY0HOSP9A//KWCuMAYh+oOqD1LCJTwSJzEdPt/DwuIqM2ZJK+jRQXZnLdn4B9ry3HBgvattG91891uAsz/mmOr5GTGYxRBoe+l4= Received: by 10.66.249.11 with SMTP id w11mr1731395ugh; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.106.8 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <226ae0c60609280608p2a65b6d8w6b6eed90ea958e9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:08:15 -0400 From: "David Robillard" To: Blue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: Does mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) support IPv6? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:08:18 -0000 > I want to know whether mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) could possibly > support IPv6. When I want to establish a PPTP connection with a PPTP > server running mpd, could I use IPv6CP instead of IPv4CP to set up the > PPP? If it supports, how could I configure the related parameters in the > configuration files? I could only find the ipcp syntax. I run mpd and I did a simple `grep -i ipv6 /usr/local/share/doc/mpd/*`. It came up with nothing. No mention of IPv6 in the mpd(8) man page either. Try to contact the project admins, they probably know more then us on this topic. Get their email at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mpd Cheers, David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 13:22:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894AA16A494 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD00143D9E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:21:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-148-132.51-151.net24.it [151.51.132.148]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8SDPDHB071115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:25:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8SDJm5r032310 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:19:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <451BCC0B.5090207@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:20:11 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: Reading .pub's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:22:09 -0000 Hello. Anything in the port tree can read MsPublisher files? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 13:25:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519A416A412 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9FD43D73 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:25:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6711869A22 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:24:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:24:37 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060928092437.4a4923a7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Fw: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:25:45 -0000 Can anyone define "exceptionally large" as noted in this statement?: "NOTE ALSO: The above patch reduces the functionality of libcrypto(3) by prohibiting the use of exceptionally large public keys. It is believed that no existing applications legitimately use such key lengths as would be affected by this change." It would be nice if "exceptionally large" were replaced with "keys in excess of x bits in size" or something. I don't expect that this will affect me, but ambiguous statements like that make me uncomfortable. Begin forwarded message: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:13:53 GMT From: FreeBSD Security Advisories To: FreeBSD Security Advisories Cc: Subject: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Multiple problems in crypto(3) Category: contrib Module: openssl Announced: 2006-09-28 Credits: Dr S N Henson, Tavis Ormandy, Will Drewry Affects: All FreeBSD releases. Corrected: 2006-09-28 13:02:37 UTC (RELENG_6, 6.1-PRERELEASE) 2006-09-28 13:03:14 UTC (RELENG_6_1, 6.1-RELEASE-p8) 2006-09-28 13:03:41 UTC (RELENG_6_0, 6.0-RELEASE-p13) 2006-09-28 13:03:57 UTC (RELENG_5, 5.5-STABLE) 2006-09-28 13:04:16 UTC (RELENG_5_5, 5.5-RELEASE-p6) 2006-09-28 13:04:47 UTC (RELENG_5_4, 5.4-RELEASE-p20) 2006-09-28 13:05:08 UTC (RELENG_5_3, 5.3-RELEASE-p35) 2006-09-28 13:05:59 UTC (RELENG_4, 4.11-STABLE) 2006-09-28 13:06:23 UTC (RELENG_4_11, 4.11-RELEASE-p23) CVE Name: CVE-2006-2937, CVE-2006-2940, CVE-2006-3738, CVE-2006-4343 For general information regarding FreeBSD Security Advisories, including descriptions of the fields above, security branches, and the following sections, please visit . I. Background FreeBSD includes software from the OpenSSL Project. The OpenSSL Project is a collaborative effort to develop a robust, commercial-grade, full-featured, and Open Source toolkit implementing the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) protocols as well as a full-strength general purpose cryptography library. II. Problem Description Several problems have been found in OpenSSL: 1. During the parsing of certain invalid ASN1 structures an error condition is mishandled, possibly resulting in an infinite loop. [CVE-2006-2937] 2. A buffer overflow exists in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function. [CVE-2006-3738] 3. A NULL pointer may be dereferenced in the SSL version 2 client code. [CVE-2006-4343] In addition, many applications using OpenSSL do not perform any validation of the lengths of public keys being used. [CVE-2006-2940] III. Impact Servers which parse ASN1 data from untrusted sources may be vulnerable to a denial of service attack. [CVE-2006-2937] An attacker accessing a server which uses SSL version 2 may be able to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of that server. [CVE-2006-3738] A malicious SSL server can cause clients connecting using SSL version 2 to crash. [CVE-2006-4343] Applications which perform public key operations using untrusted keys may be vulnerable to a denial of service attack. [CVE-2006-2940] IV. Workaround No workaround is available, but not all of the vulnerabilities mentioned affect all applications. V. Solution Perform one of the following: 1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE, 5-STABLE, or 6-STABLE, or to the RELENG_6_1, RELENG_6_0, RELENG_5_5, RELENG_5_4, RELENG_5_3, or RELENG_4_11 security branch dated after the correction date. 2) To patch your present system: The following patches have been verified to apply to FreeBSD 4.11, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 6.0, and 6.1 systems. a) Download the relevant patch from the location below, and verify the detached PGP signature using your PGP utility. # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-06:23/openssl.patch # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-06:23/openssl.patch.asc b) Execute the following commands as root: # cd /usr/src # patch < /path/to/patch c) Recompile the operating system as described in and reboot the system. NOTE: Any third-party applications, including those installed from the FreeBSD ports collection, which are statically linked to libcrypto(3) should be recompiled in order to use the corrected code. NOTE ALSO: The above patch reduces the functionality of libcrypto(3) by prohibiting the use of exceptionally large public keys. It is believed that no existing applications legitimately use such key lengths as would be affected by this change. VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.1.2.4 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.1.2.8 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.1.2.7 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.1.2.11 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.1.2.8 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.1.2.7 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.1.2.11 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.2.2.14 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.2.4.16 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.1.2.7 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.2.2.14 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.1.2.20 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.1.2.14 RELENG_4_11 src/UPDATING 1.73.2.91.2.24 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.39.2.27 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.1.2.2.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.1.2.4.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.1.2.3.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.1.2.7.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.1.2.4.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.1.2.3.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.1.2.7.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.2.2.8.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.2.4.8.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.1.2.3.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.2.2.8.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.1.2.9.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.1.2.8.4.1 RELENG_5 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.2.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.6.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.4.6.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.8.4.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.6.6.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.7.4.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.10.4.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.12.4.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.12.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.13.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.11.2.2 RELENG_5_5 src/UPDATING 1.342.2.35.2.6 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.62.2.21.2.8 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.2.16.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.6.18.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.4.6.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.8.4.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.6.6.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.18.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.7.4.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.10.4.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.12.4.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.18.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.12.2.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.13.2.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.11.2.1.4.1 RELENG_5_4 src/UPDATING 1.342.2.24.2.29 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.62.2.18.2.25 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.2.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.6.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.4.6.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.8.4.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.6.6.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.7.4.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.10.4.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.12.4.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.12.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.13.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.11.2.1.2.1 RELENG_5_3 src/UPDATING 1.342.2.13.2.38 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.62.2.15.2.40 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.2.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.6.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.4.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.8.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.6.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.7.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.10.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.12.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.12.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.13.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.11.4.1 RELENG_6 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.2.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.6.12.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.5.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.9.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.7.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.12.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.8.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.11.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.13.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.12.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.13.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.14.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.12.2.1 RELENG_6_1 src/UPDATING 1.416.2.22.2.10 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.69.2.11.2.10 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.2.14.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.6.16.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.5.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.9.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.7.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.16.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.8.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.11.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.13.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.16.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.13.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.14.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.12.6.1 RELENG_6_0 src/UPDATING 1.416.2.3.2.18 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.69.2.8.2.14 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c 1.1.1.2.12.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh.h 1.1.1.6.14.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c 1.1.1.5.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c 1.1.1.9.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa.h 1.1.1.7.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.14.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c 1.1.1.8.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa.h 1.11.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c 1.13.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c 1.1.1.4.14.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s2_clnt.c 1.13.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.14.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 1.1.1.12.4.1 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- VII. References http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-2937 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-2940 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3738 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-4343 The latest revision of this advisory is available at http://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFG8l8FdaIBMps37IRAn0pAKCRuDXjFm2w7YtoZ9C6oVgM9UK0GgCdHdYu 7owfMI1ZVr22prZNmPTeM7k= =DguL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-announce@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-announce To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-announce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. **************************************************************** IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. **************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 13:30:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DFA16A492 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8247D43D55 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:29:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:29:43 -0400 id 00056439.451BCE47.00003CE9 Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 09:27:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:29:42 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060928092942.41ddd3a7.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <451BCC0B.5090207@netfence.it> References: <451BCC0B.5090207@netfence.it> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: Reading .pub's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:30:34 -0000 In response to Andrea Venturoli : > Hello. > Anything in the port tree can read MsPublisher files? Have you looked at Scribus? I don't know for a fact that it can use MSPub files, but it's probably the best thing to check. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 13:36:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9B616A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C1943D5A for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:35:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.69]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J6B00K651NJ2D90@l-daemon> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.80]) by pd4mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J6B0080U1NJJWH0@pd4mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hexahedron.daemonology.net ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with SMTP id <0J6B004DF1NIZDZ0@l-daemon> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: (qmail 91356 invoked from network); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:33:18 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:33:18 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:33:18 -0700 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <20060928092437.4a4923a7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: Bill Moran Message-id: <451BCF1E.2070609@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 References: <20060928092437.4a4923a7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060416) Cc: freebsd security , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fw: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:36:11 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > Can anyone define "exceptionally large" as noted in this statement?: > > "NOTE ALSO: The above patch reduces the functionality of libcrypto(3) by > prohibiting the use of exceptionally large public keys. It is believed > that no existing applications legitimately use such key lengths as would > be affected by this change." > > It would be nice if "exceptionally large" were replaced with "keys in > excess of x bits in size" or something. I don't expect that this will > affect me, but ambiguous statements like that make me uncomfortable. DH and DSA are limited to 10000 bits. RSA is limited to 16400 or 4112 bits depending upon whether the public exponent is less or more than 72 bits. I wouldn't have allowed this change into the security branches if I was not very very confident that no applications would be affected by this. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 13:46:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A80B16A40F; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69FE43D6B; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:46:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F13B69A22; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:46:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:46:26 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Colin Percival Message-Id: <20060928094626.012b930c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <451BCF1E.2070609@freebsd.org> References: <20060928092437.4a4923a7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <451BCF1E.2070609@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd security , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fw: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:46:28 -0000 In response to Colin Percival : > Bill Moran wrote: > > Can anyone define "exceptionally large" as noted in this statement?: > > > > "NOTE ALSO: The above patch reduces the functionality of libcrypto(3) by > > prohibiting the use of exceptionally large public keys. It is believed > > that no existing applications legitimately use such key lengths as would > > be affected by this change." > > > > It would be nice if "exceptionally large" were replaced with "keys in > > excess of x bits in size" or something. I don't expect that this will > > affect me, but ambiguous statements like that make me uncomfortable. > > DH and DSA are limited to 10000 bits. RSA is limited to 16400 or 4112 bits > depending upon whether the public exponent is less or more than 72 bits. > > I wouldn't have allowed this change into the security branches if I was not > very very confident that no applications would be affected by this. > > Colin Percival I'm not questioning your ability to make these decisions, Colin. Far, far from it. I'm the type that is made uncomfortable by any statement that reads _anything_ like "don't worry, we've taken care of it." Take that email as two separate statements: 1) I'm curious as to exactly how big "exceptionally large" is. 2) I think this security advisory could be improved by including the answer to #1. Thanks for the quick response, and all the work you do. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 14:28:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E822416A492 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21F143D88 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:28:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 8652 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2006 14:28:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Sep 2006 14:28:06 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 754042842C; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:28:06 -0400 (EDT) To: steven References: <10cbaf0f0609250455h4a3c737aw5f0138abc2dca535@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:28:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <10cbaf0f0609250455h4a3c737aw5f0138abc2dca535@mail.gmail.com> (steven's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:55:54 +0800") Message-ID: <441wpw83rd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need help, some thing goes with wrong with Bridge-networking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:28:09 -0000 steven writes: > Dear Sir: > Those days i tried build an in-line firewall, I take freebsd > as a good operation system because it is safety and stabilty, but i > came with trouble when i follow the handbook to bridge the two > Ethernet Card, the > book(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bridging.html) > says that i should recomplie the kernel to add options BRIDGE > into it, however, after compiling the new kernel, typing comamds > including "sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1","sysctl -w > net.link.ether.bridge.config=rl0,rl1", the bridge seems out of > working, and my fressbsd system version is 6.1, those two network card > is not assign any static ipv4 address, Can you tell me why it comes > intn that, dieing to hrear from your answer, and i'm appriciate for > it. A bridge does not necessarily have to have an IP address. For us to help you, you will need to be more specific about what you are trying and what you want to have happen. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 14:36:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF1E16A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2167F43D7D for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:36:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 25582 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2006 14:36:41 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Sep 2006 14:36:41 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8F63A2842C; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:36:40 -0400 (EDT) To: Free BSD Questions list References: <20060927123921.GA6760@teddy.fas.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:36:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060927123921.GA6760@teddy.fas.com> (stan's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:39:21 -0400") Message-ID: <44wt7o6osn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Replace worksation, now can't ssh to older machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:36:45 -0000 stan writes: > My trusty lon suffering FreeBSD workstation at work died (hardware), and I > am in the process of replacig it. > > The current iss I have is that I have several older HP-UX achines that I > need to be able to ssh to. I can't remeber exactly how I set these machines > up (it was years agao), but they seem to have some restrictions as to what > machines can ssh to them. I can't sem to get the new FreeBSD machine to be > accepted by them. The are running: > > OpenSSH_2.5.1p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090600f > > I added the id_rsa.pub and identity.pub lines to the ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > file on one of the HP-UX machines, but when Itry to conect with verbose > mode urned on, I get: > > ssh -v phse6 > OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-20050903, OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004 > debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config > debug1: Connecting to phse6.meadwestvaco.com [170.85.106.131] port 22. > debug1: Connection established. > debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/identity type 0 > debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/id_rsa type 1 > debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 > debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version > OpenSSH_2.5.1p1 > debug1: match: OpenSSH_2.5.1p1 pat OpenSSH_2.5.0p1*,OpenSSH_2.5.1p1* > debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 > debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-20050903 > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received > debug1: kex: server->client 3des-cbc hmac-md5 none > debug1: kex: client->server 3des-cbc hmac-md5 none > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST_OLD(2048) sent > debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent > debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY > debug1: Host 'phse6.meadwestvaco.com' is known and matches the DSA host > key. > debug1: Found key in /home/stan/.ssh/known_hosts:195 > debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct > debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent > debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS > debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received > debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent > debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received > debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > debug1: Offering public key: /home/stan/.ssh/id_rsa > debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive > debug1: Trying private key: /home/stan/.ssh/id_dsa > debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive > debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive > debug1: No more authentication methods to try. > Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). > > Any sugestionsas to what to check next? Turn on verbose mode on the servers, and see what they think. They're the ones that are unhappy with the authentication, so they're the ones you should look at for why the RSA key isn't being accepted. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 14:49:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B5016A4E9 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FDE43DBF for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18340 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2006 14:49:41 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Sep 2006 14:49:41 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9855B2842C; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:49:40 -0400 (EDT) To: Bob References: <200609280412.51064.bob@tania.servebbs.org> <451B8666.4030909@inode.at> <200609280432.54612.bob@tania.servebbs.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:49:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200609280432.54612.bob@tania.servebbs.org> (bob@tania.servebbs.org's message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:32:53 -0400") Message-ID: <44slic6o6z.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PortUpgrade multiple packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:56 -0000 Bob writes: > On Thursday 28 September 2006 04:23, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > >> That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies >> (fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict) > > Likely they do; Mozilla, Seamonkey, Opera, and Firefox. (all flagged in my > security audit) Was hoping to do them all at once. > >> (smp etc is >> excluded from this assumption) > > Yeah, running SMP, so cpu is not a problem. But bumping into deps may very > well be. I have synched-up my ports tree, and have also done portupgrade -Fa > so all the sources, as well as any deps are already here. However, I fear > several packages may need the same dep, and all try to upgrade it at the same > time.... would make a mess! > > I don't think portupgrade is smart enough to detect multiple upgrades, at > least I have not seen any reference in the docs. > > Thanks! guess I will just so one a night, some of these are pretty BIG. You could look over the dependencies and figure out the conflicts by hand. One way to do that would be to use "portupgrade -n" on the different major packages, and compare the results. Or maybe sysutils/gpkgdep would be easier for you to figure out the overlaps from... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 15:14:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC2D16A412 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF77543D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1GSxaD-000Ohc-0J for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:13:53 +0400 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GSxa3-0003U8-2m for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:13:43 +0400 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8SFDgeR013399 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:13:42 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:13:42 +0400 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060928151342.GD1250@sysadm.stc> References: <8a0028260609051250m45931c68y59b377eb66b22716@mail.gmail.com> <8a0028260609070511t3c18a9c7xf70388821bd6415d@mail.gmail.com> <450015FA.7040406@unsane.co.uk> <8a0028260609070737l75b929f6m88ec117e6b7b041@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a0028260609070737l75b929f6m88ec117e6b7b041@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: LVM support in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:14:00 -0000 On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:37:28PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: > Thanks for the pointers. As an aside, are you worried about the legality > of > VMWare images in VMPlayer? I don't think they're an issue (at least with You can freely download VMware server from VMWare. ... no FreeBSD port :-( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 15:25:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138CD16A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C3A43D62 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:25:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8SFP8qs025737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:25:08 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8SFP8J6015774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:25:08 -0700 Message-ID: <451BE953.9020509@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:25:07 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200609281526.55362.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200609281526.55362.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.266434, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.9.28.75942 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Kopete MSN + Cam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:25:10 -0000 Warren Liddell wrote: > Is or will there ever be support to allow the viewing of Webcams from others > or is it simply not possible ? Webcam support still isn't fully functional in any of the opensource projects I think; gaim is the closest to getting a working prototype though, through the gaim-vv subproject. IIRC, the author of Kopete is helping out, so the MSN webcam functionality might become available in Kopete sometime in the near future. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 15:47:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8B716A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3001243D5C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8SFjbu6096231; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:45:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8SFjbo4096230; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:45:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:45:37 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Kristopher Yates Message-ID: <20060928154537.GD95657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: growfs HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:06 -0000 On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:26:27AM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > Hi everyone, > > First of all, glad to still be running FBSD after all these years. > > I tried following some docs I found online in order to make my /usr > partition bigger and made it all the way to growfs -s, which is where I got > stuck. > > First of all, here was my original dilema, what I did, then a descript of > where I am regarding growfs problem. > > System (aka firewall): Pentium60 40M RAM 2 NICS, running FBSD4.5-stable (a > great firewall running 24/7 since OCT 2000.) > > I tried to upgrade (make buildword make installworld to 4.11-stable).. I > made the new world and installed the new kernel but not quite enough space > to do the last steps (mergemaster and then installworld). > > So I built a spare box, and installed FBSD on it. > > I put the hard drive from the firewall as secondary master, and a larger > drive as secondary slave. > > * I ran dd and imaged the old drive onto the new drive > > old drive seagate 1.2gb > new drive quantum 4.3gb > > * I put the new drive into the old faithful P60 (firewall). It boots up > fine running 4.11-p22 and is currently online as my firewall. > > What is left to do: > > Finish the 4.11 install which ended on make kernel KERNCONF=CUSTOMKERN.. I > just need to mergemaster then installworld as single user. > > Obviously, /usr partition (/dev/ad0s1f) is basically full w/ 8.6MB free. > > ** soo.. I did some fdisk magic and got stuck on the growfs (final step) in > order to growfs /usr > > fdisk reports my 1 partition @ full size of disk but no idea how to > properly use growfs. To use growfs you must have space in the slice contiguous with the partition you want to increase in size. It cannot just grow anywhere. You really did not want to move things using dd. You really wanted to build the new file systems to the sizes you want on the new disk and then use dump/restore to to the new partitions. First, fdisk the new disk and put the MBR on it and create your one slice on it and flag that as bootable. Then, use disklabel (in 4.xxx, bsd label in later versions of FreeBSD) to create your slices and also make it write out the boot sector. There is a block of examples in the disklabel/bsdlabel man page that tells how to use dd to make sure a drive is clean and then fdisk to make one slice with MBR and finally two disklabels to create the bootable partition and then to edit the partition table for all the partitions. That group of commands is just what you need. Then, do a newfs on each partition created (except swap) and then make a mount point for them. Mount the 'a' partition on something like '/newroot' for example and then run dump/restore to copy root cd /newroot dump 0af - / | restore -rf - Do the same dump/restore thing for each of the partitions/filesystems. Make sure you cd in to the base of each mounted new filesystem before doing the dump/restore and replace the '/' in the dump to be each filesystem - for example, for /usr, make a /newusr mountpoint mount it and then cd to /newusr and do 'dump 0af - /usr | restore -rf -' When you get done, you will have a fully useable, bootable copy of your machine on the new disk. Move the new disk to the primary boot position in your boot chain and start it up. By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. Maybe you need some new hardware. ////jerry > > Here is what I have: > cylinders=8895 heads=15 sectors/track=63 (945blks/cyl) > > media sector size 512 > > partition 1 sysid 165, start 63, size 8405712 (4104 Meg), flag 80 (active) > beg: cyl 0/head 1 / sector 1 > end: cyl 1023 / head 14 / sector 63 > > basically I need help filling in the following blank (/dev/ad0s1f == /usr > slice) > > # growfs -s ______ /dev/ad0s1f > > as shown above, fdisk sees the correct geometry as 4104MB partition but > /stand/sysinstall disklabel editor sees ad0s1 as 2888MB, which is the > amount of space I thought I was to be adding to /usr via growfs. Currently, > my /usr slice is 975MB and really needs to grow. :) > > Please let me know what other info I can provide that will help you help me > solve this problem. I have read man growfs and some docs online, however, > I'm stuck and dont know exactly how to resolve the problem. > > Much thanks, > > Kris > > _________________________________________________________________ > Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more?then map the best > route! http://local.live.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 16:22:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD6F16A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DE5C43D5D for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:22:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 50933 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2006 16:22:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 16:22:30 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <451BF6D3.7000901@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:22:43 +0100 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: denyhosts problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:22:32 -0000 I'm trying to get denyhosts-2.5 to work in 6.0 and have inserted a line in hosts.allow ALL: xxx.myoffice.com : allow sshd: /etc/hosts.deniedssh : deny ALL: ALL : allow but am finding that this causes my home ip to be denied even though I log in with a pre-shared key. The /etc/hosts.deniedssh file is being created, but my home ip is not present (it would be hard as I have a dynamically allocated one anyhow). The hosts.deniedssh file contains entries like ....... ALL: 61.219.xx.250 : deny ALL: 209.8.xx.242 : deny ....... I am getting an error in the auth log related to the denial that looks like this /etc/hosts.allow, line 24: can't verify hostname: getaddrinfo(xxx-yyy-......, AF_INET) where /etc/hosts.allow line24 corresponds to the sshd: /etc/hosts.deniedssh : deny line in hosts.allow. I have the same setup in 6.1 and it seems to work. But I still see messages related to line 24 from that setup. Does denyhosts work properly? -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 16:24:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9740D16A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunorbsd@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B6F43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:24:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hunorbsd@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so786192nfc for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MzLoVwNH1KRXZ+KDTI4FclXC/y92MFWHQJleMp2g3cxYu8Ahc/xIEaQ7W3tgUtjKqmvcJ9VquyrrvCoLGllEh9RpOmv2xLGTCE4BQa86V/AwVItggL9gTZHllTFFSZoHD86U6HqJiC8LA8ZKi0VtUTSpt3w8NuxJAat85L+Z2PA= Received: by 10.78.128.15 with SMTP id a15mr1595978hud; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.124.7 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:24:16 +0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Forr=F3_A_Hunor?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <451BE953.9020509@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200609281526.55362.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <451BE953.9020509@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Kopete MSN + Cam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:24:18 -0000 2006/9/28, Garrett Cooper : > > Warren Liddell wrote: > > Is or will there ever be support to allow the viewing of Webcams from > others > > or is it simply not possible ? > Webcam support still isn't fully functional in any of the opensource > projects I think; gaim is the closest to getting a working prototype > though, through the gaim-vv subproject. IIRC, the author of Kopete is > helping out, so the MSN webcam functionality might become available in > Kopete sometime in the near future. > -Garrett > There is an MSN Messenger clone for Linux. I haven't used it but I think it seems to be good. I will try it shortly. You can read further and download from the project's homepage at http://amsn.sourceforge.net/ Don't forget to enable linux compatibility in /etc/rc.conf from linux_enable="NO" to linux_enable="YES" Pls notify me if it's working -- Regards, [Hunor] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:08:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4430016A412 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4577443D64 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:07:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:07:57 -0400 id 0005643B.451C0F7D.0000621B Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 14:05:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:08:04 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: moused insists on starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:08:07 -0000 6.1. Moused starts on boot, and issuing /etc/rc.d/moused stop has not effect. My /etc/rc.conf has the line: moused_enable="NO" yet the damn thing starts. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:10:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D56916A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal4.es.net (postal4.es.net [198.124.252.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D2F43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:10:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal4.es.net (Postal Node 4) with ESMTP (SSL) id GBL09543 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:09:43 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 50C3545042 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:09:42 -0700 (PDT) To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1159466982_61032P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:09:42 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20060928180942.50C3545042@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Subject: Thread libraries and Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:10:00 -0000 --==_Exmh_1159466982_61032P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I use a Perl program that uses GTK2 for its display. This means that it uses the p5-Gtk2 port. Many GTK2 routines are threaded, and when they are called, the rtld fails to resolve the symbol "pthread_getschedparam" and the program exists. I know that normally the inclusion of the threading libraries is done at compile time for the main code which will be using threading routines in libraries to which it is linked, but Perl is not compiled and, if I don't do something to pull libpthread into the process, such as using LD_PRELOAD, I will get the error. My question is, what is the best way to do this? Should the Perl bindings to the threaded libraries do it? (In this case, p5-Gtk2) or is there a better way. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1159466982_61032P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFFHA/mkn3rs5h7N1ERAqsSAJwIWOlKKlEkatrFzfM/VwsrrskuuwCeJJST lKhUUGLy40JB7yXmGPP4S9U= =osoK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1159466982_61032P-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:17:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1AA16A412 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D9243D49 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:17:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8SIH7cV030318; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:17:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:16:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609281416.56648.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: moused insists on starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:17:11 -0000 On Thursday 28 September 2006 14:08, Bill Moran wrote: > 6.1. Moused starts on boot, and issuing /etc/rc.d/moused stop has > not effect. My /etc/rc.conf has the line: > moused_enable="NO" > yet the damn thing starts. Assuming you have a USB mouse, this is controlled by /etc/devd.conf (or /etc/usbd.conf in older releases). Comment out or modify the ums/moused entry to suit your preferences. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:24:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E195416A47E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A0D43DBA for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:23:51 -0400 id 00056458.451C1337.00006535 Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 14:21:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:23:54 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: John Nielsen Message-Id: <20060928142354.6450b2e0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200609281416.56648.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200609281416.56648.lists@jnielsen.net> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moused insists on starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:24:11 -0000 In response to John Nielsen : > On Thursday 28 September 2006 14:08, Bill Moran wrote: > > 6.1. Moused starts on boot, and issuing /etc/rc.d/moused stop has > > not effect. My /etc/rc.conf has the line: > > moused_enable="NO" > > yet the damn thing starts. > > Assuming you have a USB mouse, this is controlled by /etc/devd.conf > (or /etc/usbd.conf in older releases). Comment out or modify the ums/moused > entry to suit your preferences. Huh. I hate to be a whiner, but shouldn't this respect the moused_enable setting in rc.conf? I find this a violation of POLA. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. **************************************************************** IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. **************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:26:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272F616A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC8643D64 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:26:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so293980nzn for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tOzggTnA0uqqGnjz5zrPJQS+SfS//8ZQ1qxMGazGp+2toZkmIe76xUuPxllhRSzNg0QgFsMBwnRsr8GyVl5XTqjNLUwkIe0/6E5U5T8g7L2pc54gWFbkXtXDfr7qlAyOXC+bXlMNmKS4gemWDsbojsrHJx/J49MLZ1Z16vGTAcE= Received: by 10.65.151.6 with SMTP id d6mr2332316qbo; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.84.5 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:26:05 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moused insists on starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:26:07 -0000 On 9/28/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > 6.1. Moused starts on boot, and issuing /etc/rc.d/moused stop has > not effect. My /etc/rc.conf has the line: > moused_enable="NO" > yet the damn thing starts. > USB mouse? Becuase those seem to be handled automagically somewhere by usbd. usbd.conf(5) gives an ensample of how to make usbd attach a mouse, but there does not seem to be a simple counterexample, and it happens without such lines in any case, it would seem. >From a quick grep, it would appear that apmd has a provision for starting moused, as with devd. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:39:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4B116A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBE343D77 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:39:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA0F5E3A; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hP-qUssGQBqT; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931F05C64; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451C16D4.2000403@mac.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:16 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200609281416.56648.lists@jnielsen.net> <20060928142354.6450b2e0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928142354.6450b2e0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moused insists on starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:39:23 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: [ ... ] > I hate to be a whiner, but shouldn't this respect the moused_enable > setting in rc.conf? I find this a violation of POLA. I would agree that a USB mouse should respect moused_enable; I gather this means the USB daemon needs to become smarter... -- -Chuck PS: Is there any chance you can not use the 16-line .sig disclaimer...? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:45:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D69A16A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:45:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D0043D8D for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:45:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:45:29 -0400 id 0005643B.451C1849.000069CD Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 14:43:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:45:28 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Chuck Swiger Message-Id: <20060928144528.747e8202.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <451C16D4.2000403@mac.com> References: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200609281416.56648.lists@jnielsen.net> <20060928142354.6450b2e0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <451C16D4.2000403@mac.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moused insists on starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:45:53 -0000 In response to Chuck Swiger : > PS: Is there any chance you can not use the 16-line .sig disclaimer...? Yes. I usually take the time to manually delete it when it doesn't apply, but (like any manual process) I sometimes forget. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:54:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4AE16A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris_yates64@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s30.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s30.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D1543D6D for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:54:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris_yates64@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.174.14]) by bay0-omc2-s30.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:54:29 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:54:29 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.174.200 by by103fd.bay103.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:54:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.37.68.73] X-Originating-Email: [kris_yates64@hotmail.com] X-Sender: kris_yates64@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20060928154537.GD95657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> From: "Kristopher Yates" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:54:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2006 18:54:29.0356 (UTC) FILETIME=[86F132C0:01C6E32F] Cc: jerrymc@msu.edu Subject: Re: growfs HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:54:30 -0000 Anyone else have any suggestions? I was thinking I could rewrite my partition table to what it was originally, then growfs using the empty partionable space.. but I dont exactly know how. I just had some docs I found online (URL is below). Before I did fdisk -s, the 2.888GB was an empty partition of the drive where I could have created a new partition.. but instead I did fdisk to merge it all into the same partition. The docs I read said to do that, then growfs.. I just didnt understand the vague explanation of doing the math to determine the correct number of sectors to pass to growfs. The docs I was using: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200111/growfs.html I know it is possible without doing all that you suggested. It should be a matter of just executing growfs properly and I'm done. Otherwise, it would be easier to just do a fresh install than to do all that you suggested. Makes sense to me. I'd rather not have to reinstall. My idea was to post here and get a better understanding, growfs and be done with it. I didnt expect comments from the peanut gallery; ie. >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. >Maybe you need some new hardware. >///jerry Not everyone has a kush job at the SCNC working with universities. A) Why does a box that is just running NATD and portsentry need an 18GB hard drive and a faster processor? B) Maybe you need to give me some money so that I may afford to build the fancy firewall/gateway that you suggest. I almost appreciate your reply but found your final remark to be rather condescending. My hardware is fine. It works and its all I have. This firewall box has been online 24/7 since 1998 running FBSD just fine. Blow the dust out once a year and "keep on trucking". Michigan has the 2nd worst economy in the US. I would think you would be more understanding of my situation. Unfortunately, you have proven me wrong. Thanks to the FREEBSD community for continuing to be the leader in backward-compatible support for old hardware. Long live the Pentium 60 and the 640 ATA controller! ;) Cheers, Kris >From: Jerry McAllister >To: Kristopher Yates >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: growfs HELP >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:45:37 -0400 > >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:26:27AM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > First of all, glad to still be running FBSD after all these years. > > > > I tried following some docs I found online in order to make my /usr > > partition bigger and made it all the way to growfs -s, which is where I >got > > stuck. > > > > First of all, here was my original dilema, what I did, then a descript >of > > where I am regarding growfs problem. > > > > System (aka firewall): Pentium60 40M RAM 2 NICS, running FBSD4.5-stable >(a > > great firewall running 24/7 since OCT 2000.) > > > > I tried to upgrade (make buildword make installworld to 4.11-stable).. I > > made the new world and installed the new kernel but not quite enough >space > > to do the last steps (mergemaster and then installworld). > > > > So I built a spare box, and installed FBSD on it. > > > > I put the hard drive from the firewall as secondary master, and a larger > > drive as secondary slave. > > > > * I ran dd and imaged the old drive onto the new drive > > > > old drive seagate 1.2gb > > new drive quantum 4.3gb > > > > * I put the new drive into the old faithful P60 (firewall). It boots up > > fine running 4.11-p22 and is currently online as my firewall. > > > > What is left to do: > > > > Finish the 4.11 install which ended on make kernel KERNCONF=CUSTOMKERN.. >I > > just need to mergemaster then installworld as single user. > > > > Obviously, /usr partition (/dev/ad0s1f) is basically full w/ 8.6MB free. > > > > ** soo.. I did some fdisk magic and got stuck on the growfs (final step) >in > > order to growfs /usr > > > > fdisk reports my 1 partition @ full size of disk but no idea how to > > properly use growfs. > >To use growfs you must have space in the slice contiguous with >the partition you want to increase in size. It cannot just grow >anywhere. You really did not want to move things using dd. >You really wanted to build the new file systems to the sizes you >want on the new disk and then use dump/restore to to the new >partitions. > >First, fdisk the new disk and put the MBR on it and create your >one slice on it and flag that as bootable. > >Then, use disklabel (in 4.xxx, bsd label in later versions of FreeBSD) >to create your slices and also make it write out the boot sector. >There is a block of examples in the disklabel/bsdlabel man page >that tells how to use dd to make sure a drive is clean >and then fdisk to make one slice with MBR and finally two disklabels >to create the bootable partition and then to edit the partition >table for all the partitions. That group of commands is just what >you need. > >Then, do a newfs on each partition created (except swap) and >then make a mount point for them. Mount the 'a' partition on >something like '/newroot' for example and then run dump/restore >to copy root > cd /newroot > dump 0af - / | restore -rf - > >Do the same dump/restore thing for each of the partitions/filesystems. >Make sure you cd in to the base of each mounted new filesystem >before doing the dump/restore and replace the '/' in the dump to >be each filesystem - for example, for /usr, make a /newusr mountpoint >mount it and then cd to /newusr and do 'dump 0af - /usr | restore -rf -' > >When you get done, you will have a fully useable, bootable copy of your >machine on the new disk. Move the new disk to the primary boot >position in your boot chain and start it up. > >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. >Maybe you need some new hardware. > >////jerry > > > > > Here is what I have: > > cylinders=8895 heads=15 sectors/track=63 (945blks/cyl) > > > > media sector size 512 > > > > partition 1 sysid 165, start 63, size 8405712 (4104 Meg), flag 80 >(active) > > beg: cyl 0/head 1 / sector 1 > > end: cyl 1023 / head 14 / sector 63 > > > > basically I need help filling in the following blank (/dev/ad0s1f == >/usr > > slice) > > > > # growfs -s ______ /dev/ad0s1f > > > > as shown above, fdisk sees the correct geometry as 4104MB partition but > > /stand/sysinstall disklabel editor sees ad0s1 as 2888MB, which is the > > amount of space I thought I was to be adding to /usr via growfs. >Currently, > > my /usr slice is 975MB and really needs to grow. :) > > > > Please let me know what other info I can provide that will help you help >me > > solve this problem. I have read man growfs and some docs online, >however, > > I'm stuck and dont know exactly how to resolve the problem. > > > > Much thanks, > > > > Kris > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more?then map the best > > route! http://local.live.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _________________________________________________________________ All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.  Get a free 90-day trial! http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 18:56:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7FA16A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc3-cmbg1-0-0-cust506.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.21.101.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B5743D64 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.63 #0) id 1GT13V-000AF3-Ps by authid for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:56:21 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:56:21 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060928185621.GA43858@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <451BF6D3.7000901@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <451BF6D3.7000901@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: denyhosts problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:56:24 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:22:43PM +0100, Robin Becker wrote: > I'm trying to get denyhosts-2.5 to work in 6.0 and have inserted a line i= n=20 > hosts.allow >=20 >=20 > ALL: xxx.myoffice.com : allow > sshd: /etc/hosts.deniedssh : deny > ALL: ALL : allow >=20 > but am finding that this causes my home ip to be denied even though I log= =20 > in with a pre-shared key. sshd will still avail itself of libwrap's functionality /before/ the client even has a chance to offer its key. Anyone who manages to get a copy of your key will need also to satisfy your /etc/hosts.allow rules before they can use it. > The /etc/hosts.deniedssh file is being created, but my home ip is not=20 > present (it would be hard as I have a dynamically allocated one anyhow). >=20 > The hosts.deniedssh file contains entries like >=20 > ....... > ALL: 61.219.xx.250 : deny > ALL: 209.8.xx.242 : deny > ....... This is wrong - when using an auxiliary file like this, that file should contain only the IP address of offending hosts. If you think about how hosts.allow rules are structured, this will make sense. > I am getting an error in the auth log related to the denial that looks li= ke=20 > this > /etc/hosts.allow, line 24: can't verify hostname:=20 > getaddrinfo(xxx-yyy-......, AF_INET) >=20 > where /etc/hosts.allow line24 corresponds to the >=20 > sshd: /etc/hosts.deniedssh : deny >=20 > line in hosts.allow. Indeed. It is precisely that rule that is uncovering the problems with your current configuration. Look at the structure of the rules. First, you have the service name, a colon, an address specification, another colon, and an action. (this is actually a bit of an over simplification, but you can get the full story if you look at hosts_access(5)) If the address specification actually contains the path to a file, the contents of that file are interpolated into the body of the rule. So, in your case, what libwrap constructs will look something like ALL : ALL : 61.219.xx.250 : deny : deny which, clearly, is nonsense! Make sure that denyhosts.cfg has a blank value for BLOCK_SERVICE and that it points HOSTS_DENY to the right file. I guess that at least is correct, though. DenyHosts will then correctly record only the IP address of blocked hosts, which will result in much saner rule expansions! > I have the same setup in 6.1 and it seems to work. But I still see messag= es=20 > related to line 24 from that setup. Does denyhosts work properly? I suspect it is not quite the same - check the BLOCK_SERVICE setting on that machine. Check out the DenyHosts FAQ - it's very useful. http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/faq.html And the FreeBSD hosts_options(5) man page as well, which, as I said earlier, contains the full story on setting up your /etc/hosts.allow. HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFHBrVixf5fBYiFmoRAptEAJ4qRZ9CsQkLKnHA/PooudNL411B8gCfSWSb 7IjH46p/C/1vnUbeNLn8QYY= =5em0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 19:18:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9748D16A494 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118BF43D4C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:18:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8SJHHiM097072; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:17:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8SJHHL4097071; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:17:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:17:17 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Kristopher Yates Message-ID: <20060928191717.GA96965@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060928154537.GD95657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: growfs HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:18:45 -0000 On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:54:26PM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > Anyone else have any suggestions? > > I was thinking I could rewrite my partition table to what it was > originally, then growfs using the empty partionable space.. but I dont > exactly know how. I just had some docs I found online (URL is below). > Before I did fdisk -s, the 2.888GB was an empty partition of the drive > where I could have created a new partition.. but instead I did fdisk to > merge it all into the same partition. The docs I read said to do that, > then growfs.. I just didnt understand the vague explanation of doing the > math to determine the correct number of sectors to pass to growfs. > The docs I was using: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200111/growfs.html > > I know it is possible without doing all that you suggested. It should be a > matter of just executing growfs properly and I'm done. Otherwise, it would > be easier to just do a fresh install than to do all that you suggested. > Makes sense to me. I'd rather not have to reinstall. No, it is less trouble to do it the way I wrote. Doing the dd stuff is harder and anyway, may not result in what you want. Growfs is really not all that useful. Remember that you have to have empty space in the slice right contiguous to to the one you want to grow. You cannot just grab space from somewhere else on the disk and add it in. You could, if you have free space already within an existing file system, move some diectories, such as /usr/local out of /usr and put them[it] in the available space and create a sym link to the new location. But, if it is unused space that has not been part of a partition, you will remake the partition table with disklabel. If the space is right at the end of existing partitioned space, you might get away with it without redoing everything, but it is kind of an unadvisable thing to try, because what gets written back in the partition table for the existing partitions just might not line up exactly with their previous positions - you're expecting a new pointer to point to the same place as the old one. It could, but maybe a critical sector gets mapped out in the middle things. It would mess things up. So, > > My idea was to post here and get a better understanding, growfs and be done > with it. I didnt expect comments from the peanut gallery; ie. It takes some knowledge to grow peanuts. If you want help, don't throw ignorance stones. > > >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > >Maybe you need some new hardware. > >///jerry > > Not everyone has a kush job at the SCNC working with universities. What do you know about SCNC? Obviously nothing. > > A) Why does a box that is just running NATD and portsentry need an 18GB > hard drive and a faster processor? Whatever you want. > > B) Maybe you need to give me some money so that I may afford to build the > fancy firewall/gateway that you suggest. I almost appreciate your reply > but found your final remark to be rather condescending. > > My hardware is fine. It works and its all I have. This firewall box has > been online 24/7 since 1998 running FBSD just fine. Blow the dust out once > a year and "keep on trucking". Fine. I have a couple of those right here. > > Michigan has the 2nd worst economy in the US. I would think you would be > more understanding of my situation. Unfortunately, you have proven me > wrong. Because the previous governor abetted by his psuedo right-wing cronies in the state congress gutted the state's economy before he finally got term limited out. > Thanks to the FREEBSD community for continuing to be the leader in > backward-compatible support for old hardware. Long live the Pentium 60 and > the 640 ATA controller! ;) > > Cheers, > > Kris > > > > >From: Jerry McAllister > >To: Kristopher Yates > >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: growfs HELP > >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:45:37 -0400 > > > >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:26:27AM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> First of all, glad to still be running FBSD after all these years. > >> > >> I tried following some docs I found online in order to make my /usr > >> partition bigger and made it all the way to growfs -s, which is where I > >got > >> stuck. > >> > >> First of all, here was my original dilema, what I did, then a descript > >of > >> where I am regarding growfs problem. > >> > >> System (aka firewall): Pentium60 40M RAM 2 NICS, running FBSD4.5-stable > >(a > >> great firewall running 24/7 since OCT 2000.) > >> > >> I tried to upgrade (make buildword make installworld to 4.11-stable).. I > >> made the new world and installed the new kernel but not quite enough > >space > >> to do the last steps (mergemaster and then installworld). > >> > >> So I built a spare box, and installed FBSD on it. > >> > >> I put the hard drive from the firewall as secondary master, and a larger > >> drive as secondary slave. > >> > >> * I ran dd and imaged the old drive onto the new drive > >> > >> old drive seagate 1.2gb > >> new drive quantum 4.3gb > >> > >> * I put the new drive into the old faithful P60 (firewall). It boots up > >> fine running 4.11-p22 and is currently online as my firewall. > >> > >> What is left to do: > >> > >> Finish the 4.11 install which ended on make kernel KERNCONF=CUSTOMKERN.. > >I > >> just need to mergemaster then installworld as single user. > >> > >> Obviously, /usr partition (/dev/ad0s1f) is basically full w/ 8.6MB free. > >> > >> ** soo.. I did some fdisk magic and got stuck on the growfs (final step) > >in > >> order to growfs /usr > >> > >> fdisk reports my 1 partition @ full size of disk but no idea how to > >> properly use growfs. > > > >To use growfs you must have space in the slice contiguous with > >the partition you want to increase in size. It cannot just grow > >anywhere. You really did not want to move things using dd. > >You really wanted to build the new file systems to the sizes you > >want on the new disk and then use dump/restore to to the new > >partitions. > > > >First, fdisk the new disk and put the MBR on it and create your > >one slice on it and flag that as bootable. > > > >Then, use disklabel (in 4.xxx, bsd label in later versions of FreeBSD) > >to create your slices and also make it write out the boot sector. > >There is a block of examples in the disklabel/bsdlabel man page > >that tells how to use dd to make sure a drive is clean > >and then fdisk to make one slice with MBR and finally two disklabels > >to create the bootable partition and then to edit the partition > >table for all the partitions. That group of commands is just what > >you need. > > > >Then, do a newfs on each partition created (except swap) and > >then make a mount point for them. Mount the 'a' partition on > >something like '/newroot' for example and then run dump/restore > >to copy root > > cd /newroot > > dump 0af - / | restore -rf - > > > >Do the same dump/restore thing for each of the partitions/filesystems. > >Make sure you cd in to the base of each mounted new filesystem > >before doing the dump/restore and replace the '/' in the dump to > >be each filesystem - for example, for /usr, make a /newusr mountpoint > >mount it and then cd to /newusr and do 'dump 0af - /usr | restore -rf -' > > > >When you get done, you will have a fully useable, bootable copy of your > >machine on the new disk. Move the new disk to the primary boot > >position in your boot chain and start it up. > > > >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > >Maybe you need some new hardware. > > > >////jerry > > > >> > >> Here is what I have: > >> cylinders=8895 heads=15 sectors/track=63 (945blks/cyl) > >> > >> media sector size 512 > >> > >> partition 1 sysid 165, start 63, size 8405712 (4104 Meg), flag 80 > >(active) > >> beg: cyl 0/head 1 / sector 1 > >> end: cyl 1023 / head 14 / sector 63 > >> > >> basically I need help filling in the following blank (/dev/ad0s1f == > >/usr > >> slice) > >> > >> # growfs -s ______ /dev/ad0s1f > >> > >> as shown above, fdisk sees the correct geometry as 4104MB partition but > >> /stand/sysinstall disklabel editor sees ad0s1 as 2888MB, which is the > >> amount of space I thought I was to be adding to /usr via growfs. > >Currently, > >> my /usr slice is 975MB and really needs to grow. :) > >> > >> Please let me know what other info I can provide that will help you help > >me > >> solve this problem. I have read man growfs and some docs online, > >however, > >> I'm stuck and dont know exactly how to resolve the problem. > >> > >> Much thanks, > >> > >> Kris > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more?then map the best > >> route! http://local.live.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _________________________________________________________________ > All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.? Get a free 90-day trial! > http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 19:25:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBD616A4E7 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp21.tin.it (vsmtp21alice.tin.it [212.216.176.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADBD43DAD for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:24:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from [10.155.100.8] (87.1.9.91) by vsmtp21.tin.it (7.2.072.1) (authenticated as vdemart1@tin.it) id 451BED5300007956 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:24:43 +0200 From: vittorio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:24:41 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609282124.41912.vdemart1@tin.it> Subject: IPFW & protected sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:25:24 -0000 With my ipfw firewall I can't surf the protected sites (I think by means of the ssl protocol), those with the closed locker in the frame of the browser. How can I enable this sites from my freebsd 6.1 box? Ciao Vittorio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 19:38:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11C516A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it (vsmtp1.tin.it [212.216.176.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A8843D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from [10.155.100.8] (87.1.9.91) by vsmtp1.tin.it (7.2.072.1) (authenticated as vdemart1@tin.it) id 451BEB280002769D for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:38:57 +0200 From: vittorio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:38:55 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609282138.55469.vdemart1@tin.it> Subject: konqueror & protected sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:38:59 -0000 I cannot access protected sites (such as those of internet banking, credit card and so on) with konqueror under kde because "the process died unexpectedly") while I can smoothly surf them with other browsers like mozilla. What should I do? Vittorio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 19:47:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4407416A416 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 260E343D68 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:47:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2006 19:47:07 -0000 Received: from p54A7F67E.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.12]) [84.167.246.126] by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 21:47:07 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <451C26AF.8060709@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:46:55 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <20060928140804.a7c302e8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200609281416.56648.lists@jnielsen.net> <20060928142354.6450b2e0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928142354.6450b2e0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: John Nielsen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moused insists on starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:47:16 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > In response to John Nielsen : > >> On Thursday 28 September 2006 14:08, Bill Moran wrote: >>> 6.1. Moused starts on boot, and issuing /etc/rc.d/moused stop has >>> not effect. My /etc/rc.conf has the line: >>> moused_enable="NO" >>> yet the damn thing starts. >> Assuming you have a USB mouse, this is controlled by /etc/devd.conf >> (or /etc/usbd.conf in older releases). Comment out or modify the ums/moused >> entry to suit your preferences. > > Huh. > > I hate to be a whiner, but shouldn't this respect the moused_enable > setting in rc.conf? I find this a violation of POLA. > I have recently been told that you have to set moused_nondefault_enable="NO" in your rc.conf to deactivate this behaviour. There is no need to mess with your devd.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 19:53:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1010416A403 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from typhoon.enabled.com (typhoon.enabled.com [216.218.220.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40FF43D5E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:53:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from [172.24.241.12] (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by typhoon.enabled.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8SJrZR8057206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:53:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Message-ID: <451C2835.7000200@enabled.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:53:25 -0700 From: Noah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: compling php4 with pcre, the session extension X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:53:36 -0000 Hi there, does anybody know how to compile php4 with pcre and the session extension? I am unable to find those options in the 'make config' menu? Looks like I need them. cheers, Noah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 20:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D40916A416 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5361B43D6E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8SKBBSu004833; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:11:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8SKBBSu004833 Message-ID: <451C2C5F.7050800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:11:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Noah References: <451C2835.7000200@enabled.com> In-Reply-To: <451C2835.7000200@enabled.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE04460F8337A311931FB0009" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:11:32 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1950/Thu Sep 28 15:11:54 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compling php4 with pcre, the session extension X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:12:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE04460F8337A311931FB0009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Noah wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > does anybody know how to compile php4 with pcre and the session > extension? I am unable to find those options in the 'make config' menu= ? >=20 > Looks like I need them. Just install the devel/php4-pcre and www/php4-session ports. Easy. Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE04460F8337A311931FB0009 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHCxf8Mjk52CukIwRCDrhAJoD2MoLmfe11Lo7v7j7NOVm/X8wiwCghp4d q4nJqkZeFf41UFN+2REdWqE= =vfBJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE04460F8337A311931FB0009-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 17:31:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C757316A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C2E43D69 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:31:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so216312wri for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:31:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=PrfCYcL32f3eLHymPyhVx30upJeu6OaKm5TJKbPI1eloIYDddj5kKrng3cfLanOea8jXGbyLJZV9cZm6MTZBEdjKXyMfLbegvwvyjuk4fMppvEiwb/JOhyfAIibHoGRfrb/bnZDBdVdm2QkzvyzhNJKFoWpaZeLUyEJKrGayWmQ= Received: by 10.90.34.9 with SMTP id h9mr949841agh; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.25.17 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:31:49 +0900 From: "azhar freebsd" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:14:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: mouse problem in X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:31:57 -0000 hi i am new about freebsd . currently i am running 6.2-PRERELEASE(?) in one of my machine . other 2 are FC5 and xp . i am using common one set of keyboard , mouse and monitor for every cpu through KVM (model REX-420 ) cpu changer . the problem is whenever i change to other os then go back to freebsd the mouse does not work . to change cpu i need to press "Scroll Lock" 2 times then the number (for me 1-freebsd ,2 -xp ,3 -FC5 ) . i also noticed that if i press "Scroll Lock" 2 times the mouse pointer just vanish . please help me .why this happens ? is there any way so that i can keep the mouse working ? azhar here is a copy of dmesg . Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC ........................................................ atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model VersaPad, device ID 0 ................................................................ psm0: failed to get status (doinitialize). psm0: failed to enable the device (doopen). psm0: failed to enable the device (reinitialize). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 20:14:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1AC16A500 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CD343D66 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:14:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8SKDksj004850; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:13:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8SKDksj004850 Message-ID: <451C2CFA.2010901@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:13:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vittorio References: <200609282124.41912.vdemart1@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <200609282124.41912.vdemart1@tin.it> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCDC648516BB182C02E36C276" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:14:07 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1950/Thu Sep 28 15:11:54 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW & protected sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:14:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCDC648516BB182C02E36C276 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable vittorio wrote: > With my ipfw firewall I can't surf the protected sites (I think by mean= s of =20 > the ssl protocol), those with the closed locker in the frame of the bro= wser. >=20 > How can I enable this sites from my freebsd 6.1 box? HTTPS uses port 443. You need to open up access to any host port 443 in your firewall. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigCDC648516BB182C02E36C276 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHCz68Mjk52CukIwRCJfkAJsHKtGfQAJe/Yo+rdRl2GiebBb7SQCfZE+p 0klUw2LURrYBES8RWOLOwYQ= =atd7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCDC648516BB182C02E36C276-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 20:39:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743B016A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0727443D64 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from [87.112.86.15] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GT2fU-0008M5-TG; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:39:41 +0100 Message-ID: <451C330A.8070202@jessikat.plus.net> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:39:38 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ahmad Arafat Abdullah References: <20060928004518.AFD371158CC@ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928004518.AFD371158CC@ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux recovery tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:39:44 -0000 Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote: ... >> >> One of my hosters says they provide a ram based linux recovery >> tool, but I'm actually using freebsd on the hardware so am >> wondering if linux knows how to mount UFS partitions? >> -- Robin Becker > > Yes, it does ...... thanks -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 20:48:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CD416A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEC643D68 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from [87.112.86.15] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GT2o1-0004qO-V4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:48:30 +0100 Message-ID: <451C3520.7050500@jessikat.plus.net> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:48:32 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <451BF6D3.7000901@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> <20060928185621.GA43858@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20060928185621.GA43858@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: denyhosts problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:48:33 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:22:43PM +0100, Robin Becker wrote: >> I'm trying to get denyhosts-2.5 to work in 6.0 and have inserted a line in >> hosts.allow >> >> >> ALL: xxx.myoffice.com : allow >> sshd: /etc/hosts.deniedssh : deny >> ALL: ALL : allow >> >> but am finding that this causes my home ip to be denied even though I log >> in with a pre-shared key. > > sshd will still avail itself of libwrap's functionality /before/ the > client even has a chance to offer its key. Anyone who manages to get > a copy of your key will need also to satisfy your /etc/hosts.allow > rules before they can use it. > >> The /etc/hosts.deniedssh file is being created, but my home ip is not >> present (it would be hard as I have a dynamically allocated one anyhow). >> >> The hosts.deniedssh file contains entries like >> ....... > > ALL : ALL : 61.219.xx.250 : deny : deny > > which, clearly, is nonsense! I am not writing this file, denyhosts is. > > Make sure that denyhosts.cfg has a blank value for BLOCK_SERVICE and > that it points HOSTS_DENY to the right file. I guess that at least > is correct, though. My BAD I have the value ALL for BLOCK_SERVICE, I suppose that's the problem. I read further and it seems I do indeed need to set an empty value. Thanks. > > DenyHosts will then correctly record only the IP address of blocked > hosts, which will result in much saner rule expansions! > >> I have the same setup in 6.1 and it seems to work. But I still see messages >> related to line 24 from that setup. Does denyhosts work properly? > > I suspect it is not quite the same - check the BLOCK_SERVICE setting on > that machine. You're probably right. > > Check out the DenyHosts FAQ - it's very useful. > > http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/faq.html > > And the FreeBSD hosts_options(5) man page as well, which, as I said > earlier, contains the full story on setting up your /etc/hosts.allow. Thanks again. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 21:03:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BF616A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2432443D49 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:03:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8SL3jam019887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:03:45 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8SL3jX8001792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:03:45 -0700 Message-ID: <451C38B1.3000802@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:03:45 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060928004518.AFD371158CC@ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com> <451C330A.8070202@jessikat.plus.net> In-Reply-To: <451C330A.8070202@jessikat.plus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.266434, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.9.28.132943 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: linux recovery tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:03:46 -0000 Robin Becker wrote: > Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote: > ... >>> >>> One of my hosters says they provide a ram based linux recovery tool, >>> but I'm actually using freebsd on the hardware so am wondering if >>> linux knows how to mount UFS partitions? >>> -- Robin Becker >> >> Yes, it does > ...... thanks > > That is if the kernel has UFS and BSD labels support compiled into the kernel. Be aware that UFS support isn't really 100% stable yet, so they marked UFS writing as "dangerous" in the Linux kernel file systems config section. However, UFS fs reading is "stable". -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 21:42:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3ABA16A415 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pas.ble@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C70E43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:42:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pas.ble@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2006 21:42:35 -0000 Received: from dslb-084-057-036-085.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO voodoo5) [84.57.36.85] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 23:42:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #6325383 From: "Pascal Bleyler" To: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:44:49 +0200 Message-ID: <008a01c6e347$530aaeb0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: portupgrade: ruby state=swread X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:42:37 -0000 Hello, i'm actually updating my installed ports with portupgrade -a over a remote ssh session. Before i have done a cvsup and a portsdb -Fu There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port is ruby. pkg_info means i have ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 installed and under /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby is ruby-1.8.5.tar.gz (i think it's the update version) All ran fine but since 1hour top shows me the following: ---- last pid: 12998; load averages: 0.47, 0.18, 0.06 up 0+03:12:40 23:28:35 41 processes: 1 running, 40 sleeping CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.4% interrupt, 98.0% idle Mem: 82M Active, 4340K Inact, 24M Wired, 5268K Cache, 22M Buf, 480K Free Swap: 231M Total, 126M Used, 105M Free, 54% Inuse, 956K In PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 12613 root 1 -20 0 123M 87500K swread 6:29 0.05% ruby18 ---- The output of portupgrade -a is also since 1hour: stringio.c: c............................. strscan.c: cc................................ Generating RI... I use FreeBSD_6.1.RELEASE without the today published patch for FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl=20 What can i do now? I don't want to kill the update process. Dunno what happens then.... :/ Many thanks in advance for any hints Pascal Bleyler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:29:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5533D16A407 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pas.ble@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9317943D4C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pas.ble@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2006 22:29:22 -0000 Received: from dslb-084-057-036-085.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO voodoo5) [84.57.36.85] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 00:29:22 +0200 X-Authenticated: #6325383 From: "Pascal Bleyler" To: Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:30:45 +0200 Message-ID: <009201c6e34d$bdb301d0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: <008a01c6e347$530aaeb0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> Importance: Normal X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: RE: portupgrade: ruby state=swread X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:29:24 -0000 HI, I've founded this atm: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=3Dlang&portname=3Dru= by1 8 what are my options? The PC has only 80M RAM ... :( Thanks Pascal Bleyler > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Pascal Bleyler > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:45 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: portupgrade: ruby state=3Dswread >=20 >=20 > Hello, >=20 > i'm actually updating my installed ports with > portupgrade -a over a remote ssh session. > Before i have done a cvsup and a portsdb -Fu >=20 > There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port > is ruby. > pkg_info means i have ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 installed > and under /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby is > ruby-1.8.5.tar.gz (i think it's the update version) >=20 > All ran fine but since 1hour top shows me the following: >=20 > ---- > last pid: 12998; load averages: 0.47, 0.18, 0.06 up 0+03:12:40 > 23:28:35 > 41 processes: 1 running, 40 sleeping > CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.4%=20 > interrupt, 98.0% idle > Mem: 82M Active, 4340K Inact, 24M Wired, 5268K Cache, 22M=20 > Buf, 480K Free > Swap: 231M Total, 126M Used, 105M Free, 54% Inuse, 956K In >=20 > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME =20 > WCPU COMMAND > 12613 root 1 -20 0 123M 87500K swread 6:29 0.05% ruby18 > ---- >=20 > The output of portupgrade -a is also since 1hour: > > stringio.c: c............................. > strscan.c: cc................................ > Generating RI... >=20 >=20 > I use FreeBSD_6.1.RELEASE without the today published > patch for FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl=20 >=20 > What can i do now? I don't want to kill the update process.=20 > Dunno what happens then.... :/ >=20 > Many thanks in advance for any hints > Pascal Bleyler >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:35:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941EF16A412 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CF843D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:35:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93E1A3C1C; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A42C251282; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:35:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:35:08 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Pascal Bleyler Message-ID: <20060928223507.GA2217@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <008a01c6e347$530aaeb0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> <009201c6e34d$bdb301d0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009201c6e34d$bdb301d0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade: ruby state=swread X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:35:10 -0000 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:30:45AM +0200, Pascal Bleyler wrote: > HI, >=20 > I've founded this atm: >=20 > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=3Dlang&portname=3Dru= by1 > 8 >=20 > what are my options? The PC has only 80M RAM ... :( Wait it out, add more RAM, or use a tool that requires less memory. Others may recommend portmaster, but I've not used it and cannot comment on its utility or resource requirements. You can always just use pkg_add/pkg_delete by hand (if you're careful), of course. Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFHE4bWry0BWjoQKURAj/6AJ9ag1di4HGUaJMX1PIhp/CVtzo+kwCfSlWf uCebPpE7+EQGrDVSTtYuTFw= =pgGy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:35:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002E216A494 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m3.bsd.mania@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3529643D46 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:35:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m3.bsd.mania@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so871694nfc for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:35:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oK1ZbmtyfF5K4jpmpikxTsKZHJqsH8hLCR4uvYnCeiayB2qWUGLfJaJ0EBKPvH64P151mrPW2Oxl5xy9IMBd/HBMUYg2XiHI7vSj2irOtyBjUp4kbMgJcsmSin8O9L9iF5LRJawgq5Tsgz6jxBEmYRZtbCpdndWLkVPfYEcGEnI= Received: by 10.49.21.8 with SMTP id y8mr713928nfi; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.230.19 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b4e25200609281535n7f69241j9ec612a66d033089@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:35:10 +0000 From: "m3 BSD" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Raid strip with freebsd slices or partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:35:13 -0000 Hi, i would like to do a raid strip with freebsd slices or partitions and not with a entire disk. For example: I've a two SCSI drivers with 68Gb. I want to make a two partitions or slices in two disks, first with 10G and other with 58Gb, this in two disks, and make a raid strip "virtual disk" with 58+58GB = 116 GB, and user other two partitions normaly. -- Thanks for all answers Mario Augusto Mania ----------------------------------------------- m3.bsd.mania@gmail.com Cel.: (43) 9938-9629 Msn: mario@oquei.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:36:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2CF16A415 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris_yates64@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s31.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s31.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC44243D66 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris_yates64@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.174.50]) by bay0-omc3-s31.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:36:31 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:36:31 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.174.200 by by103fd.bay103.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:36:28 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.37.68.73] X-Originating-Email: [kris_yates64@hotmail.com] X-Sender: kris_yates64@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20060928191717.GA96965@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> From: "Kristopher Yates" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:36:28 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2006 22:36:31.0463 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B896770:01C6E34E] Subject: Re: growfs HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:36:37 -0000 >It takes some knowledge to grow peanuts. >If you want help, don't throw ignorance stones. Hey dude, You threw the first stone. I'm not Jesus. I'll throw one right back 'atcha, old man. > > > > >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > > >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > > >Maybe you need some new hardware. > > >///jerry After reading your initial response, I decided to create a new partition and move the majority of /usr to it. I dont have all day. Problem solved. I see in your last response that we are agreeable technologically, at least as far as symlinking goes. Waste not, want not. ON a final note, democrats are just as corrupt as republicans. Don't go whining about milking the cow dry being a problem with right wing fascists. Left wing libs do the same thing all the time. Look at both sides of the fence. God Bless the FBI. We should throw all the rich senators and congressmen in jail. Talk about ignorant stones. I didn't know you collected rocks! efilnikufecin and a long cold winter, Kris >From: Jerry McAllister >To: Kristopher Yates >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: growfs HELP >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:17:17 -0400 > >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:54:26PM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > > > Anyone else have any suggestions? > > > > I was thinking I could rewrite my partition table to what it was > > originally, then growfs using the empty partionable space.. but I dont > > exactly know how. I just had some docs I found online (URL is below). > > Before I did fdisk -s, the 2.888GB was an empty partition of the drive > > where I could have created a new partition.. but instead I did fdisk to > > merge it all into the same partition. The docs I read said to do that, > > then growfs.. I just didnt understand the vague explanation of doing >the > > math to determine the correct number of sectors to pass to growfs. > > > The docs I was using: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200111/growfs.html > > > > I know it is possible without doing all that you suggested. It should >be a > > matter of just executing growfs properly and I'm done. Otherwise, it >would > > be easier to just do a fresh install than to do all that you suggested. > > Makes sense to me. I'd rather not have to reinstall. > >No, it is less trouble to do it the way I wrote. >Doing the dd stuff is harder and anyway, may not result in what >you want. > >Growfs is really not all that useful. >Remember that you have to have empty space in the slice right >contiguous to to the one you want to grow. You cannot just grab >space from somewhere else on the disk and add it in. > >You could, if you have free space already within an existing >file system, move some diectories, such as /usr/local out of /usr >and put them[it] in the available space and create a sym link to >the new location. > >But, if it is unused space that has not been part of a partition, you >will remake the partition table with disklabel. If the space is right >at the end of existing partitioned space, you might get away with it >without redoing everything, but it is kind of an unadvisable thing >to try, because what gets written back in the partition table for >the existing partitions just might not line up exactly with their >previous positions - you're expecting a new pointer to point to the >same place as the old one. It could, but maybe a critical sector gets >mapped out in the middle things. It would mess things up. > >So, > > > > My idea was to post here and get a better understanding, growfs and be >done > > with it. I didnt expect comments from the peanut gallery; ie. > >It takes some knowledge to grow peanuts. >If you want help, don't throw ignorance stones. > > > > >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > > >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > > >Maybe you need some new hardware. > > >///jerry > > > > Not everyone has a kush job at the SCNC working with universities. > >What do you know about SCNC? Obviously nothing. > > > > > A) Why does a box that is just running NATD and portsentry need an 18GB > > hard drive and a faster processor? > >Whatever you want. > > > > B) Maybe you need to give me some money so that I may afford to build >the > > fancy firewall/gateway that you suggest. I almost appreciate your reply > > but found your final remark to be rather condescending. > > > > My hardware is fine. It works and its all I have. This firewall box >has > > been online 24/7 since 1998 running FBSD just fine. Blow the dust out >once > > a year and "keep on trucking". > >Fine. >I have a couple of those right here. > > > > > > > Michigan has the 2nd worst economy in the US. I would think you would >be > > more understanding of my situation. Unfortunately, you have proven me > > wrong. > >Because the previous governor abetted by his psuedo right-wing cronies >in the state congress gutted the state's economy before he finally got >term limited out. > > > > Thanks to the FREEBSD community for continuing to be the leader in > > backward-compatible support for old hardware. Long live the Pentium 60 >and > > the 640 ATA controller! ;) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Kris > > > > > > > > >From: Jerry McAllister > > >To: Kristopher Yates > > >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > >Subject: Re: growfs HELP > > >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:45:37 -0400 > > > > > >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:26:27AM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > > >> First of all, glad to still be running FBSD after all these years. > > >> > > >> I tried following some docs I found online in order to make my /usr > > >> partition bigger and made it all the way to growfs -s, which is where >I > > >got > > >> stuck. > > >> > > >> First of all, here was my original dilema, what I did, then a >descript > > >of > > >> where I am regarding growfs problem. > > >> > > >> System (aka firewall): Pentium60 40M RAM 2 NICS, running >FBSD4.5-stable > > >(a > > >> great firewall running 24/7 since OCT 2000.) > > >> > > >> I tried to upgrade (make buildword make installworld to >4.11-stable).. I > > >> made the new world and installed the new kernel but not quite enough > > >space > > >> to do the last steps (mergemaster and then installworld). > > >> > > >> So I built a spare box, and installed FBSD on it. > > >> > > >> I put the hard drive from the firewall as secondary master, and a >larger > > >> drive as secondary slave. > > >> > > >> * I ran dd and imaged the old drive onto the new drive > > >> > > >> old drive seagate 1.2gb > > >> new drive quantum 4.3gb > > >> > > >> * I put the new drive into the old faithful P60 (firewall). It boots >up > > >> fine running 4.11-p22 and is currently online as my firewall. > > >> > > >> What is left to do: > > >> > > >> Finish the 4.11 install which ended on make kernel >KERNCONF=CUSTOMKERN.. > > >I > > >> just need to mergemaster then installworld as single user. > > >> > > >> Obviously, /usr partition (/dev/ad0s1f) is basically full w/ 8.6MB >free. > > >> > > >> ** soo.. I did some fdisk magic and got stuck on the growfs (final >step) > > >in > > >> order to growfs /usr > > >> > > >> fdisk reports my 1 partition @ full size of disk but no idea how to > > >> properly use growfs. > > > > > >To use growfs you must have space in the slice contiguous with > > >the partition you want to increase in size. It cannot just grow > > >anywhere. You really did not want to move things using dd. > > >You really wanted to build the new file systems to the sizes you > > >want on the new disk and then use dump/restore to to the new > > >partitions. > > > > > >First, fdisk the new disk and put the MBR on it and create your > > >one slice on it and flag that as bootable. > > > > > >Then, use disklabel (in 4.xxx, bsd label in later versions of FreeBSD) > > >to create your slices and also make it write out the boot sector. > > >There is a block of examples in the disklabel/bsdlabel man page > > >that tells how to use dd to make sure a drive is clean > > >and then fdisk to make one slice with MBR and finally two disklabels > > >to create the bootable partition and then to edit the partition > > >table for all the partitions. That group of commands is just what > > >you need. > > > > > >Then, do a newfs on each partition created (except swap) and > > >then make a mount point for them. Mount the 'a' partition on > > >something like '/newroot' for example and then run dump/restore > > >to copy root > > > cd /newroot > > > dump 0af - / | restore -rf - > > > > > >Do the same dump/restore thing for each of the partitions/filesystems. > > >Make sure you cd in to the base of each mounted new filesystem > > >before doing the dump/restore and replace the '/' in the dump to > > >be each filesystem - for example, for /usr, make a /newusr mountpoint > > >mount it and then cd to /newusr and do 'dump 0af - /usr | restore -rf >-' > > > > > >When you get done, you will have a fully useable, bootable copy of your > > >machine on the new disk. Move the new disk to the primary boot > > >position in your boot chain and start it up. > > > > > >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > > >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > > >Maybe you need some new hardware. > > > > > >////jerry > > > > > >> > > >> Here is what I have: > > >> cylinders=8895 heads=15 sectors/track=63 (945blks/cyl) > > >> > > >> media sector size 512 > > >> > > >> partition 1 sysid 165, start 63, size 8405712 (4104 Meg), flag 80 > > >(active) > > >> beg: cyl 0/head 1 / sector 1 > > >> end: cyl 1023 / head 14 / sector 63 > > >> > > >> basically I need help filling in the following blank (/dev/ad0s1f == > > >/usr > > >> slice) > > >> > > >> # growfs -s ______ /dev/ad0s1f > > >> > > >> as shown above, fdisk sees the correct geometry as 4104MB partition >but > > >> /stand/sysinstall disklabel editor sees ad0s1 as 2888MB, which is the > > >> amount of space I thought I was to be adding to /usr via growfs. > > >Currently, > > >> my /usr slice is 975MB and really needs to grow. :) > > >> > > >> Please let me know what other info I can provide that will help you >help > > >me > > >> solve this problem. I have read man growfs and some docs online, > > >however, > > >> I'm stuck and dont know exactly how to resolve the problem. > > >> > > >> Much thanks, > > >> > > >> Kris > > >> > > >> _________________________________________________________________ > > >> Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more?then map the >best > > >> route! http://local.live.com > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.? Get a free 90-day >trial! > > >http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself - download free Windows Live Messenger themes! http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://imagine-msn.com/themes/vibe/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:38:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB9D16A417 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302DF43D78 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:38:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.138] (helo=anti-virus01-09) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GT4WT-0001hI-4C; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:38:29 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GT4Or-000082-AY; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:30:37 +0100 Message-ID: <451C4D0C.4070100@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:30:36 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pascal Bleyler References: <008a01c6e347$530aaeb0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> In-Reply-To: <008a01c6e347$530aaeb0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade: ruby state=swread X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:38:43 -0000 Pascal Bleyler wrote: >There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port >is ruby. >pkg_info means i have ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 installed >and under /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby is >ruby-1.8.5.tar.gz (i think it's the update version) > >All ran fine but since 1hour top shows me the following: > >---- >last pid: 12998; load averages: 0.47, 0.18, 0.06 up 0+03:12:40 >23:28:35 >41 processes: 1 running, 40 sleeping >CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.4% interrupt, 98.0% >idle >Mem: 82M Active, 4340K Inact, 24M Wired, 5268K Cache, 22M Buf, 480K Free >Swap: 231M Total, 126M Used, 105M Free, 54% Inuse, 956K In > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND >12613 root 1 -20 0 123M 87500K swread 6:29 0.05% ruby18 >---- > >The output of portupgrade -a is also since 1hour: > >stringio.c: c............................. >strscan.c: cc................................ >Generating RI... > > >I use FreeBSD_6.1.RELEASE without the today published >patch for FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl > >What can i do now? I don't want to kill the update process. Dunno >what happens then.... :/ > > You haven't got enough free memory and the process is swapping - swread == swap read. Give it time and it should finish. If you have other processes using significant memory which you can kill off that might help. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:42:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5320316A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506F143D78 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [172.23.170.139] (helo=anti-virus01-10) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GT4Zu-0003Sl-Dz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:42:02 +0100 Received: from [82.35.115.93] (helo=[192.168.10.60]) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1GT4Uh-0001kK-Kv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:36:39 +0100 Message-ID: <451C4E76.1000408@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:36:38 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200609281526.55362.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <451BE953.9020509@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Kopete MSN + Cam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:42:22 -0000 Forró A Hunor wrote: > 2006/9/28, Garrett Cooper : >> >> Warren Liddell wrote: >> > Is or will there ever be support to allow the viewing of Webcams from >> others >> > or is it simply not possible ? >> Webcam support still isn't fully functional in any of the opensource >> projects I think; gaim is the closest to getting a working prototype >> though, through the gaim-vv subproject. IIRC, the author of Kopete is >> helping out, so the MSN webcam functionality might become available in >> Kopete sometime in the near future. >> -Garrett >> > > There is an MSN Messenger clone for Linux. I haven't used it but I think it > seems to be good. I will try it shortly. > > You can read further and download from the project's homepage at > http://amsn.sourceforge.net/ It's already in ports: net-im/amsn and doesn't need linux compat %make run-depends-list /usr/ports/devel/gmake /usr/ports/devel/tcllib /usr/ports/devel/tcltls /usr/ports/graphics/imlib /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk84 I've installed it and someone with a login has logged in but that's the extent of testing here, ie not tested with a webcam. Chris > > Don't forget to enable linux compatibility in > > /etc/rc.conf from > > linux_enable="NO" > > to > > linux_enable="YES" > > Pls notify me if it's working > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:53:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9819516A591 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407D143D70 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:53:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from [87.112.86.15] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GT4l3-0003uW-Rg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:53:33 +0100 Message-ID: <451C5270.1010404@jessikat.plus.net> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:53:36 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IP address impersonation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:53:35 -0000 We have a remotely hosted 6.0 server that has apparently been impersonated by a colocated server. The provider allows root access and we have set up our server from a base 6.0 installation. We were allocated an ip address and mostly we have had a good experience with this setup. However, twice in three weeks we have had difficulty in logging in and have had to crash boot the server. Analysis of the logs revealed that another machine on the hoster's network had assigned itself our ip address. Even when we provided the suspect mac address it seemed the hoster had trouble in finding out/appreciating what the problem was. I have little experience of this sort of thing, but can anyone else offer some advice on 1) is this a recognized form of attack? I can see that it could be used for password harvesting and traffic interception, but are there other implications. 2) Are there ways to mitigate this kind of problem? We have other hosted servers on machines with similar (root) access. They presumably could also be impersonated. We found this out by inspection of our own log files; could the provider be doing something more to prevent this? -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 23:27:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9824316A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55F743D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:27:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8SNRFkN028124; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:27:15 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060928182152.020fdfc8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:26:54 -0500 To: Robin Becker , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <451C5270.1010404@jessikat.plus.net> References: <451C5270.1010404@jessikat.plus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: IP address impersonation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:27:36 -0000 Taking over an IP is a known way to inspect traffic. Essentially if done well the spoofing server will act like a proxy server, inspecting the data and sending it along to the correct server. Another way, particularly at a data center is to setup a server running the NIC in promiscuous mode so that nic will catch any packets on the netowrk. Is the data center bringing up a server with a duplicate IP? Or are they attempting to change your server's IP when they bring up a server on your assigned address? It also could be just bad book keeping on the data center's part, having re-used an IP and not taken it completely out of another server's configuration files. -Derek At 05:53 PM 9/28/2006, Robin Becker wrote: >We have a remotely hosted 6.0 server that has apparently been impersonated >by a colocated server. The provider allows root access and we have set up >our server from a base 6.0 installation. We were allocated an ip address >and mostly we have had a good experience with this setup. However, twice >in three weeks we have had difficulty in logging in and have had to crash >boot the server. Analysis of the logs revealed that another machine on the >hoster's network had assigned itself our ip address. Even when we provided >the suspect mac address it seemed the hoster had trouble in finding >out/appreciating what the problem was. > >I have little experience of this sort of thing, but can anyone else offer >some advice on > >1) is this a recognized form of attack? I can see that it could be used >for password harvesting and traffic interception, but are there other >implications. > >2) Are there ways to mitigate this kind of problem? We have other hosted >servers on machines with similar (root) access. They presumably could also >be impersonated. We found this out by inspection of our own log files; >could the provider be doing something more to prevent this? >-- >Robin Becker >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 23:29:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF2516A417 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49CC43D6A for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.30]) by bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:29:04 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:29:01 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:01 GMT X-Originating-IP: [213.189.94.114] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com From: "Marwan Sultan" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:01 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2006 23:29:01.0533 (UTC) FILETIME=[E11FF0D0:01C6E355] Subject: buildworld upgrading advise please. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:09 -0000 Hello Gurus Im on FreeBSD 6.1-R decided to upgrade the src tree and for security reasons only so i did the following cvsup srcall and ports (RELENG_6_1) changed /etc/make.conf to CFLAGS= -O -pipe NO_PROFILE= cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel # make installkernel # reboot the following steps not from single user, just root, it refused to run from single user # mergemaster -p # make installworld # mergemaster # reboot Till here no errors and everything seems allright! the output of uname -a is FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Fri Sep 29 01:37:30 AST 2006 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Is this enough ? Some websites has only these steps, but in the handbook asking to update /etc, recomiple the base system and many others.. Can someone comment about my steps and advice if anything more is needed. pluse, why all was okay from root user not single user mode, and why it didnot work from single user mode. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 00:35:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B1716A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (webmail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25E643D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:35:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-66-140-60-40.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.140.60.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D762114314 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:37:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:35:30 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <451B7AD3.3000107@locolomo.org> References: <765A325E54DCF1DC39EBF9AE@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20060927220439.GC45831@dan.emsphone.com> <451B7AD3.3000107@locolomo.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========4C37E6B078144F864C88==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Sync files locally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:35:37 -0000 --==========4C37E6B078144F864C88========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On September 28, 2006 9:33:39 AM +0200 Erik Norgaard=20 wrote: > > 1) rsync changes behaviour depending on whether or not you include a > trailing / from the man-page: > > rsync -av /src/foo /dest > rsync -av /src/foo/ /dest/foo > That I know. > works the same way, (and sync locally in this example). Read the man > page, there are lots of examples. > > 2) The options -t and -p preserve time and permissions respectively. > Ownership will always change to the user running rsync unless you run as > root. This has nothing to do with rsync, you can't run chown as an > ordinary user. > > You can preserve the group if you're in that group on the destination > host. > > 3) The files you are syncing - should they be writeable by www? For > security, you may really want something like this: > > -rw-r----- user:www file > They're user:www, but the user isn't me. :-) I could go into the reasons for that, but it doesn't really matter. > and have user do the rsync. If you really need to have www write to the > file, set group permissions +w. > No, I don't need that and don't want it either. The owners of the site=20 own the files, and I know how to use sudo. :-) > > IIRC to run rsync over ssh the user doing the syncing must have shell > access, running your sync as root is not desirable, it MAY be preferred > to have it run as www to preserve owner also, at least you can restrict > access for www. > I use ssh with keys so I can cron the job, but I'll have to do the extra=20 step of fixing perms and ownership after copying the rsynced files over.=20 No big deal. I'll script that as well. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========4C37E6B078144F864C88==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 00:54:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F403B16A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADB343D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 417BF1800200 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:54:25 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.182) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 29 Sep 2006 00:54:25 -0000 Received: by ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 28FB41CE304; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:54:25 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ahmad Arafat Abdullah" To: "Marwan Sultan" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:54:24 -0800 Received: from [60.49.202.201] by ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com with http for trunasuci@mail.com; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:54:24 -0800 X-Originating-Ip: 60.49.202.201 X-Originating-Server: ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20060929005425.28FB41CE304@ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com> Cc: Subject: Re: buildworld upgrading advise please. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:54:43 -0000 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marwan Sultan" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: buildworld upgrading advise please. > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:01 +0000 >=20 >=20 > Hello Gurus >=20 > Im on FreeBSD 6.1-R decided to upgrade the src tree and for=20 > security reasons only > so i did the following > cvsup srcall and ports (RELENG_6_1) > changed /etc/make.conf to > CFLAGS=3D -O -pipe > NO_PROFILE=3D > cd /usr/src > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel > # make installkernel > # reboot > the following steps not from single user, just root, it refused to=20 > run from single user > # mergemaster -p > # make installworld > # mergemaster > # reboot >=20 > Till here no errors and everything seems allright! > the output of uname -a is > FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Fri Sep 29=20 > 01:37:30 AST 2006 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >=20 > Is this enough ? > Some websites has only these steps, but in the handbook asking to > update /etc, recomiple the base system and many others.. > Can someone comment about my steps and advice if anything more is needed. > pluse, why all was okay from root user not single user mode, > and why it didnot work from single user mode. >=20 > Thank you. Just sharing the same opinion.. i think yr step is fair and good enuff since u're also go thru mergemaste= r steps.. mine also do the same step since 4.x and it works fine for me with no error= s or anything weird.. my make.conf: # added by use.perl 2006-08-22 09:40:06 PERL_VER=3D5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=3D5.8.8 CFLAGS=3D -O -pipe COPTFLAGS=3D -O -pipe NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue CPUTYPE?=3Dpentium4 in your /etc/make.conf u just stated "NO_PROFILE=3D" with blank statements.= . can we consider is as "false"? --=20 ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 00:57:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DC016A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EA843D5D for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:57:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id BA4531800121 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:57:42 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.51) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 29 Sep 2006 00:57:43 -0000 Received: by ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 38B52478081; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:57:35 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ahmad Arafat Abdullah" To: "Garrett Cooper" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:57:35 -0800 Received: from [60.49.202.201] by ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com with http for trunasuci@mail.com; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:57:35 -0800 X-Originating-Ip: 60.49.202.201 X-Originating-Server: ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20060929005735.38B52478081@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> Cc: Subject: Re: linux recovery tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:57:59 -0000 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Garrett Cooper" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: linux recovery tool > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:03:45 -0700 >=20 >=20 > Robin Becker wrote: > > Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote: > > ... > >>> > >>> One of my hosters says they provide a ram based linux recovery=20 > >>> tool, but I'm actually using freebsd on the hardware so am=20 > >>> wondering if linux knows how to mount UFS partitions? > >>> -- Robin Becker > >> > >> Yes, it does > > ...... thanks > > > > > That is if the kernel has UFS and BSD labels support compiled into=20 > the kernel. Be aware that UFS support isn't really 100% stable yet,=20 > so they marked UFS writing as "dangerous" in the Linux kernel file=20 > systems config section. However, UFS fs reading is "stable". > -Garrett Mr garrett TQ for highlighting it.. referring to your statement there.. izzit the same= like NTFS mount on linux? read-only and not stable/supported on writing? TQ --=20 ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 01:09:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2A316A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dprobd02.vailsys.com (dprobd02.vailsys.com [63.149.73.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9990B43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dfsfbd06.vail (dfsfbd06.vail [192.168.129.190]) by dprobd02.vailsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283D58A5C71; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:09:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dfwdamian.vail [192.168.129.233]) by dfsfbd06.vail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94259323E99; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:09:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dwiest@localhost.vail [127.0.0.1]) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8SNhxLP015341; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:43:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from dwiest@localhost) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8SNhxhJ027990; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:43:59 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dfwdamian.vail: dwiest set sender to dwiest@vailsys.com using -f Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:43:58 -0500 From: Damian Wiest To: m3 BSD Message-ID: <20060928234358.GE3332@dfwdamian.vail> References: <1b4e25200609281535n7f69241j9ec612a66d033089@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1b4e25200609281535n7f69241j9ec612a66d033089@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raid strip with freebsd slices or partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:09:35 -0000 On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:35:10PM +0000, m3 BSD wrote: > Hi, i would like to do a raid strip with freebsd slices or partitions > and not with a entire disk. For example: I've a two SCSI drivers with > 68Gb. I want to make a two partitions or slices in two disks, first > with 10G and other with 58Gb, this in two disks, and make a raid strip > "virtual disk" with 58+58GB = 116 GB, and user other two partitions > normaly. > > -- > Thanks for all answers > > Mario Augusto Mania > ----------------------------------------------- > m3.bsd.mania@gmail.com > Cel.: (43) 9938-9629 > Msn: mario@oquei.com > _______________________________________________ I believe you want to use the GEOM(4) subsystem in general and the gstripe(8) command in particular. I've only used gmirror(8) with entire disks, but I believe you can simply specify a device name corresponding to the slices you want to stripe. -Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 02:26:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C931516A40F; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz (pipa.vshosting.cz [81.0.201.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1207A43D46; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6544E72F; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:26:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pipa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03839-07; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:26:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gandalf (unknown [81.0.245.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB114E705; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:26:47 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Dvo=F8=E1k?= To: Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:26:44 +0200 Message-ID: <011401c6e36e$b4b9c8e0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AcbjbrRHCCUHMzCISG6sZ7z4GR1TaA== X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at profix.cz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: NT loader still boot first FreeBSD slice, it could not boot second or another slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:26:47 -0000 Hi all, I wanted to make my system dual or multiboot. I decided to loadding os NT loader from Windows XP. I have read this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADE R My situation: 1. partion ... wxp /dev/ad4s1 2. partion ... ntfs data partition /dev/ad4s2 3. partion ... fbsd adm64 /dev/ad4s3a 4. partion ... fbsd i386 /dev/ad4s4a Sata disk 320GB. What I did: 1. /dev/ad4s3a: cp /boot/boot1 FreeBSDa64.BSD to 1. partion 2. /dev/ad4s4a: cp /boot/boot1 FreeBSDi386.BSD to 1.partion 3. reply 1.-2. with dd if=/dev/ad4s3a of=/...dd.BSD bs=512 count=1 4. edit boot.ini so there are WXP and 2 copied boot1 to 3rd and 4th partition and 2 made by dd command, so 5 records NT loader boot 3rd partion without any problem, but when I want to boot to 4th partition, it loads 3rd one again and again. I does not get to there at all. If I compare these 4 files, all are the same, so how could ntloader to load something other than the first bsd partition if files did not differ at all !!! If it is known issue, why it is not in documentation, that point 9.10 in FAQ works ONLY and ONLY with ONLY 1 FreeBSD partition ? I recommand to edit this question 9.10 to mention this barrier, if it is true. P.S.: I am not currently subscribed in the freebsd-stable and freebsd-questions mailling lists, so mail me directly. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 02:37:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752716A403; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz (pipa.vshosting.cz [81.0.201.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C152243D45; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D2B4E72F; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:37:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pipa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07898-01; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gandalf (unknown [81.0.245.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD4B4E705; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:37:17 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Dvo=F8=E1k?= To: Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:37:13 +0200 Message-ID: <012501c6e370$2bf90460$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AcbjcCus+TdlII9jTEOI2ZyBeKXsrA== X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at profix.cz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: adding other login class to login.conf in case one is already there X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:37:17 -0000 Hi all, could somebody looks at this PR ? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D103794 It began with my mail to LI Xin. He agreed that I attach our mail=B4s correspondence. Here it is: =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: LI Xin [ = mailto:delphij@delphij.net]=20 > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:24 AM > To: dandee@volny.cz > Cc: delphij@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: /etc/login.conf - add czech user login class with locales >=20 > Hello Xin Li, > I found out that last change to login.conf perhaps you have done. > I see Russian user class and definition of lang and mm_char. > Why is there only that one class ? > Is it possible to upadte this file in CVS and add new user class for=20 > czech language ? > czech|Czech Users Accounts:\ > :charset=3DISO-8859-2:\ > :lang=3Dcs_CZ.ISO8859-2:\ > :tc=3Ddefault: According to the CVS annotate, it seems that ache@ has added the Russian user class 9 years ago. It looks like an example to me, though. Actually the previous change I have made against RELENG_6 was a comment change which reduces diff against -HEAD, but frankly I am not an expert = in this stuff, so it would probably better if there is someone who is more quantifiable than me to do the CVS operation. Would you please send a patch as PR, so someone can pick up (perhaps = also by sending a reminder to -current@)? I guess there were some performance concerns about adding more login classes in the past, but with the newly added NSS caching mechanism things could have changed :-) Cheers, =20 So could somebody give one=B4s opinion or even commit this change to = RELENG_6 and HEAD CVS tree ? =20 Thank you for attention. Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 02:39:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AB416A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9D343D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B2A3A465D for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:39:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36700-06 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:38:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-86-60.eastlink.ca [24.137.86.60]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8365F3A4662 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:38:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1027) id 4B0E0356D7; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:38:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D2035450 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:38:15 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:38:15 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:39:39 -0000 As painful as it was to do, I backed up the old data tonight and wiped out the stats ... for one major reason: the stats lost their accuracy. As several have noticed, the OpenBSD numbers have been increasing quite steadily, but looking at the RAW urls coming in, 99% of those #s were from a couple of IPs, and they were submitting the full range of releases and architectures ... Unfortunately, since we store neither IP or hostname, trying to 'surgically remove' the false entries proved to be very difficult ... I've have just committed BSDstats 4.0 to CVS, and there is a copy of it available at http://www.bsdstats.org/downloads/300.statistics ... download and replace the one you are currently running, as it will not work anymore ... the new version even knows to remove your /var/db/bsdstats file, since its format is no longer valid either ... I've increased the size of the IDTOKEN to 32 from 16, since I've been noticing alot of duplicates when two hosts submit at close to the same time ... I've also added an 'enable/disable' record before/after submitting the reports ... And, when reporting, both your TOKEN *and* KEY are sent, instead of just the KEY ... that way we not only check what we returned to you the first time, but also what you sent to us ... This version also has a 'Network Connectivity' check, in the form of checking a TXT record in DNS, so that if the Network is down, it doesn't bother going through the whole procedure ... And, finally, I've made 'checkin_server' configurable, so that you don't have to modify the script itself to change that value ... default being, of course, bsdstats.org ... Antony is working on docs for how to use Apache as a 'quick-n-dirty proxy server', which he'll put up onto the web site as soon as completed ... As I said, you just need to download the new version and run it, you don't have to wait for the port to go through, assuming you have already installed from the port and /etc/periodic.conf is setup ... Make sure you run it right after downloading though ... If anyone out there can see a flaw in the script ... or something that I may have overlooked as far as a 'loophole' that could be used to screw around with the data, please let me know ... I know its not possible, minus registration, to get rid of all holes, but, hopefully I've now gotten rid of the ones that a truck could (and did) drive though ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 03:13:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3C716A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdguru@cox.net) Received: from centrmmtao03.cox.net (centrmmtao03.cox.net [70.168.83.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B39D43D5E for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdguru@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by centrmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060929031319.JVDS27431.centrmmtao03.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:13:19 -0400 Received: from beastie.cornpropst.net ([70.174.152.21]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id U3DC1V00T0TxSZi0000000 Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:13:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:18:54 -0400 From: Trevor Cornpropst To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060928231854.d1d48f76.bsdguru@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <86irjd8qra.fsf@PCBSD.localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jdarnold@buddydog.org Subject: Re: Dual Monitor problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:13:21 -0000 On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:24:58 -0400 Jonathan Arnold wrote: > Well, I didn't get much input here. How about if I generalize it > a little bit? > > Is *anyone* currently running a late model ATI card with dual monitors? > If so, could you post or email me your xorg.conf? > > -- > Jonathan Arnold > Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD blog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog > This is a working dual monitor setup for a Radeon 9550 RV350 with dual Samsung 19" LCD panels. agp is in the kernel, drm and radeon loaded as modules. 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Fri Jul 14 16:35:41 EDT 2006 xorg-server-6.9.0_3 X.Org X server and related programs I have experienced some lockups since upgrading to 6.1 It seems to happen with anything that does intensive ops like watching tv, dvds and games. HTH, Trevor ----- Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/urwfonts-ttf/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/URW/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "extmod" Load "dri" Load "dbe" # Load "record" # Load "xtrap" Load "glx" Load "type1" Load "freetype" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "SAM" ModelName "SyncMaster" Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Card0" Driver "ati" VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc" BoardName "RV350 AS [Radeon 9550]" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" Option "AGPMode" "4" # # This MAKEM BIG LOCKUP # Option "AGPFastWrite" "True" # [] Option "MergedDPI" "100 100" # [] Option "MergedFB" "True" # [] Option "CRT2Position" "RightOf" # [] Option "MetaModes" "1280x1024-1280x1024" Option "RenderAccel" "True" # [] Option "DMAForXv" "True" # [] EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" Virtual 2560 1024 EndSubSection EndSection -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 03:27:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD7316A412 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from S3.cableone.net (s3.cableone.net [24.116.0.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1996443D53 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:27:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from [172.16.0.101] (unverified [24.117.52.220]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 76328808 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:27:18 -0700 Message-ID: <451C9283.3070603@averageadmins.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:26:59 -0500 From: Jeff Cross User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 148, in=48, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.117.52.220 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: Subject: Can't Update With freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:27:20 -0000 I have been using freebsd-update to fetch binary security related updates since I started using FreeBSD this time last year. However, when I ran it tonight and paid attention to the initial output, I saw the following: The following files are affected by security fixes, but have not been updated because they have been modified locally: /boot/kernel/kernel /etc/rc.d/jail /lib/libcrypto.so.4 /usr/lib/libcrypto.a /usr/lib/libcrypto_p.a /usr/lib/libssl.a /usr/lib/libssl_p.a /usr/sbin/lwresd /usr/sbin/named No updates available I haven't compiled anything on my system from source (base system related anyway, ports yes) so why would this be reporting? Is there anyway I can grab the binary updates at this point and go from here? Thanks in advance! Jeff Cross http://www.averageadmins.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 03:58:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567B616A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:58:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from S1.cableone.net (s1.cableone.net [24.116.0.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28A043D4C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:58:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from [172.16.0.101] (unverified [24.117.52.220]) by S1.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S1) with ESMTP id 76319169 for multiple; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:58:46 -0700 Message-ID: <451C99E2.7020605@averageadmins.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:58:26 -0500 From: Jeff Cross User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Cross References: <451C9283.3070603@averageadmins.com> In-Reply-To: <451C9283.3070603@averageadmins.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 85, in=28, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.117.52.220 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't Update With freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:58:47 -0000 Jeff Cross wrote: > I have been using freebsd-update to fetch binary security related > updates since I started using FreeBSD this time last year. However, > when I ran it tonight and paid attention to the initial output, I saw > the following: > > The following files are affected by security > fixes, but have not been updated because they > have been modified locally: > > /boot/kernel/kernel > /etc/rc.d/jail > /lib/libcrypto.so.4 > /usr/lib/libcrypto.a > /usr/lib/libcrypto_p.a > /usr/lib/libssl.a > /usr/lib/libssl_p.a > /usr/sbin/lwresd > /usr/sbin/named > > No updates available > > I haven't compiled anything on my system from source (base system > related anyway, ports yes) so why would this be reporting? Is there > anyway I can grab the binary updates at this point and go from here? > > Thanks in advance! > > Jeff Cross > http://www.averageadmins.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Nevermind... Google is a wonderful thing and I should have consulted it first. For the archives, /usr/local/sbin/freebsd-update --branch crypto fetch ...corrected my issue. I found the info here: http://users.skynet.be/six/gpure/tech/freebsd.txt Jeff Cross http://www.averageadmins.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 04:05:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DA416A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sprafulla@novell.com) Received: from lucius.provo.novell.com (lucius.provo.novell.com [137.65.248.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD3F43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:05:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sprafulla@novell.com) Received: from INET-PRV1-MTA by lucius.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:04:59 -0600 Message-Id: <451CE942.4EF4.007B.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:07:06 -0600 From: "Prafulla Kumar H.S." To: References: <20060929032725.CAA7416A57F@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060929032725.CAA7416A57F@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: sctp configuration under FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:05:03 -0000 Hi, Is there any document for configuring sctp under FreeBSD 6.1 Regards, Prafulla Kumar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 05:19:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0195E16A416 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:19:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4214543D4C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:19:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal (svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal [10.0.0.3]) by bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8T5J37a055854 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:19:04 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal with MailMarshal (v6, 1, 4, 441) id ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:19:03 +1000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:19:02 +1000 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F11EF75F@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Anyone used this mobo with 6.1 ?? Thread-Index: AcbjhsaMy+Qu73pEQdetqL7x5zJw2Q== From: "Murray Taylor" To: Subject: Anyone used this mobo with 6.1 ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:19:08 -0000 ASUS P5LD2-VM-DH/C Onboard Audio,=20 VGA,=20 1*GLAN,=20 1*PCI-E,=20 2*PCI,=20 4*DDRII,=20 4*SATAII (RAID 0,1),=20 mATX --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 06:38:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9008616A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B41443D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:38:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8T6c0xv001356; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:38:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8T6c0xv001356 Message-ID: <451CBF41.1010208@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:37:53 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6552E66A44F1AB20E84D8EA2" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:38:20 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:38:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6552E66A44F1AB20E84D8EA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I've increased the size of the IDTOKEN to 32 from 16, since I've been > noticing alot of duplicates when two hosts submit at close to the same > time ... Ummm... that's actually really bad. That means that the RNG used by Open= SSL (hence SSH and others) is not actually producing anything like a proper random sequence for a lot of people. Hence all sorts of crypto handled b= y those machines is potentially vulnerable to attack. If this is the case,= going from 16 to 32 bytes of random token won't actually help at all. On the other hand, the duplicates could be the result of people deliberat= ely trying to frig the statistics or just innocently running the 300.statisti= cs script manually several times. In either case, entries with duplicate to= kens should be discarded -- I guess you'ld always want to keep just the last e= ntry for any token. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig6552E66A44F1AB20E84D8EA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHL9H8Mjk52CukIwRCJIWAJ9l3ytuP5Lo+E9uL5M3hJ7+8mFy4ACePerB zUkToHsLR6LFeaD2EsFdvWo= =Zl1C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6552E66A44F1AB20E84D8EA2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 07:40:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23F416A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118E143D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA61B2E024; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:40:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451CCDD2.6050800@locolomo.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:40:02 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robin Becker References: <451C5270.1010404@jessikat.plus.net> In-Reply-To: <451C5270.1010404@jessikat.plus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP address impersonation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:40:13 -0000 Robin Becker wrote: > 1) is this a recognized form of attack? I can see that it could be used > for password harvesting and traffic interception, but are there other > implications. ip spoofing is a well known attack. > 2) Are there ways to mitigate this kind of problem? We have other hosted > servers on machines with similar (root) access. They presumably could > also be impersonated. We found this out by inspection of our own log > files; could the provider be doing something more to prevent this? All hosts and routers hold a local dynamic table of arp addresses and their corresponding ip addresses. Since the ip may change, these are held only for one minute and each node only keeps the addresses they actually communicate with. When some node need to communicate with another node it does not know the arp address of it sends out an arp request "WHO-HAS" to all nodes on the network. If two nodes uses the same ip, they will both respond and it is somewhat random who "wins". But one can use an attack called "arp cache poisoning" to make a particular arp address appear. There is a solution to this problem: Static arp-tables. This requires that your provider in the router adds machines arp addresses and their ip addresses in a static table. Static by nature these are not flushed so the spoofing will fail. Only the nodes that maintain a static arp table will ignore the spoofing, so if you need to communicate with other hosts on the network these need also to have the static table. It is likely that your provider don't want to do the trouble of maintaining a static table. To prove the problem to them you can use arpwatch to monitor changes and document the problem. You may also use arping to ping arp addresses, this may help you claim your ip - like the arp cache poisoning attack. This means that the other host will loose connection and maybe make the admin aware that there are problems. But the real solution is to get to the administrator of the offending host and make him change the ip. Your provider should keep track of who has been assigned which ip. If someone else in error uses your ip, some other ip must be free and the provider should be able to identify who it is. Unfortunately, AFIAK there is no way of identifying which machine is offending from analysing the network traffic, but the arp address is normally printed on the network interfaces so physical inspection will do it. Things get complicated, because it is possible to change the arp address. This means that you can set your arp address to the same as the offending host. If you're connected by a hub or a wireless network, both will get traffic to both hosts and it really becomes a mess if both try to respond. If you're on a switched network no one knows who gets the packets. This arp spoofing is the ultimate way of hiding yourself behind someone else (or the other way round). I once had ip's static assigned on a network, but users couldn't figure out what these numbers were and every once in a while someone would use the routers ip as their own ip taking down the entire network. That was when I learned about dhcp! (and all the arp spoofing stuff). Note, ARP is the protocol, the network interface address is often called MAC. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 07:41:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8025216A586 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arcade@synergetica.dn.ua) Received: from nora.synergetica.dn.ua (synergetica.dn.ua [82.207.115.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C7C43D6E for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arcade@synergetica.dn.ua) Received: from [172.30.0.159] (yarn.lan [172.30.0.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by nora.synergetica.dn.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8T7fbjc054444 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:41:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from arcade@synergetica.dn.ua) Message-ID: <451CCDF3.1050005@synergetica.dn.ua> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:40:35 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060918 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ENABLE_SUID_K5SU and ksu behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:41:47 -0000 I don't get it... The behavior of 'ksu' is entirely different from 'su'. It doesn't check whether user is listed in wheel group - it just lets user in if he knows password. And when there's no root password (sometimes it's much easier to add to wheel group all who is responsible while all other are left out) it just lets anyone in unconditionally. It seems that ordinary su works through pam, while ksu doesn't... What am I missing? -- [WBR], Arcade. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 08:28:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B4316A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650743D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:28:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8T8SgGv001533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:28:42 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8T8Sgn1010504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:28:42 -0700 Message-ID: <451CD93E.70603@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:28:46 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.266434, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.9.29.10442 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Issues with configuring IPFW for NAT setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:28:43 -0000 I'm trying to configure a lightweight router/gateway just to block bad SMTP requests; many virii/spyware apps on Windoze boxes on my network have forced our ISP to almost shut us down more than once now because people don't know how to manage their machines =\. The problem with my config is that all that's going through the NAT machine are ICMP packets (?!). Weird.. Anyhow, here's the ipfw configuration so far: #!/bin/sh # comment the line below and uncomment the line following that if you just want to test the rule output cmd_flags="-f" #cmd_flags="-n" cmd="ipfw $cmd_flags" cmd_a="$cmd add" cmd_d="$cmd del" ks="keep-state" # just macros to simplify typing/reading fata="from any to any" aafat="allow all from any to" daf="deny all from" dafat="$daf any to" prif="fxp0" puif="xl0" # trusted subnet tsu="192.168.1.0/24" # untrusted subnet usu="192.168.0.0/24" bad_ports="81, 113, 137-139, 445, 901, 1026, 1433-1434, 1900, 2283, 2869, 3389, 5000, 8080" # IRC IDENT, HTTP, Sun RPC ports, uPnP ports, RDP ports, etc virus_ports="1080, 2283, 2535, 2745, 3127-3198, 3410, 5554, 8866, 9898" # See /root/ports.html for a short list with explanations $cmd -f flush $cmd_a 001 $aafat any via lo* $cmd_a 050 divert natd ip from any to me in via $puif # Properly direct all incoming NAT redirects $cmd_a 081 $daf 172.16.0.0/12 to any # reserved IPs $cmd_a 082 $daf 10.0.0.0/8 to any # reserved IPs $cmd_a 083 $daf 127.0.0.0/8 to any # loopback $cmd_a 084 $daf 0.0.0.0/8 to any # broadcast $cmd_a 085 $daf 169.254.0.0/16 to any # auto-DHCP $cmd_a 086 deny tcp from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # deny multicast TCP support # private subnet firewall rules -- allow incoming SSH, HTTP, and HTTP-SSL $cmd_a 160 allow all from any to me 22, 68-69, 80, 443 via $prif # public SSH rules $cmd_a 170 allow all from any to me 22 via $puif $cmd_a 171 deny all from any to me 22, 68-69, 80, 443 via $puif # SMTP rules -- basically allow SMTP traffic on port 25 to UW, Comcast, and Earthlink clients; block the rest to prevent mass spamming $cmd_a 200 $aafat smtp.washington.edu 25 out via $puif $cmd_a 201 $aafat smtp.comcast.net 25 out via $puif $cmd_a 202 $aafat smtp.earthlink.net 25 out via $puif $cmd_a 203 $dafat any 25 out via $puif $cmd_a 400 $dafat any $bad_ports, $virus_ports via $puif # deny any TCP traffic trying to be forwarded on ports 10000-65535. Don't block UDP since MSN and other services like to randomly allocate ports in this range for UDP use. $cmd_a 401 deny tcp $fata 10000-65535 $cmd_a 600 divert natd all from $tsu to any out via $puif # For outbound NAT translation $cmd_a 605 deny all from $usu to not me via $prif $cmd_a 611 allow all $fata Some additional helpful information: FreeBSD router: su-2.05b# uname -a FreeBSD hummer.localdomain 6.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p5 #10: Wed Sep 27 00:17:54 PDT 2006 root@hummer.localdomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HUMMER i386 su-2.05b# sysctl -n net.inet.ip.forwarding 1 Another interesting thing is that it appears that I've totally screwed up my TCP configuration or something (or firewalled a bunch of ports), so my machine cannot access the outside world (even from localhost). The only thing that appears to be working is DNS resolving.. =\. My routing tables: su-2.05b# netstat -r -f inet Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.0.1 UGS 0 2389 xl0 localhost localhost UH 0 2 lo0 192.168.0 link#2 UC 0 0 xl0 192.168.0.1 00:09:5b:56:c4:b4 UHLW 2 0 xl0 1175 hoover 00:0a:e6:47:73:c7 UHLW 1 2 xl0 957 sprsd 00:e0:7d:f7:6e:2e UHLW 1 16281 xl0 1117 192.168.1 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 192.168.1.1 00:a0:c9:5e:ba:2d UHLW 1 0 lo0 192.168.1.224 00:11:24:2f:15:bc UHLW 1 51 fxp0 306 My static routes in /etc/rc.conf: #..snip.. #Route defs static_routes="router tsu usu" #static_routes="usu" route_router="-net 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1" route_usu="-net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.0.1" route_tsu="-net 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.1.1" #..end snip.. Ping example of DNS resolving working: su-2.05b# ping -c 3 google.com PING google.com (64.233.187.99): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=246 time=84.567 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=246 time=107.181 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=246 time=84.443 ms --- google.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 84.443/92.064/107.181/10.690 ms su-2.05b# IPFIREWALL sections of kernel config: su-2.05b# grep IPFIREWALL /root/HUMMER options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=5 options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT Anyone have an idea of what I'm doing wrong in this case? Thanks! -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 10:00:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B5916A412 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luyt@guild-evo.org) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C2E43D4C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:00:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luyt@guild-evo.org) Received: from [172.20.2.48] ([62.58.152.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8TA0Qvt017956 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:00:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from luyt@guild-evo.org) From: Luyt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:57:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <011401c6e36e$b4b9c8e0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> In-Reply-To: <011401c6e36e$b4b9c8e0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609291357.03330.luyt@guild-evo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: NT loader still boot first FreeBSD slice, it could not boot second or another slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:00:31 -0000 On Friday 29 September 2006 04:26, Daniel Dvo=F8=E1k wrote: > I wanted to make my system dual or multiboot. I decided to loadding os NT > loader from Windows XP. I did this using BOOTPART. =20 http://www.winimage.com/bootpart.htm It lets me start FreeBSD from the Windows boot menu. =2D-=20 "The ability of the OSS process to collect and harness=20 the collective IQ of thousands of individuals across=20 the Internet is simply amazing." - Vinod Vallopillil http://www.catb.org/~esr/halloween/halloween4.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 11:11:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43C516A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF6643D4C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:11:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so983128nfc for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:11:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kWiOzqyVhHMGsazVYDos/CcADRtadY4qxB5Wn8ntKAUMioVKpDdaIRc2reFx+G/4iTb2mbIlvukGLwApojbI6J3fFTRIIo/5dZXNCzTXa4ppW67LFVJH8GHXUKGiIgyW6iCMMETYfkC1XlOtD6FPwJAUIip7XZvge0WZj/8uV34= Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr2349997hub; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.168.7 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70e8236f0609290411x2927f852m7f649f22c596119@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:11:51 +0100 From: "Joao Barros" To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:11:53 -0000 On 9/29/06, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > As painful as it was to do, I backed up the old data tonight and wiped out > the stats ... for one major reason: the stats lost their accuracy. > > As I said, you just need to download the new version and run it, you don't > have to wait for the port to go through, assuming you have already > installed from the port and /etc/periodic.conf is setup ... > > Make sure you run it right after downloading though ... > > If anyone out there can see a flaw in the script ... or something that I > may have overlooked as far as a 'loophole' that could be used to screw > around with the data, please let me know ... I know its not possible, > minus registration, to get rid of all holes, but, hopefully I've now > gotten rid of the ones that a truck could (and did) drive though ... > I just updated the script and it ran fine :) I'm the only guy yet from Portugal and the only sparc cpu :D On another subject, with the addition of the other BSDs the releases stats for example are pretty much nonsense. Do you plan to work on that? -- Joao Barros From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 11:39:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3C416A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nagylzs@enternet.hu) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83D243D55 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:39:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@enternet.hu) Received: from [62.112.221.3] (helo=[172.16.0.43]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1GTGhz-000Ejr-5A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:39:11 +0200 Message-ID: <451D05DF.2060701@enternet.hu> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:39:11 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Nagy_L=E1szl=F3?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DHCP IP range + auto hostname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:39:13 -0000 Hello, I have a DHCP server with this config file: option domain-name "cassiopeia.ronet"; option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.1; default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; authoritative; log-facility local7; ddns-update-style none; subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 { range 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.139; option routers 192.168.0.1; use-host-decl-names on; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; filename "pxeboot"; option root-path "192.168.0.1:/mnt/d1/rootfs"; } I would like the diskless machines to set their hostname automatically. I have a working named for this. For example: cassiopeia# host diskless131.ronet diskless131.ronet has address 192.168.0.131 cassiopeia# host 192.168.0.131 131.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer diskless131.ronet. cassiopeia# Of course I can create individual hosts in the dhcp config file and set their hostnames. But I do not want to create 40 host declarations and look for the hardware addresses by hand... The clients should be able to determine their hostnames using a reverse dns lookup, and the set their hostnames automatically. In the above example: after the machine got its IP address (192.168.0.131) from the DHCP server, it should set its hostname to 'diskless131.ronet'. Sounds easy, but I do not know how to do that. Is it a standard procedure, or do I need to write a custom script? (Where should I place it?) Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 11:47:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E6616A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394F343D49 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:47:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c220-239-234-69.thorn1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.234.69]) by mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8TBltoS001896; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:47:56 +1000 Message-ID: <451D080C.2050701@mawer.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:48:28 -1000 From: Antony Mawer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joao Barros References: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> <70e8236f0609290411x2927f852m7f649f22c596119@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0609290411x2927f852m7f649f22c596119@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:47:58 -0000 On 29/09/2006 1:11 AM, Joao Barros wrote: > On another subject, with the addition of the other BSDs the releases > stats for example are pretty much nonsense. Do you plan to work on > that? Yep, each individual *BSD is getting its own detailed stats summary section... they're not finished yet, so at the moment I've left the links to the old (nonsensical) pages, but it's a long weekend here this weekend so I'm hoping to try and finalise them :-) See here for the FreeBSD page: http://www.bsdstats.org/freebsd/ Thus far I have Releases and Countries done, so it's just a matter of some further formatting and then the Platforms + Devices pages... Cheers Antony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 11:51:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447BF16A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B376843D67 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7312E118; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:51:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451D08BF.9020009@locolomo.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:51:27 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Nagy_L=E1szl=F3?= References: <451D05DF.2060701@enternet.hu> In-Reply-To: <451D05DF.2060701@enternet.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP IP range + auto hostname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:51:32 -0000 Nagy László wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a DHCP server with this config file: > > option domain-name "cassiopeia.ronet"; > option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.1; > default-lease-time 600; > max-lease-time 7200; > authoritative; > log-facility local7; > ddns-update-style none; > > subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 { > range 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.139; > option routers 192.168.0.1; > use-host-decl-names on; > option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; > filename "pxeboot"; > option root-path "192.168.0.1:/mnt/d1/rootfs"; > } > > I would like the diskless machines to set their hostname automatically. > I have a working named for this. For example: > > cassiopeia# host diskless131.ronet > diskless131.ronet has address 192.168.0.131 > cassiopeia# host 192.168.0.131 > 131.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer diskless131.ronet. > cassiopeia# > > Of course I can create individual hosts in the dhcp config file and set > their hostnames. But I do not want to create 40 host declarations and > look for the hardware addresses by hand... The clients should be able > to determine their hostnames using a reverse dns lookup, and the set > their hostnames automatically. In the above example: after the machine > got its IP address (192.168.0.131) from the DHCP server, it should set > its hostname to 'diskless131.ronet'. > > Sounds easy, but I do not know how to do that. Is it a standard > procedure, or do I need to write a custom script? (Where should I place > it?) IIRC you need to build the kernel for the diskless clients with the BOOTP options (I don't remember which of them right now), this should allow the kernel to rerequest parameters later in the boot stage. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 11:51:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD17416A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4511343D6D for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so990216nfc for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:51:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Tvk9Z8WleXS9kqgoWSN02fSI9sdPTWIRjvEUFE/NY9v///HXzR7eF6fijW1iOy3y8vg4ah+nSuXaXnI8l08KTkfU6SE3wbE7qkE2GQmXKOJsyprJUbRHxUT9Gz9Y26L1OqSavbMA8ghyDb/6GZufba6/WiQf51VLezaCv5mCaYY= Received: by 10.78.196.10 with SMTP id t10mr254879huf; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.168.7 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70e8236f0609290451k53026cd4rfd55fc3e64ee9014@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:51:26 +0100 From: "Joao Barros" To: "Antony Mawer" In-Reply-To: <451D080C.2050701@mawer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> <70e8236f0609290411x2927f852m7f649f22c596119@mail.gmail.com> <451D080C.2050701@mawer.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:51:32 -0000 On 9/29/06, Antony Mawer wrote: > On 29/09/2006 1:11 AM, Joao Barros wrote: > > On another subject, with the addition of the other BSDs the releases > > stats for example are pretty much nonsense. Do you plan to work on > > that? > > Yep, each individual *BSD is getting its own detailed stats summary > section... they're not finished yet, so at the moment I've left the > links to the old (nonsensical) pages, but it's a long weekend here this > weekend so I'm hoping to try and finalise them :-) > > See here for the FreeBSD page: > > http://www.bsdstats.org/freebsd/ > > Thus far I have Releases and Countries done, so it's just a matter of > some further formatting and then the Platforms + Devices pages... > > Cheers > Antony > > It looks very nice indeed, good work! :-) -- Joao Barros From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 12:01:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3036716A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C2143D5D for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.7.193] (68.Red-80-34-55.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.34.55.68]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823D22E219; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:01:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451D0B1F.5090705@locolomo.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:01:35 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> <451CBF41.1010208@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <451CBF41.1010208@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:01:41 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On the other hand, the duplicates could be the result of people deliberately > trying to frig the statistics or just innocently running the 300.statistics > script manually several times. In either case, entries with duplicate tokens > should be discarded -- I guess you'ld always want to keep just the last entry > for any token. How is the country determined? by whois lookup? I am just surprised that after the wipe and required update of the stats-script, Panama has 75% of the hosts, 10 times the US. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 01:13:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730CA16A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artmattox@yahoo.com) Received: from web54103.mail.yahoo.com (web54103.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BAD943D5C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:13:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artmattox@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 20648 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2006 01:13:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=lqSCuVNFjNYzeefOttYfcvLxXcwBmtt0aZwxffNjsaB1ot2TA8G64UX64bI3fGxNHntyI4qUjybdnq4yFSevzRh1uVoMsvon89bPk7hwd6jHlhMBgHseNhj+3qEt/YsvEjp6lb63p2j0Ukh3xN9LK+PLHMfwo4+tETFVkvn8lfo= ; Message-ID: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.190.49.245] by web54103.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:13:16 PDT Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:13:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Art Mattox To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:10:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: minimum requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:13:18 -0000 what are the recommended minimum hw requirements for version 6.1? e.g. diskspace, memory, etc thank you. -art --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 09:13:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BCD16A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msx324@mail.ru) Received: from f63.mail.ru (f63.mail.ru [194.67.57.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFEB43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msx324@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f63.mail.ru with local id 1GTER5-000M6Z-00 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:13:35 +0400 Received: from [89.208.22.70] by koi.mail.ru with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:13:35 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?Q?=E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA_=E5=C6=D2=C5=CD=CF=D7?= To: questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [89.208.22.70] Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:13:35 +0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:12:48 +0000 Cc: Subject: Question! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?Q?=E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA_=E5=C6=D2=C5=CD=CF=D7?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:13:38 -0000 Hello! I have one question. I had installed Free BSD 6.1 and i use GNOME.My monitor is Philips 107p5 and i want to have 100 Hz at 1024x768. I wrote the characteristics of my monitor to xorg.conf,but it doesn't switch to 100 Hz, only 85 Hz. What should i do? I know that that monitor can support 100 Hz at that resolution! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 12:34:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBD616A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5999443D80 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8TCYYcV018872; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:34:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <1b4e25200609281535n7f69241j9ec612a66d033089@mail.gmail.com> <20060928234358.GE3332@dfwdamian.vail> In-Reply-To: <20060928234358.GE3332@dfwdamian.vail> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609290834.22006.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: m3 BSD , Damian Wiest Subject: Re: Raid strip with freebsd slices or partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:34:37 -0000 On Thursday 28 September 2006 19:43, Damian Wiest wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:35:10PM +0000, m3 BSD wrote: > > Hi, i would like to do a raid strip with freebsd slices or partitions > > and not with a entire disk. For example: I've a two SCSI drivers with > > 68Gb. I want to make a two partitions or slices in two disks, first > > with 10G and other with 58Gb, this in two disks, and make a raid strip > > "virtual disk" with 58+58GB = 116 GB, and user other two partitions > > normaly. > > I believe you want to use the GEOM(4) subsystem in general and the > gstripe(8) command in particular. I've only used gmirror(8) with > entire disks, but I believe you can simply specify a device name > corresponding to the slices you want to stripe. That's correct. Use bsdlabel to divide the disks how you want them, put your normal filesystems on (e.g.) ad0s1a and ad2s1a, and use ad0s1d and ad2s1d as the elements of your gstripe. (e.g. "gstripe label bigvol ad0s1d ad2s1d"). Or you can divide the disk using fdisk and just use slices as the elements of your gstripe (ad0s2 and ad2s2, for instance). It doesn't matter what the device actually represents; geom can use it. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 12:44:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B155116A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37E943D6A for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:44:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so375826nzn for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:44:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ACAbvjsmQ0O3885698xbLBu23acOOzx4UmicjUEr4o78eoi0TpqPRmrzf5O91enbjTqB20LSt0EQQLGVvt4NaD7nGjZgAKTpiio+qAGHosbfu2Y6SnVhiDsa+MBGQidzmR+6ZoD2Y7RehOCeDzWocIFymgAL6rvSVX7myEhmWos= Received: by 10.65.15.17 with SMTP id s17mr3583255qbi; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.35.13 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <59adc1a0609290544p743284b8t6a102c792dfff0af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:44:24 +0200 From: "Dimitar Vasilev" To: "=?ISO-8859-5?B?tNzY4uDY2SC15ODV3N7S?=" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-5; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Question! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:44:32 -0000 R29vZ2xlIGZvciBjdXN0b20gbW9kZWxpbmUuIEhlcmUgaXMgYSBnZW5lcmF0b3IuCmh0dHA6Ly94 dGltaW5nLnNvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldC9jZ2ktYmluL3h0aW1pbmcucGwKCkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywK CjIwMDYvOS8yOSwgtNzY4uDY2SC15ODV3N7SIDxtc3gzMjRAbWFpbC5ydT46Cj4KPiBIZWxsbyEg SSBoYXZlIG9uZSBxdWVzdGlvbi4gSSBoYWQgaW5zdGFsbGVkIEZyZWUgQlNEIDYuMSBhbmQgaSB1 c2UKPiBHTk9NRS5NeSBtb25pdG9yIGlzIFBoaWxpcHMgMTA3cDUgYW5kIGkgd2FudCB0byBoYXZl IDEwMCBIeiBhdCAxMDI0eDc2OC4gSQo+IHdyb3RlIHRoZSBjaGFyYWN0ZXJpc3RpY3Mgb2YgbXkg bW9uaXRvciB0byB4b3JnLmNvbmYsYnV0IGl0IGRvZXNuJ3Qgc3dpdGNoCj4gdG8gMTAwIEh6LCBv bmx5IDg1IEh6LiBXaGF0IHNob3VsZCBpIGRvPwo+IEkga25vdyB0aGF0IHRoYXQgbW9uaXRvciBj YW4gc3VwcG9ydCAxMDAgSHogYXQgdGhhdCByZXNvbHV0aW9uIQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJz ZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cj4gaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMKPiBUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0 byAiCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMtdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmciCj4KCgoKLS0g CrTY3Nji6uAgstDh2NvV0gpEaW1pdGFyIFZhc3NpbGV2CgpHbnVQRyBrZXkgSUQ6IDB4NEI4REI1 MjUKS2V5c2VydmVyOiBwZ3AubWl0LmVkdQpLZXkgZmluZ2VycHJpbnQ6IEQ4OEEgM0I5MiBERUQ1 IDkxN0UgMzQxRSBENjJGIDhDNTEgNUZDNCA0QjhEIEI1MjUK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 13:10:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2135616A407; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691DD43D46; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8TDAMcV073115; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:10:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?koi8-r?b?5M3J1NLJyiDlxtLFzc/X?= Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:10:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609290910.09568.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:10:27 -0000 On Friday 29 September 2006 05:13, =E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA =E5=C6=D2=C5=CD=CF= =D7 wrote: > Hello! I have one question. I had installed Free BSD 6.1 and i use GNOME.= My > monitor is Philips 107p5 and i want to have 100 Hz at 1024x768. I wrote t= he > characteristics of my monitor to xorg.conf,but it doesn't switch to 100 H= z, > only 85 Hz. What should i do? I know that that monitor can support 100 Hz > at that resolution! You could try lying about your monitor's abilities. Try something like VertRefresh 99.0 - 101.0 in /etc/X11/xorg.conf. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 13:10:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2135616A407; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691DD43D46; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8TDAMcV073115; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:10:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?koi8-r?b?5M3J1NLJyiDlxtLFzc/X?= Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:10:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609290910.09568.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:10:27 -0000 On Friday 29 September 2006 05:13, =E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA =E5=C6=D2=C5=CD=CF= =D7 wrote: > Hello! I have one question. I had installed Free BSD 6.1 and i use GNOME.= My > monitor is Philips 107p5 and i want to have 100 Hz at 1024x768. I wrote t= he > characteristics of my monitor to xorg.conf,but it doesn't switch to 100 H= z, > only 85 Hz. What should i do? I know that that monitor can support 100 Hz > at that resolution! You could try lying about your monitor's abilities. Try something like VertRefresh 99.0 - 101.0 in /etc/X11/xorg.conf. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 20:34:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F9416A412 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toby.whaymand@ntlworld.com) Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F27043D70 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:34:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from toby.whaymand@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060928203412.COEB15018.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:34:12 +0100 Received: from smtp.ntlworld.com ([81.103.221.25]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP id <20060928203414.BVFM11710.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@smtp.ntlworld.com> for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:34:14 +0100 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.19 (webedge20-101-1110-20050615) X-Originating-IP: [213.107.224.24] From: To: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:34:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20060928203414.BVFM11710.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@smtp.ntlworld.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:37:17 +0000 Cc: Subject: Software before trying it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:34:13 -0000 If the Mac uses BSD would that not mean that any one can use Mac software on a PC-BSD... My mind is telling me that this is not possible so it be intresting to know the reason behind it... to learn Thanks Toby ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 13:46:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C13D16A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6F043FE4 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:42:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:42:21 -0400 id 00056440.451D22BD.0000F262 Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 09:40:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:42:20 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: toby.whaymand@ntlworld.com Message-Id: <20060929094220.109e6a4e.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928203414.BVFM11710.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@smtp.ntlworld.com> References: <20060928203414.BVFM11710.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@smtp.ntlworld.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Software before trying it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:46:01 -0000 In response to toby.whaymand@ntlworld.com: > If the Mac uses BSD would that not mean that any one can use Mac > software on a PC-BSD... > > My mind is telling me that this is not possible so it be intresting to >know the reason behind it... to learn Please wrap lines around 72 chars. The primary reason is that the Mac uses a completely different GUI than any BSD does. A secondary reason is that the Mac does not use FreeBSD exactly, it uses bits and pieces, so it's not a 1:1 copy. However, there are lots of programs that were written for Linux/BSD that have easily been ported to the Mac, because the systems are so similar. It's a lot easier than porting software to Windows. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 14:24:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D2B16A417 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B3343D53 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:24:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront02.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.56]) by mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2006 16:24:57 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:24:57 +0200 Received: from [130.133.86.198] ([130.133.86.198] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:24:57 +0200 Message-ID: <451D2CB6.4000808@uni-mainz.de> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:24:54 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2006 14:24:57.0789 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A59A6D0:01C6E3D3] Subject: Sounblaster Audigy SE: no driver support/No OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:24:59 -0000 Hello. running FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64 and bougth a Soundblaster Audigy SE, based on the CS0106-DAT DSP. I search Google and the mailing list and found some notes about this sound card and it seems not to be supported yet. Are there plans of supporting this sound card in the near future? The commercial OSS drivers seems to support this Soundblaster, but with FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64, I only get weird noises out of my speakers and my box behaves a bit 'jumping' (driver problem?). I would appreciate a FreeBSD native driver. Thank you in advance for any comments and hints, regards oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:03:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6279D16A47E for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat02.inode.at [62.99.145.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288BA43D4C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:03:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.122] (port=12760 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-02.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GTJtF-0000Zy-IW; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:03:01 +0200 Message-ID: <451D35A3.4080100@inode.at> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:02:59 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <451D2CB6.4000808@uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <451D2CB6.4000808@uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sounblaster Audigy SE: no driver support/No OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:03:25 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > Hello. > running FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64 and bougth a Soundblaster Audigy SE, based > on the CS0106-DAT DSP. > I search Google and the mailing list and found some notes about this > sound card and it seems not to be supported yet. Are there plans of > supporting this sound card in the near future? > > The commercial OSS drivers seems to support this Soundblaster, but with > FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64, I only get weird noises out of my speakers and my > box behaves a bit 'jumping' (driver problem?). I would appreciate a > FreeBSD native driver. You might want to try audio/emu10kx (however afaik there is some work on importing that driver into the base system on CURRENT) -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:12:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6932A16A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B727A43D5E for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8TFAlYd000675; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:10:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8TFAkEL000674; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:10:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:10:46 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Kristopher Yates Message-ID: <20060929151046.GA657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060928191717.GA96965@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: growfs HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:12:39 -0000 On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:36:28PM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > > >It takes some knowledge to grow peanuts. > >If you want help, don't throw ignorance stones. > > Hey dude, > > You threw the first stone. I'm not Jesus. I'll throw one right back > 'atcha, old man. What stone? > >> >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > >> >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > >> >Maybe you need some new hardware. > >> >///jerry > > After reading your initial response, I decided to create a new partition > and move the majority of /usr > to it. I dont have all day. Problem solved. I see in your last response > that we are agreeable technologically, at least as far as symlinking goes. > > Waste not, want not. > > ON a final note, democrats are just as corrupt as republicans. Don't go > whining about milking the cow dry being a problem with right wing fascists. > Left wing libs do the same thing all the time. Look at both sides of the > fence. God Bless the FBI. We should throw all the rich senators and > congressmen in jail. Talk about ignorant stones. I didn't know you > collected rocks! Yah, but in this case there was a specific group and they liked to be right wingers. The don't qualify as honest conservatives. ////jerry > > efilnikufecin and a long cold winter, > > Kris > > > >From: Jerry McAllister > >To: Kristopher Yates > >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: growfs HELP > >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:17:17 -0400 > > > >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:54:26PM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > > > >> Anyone else have any suggestions? > >> > >> I was thinking I could rewrite my partition table to what it was > >> originally, then growfs using the empty partionable space.. but I dont > >> exactly know how. I just had some docs I found online (URL is below). > >> Before I did fdisk -s, the 2.888GB was an empty partition of the drive > >> where I could have created a new partition.. but instead I did fdisk to > >> merge it all into the same partition. The docs I read said to do that, > >> then growfs.. I just didnt understand the vague explanation of doing > >the > >> math to determine the correct number of sectors to pass to growfs. > > > >> The docs I was using: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200111/growfs.html > >> > >> I know it is possible without doing all that you suggested. It should > >be a > >> matter of just executing growfs properly and I'm done. Otherwise, it > >would > >> be easier to just do a fresh install than to do all that you suggested. > >> Makes sense to me. I'd rather not have to reinstall. > > > >No, it is less trouble to do it the way I wrote. > >Doing the dd stuff is harder and anyway, may not result in what > >you want. > > > >Growfs is really not all that useful. > >Remember that you have to have empty space in the slice right > >contiguous to to the one you want to grow. You cannot just grab > >space from somewhere else on the disk and add it in. > > > >You could, if you have free space already within an existing > >file system, move some diectories, such as /usr/local out of /usr > >and put them[it] in the available space and create a sym link to > >the new location. > > > >But, if it is unused space that has not been part of a partition, you > >will remake the partition table with disklabel. If the space is right > >at the end of existing partitioned space, you might get away with it > >without redoing everything, but it is kind of an unadvisable thing > >to try, because what gets written back in the partition table for > >the existing partitions just might not line up exactly with their > >previous positions - you're expecting a new pointer to point to the > >same place as the old one. It could, but maybe a critical sector gets > >mapped out in the middle things. It would mess things up. > > > >So, > >> > >> My idea was to post here and get a better understanding, growfs and be > >done > >> with it. I didnt expect comments from the peanut gallery; ie. > > > >It takes some knowledge to grow peanuts. > >If you want help, don't throw ignorance stones. > >> > >> >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > >> >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > >> >Maybe you need some new hardware. > >> >///jerry > >> > >> Not everyone has a kush job at the SCNC working with universities. > > > >What do you know about SCNC? Obviously nothing. > > > >> > >> A) Why does a box that is just running NATD and portsentry need an 18GB > >> hard drive and a faster processor? > > > >Whatever you want. > >> > >> B) Maybe you need to give me some money so that I may afford to build > >the > >> fancy firewall/gateway that you suggest. I almost appreciate your reply > >> but found your final remark to be rather condescending. > >> > >> My hardware is fine. It works and its all I have. This firewall box > >has > >> been online 24/7 since 1998 running FBSD just fine. Blow the dust out > >once > >> a year and "keep on trucking". > > > >Fine. > >I have a couple of those right here. > > > > > > > >> > >> Michigan has the 2nd worst economy in the US. I would think you would > >be > >> more understanding of my situation. Unfortunately, you have proven me > >> wrong. > > > >Because the previous governor abetted by his psuedo right-wing cronies > >in the state congress gutted the state's economy before he finally got > >term limited out. > > > > > >> Thanks to the FREEBSD community for continuing to be the leader in > >> backward-compatible support for old hardware. Long live the Pentium 60 > >and > >> the 640 ATA controller! ;) > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Kris > >> > >> > >> > >> >From: Jerry McAllister > >> >To: Kristopher Yates > >> >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> >Subject: Re: growfs HELP > >> >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:45:37 -0400 > >> > > >> >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:26:27AM -0500, Kristopher Yates wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi everyone, > >> >> > >> >> First of all, glad to still be running FBSD after all these years. > >> >> > >> >> I tried following some docs I found online in order to make my /usr > >> >> partition bigger and made it all the way to growfs -s, which is where > >I > >> >got > >> >> stuck. > >> >> > >> >> First of all, here was my original dilema, what I did, then a > >descript > >> >of > >> >> where I am regarding growfs problem. > >> >> > >> >> System (aka firewall): Pentium60 40M RAM 2 NICS, running > >FBSD4.5-stable > >> >(a > >> >> great firewall running 24/7 since OCT 2000.) > >> >> > >> >> I tried to upgrade (make buildword make installworld to > >4.11-stable).. I > >> >> made the new world and installed the new kernel but not quite enough > >> >space > >> >> to do the last steps (mergemaster and then installworld). > >> >> > >> >> So I built a spare box, and installed FBSD on it. > >> >> > >> >> I put the hard drive from the firewall as secondary master, and a > >larger > >> >> drive as secondary slave. > >> >> > >> >> * I ran dd and imaged the old drive onto the new drive > >> >> > >> >> old drive seagate 1.2gb > >> >> new drive quantum 4.3gb > >> >> > >> >> * I put the new drive into the old faithful P60 (firewall). It boots > >up > >> >> fine running 4.11-p22 and is currently online as my firewall. > >> >> > >> >> What is left to do: > >> >> > >> >> Finish the 4.11 install which ended on make kernel > >KERNCONF=CUSTOMKERN.. > >> >I > >> >> just need to mergemaster then installworld as single user. > >> >> > >> >> Obviously, /usr partition (/dev/ad0s1f) is basically full w/ 8.6MB > >free. > >> >> > >> >> ** soo.. I did some fdisk magic and got stuck on the growfs (final > >step) > >> >in > >> >> order to growfs /usr > >> >> > >> >> fdisk reports my 1 partition @ full size of disk but no idea how to > >> >> properly use growfs. > >> > > >> >To use growfs you must have space in the slice contiguous with > >> >the partition you want to increase in size. It cannot just grow > >> >anywhere. You really did not want to move things using dd. > >> >You really wanted to build the new file systems to the sizes you > >> >want on the new disk and then use dump/restore to to the new > >> >partitions. > >> > > >> >First, fdisk the new disk and put the MBR on it and create your > >> >one slice on it and flag that as bootable. > >> > > >> >Then, use disklabel (in 4.xxx, bsd label in later versions of FreeBSD) > >> >to create your slices and also make it write out the boot sector. > >> >There is a block of examples in the disklabel/bsdlabel man page > >> >that tells how to use dd to make sure a drive is clean > >> >and then fdisk to make one slice with MBR and finally two disklabels > >> >to create the bootable partition and then to edit the partition > >> >table for all the partitions. That group of commands is just what > >> >you need. > >> > > >> >Then, do a newfs on each partition created (except swap) and > >> >then make a mount point for them. Mount the 'a' partition on > >> >something like '/newroot' for example and then run dump/restore > >> >to copy root > >> > cd /newroot > >> > dump 0af - / | restore -rf - > >> > > >> >Do the same dump/restore thing for each of the partitions/filesystems. > >> >Make sure you cd in to the base of each mounted new filesystem > >> >before doing the dump/restore and replace the '/' in the dump to > >> >be each filesystem - for example, for /usr, make a /newusr mountpoint > >> >mount it and then cd to /newusr and do 'dump 0af - /usr | restore -rf > >-' > >> > > >> >When you get done, you will have a fully useable, bootable copy of your > >> >machine on the new disk. Move the new disk to the primary boot > >> >position in your boot chain and start it up. > >> > > >> >By the way, those are pretty small drives. I don't see any > >> >on the market nowdays less that 18 GB and more likely larger. > >> >Maybe you need some new hardware. > >> > > >> >////jerry > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Here is what I have: > >> >> cylinders=8895 heads=15 sectors/track=63 (945blks/cyl) > >> >> > >> >> media sector size 512 > >> >> > >> >> partition 1 sysid 165, start 63, size 8405712 (4104 Meg), flag 80 > >> >(active) > >> >> beg: cyl 0/head 1 / sector 1 > >> >> end: cyl 1023 / head 14 / sector 63 > >> >> > >> >> basically I need help filling in the following blank (/dev/ad0s1f == > >> >/usr > >> >> slice) > >> >> > >> >> # growfs -s ______ /dev/ad0s1f > >> >> > >> >> as shown above, fdisk sees the correct geometry as 4104MB partition > >but > >> >> /stand/sysinstall disklabel editor sees ad0s1 as 2888MB, which is the > >> >> amount of space I thought I was to be adding to /usr via growfs. > >> >Currently, > >> >> my /usr slice is 975MB and really needs to grow. :) > >> >> > >> >> Please let me know what other info I can provide that will help you > >help > >> >me > >> >> solve this problem. I have read man growfs and some docs online, > >> >however, > >> >> I'm stuck and dont know exactly how to resolve the problem. > >> >> > >> >> Much thanks, > >> >> > >> >> Kris > >> >> > >> >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> >> Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more?then map the > >best > >> >> route! http://local.live.com > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.? Get a free 90-day > >trial! > >> > >http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself - download free Windows Live Messenger themes! > http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://imagine-msn.com/themes/vibe/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:13:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C754716A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9337943D5A for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so959291wxd for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.87.5 with SMTP id k5mr553046wxb; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i35sm4772731wxd.2006.09.29.08.12.51; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BCFBF08; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:12:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC74BEC1; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:12:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8TFCjL1003599; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:12:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) From: Gerard Seibert Organization: Seibercom.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:12:33 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09RnSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2930674.GYyjkorm5l"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609291112.43992.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Permissions on /var/mail directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:13:09 -0000 --nextPart2930674.GYyjkorm5l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =46reeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p8 postfix-current-2.4.20060903,3 dovecot-1.0.r7 I just did a buildworld along with a new kernel this morning. While doing=20 the installworld, I noticed an error message displayed regarding=20 the /var/mail directory. I have the directory set to: 1777 so that dovecot= =20 can assess it. The installworld process reset the permissions to 0775 which= =20 were not sufficient for Dovecot. The dovecot.log file had over a hundred entries similar to this: deliver(gerard): Error:=20 open(/var/mail/.temp.scorpio.seibercom.net.1123.cd38cd4d82e1368f) failed:=20 Permission denied deliver(gerard): Error: file_lock_dotlock() failed with mbox=20 file /var/mail/gerard: Permission denied Obviously the /var/log/maillog had similar fail warnings. By changing the permission to 1777 on the /var/mail directory and running=20 postsuper -r ALL, I was able to get the mail delivered. This is the second= =20 time this has happened. The last time I rebuild world I experienced the=20 same phenomena. Why does build world insist on changing the directory=20 permissions and is there a way I can prevent it from doing so? What I am trying to determine is if I really should have those settings on= =20 the directory, or if I have something configured wrong in either postfix or= =20 dovecot. =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net Antique fairy tale: Little Red Riding Hood. Modern fairy tale: Oswald, acting alone, shot Kennedy. --nextPart2930674.GYyjkorm5l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFHTfrs3R1WQUU6lgRAgkcAKCp1Tur3hdNRLN8A7uW9E9cRDRp0wCfRRRw brN7SXdH6/lTQSSKGQFMIRY= =H8D1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2930674.GYyjkorm5l-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:23:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2751316A47B for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF5643DAE for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:23:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront01.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2006 17:23:02 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.56]) by exfront01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:23:02 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.52.133] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:23:01 +0200 Message-ID: <451D3A4B.3030101@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:22:51 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Armin Pirkovitsch References: <451D2CB6.4000808@uni-mainz.de> <451D35A3.4080100@inode.at> In-Reply-To: <451D35A3.4080100@inode.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2006 15:23:02.0034 (UTC) FILETIME=[271F3F20:01C6E3DB] Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sounblaster Audigy SE: no driver support/No OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:23:27 -0000 Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Hello. >> running FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64 and bougth a Soundblaster Audigy SE, based >> on the CS0106-DAT DSP. >> I search Google and the mailing list and found some notes about this >> sound card and it seems not to be supported yet. Are there plans of >> supporting this sound card in the near future? >> >> The commercial OSS drivers seems to support this Soundblaster, but with >> FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64, I only get weird noises out of my speakers and my >> box behaves a bit 'jumping' (driver problem?). I would appreciate a >> FreeBSD native driver. >> > > You might want to try audio/emu10kx (however afaik there is some work on > importing that driver into the base system on CURRENT) > > This above mentioned driver doesn't support the sound card in question, sorry. Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:25:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7AC16A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abid@saigol.biz) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377B343D5A for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:24:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from abid@saigol.biz) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([206.248.137.162]) by VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J6D002DG1HJWR50@VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:24:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:24:53 -0400 From: Abid Saigol To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <451D3AC5.8000703@saigol.biz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) Subject: Periodic Emails are not coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:25:22 -0000 Hello, Recently, the daily/weekly/monthly periodic emails have stopped coming from one of my servers. There were no changes made of the system, except that part of the filesystem was exported as an NFS share. These shares are setup on another FreeBSD machine for automount. I have checked my /etc and /var/logs and cannot find any reason for the mails to have stopped. Any help and guidance will be greatly appreciated. Here are some of the relevant files: /etc/crontab ========= # /etc/crontab - root's crontab for FreeBSD # # $FreeBSD: src/etc/crontab,v 1.32 2002/11/22 16:13:39 tom Exp $ # SHELL=/bin/sh PATH=/etc:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin HOME=/var/log # #minute hour mday month wday who command # */5 * * * * root /usr/libexec/atrun # # Save some entropy so that /dev/random can re-seed on boot. */11 * * * * operator /usr/libexec/save-entropy # # Rotate log files every hour, if necessary. 0 * * * * root newsyslog # # Perform daily/weekly/monthly maintenance. 1 3 * * * root periodic daily 15 4 * * 6 root periodic weekly 30 5 1 * * root periodic monthly # # Adjust the time zone if the CMOS clock keeps local time, as opposed to # UTC time. See adjkerntz(8) for details. 1,31 0-5 * * * root adjkerntz -a /etc/periodic.conf ============= daily_clean_hoststat_enable="NO" daily_status_mail_rejects_enable="NO" daily_status_include_submit_mailq="NO" daily_submit_queuerun="NO" /var/log/cron [for 3am when daily is supposed to run] ====================================== Sep 29 03:00:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25669]: (root) CMD (newsyslog) Sep 29 03:00:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25671]: (www) CMD (/usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/www/phpcli/ebay/newsales.php) Sep 29 03:00:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25672]: (www) CMD (/usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/www/phpcli/ebay/newlisting.php) Sep 29 03:00:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25673]: (www) CMD (/usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/www/phpcli/ebay/mkthumb.php) Sep 29 03:00:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25670]: (operator) CMD (/usr/libexec/save-entropy) Sep 29 03:00:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25674]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Sep 29 03:00:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25675]: (www) CMD (/usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/www/phpcli/ebay/parselogs.php) Sep 29 03:01:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25695]: (root) CMD (periodic daily) Sep 29 03:01:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25696]: (root) CMD (adjkerntz -a) Sep 29 03:02:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25808]: (www) CMD (/usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/www/phpcli/ebay/mkthumb.php) Sep 29 03:02:27 server cron[25694]: (root) MAIL (mailed 123 bytes of output but got status 0x004b ) Sep 29 03:04:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25955]: (www) CMD (/usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/www/phpcli/ebay/mkthumb.php) Sep 29 03:05:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25960]: (www) CMD (/usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/www/phpcli/ebay/newsales.php) Sep 29 03:05:00 server /usr/sbin/cron[25959]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /var/log/maillog [running courier-mta] ========================== Sep 29 03:00:11 server courierd: Waiting. shutdown time=Fri Sep 29 03:05:11 2006, wakeup time=Fri Sep 29 03:05:11 2006, queuedelivering=0, inprogress=0 Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: SHUTDOWN: respawnlo limit reached, system inactive. Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Loading STATIC transport module libraries. Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Courier 0.53.2 Copyright 1999-2005 Double Precision, Inc. Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Installing [0/0] Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Installing local Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Installed: module.local - Courier 0.53.2 Copyright 1999-2005 Double Precision, Inc. Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Installing esmtp Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Installed: module.esmtp - Courier 0.53.2 Copyright 1999-2005 Double Precision, Inc. Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Installing dsn Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Installed: module.dsn - Courier 0.53.2 Copyright 1999-2005 Double Precision, Inc. Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Initializing local Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Initializing esmtp Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Initializing dsn Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Started exec ./courierlocal, pid=25964, maxdels=10, maxhost=4, maxrcpt=1 Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Started exec ./courieresmtp, pid=25965, maxdels=40, maxhost=4, maxrcpt=100 Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Started exec ./courierdsn, pid=25966, maxdels=4, maxhost=1, maxrcpt=1 Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: queuelo=200, queuehi=400 Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Purging /var/spool/courier/msgq Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Purging /var/spool/courier/msgs Sep 29 03:05:11 server courierd: Waiting. shutdown time=Fri Sep 29 04:05:11 2006, wakeup time=Fri Sep 29 04:05:11 2006, queuedelivering=0, inprogress=0 The only anomalous entry is in the cron log at 3:02, but nothing in the maillog to reflect that. Thanks in advance for any and all help. Abid From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:29:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C83816A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [204.127.200.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B944743D8C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:29:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from fuggle.veldy.net (c-69-180-171-46.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[69.180.171.46]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <2006092915295101500ipig5e>; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:29:52 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gw.veldy.net [192.168.1.3]) by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2CF17043; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:29:51 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <451D3BEE.1050705@veldy.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:29:50 -0500 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Abid Saigol References: <451D3AC5.8000703@saigol.biz> In-Reply-To: <451D3AC5.8000703@saigol.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Periodic Emails are not coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:29:53 -0000 Abid Saigol wrote: > Hello, > > Recently, the daily/weekly/monthly periodic emails have stopped coming > from one of my servers. There were no changes made of the system, > except that part of the filesystem was exported as an NFS share. > These shares are setup on another FreeBSD machine for automount. I > have checked my /etc and /var/logs and cannot find any reason for the > mails to have stopped. Any help and guidance will be greatly > appreciated. Here are some of the relevant files: Have you inadvertently aliased the root user to another user? Or perhaps you deleted an alias and should be looking in the "root" mailbox? I have virtual mail setup on my systems and I lost periodic emails as well until I configured postfix correctly to consider my local machine's hostname as an acceptable recipient. I now alias root to the virtual user I want to receive these emails. Tom Veldhouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:29:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431ED16A56F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F051743D8A for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:29:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8TFTnHd005338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:29:49 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k8TFTnTw018102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:29:49 -0700 Message-ID: <451D3BF1.1080307@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:29:53 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060928203414.BVFM11710.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@smtp.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928203414.BVFM11710.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@smtp.ntlworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.266434, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.9.29.80442 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Software before trying it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:29:59 -0000 toby.whaymand@ntlworld.com wrote: > If the Mac uses BSD would that not mean that any one can use Mac software on a PC-BSD... > > My mind is telling me that this is not possible so it be intresting to know the reason behind it... to learn > > Thanks > > Toby > Short answer: not possible. This is due in part to a proprietary setup with Apple's libraries and stuff, and also due to the fact that many items have been modified in Darwin and differ from a traditional BSD setup. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:35:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56D216A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mail.ecommerce.com (mail.ecommerce.com [80.121.204.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE49F43D73 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:35:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: (qmail 18839 invoked by uid 399); 29 Sep 2006 15:50:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.31.215.2?) (80.121.204.1) by mail.opentransfer.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 15:50:49 -0000 Message-ID: <451D3C83.3050702@wilderness.homeip.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:32:19 -0500 From: Drew Sanford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060926) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" References: <451D3AC5.8000703@saigol.biz> <451D3BEE.1050705@veldy.net> In-Reply-To: <451D3BEE.1050705@veldy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Periodic Emails are not coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:35:01 -0000 Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Abid Saigol wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Recently, the daily/weekly/monthly periodic emails have stopped >> coming from one of my servers. There were no changes made of the >> system, except that part of the filesystem was exported as an NFS >> share. These shares are setup on another FreeBSD machine for >> automount. I have checked my /etc and /var/logs and cannot find any >> reason for the mails to have stopped. Any help and guidance will be >> greatly appreciated. Here are some of the relevant files: > Have you inadvertently aliased the root user to another user? Or > perhaps you deleted an alias and should be looking in the "root" mailbox? > I have virtual mail setup on my systems and I lost periodic emails as > well until I configured postfix correctly to consider my local > machine's hostname as an acceptable recipient. I now alias root to > the virtual user I want to receive these emails. I had this same thing happen recently on one of my machines, but it was one I use for my desktop. They stopped for me when I installed KDE, upgrading from enlightenment. I don't know if there's something going on with a particular update or not, but honestly, the mails don't even appear to be getting generated, which is to say, I don't know if the job is even being run. Can you determine if the job is being run for you or not? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:49:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8428816A412 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120D043D6E for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:49:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8TFmQmp000876; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:48:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8TFmQQQ000875; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:48:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:48:26 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Art Mattox Message-ID: <20060929154826.GC657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: minimum requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:49:57 -0000 On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:13:16PM -0700, Art Mattox wrote: > what are the recommended minimum hw requirements for version 6.1? > e.g. diskspace, memory, etc I don't know what the current absolute minimum to run values would be. So recommended minimums would be somewhat subjective and depend on the intended use of the machine and the number of ports and user accounts you might put on it. For a personal work station with only a few ports, but not a stripped DNS server or something, I would recommend at least 512 MB memory and 18 GB disk and 1.5 GHz CPU with at least 400 MHz frontside bus. More and faster is nice. A stripped router or DNS server might get by with 1/4 the memory and 1 GB disk and a much slower CPU. A loaded desktop that included web server and web based utilities such as database services, Email and list services, etc might do better to start with 1 GB memory and 72 GB disk and 2 Ghz CPU and storage would go up from there depending on the size of things you are serving. ////jerry > > thank you. > > -art > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:53:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FB616A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n120.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1107.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD3843D64 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n120.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 451CC1560001482D for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:53:06 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Chris Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:52:58 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Swap Size Importance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:53:25 -0000 As a standard practice, I've always configured swap file to be double the size of real ram split across system and data disk. For example, 8gb on da0 and 8gb on da1 if the system has 8g real ram. In practice, In 7 or 8 years, I've never seen swap used for anything but a few k of inactive processes and I would imagine if real active process swapping occurred, it would be an immediate indicator that the system that isn't responsive enough for use anymore and requires upgrade or tuning. Can't run a website process off disk and keep anyone coming to the site ;-). (BTW, I'm talking only about high end servers, not test boxes where I've seen lots of swapping). I'm at the point of attempting my first gvinum software raid-5 and realized, I need the entire disk storage of all three non-system drives to avoid pulling an 8gb chunk out of the drive sizes. The configuration is one scsi 72g system disk and 3 that will be used for the raid volume. I should mention I turn off dumps, haven't found the use for that in a production server since it should not be rebooting or it's back in the shop and another box is taking it's place. Is there any shortfall in performance or reliability to running production with swap equal in size to the 8gb of system memory? I can't think of any but don't want to make a hard to correct mistake once this thing goes in. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:56:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E7A16A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abid@saigol.biz) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF0743D90 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from abid@saigol.biz) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([206.248.137.162]) by VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J6D0014N2XJX7G0@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:56:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:56:05 -0400 From: Abid Saigol In-reply-to: <451D3BEE.1050705@veldy.net> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Message-id: <451D4215.4050306@saigol.biz> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <451D3AC5.8000703@saigol.biz> <451D3BEE.1050705@veldy.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Periodic Emails are not coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:56:10 -0000 Tom, Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. My aliases file was setup properly, but I have discovered that it wasn't compiled (I hadn't run "makealiases" for courier-mta). When I tried to send mail to root ("#mail root"), it failed. However, after running makealiases I was able to send mail to root. I will know tomorrow am whether this means that periodic will run successfully. Since the maillog showed successful transmission of other messages, I automatically assumed that the problem was not with mail configuration... Thanks for the help. Abid Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Abid Saigol wrote: Hello, Recently, the daily/weekly/monthly periodic emails have stopped coming from one of my servers. There were no changes made of the system, except that part of the filesystem was exported as an NFS share. These shares are setup on another FreeBSD machine for automount. I have checked my /etc and /var/logs and cannot find any reason for the mails to have stopped. Any help and guidance will be greatly appreciated. Here are some of the relevant files: Have you inadvertently aliased the root user to another user? Or perhaps you deleted an alias and should be looking in the "root" mailbox? I have virtual mail setup on my systems and I lost periodic emails as well until I configured postfix correctly to consider my local machine's hostname as an acceptable recipient. I now alias root to the virtual user I want to receive these emails. Tom Veldhouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:56:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9C316A412 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felix@Lett.UBBCluj.Ro) Received: from Lett.UBBCluj.Ro (lett.ubbcluj.ro [193.0.225.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7DE43D79 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:56:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix@Lett.UBBCluj.Ro) Received: from Lett.UBBCluj.Ro (Lett.UBBCluj.Ro [127.0.0.1]) by Lett.UBBCluj.Ro (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8TJ2SR0081147; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:02:28 GMT (envelope-from felix@Lett.UBBCluj.Ro) Received: from localhost (felix@localhost) by Lett.UBBCluj.Ro (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k8TJ2Ng4081144; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:02:23 GMT (envelope-from felix@Lett.UBBCluj.Ro) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:02:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Farcas Felix To: Art Mattox In-Reply-To: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060929190153.O81107@Lett.UBBCluj.Ro> References: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: minimum requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:56:55 -0000 look at: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/2006-August/011029.html or: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE: 4MB, 8MB: Dies at bootstrap loader. 12MB, 16MB: Dies while loading acpi.ko. 20MB: Boots / Successfully installed the default minimal distribution set. Mem: 2484K Active, 1396K Iact, 6004K Wired, 680K Cache, 1984K Buf, 348K Free Swap: 7184K Total, 2732K Used, 4452K Free, 38% Inuse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:58:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F4116A40F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAAD43D55 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8TFwcCJ022290; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:58:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:58:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609291158.25518.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Chris Subject: Re: Swap Size Importance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:58:40 -0000 On Friday 29 September 2006 11:52, Chris wrote: > As a standard practice, I've always configured swap file to be double > the size of real ram split across system and data disk. For example, > 8gb on da0 and 8gb on da1 if the system has 8g real ram. In practice, > In 7 or 8 years, I've never seen swap used for anything but a few k > of inactive processes and I would imagine if real active process > swapping occurred, it would be an immediate indicator that the system > that isn't responsive enough for use anymore and requires upgrade or > tuning. Can't run a website process off disk and keep anyone coming > to the site ;-). (BTW, I'm talking only about high end servers, not > test boxes where I've seen lots of swapping). > > I'm at the point of attempting my first gvinum software raid-5 and > realized, I need the entire disk storage of all three non-system > drives to avoid pulling an 8gb chunk out of the drive sizes. The > configuration is one scsi 72g system disk and 3 that will be used for > the raid volume. I should mention I turn off dumps, haven't found the > use for that in a production server since it should not be rebooting > or it's back in the shop and another box is taking it's place. > > Is there any shortfall in performance or reliability to running > production with swap equal in size to the 8gb of system memory? I > can't think of any but don't want to make a hard to correct mistake > once this thing goes in. Nope. I routinely run boxes with 512MB or 1GB of swap, even if the RAM size is much higher than that. You won't have anywhere to save a crashdump in that case, but you seem to already be aware of that. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 16:05:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9AE16A412 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA3543D77 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so972933wxd for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:05:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Sabw6f1ykky4vX9mWv2D+cIFQB/Mbn01czOWQryggEn+27/My1pE74DnQHCw7rj8WWJnaPR6DHi+hjR4M6G9xtrq5CcyGiQuhGaN14Ve/ZfAB9xFs+9zFxCPPjdFRN4bRBR9cqRhmLEVl0lYcHRRicrh4UZ969rPFn+bhNU14+c= Received: by 10.70.14.9 with SMTP id 9mr5360641wxn; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakshmi.susmita.org ( [59.92.56.44]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h16sm4217664wxd.2006.09.29.09.05.22; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lakshmi.susmita.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 863C423A93A; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:35:17 +0530 (IST) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:35:16 +0530 From: Girish Venkatachalam To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20060929160516.GA3605@lakshmi.susmita.org> References: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> <20060929154826.GC657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060929154826.GC657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Art Mattox Subject: Re: minimum requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:26 -0000 On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:48:26AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote: > I don't know what the current absolute minimum to run values > would be. So recommended minimums would be somewhat subjective > and depend on the intended use of the machine and the number > of ports and user accounts you might put on it. > > For a personal work station with only a few ports, but not a > stripped DNS server or something, I would recommend at least 512 MB > memory and 18 GB disk and 1.5 GHz CPU with at least 400 MHz frontside > bus. More and faster is nice. > A stripped router or DNS server might get by with 1/4 the memory > and 1 GB disk and a much slower CPU. > > A loaded desktop that included web server and web based utilities > such as database services, Email and list services, etc might do better > to start with 1 GB memory and 72 GB disk and 2 Ghz CPU and storage > would go up from there depending on the size of things you are > serving. > > ////jerry I am happily running FreeBSD 6.0 on 233 Mhz 128 MB RAM machine. It has given very good performance with very little cause for complaint. It is my workstation/desktop. I am not aware of any theoretical limit on hardware config for FreeBSD. Please remember to config a big enuf swap partition if ur RAM is low. regards, Girish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 16:05:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E36116A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F75243D70 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.142] (helo=anti-virus02-09) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTKrY-0008Jq-8c; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:05:20 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTKrX-0002pX-AA; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:05:19 +0100 Message-ID: <451D443E.7000705@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:05:18 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Art Mattox References: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> <20060929154826.GC657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060929154826.GC657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: minimum requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:27 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:13:16PM -0700, Art Mattox wrote: > > > >>what are the recommended minimum hw requirements for version 6.1? >>e.g. diskspace, memory, etc >> >> > >I don't know what the current absolute minimum to run values >would be. > I believe minimum ram is 24Mb but if you can get more... . I'm sure I used to run 4.X off < 4Gb of disk and would suspect 6.X would fit too, with care. Of course, you have to be very careful what you actually do with a machine this low spec'ed. Certainly no room to compile firefox or openoffice :-) --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 16:06:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF6416A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (auj181.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.17.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE5143D73 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8TG5qNC034540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:06:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <451D4457.8060501@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:05:43 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <008a01c6e347$530aaeb0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> In-Reply-To: <008a01c6e347$530aaeb0$0500a8c0@voodoo5> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig34C2579BF3632CB9AB1F2828" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Pascal Bleyler Subject: Re: portupgrade: ruby state=swread X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:06:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig34C2579BF3632CB9AB1F2828 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/09/2006 23:44, Pascal Bleyler wrote: > Hello, >=20 > i'm actually updating my installed ports with > portupgrade -a over a remote ssh session. > Before i have done a cvsup and a portsdb -Fu >=20 > There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port > is ruby. > pkg_info means i have ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 installed > and under /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby is > ruby-1.8.5.tar.gz (i think it's the update version) >=20 > All ran fine but since 1hour top shows me the following: >=20 > ---- > last pid: 12998; load averages: 0.47, 0.18, 0.06 up 0+03:12:40 > 23:28:35 > 41 processes: 1 running, 40 sleeping > CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.4% interrupt, 98.0= % > idle > Mem: 82M Active, 4340K Inact, 24M Wired, 5268K Cache, 22M Buf, 480K Fre= e > Swap: 231M Total, 126M Used, 105M Free, 54% Inuse, 956K In >=20 > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND= > 12613 root 1 -20 0 123M 87500K swread 6:29 0.05% ruby18 > ---- >=20 > The output of portupgrade -a is also since 1hour: > > stringio.c: c............................. > strscan.c: cc................................ > Generating RI... >=20 >=20 > I use FreeBSD_6.1.RELEASE without the today published > patch for FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl=20 >=20 > What can i do now? I don't want to kill the update process. Dunno > what happens then.... :/ >=20 > Many thanks in advance for any hints > Pascal Bleyler Just some thoughts as others already identified the problem: here's similar thread with some workarounds: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-September/13132= 8.html In the meantime I've found NOPORTDOCS variable - if you don't need ruby docs just disable them (docs are generated during install part) # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby18 # make -DNOPORTDOCS install The install part without docs takes about 30 seconds on 400Mhz/96MB machine (it would take hours otherwise). HTH, Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enig34C2579BF3632CB9AB1F2828 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHURgezeoPAwGIYsRCLyKAJ4n0wNGEBZfPqoRZu6DbPWWp80HKQCfchHV KM/kfer4R7JiY5N6DU4/3Gw= =nKhI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig34C2579BF3632CB9AB1F2828-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 16:08:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BC916A519 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D3243D6D for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8TG6Vvk001044; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:06:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8TG6V6E001043; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:06:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:06:31 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Chris Message-ID: <20060929160631.GE657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Swap Size Importance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:03 -0000 On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:52:58AM -0700, Chris wrote: > As a standard practice, I've always configured swap file to be double > the size of real ram split across system and data disk. For example, > 8gb on da0 and 8gb on da1 if the system has 8g real ram. In practice, > In 7 or 8 years, I've never seen swap used for anything but a few k > of inactive processes and I would imagine if real active process > swapping occurred, it would be an immediate indicator that the system > that isn't responsive enough for use anymore and requires upgrade or > tuning. Can't run a website process off disk and keep anyone coming > to the site ;-). (BTW, I'm talking only about high end servers, not > test boxes where I've seen lots of swapping). > > I'm at the point of attempting my first gvinum software raid-5 and > realized, I need the entire disk storage of all three non-system > drives to avoid pulling an 8gb chunk out of the drive sizes. The > configuration is one scsi 72g system disk and 3 that will be used for > the raid volume. I should mention I turn off dumps, haven't found the > use for that in a production server since it should not be rebooting > or it's back in the shop and another box is taking it's place. > > Is there any shortfall in performance or reliability to running > production with swap equal in size to the 8gb of system memory? I > can't think of any but don't want to make a hard to correct mistake > once this thing goes in. It really depends on the number and size of processes you will be running. It you have a large memory and generally run a mix of processes that will totally fit in memory, then it probably doesn't doesn't matter much. But, if you run enough to actually cause paging - which goes to swap space - then it becomes an issue. Also, I think some things that get pulled to execute often can get left in swap space and accessed more quickly that all the way from main disk each time. eg the system keeps track of what it has in swap and it is more efficient to read from swap - less overhead. But someone else should know more about that than I. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 16:08:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0826716A412 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=oe+shMI+=DM=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from mail.asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D913B43D6A for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=oe+shMI+=DM=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from anonymizer.asarian-host.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8TG8kc7004302 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:08:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: 127.0.0.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) receiver=anonymizer.asarian-host.net; client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=; helo=clientrunner.asarian-host.net; Message-Id: <200609291608.k8TG8hGh004289@asarian-host.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:45 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: IeGca8zjvML3ZeOjQkgN6lXzt4bRoq41nr/dMthfhnWF8mPQ6k4rmd0AfHvuuIe/ X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: "'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUARR1FDTFqW1BleBN9AQF3xAgAj2VbegD8tM0OAoHCYjuwC9d0RUjsB8zh tpdbwNMzwk43xn7pAGmzSXWd32sTRfjqoiplgAwAEgz9Xc4NTUc/hHoiTy6dfvtp l7FWmI1gM43pc45f6ns9tlaOcNdFmVntFsXc+UpQFYcLRGb5vkPXE+PS269JVOVs 2jw1I4lcN3jkJp21bc7f1p1CD4dv6kak2w8I4P22GdmUgGoR8ypC+Ccm/Ab0rFcS tEDFUa5YF676AoO6Jrw4sy0TZPh7WhvZxTko3v8CvwN0Lu8G2msbmn+TI+uax2le ueipzdQo0GDGgvojkbobc6RO4cwg7tdjG/t5rJrdD5O5uN8aD3iTfw== =3kPi Subject: Trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:49 -0000 Hello, Am I the only person having trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? I've been using 4.2 for quite a while. Then I upgraded, a few days back. But a Perl process that actually uses it (BerkeleyDB-0.30) has become unstable. I've been ktracing it, and setting log-points myself, but it keeps core dumping at places where it accesses BerkeleyDB. Sporadically, but often enough. Naturally I compiled BerkeleyDB-0.30 against the correct libraries (in config.in). And it seems more or less ok, but not always. Finally, this morning, I just did a full restore from an earlier date; db44 is not working out for me, obviously. I'm not sure whether it's Berkeley DB version 4.4.20 or BerkeleyDB-0.30, or a combination of the two; but I wonder if someone else has had trouble with it, too? Sometimes I got a weird lock error notice; but otherwise it remains a mystery. - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 16:22:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D34416A580 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40B243D6D for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2006 12:22:32 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,238,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="310818428:sNHT36093208" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id HCZ87097; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:22:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2006 12:22:25 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,238,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="285300502:sNHT34755626" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17693.18027.492817.951831@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:14:35 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <451D443E.7000705@dial.pipex.com> References: <20060929011316.20646.qmail@web54103.mail.yahoo.com> <20060929154826.GC657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <451D443E.7000705@dial.pipex.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090202.451D4832.003A,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.113/2006-07-26 Cc: Subject: Re: minimum requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:22:47 -0000 Alex Zbyslaw writes: > I believe minimum ram is 24Mb but if you can get more... . I'm > sure I used to run 4.X off < 4Gb of disk Sometime around then it was possible* to do a completely bare-bones installation in around 850 mb. This meant one partition, no swap, no X, no sources, no whole-pretty-much-anything not needed to get a) a login prompt and b) connected. Robert Huff * - by report From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 16:55:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0DA16A4C9 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from n054.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1107.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A655943D53 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:48:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n054.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 451CC919000175C8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:47:43 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20060929160631.GE657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20060929160631.GE657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <569ECAEE-4AEF-431B-B724-E734F8EE44E2@cbpratt.prohosting.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:47:31 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: Swap Size Importance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:55:41 -0000 On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:52:58AM -0700, Chris wrote: > >> >> Is there any shortfall in performance or reliability to running >> production with swap equal in size to the 8gb of system memory? I > > doesn't matter much. But, if you run enough to actually cause > paging - which goes to swap space - then it becomes an issue. Also, > I am assuming that real paging of active processes is death to that server anyway and means something else has to be throttled back with tuning of network bufs, apache or mysql. Same for crash dumps, can't run a server that is taking dumps or you lose your traffic. > I think some things that get pulled to execute often can get left > in swap space and accessed more quickly that all the way from main > disk each time. eg the system keeps track of what it has in swap and > it is more efficient to read from swap - less overhead. But someone This is the part that concerned me. If one views a top on well running system and sees no swapping, I wanted to make certain there is no magic going on behind the scenes where processes have been mapped to swap in such a way that I could be currently benefitting from swap being higher than actual and not know it. If top is an accurate read on whether the system has placed high use processes in swap then it would suggest the first post is correct, and a memory rich system, where you configure to never exceed real memory, wastes that storage taken in swap. For expensive drives, given the sizes we use in RAM now, it's hard to justify. In the case of attempting this raid-5 configuration, it equates to the loss of 24G in scsi storage. I will run with 8g on the system drive. Thank you very much for the responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 17:02:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id CA63E16A416; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060929170200.CA63E16A416@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 17:02:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id D044E16A47B; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060929170200.D044E16A47B@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 18:14:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF69116A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@edpausa.com) Received: from skywalker.edpausa.com (mail.edpausa.com [67.88.41.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DFF43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:14:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stas@edpausa.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.edpausa.com [127.0.0.1]) by skywalker.edpausa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D35C9614 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:14:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at edpausa.com Received: from skywalker.edpausa.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (skywalker.edpausa.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JWvNYcp0pj33 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:14:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (stas.edpausa.com [192.168.0.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by skywalker.edpausa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AA0C95E6 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:14:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451D62A0.7010603@edpausa.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:14:56 -0400 From: Stas Khromoy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Thunderbird/1.5.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dell poweregde 2900/2950 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stas@edpausa.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:15:00 -0000 hey folks we're planing to expand, which of course requires us to buy another server. so here is the question are there any known problems with dell PowerEdge 2900/2950 and FreeBSD ? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 18:29:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC86C16A416 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=oe+shMI+=DM=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from mail.asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3AE43D83 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=oe+shMI+=DM=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from anonymizer.asarian-host.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8TITbTL006292 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:29:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: 127.0.0.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) receiver=anonymizer.asarian-host.net; client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=; helo=clientrunner.asarian-host.net; Message-Id: <200609291829.k8TITXpk006276@asarian-host.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:29:37 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: uiknuQbx2BhXR1MY/RJGDy0gM1wrpO/2ShjuXZPsnPKisplnC9cYUD4ydioZ8klz X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: "'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUARR1mETFqW1BleBN9AQEprwf8CgDs6A0/J3QO1HMPFaekbrT6VdPZycgx mcgZ1TOKCdQO+AnPHNh08yATknTjbtgkaKxeYglOXoC1Sh0tQ5U+BhCbUnJubs9I Gmbyd0sgiIeUDncSLRb8PfbpL6WjLG17pgSfoIZ1aVZ2quIVDjpInxZO06jIku8X 1J0afHE2WQix2o3eWsIjbZKBjim2hNvC/62hjQk0rzJbnbnmsqwBAUYwYDf+PTwd MUY9cEggEaX834jAzVHuPEUtEoiyAposu5QiiNQ9D9bBLyjxDNKlvFDZ/Ysgb03E yzHmJt/RR2La2RRIZr1VyRa4FQ/BeC7Xl9kSb7LjmPFdmSFQb3QsOw== =ytag Subject: Trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:29:54 -0000 Hello, Am I the only person having trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? I've been using 4.2 for quite a while. Then I upgraded, a few days back. But a Perl process that actually uses it (BerkeleyDB-0.30) has become unstable. I've been ktracing it, and setting log-points myself, but it keeps core dumping at places where it accesses BerkeleyDB. Sporadically, but often enough. Naturally I compiled BerkeleyDB-0.30 against the correct libraries (in config.in). And it seems more or less ok, but not always. Finally, this morning, I just did a full restore from an earlier date; db44 is not working out for me, obviously. I'm not sure whether it's Berkeley DB version 4.4.20 or BerkeleyDB-0.30, or a combination of the two; but I wonder if someone else has had trouble with it, too? Sometimes I got a weird lock error notice; but otherwise it remains a mystery. - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 18:31:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C21116A574 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4A143D5F for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:31:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:31:04 -0400 id 00056441.451D6668.00011194 Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 14:28:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:31:03 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: stas@edpausa.com Message-Id: <20060929143103.1868de7a.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <451D62A0.7010603@edpausa.com> References: <451D62A0.7010603@edpausa.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dell poweregde 2900/2950 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:31:10 -0000 In response to Stas Khromoy : > hey folks > > we're planing to expand, which of course requires us to buy another server. > so here is the question are there any known problems with dell PowerEdge > 2900/2950 > and FreeBSD ? Yes. Search the various lists and you'll see lots. To summarize our personal experience: 1) Dell's DRAC5 client now works _only_ with Windows/IE -- which means I can't use it from my FreeBSD workstation. 2) The USB drivers in FreeBSD 6.1 don't work right with the DRAC5, which means that you can DRAC in from a Windows workstation, but you have neither keyboard nor mouse. I worked with some developers and the fix is in 6-STABLE, so it will be in 6.2. 3) We're having intermittent problems with the onboard NICs on these units. I have some testing to do Monday to narrow the problem down, but for now, don't trust the onboard NICs to work reliably. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 19:03:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC9516A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chobbs@siloamsprings.com) Received: from [24.248.215.39] (athome.siloamsprings.com [24.248.215.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C8643D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chobbs@siloamsprings.com) Received: from athome.siloamsprings.com by [24.248.215.39] via smtpd (for mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:00:14 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athome.siloamsprings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491E6694083 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athome.siloamsprings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E8A694093 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from athome.siloamsprings.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athome.siloamsprings.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12696-03 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:08:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.5.1.254] (unknown [10.5.1.254]) by athome.siloamsprings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3ED694083 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:08:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from no.name.available by [10.5.1.254] via smtpd (for athome.siloamsprings.com [10.5.1.3]) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:00:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:03:05 -0500 From: "Christopher M. Hobbs" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060929190305.GF818@siloamsprings.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-PGP-Key: http://altbit.org/pseudorandom/keys/officekey.gpg X-PGP-Key-FingerPrint: 75E4 B0C1 EFCB 13E1 ED5B A8B8 E43E AFFD A376 48AF X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at siloamsprings.com Subject: printer recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:03:50 -0000 --eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Could anyone recommend a good desktop laser jet printer that is known to work under FreeBSD. I don't mind if it's an older model. I'd like to go cheap with it. I will be printing black and white planning sheets, and portions of books. =20 Is there a list of printers that are useable under FreeBSD somewhere? Thank you for your time! cmh --=20 Christopher M. Hobbs IS Technician, City of Siloam Springs chobbs@siloamsprings.com, (479).524.5136 --eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFHW3j5D6v/aN2SK8RAhSLAKD2GnkShG1a9CAKQ+eQuKHBp2MU/wCeMc// NGRa45LG1m9qhhV5n/LX52A= =U1MF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 19:12:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CBC16A47C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from corinth.polands.org (CPE-72-129-222-120.new.res.rr.com [72.129.222.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DCC43D8A for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:12:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from email.polands.org (ammon.polands.org [172.16.1.7]) by corinth.polands.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8TJCZKa008259; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:12:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from 209.103.215.99 (proxying for 209.103.215.99) (SquirrelMail authenticated user djp) by email.polands.org with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:12:35 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <58353.209.103.215.99.1159557155.squirrel@email.polands.org> In-Reply-To: <20060929190305.GF818@siloamsprings.com> References: <20060929190305.GF818@siloamsprings.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:12:35 -0500 (CDT) From: "Doug Poland" To: "Christopher M. Hobbs" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1950/Thu Sep 28 09:11:54 2006 on corinth.polands.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:12:53 -0000 On Fri, September 29, 2006 14:03, Christopher M. Hobbs wrote: > Could anyone recommend a good desktop laser jet printer that is known > to work under FreeBSD. I don't mind if it's an older model. I'd > like to go cheap with it. > I've got an HP-4050 LaserJet (addin JetDirect) at home that works great. At one office, I just installed an HP-1320 (duplexing/built-in JetDirect) and it works great too. I ran both of using postscript with lp but have recently switched to CUPS without issue. I've always purchased printers that speak postscript then configuration and usage is a snap. -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 19:16:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F3616A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason+lists.freebsd-questions@lixfeld.ca) Received: from eshara.ebit.ca (eshara.ebit.ca [69.90.17.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E651B43D68 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason+lists.freebsd-questions@lixfeld.ca) Received: from beta.arionetworks.ca ([216.7.194.254] helo=[192.168.100.190]) by eshara.ebit.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1GTNqG-000PSr-1R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:16:12 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jason Lixfeld Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:15:50 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: 6.1-RELEASE compiler/preprocessor problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:16:14 -0000 Not claiming to know much about anything, but can't seem to get this to compile. The only things that stand out are the preprocessor error (which I don't know enough about to even begin to troubleshoot) and the tiffio.h no such file error. I can vouch for the existence of the tiffio.h in /usr/local/include, but not sure if that's actually where it's trying to find it. [root@julian /usr/ports/net/iaxmodem]# uname -a FreeBSD julian 6.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 #2: Sat Aug 19 15:24:32 EDT 2006 root@julian:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JULIAN amd64 [root at julian /usr/ports/net/iaxmodem]# make ===> Patching for iaxmodem-0.1.14 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for iaxmodem-0.1.14 ===> iaxmodem-0.1.14 depends on shared library: tiff.4 - found ===> Configuring for iaxmodem-0.1.14 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root - g wheel ... checking tiffio.h usability... yes checking tiffio.h presence... no configure: WARNING: tiffio.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor! configure: WARNING: tiffio.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for tiffio.h... yes ... cc -DMODEMVER=\"iaxmodem-0.1.14\" -DDSPVER=\"spandsp-0.0.3- snapshot-20060707+\" -DIAXVER=\"libiax2-0.2.3-CVS-20060222+\" -Wall - g -DSTATICLIBS -D_GNU_SOURCE -std=c99 -Ilib/libiax2/src -Ilib/ spandsp/src -O2 -pipe -march=nocona -c iaxmodem.c iaxmodem.c:53:20: tiffio.h: No such file or directory In file included from lib/spandsp/src/spandsp.h:84, from iaxmodem.c:55: lib/spandsp/src/spandsp/t4.h:97: error: syntax error before "TIFF" iaxmodem.c: In function `printlog': iaxmodem.c:156: warning: implicit declaration of function `va_start' iaxmodem.c:158: warning: implicit declaration of function `va_end' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/iaxmodem/work/iaxmodem-0.1.14. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/iaxmodem. [root@julian /usr/ports/net/iaxmodem]# ls -al /usr/local/include/ tiffio.h* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 19711 Sep 17 18:17 /usr/local/include/ tiffio.h -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1610 Sep 17 18:17 /usr/local/include/ tiffio.hxx [root@julian /usr/ports/net/iaxmodem]# [root@julian /usr/ports/net/iaxmodem/work/iaxmodem-0.1.14]# grep tiffio * iaxmodem.c:#include Anyone have any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 19:21:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A4D16A4C9 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3163443D70 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:21:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEE11A3C1C; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7D80C51309; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:21:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:21:43 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jason Lixfeld Message-ID: <20060929192143.GA34402@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-RELEASE compiler/preprocessor problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:21:53 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Not claiming to know much about anything, but can't seem to get this =20 > to compile. The only things that stand out are the preprocessor =20 > error (which I don't know enough about to even begin to troubleshoot) =20 > and the tiffio.h no such file error. I can vouch for the existence =20 > of the tiffio.h in /usr/local/include, but not sure if that's =20 > actually where it's trying to find it. It's not, as the lack of -I/usr/local/include says. This is supposed to be provided by the port Makefile: CFLAGS+=3D -I${LOCALBASE}/include so make sure all files in the port are up-to-date and you have made no other changes yourself. If you still have problems, your first point of call for port problems should be the port maintainer, since they're the ones who have volunteered to help users with problems about that port. Kris --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFHXJGWry0BWjoQKURAqFMAKCPgLxXm+u+LncATJNfyEP38WG6pwCgodbr hHfXNJ/gWBDihsyNCziVpUA= =sJ6V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 19:43:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0307616A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason+lists.freebsd-questions@lixfeld.ca) Received: from eshara.ebit.ca (eshara.ebit.ca [69.90.17.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C19743DA1 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:43:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason+lists.freebsd-questions@lixfeld.ca) Received: from beta.arionetworks.ca ([216.7.194.254] helo=[192.168.100.190]) by eshara.ebit.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1GTOGb-000Ph3-Eh; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:43:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060929192143.GA34402@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060929192143.GA34402@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Lixfeld Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:43:21 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-RELEASE compiler/preprocessor problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:43:50 -0000 On 29-Sep-06, at 3:21 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > >> Not claiming to know much about anything, but can't seem to get this >> to compile. The only things that stand out are the preprocessor >> error (which I don't know enough about to even begin to troubleshoot) >> and the tiffio.h no such file error. I can vouch for the existence >> of the tiffio.h in /usr/local/include, but not sure if that's >> actually where it's trying to find it. > > It's not, as the lack of -I/usr/local/include says. This is supposed > to be provided by the port Makefile: > > CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include This is in the makefile. > so make sure all files in the port are up-to-date and you have made no > other changes yourself. No changes. Just to be sure, I will re-cvsup that port. > If you still have problems, your first point of call for port problems > should be the port maintainer, since they're the ones who have > volunteered to help users with problems about that port. Good point. Thank you! > Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 20:42:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1574916A417 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4971343D45 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2006 20:42:32 -0000 Received: from ip5455cdbf.speed.planet.nl (EHLO [10.0.0.4]) [84.85.205.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 22:42:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <451D8549.7030503@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:42:49 +0200 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060706) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: aterm + Xfce + Composite / Transparency X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:42:35 -0000 I have a question regarding to aterm and 'true-transparency'. I'm running Xfce 4.4 BETA2 and I have enabled the composite manager. Everything runs fine alltough I have one wish left: I would like to start new aterms by default at 70% transparency: I allready enabled the 'fake'-transparency in aterm itself ( -tr -sh X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6006A16A417 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewgould@yahoo.com) Received: from web35307.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35307.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA42B43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrewgould@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 86715 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2006 20:45:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y0QMtq97j5992lAOh4J+GltHoBpNmRdX8V0siMW4nXdpMsd5sFj/bWnluqGdjSx4nb+8ruKgpAVNrzNJuZ/H5gPmXzC8NwVk96fBUE5+GItCWYh5uE9MBi3mR3fBMJt0JEQYwSNKuqtw1/lmm6THBodxOFzvVy3QtnRzhumEZmo= ; Message-ID: <20060929204558.86713.qmail@web35307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [206.255.31.21] by web35307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:45:58 PDT Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:45:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Gould To: "Christopher M. Hobbs" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060929190305.GF818@siloamsprings.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: printer recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:45:59 -0000 --- "Christopher M. Hobbs" wrote: > Could anyone recommend a good desktop laser jet > printer that is known to > work under FreeBSD. I don't mind if it's an older > model. I'd like to > go cheap with it. > > I will be printing black and white planning sheets, > and portions of > books. > > Is there a list of printers that are useable under > FreeBSD somewhere? > > Thank you for your time! > cmh > -- > Christopher M. Hobbs > IS Technician, City of Siloam Springs > chobbs@siloamsprings.com, (479).524.5136 > If the printer works with Linux over the network or via parallel port, then it probably works fine with FreeBSD. If a USB printer works with Linux but not with FreeBSD, you can often get around the USB incompatibility by attaching the printer to a print server. Here's a searchable database of printers that are compatible with Linux. http://www.linuxprinting.org/printer_list.cgi I have a Oki B4350 printer (mono color laser) and an HP Photosmart 7150 that are attached to a Hawking Technology HPS12U print server. I use CUPS for printing in FreeBSD. This setup works great! Both HP and Okidata have been good about releasing PPD files (printer configuration files used by CUPS) for their printers. It's good that you're only looking for a laser printer. I've heard that compatibility issues with all-in-one printers can be a real pain. I hope this helps. Andrew L. Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 21:33:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A4A16A407 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from cprobd02.vailsys.com (cprobd02.vailsys.com [63.210.102.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C0843D45 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:33:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dfsfbd06.vail (dfsfbd06.vail [192.168.129.190]) by cprobd02.vailsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C73CE4F6; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:33:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dfwdamian.vail [192.168.129.233]) by dfsfbd06.vail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42379323E8D; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:33:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dwiest@localhost.vail [127.0.0.1]) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8TL463Q000203; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:04:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from dwiest@localhost) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8TL457j013170; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:04:05 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dfwdamian.vail: dwiest set sender to dwiest@vailsys.com using -f Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:04:05 -0500 From: Damian Wiest To: "Christopher M. Hobbs" Message-ID: <20060929210405.GG3332@dfwdamian.vail> References: <20060929190305.GF818@siloamsprings.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060929190305.GF818@siloamsprings.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:33:32 -0000 On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:03:05PM -0500, Christopher M. Hobbs wrote: > Could anyone recommend a good desktop laser jet printer that is known to > work under FreeBSD. I don't mind if it's an older model. I'd like to > go cheap with it. > > I will be printing black and white planning sheets, and portions of > books. > > Is there a list of printers that are useable under FreeBSD somewhere? > > Thank you for your time! > cmh > -- > Christopher M. Hobbs > IS Technician, City of Siloam Springs > chobbs@siloamsprings.com, (479).524.5136 I'm a fan of the (older) Hewlett Packard printers. I've got an HP LaserJet 4550 at home that I picked up on eBay, but that's probably overkill for you. I'd recommend sticking to Postscript printers with network interfaces. Be sure to check what maintaining the thing is going to cost you. -Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 21:53:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C3E16A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from smarthost3.sa.chariot.net.au (smarthost3.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487A143D67 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:52:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.qld.chariot.net.au (mail.qld.chariot.net.au [203.87.95.166]) by smarthost3.sa.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08050102031 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:22:54 +0930 (CST) Received: from localhost (avs2.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.8]) by mail.qld.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B514E87E for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:52:54 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail.qld.chariot.net.au ([203.87.95.166]) by localhost (avs2.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.8]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06129-01-86 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:22:54 +0930 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (static-203-87-66-248.qld.chariot.net.au [203.87.66.248]) by mail.qld.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82BA4E876 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:52:53 +1000 (EST) From: Warren Liddell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:56:40 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609300756.41186.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at chariot.net.au Subject: Portupgrade of varios KDE fails in Subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:53:04 -0000 Im running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE, got a few KDE packages to update, but fail due to Subversion .. below is the error .. any help//assistance is greatly appreciated. ============ any useful scripts will be installed into /usr/local/share/subversion ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for subversion-1.4.0_1 => MD5 Checksum OK for subversion/subversion-1.4.0.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for subversion/subversion-1.4.0.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for subversion-1.4.0_1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for subversion-1.4.0_1 ===> subversion-1.4.0_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found ===> subversion-1.4.0_1 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found ===> subversion-1.4.0_1 depends on shared library: neon.25 - found ===> subversion-1.4.0_1 depends on shared library: apr-1.2 - found ===> subversion-1.4.0_1 depends on shared library: intl - found ===> Configuring for subversion-1.4.0_1 You should build `devel/apr-svn' with db4 support to use subversion with it. Please rebuild `devel/apr-svn' with option `APR_UTIL_WITH_BERKELEY_DB=yes' and try again. Or you can disable db4 support. Only 'fs' repository backend will be available. To disable db4 support, define WITHOUT_BDB. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/subversion. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdesdk3. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.74901.111 env PORT_UPGRADE=yes make BATCH=yes DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 22:09:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE7916A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:09:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51114.mail.yahoo.com (web51114.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 666BE43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:09:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 38050 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2006 22:08:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=k1/0trb49BF2tkbfhwyPXuYT5BCfx+qSCa1/k4iUjq3ulzUIGwg/npVIBb7HMmR6EUf8L6iXyFcmB04eIABZ6PYTiiSDW/LPRRM/EqYqk9KBWnGCAbUDCRGRum0icpbcQoSmeBeN/kHrFerQrgvCM+qpP70ynd1ZGmL/MTfc1cg= ; Message-ID: <20060929220853.38048.qmail@web51114.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [82.170.181.144] by web51114.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:08:53 PDT Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:08:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: backup existing sata drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:09:13 -0000 Good evening peeps, I have this 80gb sata seagate harddisk in my freebsd amd64 system. This harddisk is partioned so I can dual boot with Ubuntu. So I have data on my freebsd partition as well as on my ubuntu partition. As I'm getting paranoia, I would like to know how to get by this situation, now that I've ordered a new sata seagate 80gb harddrive. I waant to use this extra drive as a backup solution. What options do I have? a) Can I just plug the new hard drive in and write a script that dumps the entire /usr/ directory onto the new hard drive? But what about my ubuntu partition then? b) Should I use raid-1, disk mirroring for this situation, knowing I will "loose" a whole 80gb disk? Will it work for the entire disk? What about the fact that I'm NOT starting with two empty disks? Hope anyone can help me out. I've never been there, so these will be my first steps. Thanks in advanced __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 22:30:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A120B16A4EA for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (webmail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C48C43D76 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:30:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [10.2.1.103] (wsip-70-167-34-18.ks.ks.cox.net [70.167.34.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAB4114333 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:32:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:29:57 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060929143103.1868de7a.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <451D62A0.7010603@edpausa.com> <20060929143103.1868de7a.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========28D481527AF3D6B2EEBA==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: dell poweregde 2900/2950 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:30:00 -0000 --==========28D481527AF3D6B2EEBA========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On September 29, 2006 2:31:03 PM -0400 Bill Moran=20 wrote: > > 3) We're having intermittent problems with the onboard NICs on these > units. I have some testing to do Monday to narrow the problem down, > but for now, don't trust the onboard NICs to work reliably. Bill, if those are the Broadcomm Extreme NICs (bce), you need to grab the=20 new version of the if_bce.c file. It fixed the problems that I had with=20 the NICs. There's a char inside the file that defines the version - you=20 need 0.9.6. You've got 0.9.5, I'll bet. I posted about it on the 16th. See this web page: Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========28D481527AF3D6B2EEBA==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 23:25:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22E316A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0A543D72 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [172.23.170.136] (helo=anti-virus01-07) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTRjm-0003T1-2v; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:25:46 +0100 Received: from [82.35.115.93] (helo=[192.168.10.60]) by asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1GTRjl-0000E3-JD; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:25:45 +0100 Message-ID: <451DAB78.5030409@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:25:44 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Murray Taylor References: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F11EF75F@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> In-Reply-To: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F11EF75F@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone used this mobo with 6.1 ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:25:48 -0000 Murray Taylor wrote: > ASUS P5LD2-VM-DH/C > > No but I recently bought another Asus board A8N-VM CSM/NBP and the BIOS is broken. Another board A8N-VM CSM had an almost identical broken BIOS which Asus fixed at some point. However Asus have now informed me that FreeBSD is not supported for my board. (It does actually work with a clever fix someone posted but Asus don't want to know). Asus seem to have a bit of a name for crap BIOS's. Moral: make sure you tell the retailer you want to use it with another operating system than Windows and make them agree to take it back if it doesn't work. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 23:32:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B0116A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dprobd02.vailsys.com (dprobd02.vailsys.com [63.149.73.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9328943D7B for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:32:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwiest@vailsys.com) Received: from dfsfbd06.vail (dfsfbd06.vail [192.168.129.190]) by dprobd02.vailsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E798A5C59; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:32:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dfwdamian.vail [192.168.129.233]) by dfsfbd06.vail (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BF5323EA0; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:31:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dfwdamian.vail (dwiest@localhost.vail [127.0.0.1]) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8TNA4GV005763; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:10:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from dwiest@localhost) by dfwdamian.vail (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8TNA4oK009759; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:10:04 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dfwdamian.vail: dwiest set sender to dwiest@vailsys.com using -f Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:10:04 -0500 From: Damian Wiest To: Dino Vliet Message-ID: <20060929231004.GH3332@dfwdamian.vail> References: <20060929220853.38048.qmail@web51114.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060929220853.38048.qmail@web51114.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backup existing sata drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:32:13 -0000 On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 03:08:53PM -0700, Dino Vliet wrote: > Good evening peeps, > I have this 80gb sata seagate harddisk in my freebsd > amd64 system. This harddisk is partioned so I can dual > boot with Ubuntu. So I have data on my freebsd > partition as well as on my ubuntu partition. > > As I'm getting paranoia, I would like to know how to > get by this situation, now that I've ordered a new > sata seagate 80gb harddrive. > > I waant to use this extra drive as a backup solution. > What options do I have? Do you want to do real backups, or just do point in time recovery? > a) Can I just plug the new hard drive in and write a > script that dumps the entire /usr/ directory onto the > new hard drive? But what about my ubuntu partition > then? If you go this route, you'll probably want to use dump(8) for your filesystems. Just name the output file according to the filesystem and date when the dump was performed. > b) Should I use raid-1, disk mirroring for this > situation, knowing I will "loose" a whole 80gb disk? > Will it work for the entire disk? What about the fact > that I'm NOT starting with two empty disks? > > Hope anyone can help me out. > I've never been there, so these will be my first > steps. > > Thanks in advanced I've only used it for a few months, but I'm a big fan of the GEOM(4) framework. With gmirror(8), you can specify specific disk slices to mirror so you don't have to do the entire drive. It should take you less than five minutes to setup once you've read the docs. -Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 00:37:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F6F16A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0140143D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:37:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c220-239-234-69.thorn1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.234.69]) by mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8U0bXw4028056; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:37:38 +1000 Message-ID: <451DBC6F.4070403@mawer.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:38:07 -1000 From: Antony Mawer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard References: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> <451CBF41.1010208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <451D0B1F.5090705@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <451D0B1F.5090705@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:37:41 -0000 On 29/09/2006 2:01 AM, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On the other hand, the duplicates could be the result of people >> deliberately >> trying to frig the statistics or just innocently running the >> 300.statistics >> script manually several times. In either case, entries with duplicate >> tokens >> should be discarded -- I guess you'ld always want to keep just the >> last entry >> for any token. > > How is the country determined? by whois lookup? I am just surprised that > after the wipe and required update of the stats-script, Panama has 75% > of the hosts, 10 times the US. Via the GeoIP module. Marc's servers are mostly/all located in Panama (hub.org), hence why they're in there quickly after the stats wipe :-) --Antony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 00:50:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714FB16A4A7 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292B743D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:50:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GTT3n-000Pwg-By for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:50:31 -0400 Received: from 71.56.92.181 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com) by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:50:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1424.71.56.92.181.1159577431.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:50:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jerry Bell" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: Trouble with new poweredge 2950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:50:32 -0000 I just got a PE 2950 and I'm having some problems. I installed 6.2PRE and it went well. The first thing I noticed is that immediate as BSD start to load, a bold/highlighted message says "768xxx bytes above 4G ignore" or something like that (don't recall what xxx was. Next thing I noticed whilest trying a buildworld against the latest stable sources. My system detects 8 cpus. It actually only has 4 - 2 dual core xeons. I'm guessing that the others are from hyperthreading, but I'm not certain. Hyperthreading is disabled by default, I believe. So, in the process of make buildworld -j 32, I noticed that only even numbered CPUs are being used (0,2,4,6). Is that because BSD is ignoring the HT CPUs, which would be 1,3,5,7? top and iostat both show that I was never able to exceed 50% overall CPU usage. Is that because even though I have the HT representations disabled, the OS is using their availabilty in calculating % idle time? Is there any way to get an accurate number? The PE doesn't let me disable HT, I don't believe. Finally, after the upgrade, I'm having a problem with the system hanging on startup right after the firewall message, and sometimes right after the CD ROM detection message. I believe that the SAS controller is supposed to be detected next, and I'm assuming that's the problem. When I first tried to install, I used 6.1, and it completely didn't recognize my SAS controller. I found a message in the archives that suggested trying the latest stable source, so I tried 6.2 and it worked. Any ideas what could be causing the problem? When I was using the 6.2PRE ISO, I had to restart a few times before it got past that stage also. Thanks much! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 01:06:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3733E16A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BA443D69 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:06:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162253A466C; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:06:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51485-04; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:04:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-86-60.eastlink.ca [24.137.86.60]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3F53A466D; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:04:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBEE39667; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:04:51 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:04:50 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Joao Barros , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0609290411x2927f852m7f649f22c596119@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060928232533.Y51847@ganymede.hub.org> <70e8236f0609290411x2927f852m7f649f22c596119@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: BSDStats v4.0: Attempt to address some major issues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:06:11 -0000 Antony is working on operating system sub-pages that will be linked from the operating system summary page ... check out what he has so far by going to: http://www.bsdstats.org/freebsd --On Friday, September 29, 2006 12:11:51 +0100 Joao Barros wrote: > On 9/29/06, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> As painful as it was to do, I backed up the old data tonight and wiped out >> the stats ... for one major reason: the stats lost their accuracy. >> >> As I said, you just need to download the new version and run it, you don't >> have to wait for the port to go through, assuming you have already >> installed from the port and /etc/periodic.conf is setup ... >> >> Make sure you run it right after downloading though ... >> >> If anyone out there can see a flaw in the script ... or something that I >> may have overlooked as far as a 'loophole' that could be used to screw >> around with the data, please let me know ... I know its not possible, >> minus registration, to get rid of all holes, but, hopefully I've now >> gotten rid of the ones that a truck could (and did) drive though ... >> > > I just updated the script and it ran fine :) > I'm the only guy yet from Portugal and the only sparc cpu :D > > On another subject, with the addition of the other BSDs the releases > stats for example are pretty much nonsense. Do you plan to work on > that? > > -- > Joao Barros ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 01:47:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6088B16A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BCF43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8TMkGE6090204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:46:17 -0800 (AKDT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <451DA238.4070402@mac.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:46:16 -0800 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dino Vliet References: <20060929220853.38048.qmail@web51114.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060929220853.38048.qmail@web51114.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backup existing sata drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:47:59 -0000 On 2006/09/29 14:08, Dino Vliet seems to have typed: > I waant to use this extra drive as a backup solution. > What options do I have? Dump is an excellent solution if you can mount all partitions (see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-basics.html for details on using dump) DD would be another option that would copy the entire hard drive sector by sector, regardless of the partitions. If you are interested in basically a "mirror" sort of situation without running RAID, dd is what you are looking for. dd doesn't care what the partitions are, indeed you could even backup Microsoft partitions with it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=dd&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE&format=html basically: dd if=/dev/sourcedisk of=/dev/backupdisk bs=1m From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 01:51:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD86416A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from captainspam@speakeasy.net) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925CD43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:51:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from captainspam@speakeasy.net) Received: (qmail 9129 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2006 01:51:55 -0000 Received: from dsl093-002-115.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) (captainspam@[66.93.2.115]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Sep 2006 01:51:55 -0000 Message-ID: <451DCDB9.1090306@speakeasy.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:51:53 -0400 From: Nicholas Killewald User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Empty dmesg output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:51:55 -0000 Is there any situation in which dmesg should give no output whatsoever? Currently, my FreeBSD machine (RELEASE-6.0) isn't reporting anything at all when I call up dmesg. It has been on for quite some time, and to the best of my knowledge there isn't much of interest it should have reported recently. It DID say something back at its initial bootup and for some time thereafter, but nothing now. Is this normal, or should I be a bit concerned? -- Nicholas Killewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 02:00:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123C216A47C for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D81443D69 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k8U20JEq086787; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:00:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:00:19 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Nicholas Killewald Message-ID: <20060930020018.GB77128@dan.emsphone.com> References: <451DCDB9.1090306@speakeasy.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <451DCDB9.1090306@speakeasy.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Empty dmesg output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:00:35 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 29), Nicholas Killewald said: > Is there any situation in which dmesg should give no output whatsoever? > Currently, my FreeBSD machine (RELEASE-6.0) isn't reporting anything > at all when I call up dmesg. It has been on for quite some time, and to > the best of my knowledge there isn't much of interest it should have > reported recently. It DID say something back at its initial bootup and > for some time thereafter, but nothing now. Is this normal, or should I > be a bit concerned? Things printed to the console (via syslog or writing to /dev/console) get logged to the dmesg buffer but aren't printed by the dmesg command. If you've had lots of console output all your kernel messages may have been pushed out. Try running "dmesg -a" to see the raw buffer. You can see the kernel bootup log at /var/run/dmesg.boot . -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 02:00:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D9F16A40F for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mxsf37.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf37.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA8B43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mxip12a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip12a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.142]) by mxsf37.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8U20ju5026970 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:00:45 -0400 Received: from 24-159-55-136.dhcp.jcsn.tn.charter.com (HELO [192.168.1.6]) ([24.159.55.136]) by mxip12a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2006 22:00:43 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,238,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="969206772:sNHT1655062804" Message-ID: <451DCFD4.3070408@wilderness.homeip.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:00:52 -0500 From: Laurence Sanford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060926) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Can't ping localhost? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:00:47 -0000 Anyone got any ideas on this? lauasanf@colossus(~)$ ping 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address ^C --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss lauasanf@colossus(~)$ ifconfig lo0 lo0: flags=8008 mtu 16384 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 02:20:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B83316A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from captainspam@speakeasy.net) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE3F43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:20:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from captainspam@speakeasy.net) Received: (qmail 9408 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2006 02:20:54 -0000 Received: from dsl093-002-115.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) (captainspam@[66.93.2.115]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Sep 2006 02:20:54 -0000 Message-ID: <451DD485.8020802@speakeasy.net> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:20:53 -0400 From: Nicholas Killewald User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <451DCDB9.1090306@speakeasy.net> <20060930020018.GB77128@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20060930020018.GB77128@dan.emsphone.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Empty dmesg output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:20:55 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Sep 29), Nicholas Killewald said: >> Is there any situation in which dmesg should give no output whatsoever? >> Currently, my FreeBSD machine (RELEASE-6.0) isn't reporting anything >> at all when I call up dmesg. It has been on for quite some time, and to >> the best of my knowledge there isn't much of interest it should have >> reported recently. It DID say something back at its initial bootup and >> for some time thereafter, but nothing now. Is this normal, or should I >> be a bit concerned? > > Things printed to the console (via syslog or writing to /dev/console) > get logged to the dmesg buffer but aren't printed by the dmesg command. > If you've had lots of console output all your kernel messages may have > been pushed out. Try running "dmesg -a" to see the raw buffer. You > can see the kernel bootup log at /var/run/dmesg.boot . > Aha... that makes sense. Yep, that was it, the console messages must've flooded out any kernel messages. Thanks! -- Nicholas Killewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 03:47:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4DF16A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darehanl@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DA843D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:47:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darehanl@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1132385wxd for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:47:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qbuhZcn5+RX3ZBLGgIIPUcJsxoISw3grt2AXKB+lFgW74ULt9NoZFQacA0wxFaZxjUe8WmHJJjyRWLwEY6G/bXTKljMZK1rsLHIdglSzJqYozmUJ2FM8EOsxyApUVI56TnTmf/BKYgj47GO4o0W+AkEhOA5ADjpmRJERH53TzW0= Received: by 10.70.29.2 with SMTP id c2mr6450452wxc; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.51? ( [67.191.242.111]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 45sm4281322wri.2006.09.29.20.47.28; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <451DE8FD.40104@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:48:13 -0400 From: Sunjae Park User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Trouble with setting up Netgear WG311v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:47:30 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've installed FreeBSD 6.1 and am trying to get my wireless adapter working. It's a Netgear WG311v3, so unfortunately ath(4) will not work (It uses a Marvell chipset). I've tried various options (honest!). 1. The Yukon driver from Marvell. They have one for 6, and I've tried loading it with kldload, and it loads alright, but the adapter won't come up. The driver says it's for Yukon and I have a Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88w8335 [Libertas] (output from Linux). Maybe it's for a different chipset? Their Readme says I should remove module "sk" from the kernel, so I rebuilt it; still no luck. 2. ndis-gen with the Netgear drivers. The adapter comes up now, but I cannot associate with any AP. ifconfig ndis0 up scan ifconfig ndis0 ssid ssid_of_ap ifconfig ndis0 ssid ssid_of_ap bssid 00:00:... all exit with a ndis0: bssid_list failed Thanks - -- Sunjae Park. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHej9F5GVw6qpYDcRApA6AJ9vnYrh8ZR/V8SjcZVh4qCie9M0zgCcCTz8 l/x02ayNp2EN4eikse1P5Q0= =/4C+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 05:56:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4F716A416 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63C443D49 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 32668456D; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:56:51 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:56:27 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2864596.9JyOf0NkU3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609292156.49675.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> Subject: Floppy drive problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:56:53 -0000 --nextPart2864596.9JyOf0NkU3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I rarely use them, but I have a floppy I needed to format and copy to. The= =20 problem is anything I try with the drive results in this error: Processing fdformat: ioctl(FD_FORM): Device not configured It shows up fine in dmesg, and I've used it before. fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on= =20 isa0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 These are brand new disks. Does anyone have a suggestion? BTW, I'm running the latest -CURRENT Thanks, Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart2864596.9JyOf0NkU3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFHgchR5sEeCt9j00RAidtAKCfd3fYBaYY20UfLL3EQOG+QHoqzgCcC6Zo 8jX15ySsoBNdUo024PCnriE= =PlAU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2864596.9JyOf0NkU3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 08:09:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D195416A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AC0043D49 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:09:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2006 08:09:51 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.2.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 30 Sep 2006 10:09:51 +0200 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <451E2662.9020500@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:10:10 +0200 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060706) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sunjae Park References: <451DE8FD.40104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <451DE8FD.40104@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble with setting up Netgear WG311v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:09:53 -0000 Sunjae Park wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, I've installed FreeBSD 6.1 and am trying to get my wireless adapter > working. It's a Netgear WG311v3, so unfortunately ath(4) will not work > (It uses a Marvell chipset). I've tried various options (honest!). > > 1. The Yukon driver from Marvell. They have one for 6, and I've tried > loading it with kldload, and it loads alright, but the adapter won't > come up. The driver says it's for Yukon and I have a Ethernet > controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88w8335 [Libertas] (output > from Linux). Maybe it's for a different chipset? > > Their Readme says I should remove module "sk" from the kernel, so I > rebuilt it; still no luck. > > 2. ndis-gen with the Netgear drivers. The adapter comes up now, but I > cannot associate with any AP. > > ifconfig ndis0 up scan > ifconfig ndis0 ssid ssid_of_ap > ifconfig ndis0 ssid ssid_of_ap bssid 00:00:... > > all exit with a > > ndis0: bssid_list failed > > Thanks > > - -- > Sunjae Park. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFFHej9F5GVw6qpYDcRApA6AJ9vnYrh8ZR/V8SjcZVh4qCie9M0zgCcCTz8 > l/x02ayNp2EN4eikse1P5Q0= > =/4C+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I have the same NIC here and I had it working ( allthough there were some issues ... : after some uptime, say a week, the NIC didn't react anymore so you had to unload the kernelmodule most of the time resulting in a system-hang :S ). I used it for adhoc-connections only so I'm not sure if it would have the same problems, but at least I could scan. Anyway, you're free to use the kernel-module I build if you want to : http://fstaals.net/junk/wg311v3xp/ Good luck, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 09:56:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55DB16A417 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vpaces@chello.sk) Received: from viefep17-int.chello.at (viefep16-int.chello.at [213.46.255.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CCE43D55 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vpaces@chello.sk) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with SMTP id <20060930095650.NMHP18728.viefep17-int.chello.at@localhost> for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:56:50 +0200 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.16 (webedge20-101-1106-20040809) X-Originating-IP: [85.216.154.110] From: To: Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:56:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20060930095650.NMHP18728.viefep17-int.chello.at@localhost> Cc: Subject: Question:socket sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:56:53 -0000 Dear FreeBSD team, I decided to contact you because I cannot find some system call C modules for a very long time. I'd like to ask you where can I find sources containing code for socket related system calls like socket, accept, bind, connect .... with interfaces described on FreeBSD MAN pages (system calls). For example: int socket(int domain, int type, int protocol); int bind(int s, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen); Browsing through your WWW CVS repository I'm just finding sources for MAN pages in directory / src / lib / libc / sys: access.2, connect.2 and so on. But where are the C sources of these calls? Or are the sources of these system calls not available? Thanks for your answer. Best regards, Viliam Paces. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 10:11:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438A616A415 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51104.mail.yahoo.com (web51104.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4C0143D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 61134 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Sep 2006 10:11:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Dw64YohShyukIxDeB5g4Ob6P6frELWLWFP1T/nBByBFzQp9gxEeAuQ7rm/hqYeObDvZV1rG35raHrs4F4ABEjPn0/dYnesSmIjXRw5AKgB1Ytk2ns79bA30vz/ioN9MnDa5kRxF3ceKHjOeXDvGkV/D9i5kuoPNZNZTSF+/qSpE= ; Message-ID: <20060930101139.61132.qmail@web51104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [82.170.181.144] by web51104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:11:39 PDT Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:11:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: "Peter A. Giessel" In-Reply-To: <451DA238.4070402@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backup existing sata drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:11:40 -0000 Thanks for your answer. I can mount all the partitions (ubuntu via the mount_ext2fs command). So, I could use DD, but then I would have to do this every time I want to be synchronized. This would be the firts thing I could try, when the disk drive arrives. Then I would know I have at least a copy of the full disk. Hmm, I have to think this over, but nice knowing this is an option. --- "Peter A. Giessel" wrote: > On 2006/09/29 14:08, Dino Vliet seems to have typed: > > I waant to use this extra drive as a backup > solution. > > What options do I have? > > > Dump is an excellent solution if you can mount all > partitions > (see > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-basics.html > for details on using dump) > > DD would be another option that would copy the > entire hard drive sector > by sector, regardless of the partitions. If you are > interested in > basically a "mirror" sort of situation without > running RAID, dd is what > you are looking for. > > dd doesn't care what the partitions are, indeed you > could even backup > Microsoft partitions with it. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=dd&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE&format=html > > basically: > dd if=/dev/sourcedisk of=/dev/backupdisk bs=1m > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 11:59:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790A716A415 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luchezar.petkov@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D879843D5A for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:59:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luchezar.petkov@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so1215836nfc for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 04:59:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; b=UPsjnQgHcUCk6xTGh7c3mJwhN7qk7QE7bS0Rwd9pWYW7/oPtM4bKcbA5o/yzafhK4n6Lb/QQIFD1CjqDRchdx5tM7SVFxX/vt2VA7G3te3m38ACJmYWKPID84TFxPS3ffVN1Ze08qs1METUyEEQ7jGcXL+sMBsoWWBjUu0FT5AI= Received: by 10.49.92.18 with SMTP id u18mr2962528nfl; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 04:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [85.217.148.22]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h1sm9947719nfe.2006.09.30.04.59.08; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 04:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:58:45 +0300 From: Luchezar Petkov To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20060930115845.GA88339@lilly.evo.bg> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: USB IrDA Adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:59:11 -0000 Hello all, I really need your help. I've just brought my first USB IrDA adapter to conncect my phone (Sony Ericsson K300i) to my computer. It is recognized by FreeBSD (6.2 beta 1) :: ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 -- addr 1: OHCI root hub, SiS uhub1 addr 2: USB-Serial Controller, Prolific Technology Inc. ugen0 And... What to do now? How to take the pictures from my photo camera? How to put files on my phone? I don't know what to do.. Any ideas? Thank you. -- Luchezar P. Petkov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 12:56:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7228116A415 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E100343D67 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:56:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A2E9E661 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CD6CCED20 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GTeOj-00071X-00 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20060930125653.GA26969@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 08:54:34 up 166 days, 9:57, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:56:58 -0000 The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in order to install Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated. What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x on an AMD64 architecture machine? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 13:27:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C62116A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=eaBS/VOT=DN=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from mail.asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401E643D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:27:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=eaBS/VOT=DN=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from anonymizer.asarian-host.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8UDRqHM044768 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:27:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: 127.0.0.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) receiver=anonymizer.asarian-host.net; client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=; helo=clientrunner.asarian-host.net; Message-Id: <200609301327.k8UDRmkD044758@asarian-host.net> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:27:52 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: gdHayhvyCSz56VA7B/hDpj2Mx5Wcyc1/ZR7tvTsrbmquJsSGS32AqTdJEz7+l6GI X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: "'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUARR5w2DFqW1BleBN9AQFETAf7BaSv/AlpOu4mp+Or/pHi2Z4pZDezdNGh R7cCgfN6JH5RZPI0fkc+MCyR0LpwTpHyyG1jFe7WiPIfcWl4leqcWRAJpl+B44WK 1Mzo1mxiePQ33uJHDhNjdRxs67hJF+bbRjagiDGmyA44jfaVMGnxSHOABrLfuXdc j9bE4yvc7zCbwJM9ztnxwzof+97Be1KVqQpaXwTuPJC+559PwxVcDGybx+OXJM/L MF2vY6cG+M69ZjEdk22YllFQlR74CFzj2LrugTu99rmge/TxdlZ7gBO753ywMiaa DVmEOLuPzg8GIoYZcuccrYRobT4c+f1BFTfvu6fCXu8jQJjc9Ru6XA== =TLdf Subject: RE: Trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:27:55 -0000 Hello, I realize this is probably not the most flashy issue, but, if possible, I would really like an answer to this question. I compiled BerkeleyDB 4.4.20 with the following in config.in: INCLUDE = /usr/local/include/db44 LIB = /usr/local/lib # also tried /usr/local/lib/db44 directly DBNAME = -ldb-4.4 # end of file config.in I have done this upgrade path for BerkeleyDB and Perl several times; from 1.85 -> 4.1 -> 4.2, and now -> 4.4.20. It has always worked well. Even now it compiles just fine. It just isn't stable anymore. If someone out there has an idea, I'd really like to know. Thanks, - Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark [mailto:admin@asarian-host.net] > Sent: vrijdag 29 september 2006 20:29 > To: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions' > Subject: Trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? > > Hello, > > Am I the only person having trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? > I've been using 4.2 for quite a while. Then I upgraded, a few days back. > But a Perl process that actually uses it (BerkeleyDB-0.30) has become > unstable. I've been ktracing it, and setting log-points myself, but it > keeps core dumping at places where it accesses BerkeleyDB. Sporadically, > but often enough. > > Naturally I compiled BerkeleyDB-0.30 against the correct libraries (in > config.in). And it seems more or less ok, but not always. Finally, this > morning, I just did a full restore from an earlier date; db44 is not > working out for me, obviously. > > I'm not sure whether it's Berkeley DB version 4.4.20 or BerkeleyDB-0.30, > or a combination of the two; but I wonder if someone else has had trou- > ble with it, too? Sometimes I got a weird lock error notice; but other- > wise it remains a mystery. > > - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 13:44:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C6D16A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC5343D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:44:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3441D5DF3; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:44:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52ENPyjgNZXk; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:44:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1FB5D2D; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:44:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451E74C8.6070702@mac.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:44:40 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurence Sanford References: <451DCFD4.3070408@wilderness.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <451DCFD4.3070408@wilderness.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't ping localhost? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:44:50 -0000 Laurence Sanford wrote: > Anyone got any ideas on this? > > lauasanf@colossus(~)$ ping 127.0.0.1 > PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ^C > --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- > 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > > lauasanf@colossus(~)$ ifconfig lo0 > lo0: flags=8008 mtu 16384 If there isn't an "inet 127.0.0.1" entry following, the loopback isn't properly configured. Perhaps you have a "network_interfaces" entry listed in /etc/rc.conf which does not mention "lo0"...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 13:45:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F410116A518 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from classic.inet.co.th (classic.inet.co.th [203.150.14.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FB943D4C for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from classic.inet.co.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by classic.inet.co.th (8.12.8p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8UDipnl038220 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:44:51 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by classic.inet.co.th (8.12.8p2/8.12.9/Submit) id k8UDipoD038219 for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:44:51 +0700 (ICT) X-Authentication-Warning: classic.inet.co.th: nobody set sender to pirat@access.inet.co.th using -f Received: from 203.185.68.131 ([203.185.68.131]) by ezmail.inet.co.th (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:44:50 +0700 Message-ID: <1159623890.451e74d2ec2ca@ezmail.inet.co.th> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:44:50 +0700 From: pirat sriyotha To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 203.185.68.131 X-INET-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-INET-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: Subject: thai keyboard and blackbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:45:00 -0000 hi sirs, am using blackbox version 0.70.1 with my box %uname -a FreeBSD siting.oaep.go.th 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 22 10:32:26 ICT 2006 root@siting.oaep.go.th:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 % since i have thai language keyboard and i want to using thai for some time, thai can be displayed correctly and clearly with blackbox, but i do not know what key (or keys) combination to switch from english to thai and vise versa ? thanks in advance for any helps and hints. -- with best regards, psr http://www.thai-aec.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using Inet-Webmail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 13:52:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4B216A417 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A557343D5F for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:52:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.172]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id k8UDqEsp052347 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:52:24 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GTfFi-0000Ex-9C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:51:38 +0400 To: Free BSD Questions list References: <20060930125653.GA26969@teddy.fas.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:51:38 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060930125653.GA26969@teddy.fas.com> (stan's message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400") Message-ID: <03377717@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:52:32 -0000 On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote: > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in order to install > Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated. > What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x > on an AMD64 architecture machine? Current default (maintained) linux base port is linux_base-fc4. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 13:52:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A082416A523 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454CC43D49 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0BC13A767 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:52:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA5E113A5E0 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:52:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GTfGc-0007Km-00 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:52:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:52:34 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20060930135234.GA28156@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 09:48:27 up 166 days, 10:51, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: /etc/exports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:52:40 -0000 I'm trying to allow al machines in a 1/2 class C subnet to mount a given NFS mount point. I've put the following line in /etc/exports: /data maproot=root -network aaa.bbb.ccc.128 -mask 255.255.255.128 The NFS server is actually on network aaa.bbb.eee.0 netmask 255.244.255.128 But I get permission denied when I try to mount this filesystem from a machine on the aaa.bbb.ccc.128 netwokr. If I change the line in /etc/exports to: /data maproot=root hostname.example.com I can mount this filesystem. Is there an issue with the server not being directly on the target network? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 14:06:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D201D16A47C for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8BD43D5F for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:06:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39635F64; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:06:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J2H8MXnZ07gL; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05B75D19; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451E79EA.4090805@mac.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:06:34 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vpaces@chello.sk References: <20060930095650.NMHP18728.viefep17-int.chello.at@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060930095650.NMHP18728.viefep17-int.chello.at@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Question:socket sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:06:48 -0000 vpaces@chello.sk wrote: [ ... ] > For example: > int socket(int domain, int type, int protocol); > int bind(int s, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen); > > Browsing through your WWW CVS repository I'm just finding sources for MAN pages in directory / src / lib / libc / sys: > access.2, connect.2 and so on. > But where are the C sources of these calls? Or are the sources of these system calls not available? C functions from section 2 of the manpages are "system calls", which means that a stub function is generated in libc via makesyscalls.sh, but most of the work in done in the kernel: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c?rev=1.221.2.4 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c?rev=1.283 -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 15:24:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C55716A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mxsf28.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf28.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C75143D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:24:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mxip32a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip32a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.247]) by mxsf28.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8UFOoAX022447 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:24:51 -0400 Received: from 24-159-55-136.dhcp.jcsn.tn.charter.com (HELO [192.168.1.6]) ([24.159.55.136]) by mxip32a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2006 11:24:50 -0400 Message-ID: <451E8C49.1080805@wilderness.homeip.net> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:24:57 -0500 From: Laurence Sanford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060926) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <451DCFD4.3070408@wilderness.homeip.net> <451E74C8.6070702@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <451E74C8.6070702@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't ping localhost? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:24:53 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Laurence Sanford wrote: >> Anyone got any ideas on this? >> >> lauasanf@colossus(~)$ ping 127.0.0.1 >> PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes >> ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address >> ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address >> ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address >> ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address >> ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address >> ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address >> ^C >> --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- >> 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss >> >> >> lauasanf@colossus(~)$ ifconfig lo0 >> lo0: flags=8008 mtu 16384 > > If there isn't an "inet 127.0.0.1" entry following, the loopback isn't > properly configured. Perhaps you have a "network_interfaces" entry > listed in /etc/rc.conf which does not mention "lo0"...? > Thanks for even bothering to reply Chuck. Honestly, at my age, I should know better than to post to mailing lists while too tired to be coherent. The actual point of my question was, how exactly does a system come to boot up without having lo0 configured as 127.0.0.1? I do have a network interfaces line in rc.conf that specifies nve0, but that's the way it's always been on this box, and this is only a recent development that it's not been assigned correctly at boot time. I was looking into several other issues I've been seeing (not getting emails from this box for periodic tasks, etc) and finally ran it down to this. Did something change recently? My last update was sept 2nd, and this stopped working for me only about a week ago, maybe two, so it didn't coincide with that update. Now that I've got a little more mental capacity to work with, anyone got something to point me in the right direction? Is it a good idea to configure lo0 in rc.conf even though it should happen automatically? Thanks again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 15:46:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6AF16A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C21E43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1236669wxd for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.47.19 with SMTP id u19mr7457162wxu; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h18sm750445wxd.2006.09.30.08.46.12; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DD4C13A for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:46:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870F0C05E for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:46:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:46:27 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060930114036.5EB3.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.26 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: 'File too large' mail delivery error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:46:13 -0000 What could cause Postfix/Dovecot to suddenly start failing to deliver mail and issue this error message in the /var/log/maillog: Sep 30 09:45:24 scorpio postfix/local[1439]: 80E65C613: to=3D, relay=3Dlocal, delay=3D6.5, delays=3D6.4/0.01/0/0.03, ds= n=3D5.2.2, st atus=3Dbounced (cannot update mailbox /var/mail/gerard-gmail for user gerar= d-gmail =2E error writing message: File too large) The dovecot.log had similar entries. A total of 122 messages were hung up before I caught it. The mailbox was 49M in size; however, it has been far larger and yet never was any problem encountered. I had to remove all of the mail before delivery would start again. Other than upgrading to FreeBSD 6.1 P8 yesterday, nothing has changed on the system. --=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 16:14:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F3C16A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B6B43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:14:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5215EE9 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:14:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmaQzjJLLoZt for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:14:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF015EBD for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:14:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <451E97D8.9010909@mac.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:14:16 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060930114036.5EB3.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20060930114036.5EB3.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 'File too large' mail delivery error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:14:24 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: > What could cause Postfix/Dovecot to suddenly start failing to deliver > mail and issue this error message in the /var/log/maillog: > > > Sep 30 09:45:24 scorpio postfix/local[1439]: 80E65C613: to= st.seibercom.net>, relay=local, delay=6.5, delays=6.4/0.01/0/0.03, dsn=5.2.2, st > atus=bounced (cannot update mailbox /var/mail/gerard-gmail for user gerard-gmail > . error writing message: File too large) Perhaps you set up user quotas or process limits (there's one for max filesize)...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 17:11:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E2916A4CE for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E24943D55 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1254257wxd for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.35.1 with SMTP id i1mr1605816wxi; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h11sm6117244wxd.2006.09.30.10.11.48; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE44C082 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:11:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A6DC021 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:11:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:12:03 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <451E97D8.9010909@mac.com> References: <20060930114036.5EB3.GERARD@seibercom.net> <451E97D8.9010909@mac.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060930131024.5EDF.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.26 [en] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: 'File too large' mail delivery error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:11:50 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: [...] > Perhaps you set up user quotas or process limits (there's one for max=20 > filesize)...? I haven't done any such thing. This just happened after updating FBSD. Perhaps there are different default settings in the newer version. --=20 Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 18:14:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D408016A47B for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0760543D4C for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.136] (helo=anti-virus01-07) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTjLc-0005xT-3T; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:14:00 +0100 Received: from [82.41.35.166] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTj6w-0000zq-7u; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:58:50 +0100 Message-ID: <451EB059.1030005@dial.pipex.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:58:49 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark References: <200609301327.k8UDRmkD044758@asarian-host.net> In-Reply-To: <200609301327.k8UDRmkD044758@asarian-host.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions' Subject: Re: Trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:14:03 -0000 Mark wrote: >Hello, > >I realize this is probably not the most flashy issue, but, if possible, I >would really like an answer to this question. I compiled BerkeleyDB 4.4.20 >with the following in config.in: > >INCLUDE = /usr/local/include/db44 >LIB = /usr/local/lib # also tried /usr/local/lib/db44 directly >DBNAME = -ldb-4.4 > ># end of file config.in > >I have done this upgrade path for BerkeleyDB and Perl several times; from >1.85 -> 4.1 -> 4.2, and now -> 4.4.20. It has always worked well. Even now >it compiles just fine. It just isn't stable anymore. > >If someone out there has an idea, I'd really like to know. > > I don't have any good answers for you, sorry. Probably no-one is answering because no-one active is doing anything with these particular package versions. But, there is a port of BerkeleyDB (databases/p5-BerkeleyDB) which would save you from having to mess around configuring config.in yourself. Just set something like WITH_BDB_VER=44 (or 42 or...) in pkgtools.conf (for portupgrade) or make.conf or on the command line. The port doesn't seem to do any local patches so I wouldn't expect it to work any better for you, unless you have been doing something wrong. I use 4.2 with p5-BerkeleyDB and no problems for me, but I do nothing complicated - really just pretend it's 1.85 without bugs! What about 4.3? If you don't need the functionality of 4.4 then downgrade back to 4.2 and keep an eye on the 4.4 and p5-BerkeleyDB ports, and try again in a few months. Other than that, try google as your problem may not have anything to do with FreeBSD, or try asking the p5-BerkeleyDB author - maybe they have other feedback like yours. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 18:29:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC5616A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DC243D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:29:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8UIRfwp007663 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:27:41 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:26:01 -0700 Message-Id: <1159640761.813.298.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: Jakarta Slide X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:29:53 -0000 I have an intern doing a project for me that uses Jakarta Tomcat and Slide. He is unable to find where exactly in ports he might find Slide (or where else, for that matter). Both he and I are unfamiliar with this whole branch of software, the names, and what is contained where. I don't know the details (as you can tell), but I am very familiar with FreeBSD. Could someone give me a few pointers on how we might find and install Slide? Thanks! Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 18:39:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D696516A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF2943D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:39:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781285A41C for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:39:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C889F113A5E0 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:39:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GTjkK-0000ly-00 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:39:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:39:32 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20060930183932.GA2712@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 14:31:39 up 166 days, 15:34, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Problems properly setting up /etc/exports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:39:34 -0000 I've got a FBSD 6 machine built from a 6.2 PRERELEASE set of sources that I need to use as an NFS server for some other similar machines. If I specify the machines by host name, or IP address in /etc/exports, I can mount the requisite directories from the test client. However, I really need to be able to allow 2 whole 1/2 class C's to mount these directories. My reading of the /etc/exports man page leads me to believe that I should be able to use a line like this: /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask 255.255.255.128 When I do this, and start mountd with the -d flag, I get: ountd: getting export list mountd: got line /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask 255.255.255.128mountd: making new ep fs=0x3e331e2f,0xe47d1981 But when I try to mount from a client n this network, it reports premission denied. I also tried putting a line like this in /etc/exports: /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network mine and putting the following in /etc/networks: mine aaa.bbb But I still get the same error. What am I doing wrong? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 18:44:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F33016A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA7643D79 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:44:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2759DA0B; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:44:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95974113A5E0; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:44:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GTjod-0000ns-00; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:43:59 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:43:59 -0400 From: stan To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20060930184359.GA3000@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Boris Samorodov , Free BSD Questions list References: <20060930125653.GA26969@teddy.fas.com> <03377717@bsam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03377717@bsam.ru> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 14:42:58 up 166 days, 15:45, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:44:18 -0000 On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:51:38PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote: > > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in order to install > > Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated. > > > What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x > > on an AMD64 architecture machine? > > Current default (maintained) linux base port is linux_base-fc4. > Thanks, I got that installed. Now what about the linux_devtools port the Handbook referes to? I can't find such a port. -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 18:56:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CCC16A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:56:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C607843D49 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GTk14-0009f3-4f for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:56:50 -0400 Received: from 71.56.92.181 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com) by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2735.71.56.92.181.1159642610.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: <1424.71.56.92.181.1159577431.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <1424.71.56.92.181.1159577431.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:56:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jerry Bell" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: Re: Trouble with new poweredge 2950 - solved X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:56:51 -0000 When I disabled hyperthreading (labelled "logical processors" in BIOS), the system started booting. Strange that HT would cause the system to hang at boot. The correct number of processors shows and the amount of CPU time being used is properly represented. Jerry > I just got a PE 2950 and I'm having some problems. > > I installed 6.2PRE and it went well. The first thing I noticed is that > immediate as BSD start to load, a bold/highlighted message says "768xxx > bytes above 4G ignore" or something like that (don't recall what xxx was. > > Next thing I noticed whilest trying a buildworld against the latest stable > sources. My system detects 8 cpus. It actually only has 4 - 2 dual core > xeons. I'm guessing that the others are from hyperthreading, but I'm not > certain. Hyperthreading is disabled by default, I believe. So, in the > process of make buildworld -j 32, I noticed that only even numbered CPUs > are being used (0,2,4,6). Is that because BSD is ignoring the HT CPUs, > which would be 1,3,5,7? top and iostat both show that I was never able to > exceed 50% overall CPU usage. Is that because even though I have the HT > representations disabled, the OS is using their availabilty in calculating > % idle time? Is there any way to get an accurate number? The PE doesn't > let me disable HT, I don't believe. > > Finally, after the upgrade, I'm having a problem with the system hanging > on startup right after the firewall message, and sometimes right after the > CD ROM detection message. I believe that the SAS controller is supposed > to be detected next, and I'm assuming that's the problem. When I first > tried to install, I used 6.1, and it completely didn't recognize my SAS > controller. I found a message in the archives that suggested trying the > latest stable source, so I tried 6.2 and it worked. Any ideas what could > be causing the problem? When I was using the 6.2PRE ISO, I had to restart > a few times before it got past that stage also. > > Thanks much! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 19:04:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF3C16A412; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:04:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2176E43D46; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:04:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.167]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id k8UJ40JC085473; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:04:10 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GTk7f-0000cu-Tv; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:03:39 +0400 To: stan References: <20060930125653.GA26969@teddy.fas.com> <03377717@bsam.ru> <20060930184359.GA3000@teddy.fas.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:03:39 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060930184359.GA3000@teddy.fas.com> (stan's message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:43:59 -0400") Message-ID: <14099892@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:04:22 -0000 Moving the thread to freebsd-emulation@. On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:43:59 -0400 stan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:51:38PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote: > > > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in order to install > > > Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated. > > > > > What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x > > > on an AMD64 architecture machine? > > > > Current default (maintained) linux base port is linux_base-fc4. > > > Thanks, I got that installed. > Now what about the linux_devtools port the Handbook referes to? > I can't find such a port. Oops, The handbook seems to be staled at that point. Linux_devtools was removed. It was used with unsupported linux_base port (which may be removed any time now). It is recommended to use linux_dist ports for development. You may consider searching mail archieves on Oracle installing. There were some threads about it recently (though I don't recall exact mailing list, but it may be emulation@, current@, stable@). May be somebody at freebsd-emulation@ list may help you. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 19:11:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F3616A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pas.ble@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BD6F43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:11:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pas.ble@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2006 19:11:12 -0000 Received: from dslb-084-057-050-089.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO voodoo5) [84.57.50.89] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 30 Sep 2006 21:11:12 +0200 X-Authenticated: #6325383 From: "Pascal Bleyler" To: Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:12:31 +0200 Message-ID: <003a01c6e4c4$60fffd30$0500a8c0@voodoo5> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <200609291359.k8TDxxbd088884@freefall.freebsd.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: RE: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security AdvisoryFreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl [REVISED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:11:15 -0000 HI, > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-announce@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-announce@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > FreeBSD Security Advisories > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 4:00 PM > To: FreeBSD Security Advisories > Subject: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security=20 > AdvisoryFreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl [REVISED] >=20 >=20 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl =20 > Security Advisory > The=20 > FreeBSD Project >=20 > Topic: Multiple problems in crypto(3) <..snip..>=20 > 1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE, 5-STABLE, or=20 > 6-STABLE, or to the RELENG_6_1, RELENG_6_0, RELENG_5_5,=20 > RELENG_5_4, RELENG_5_3, or RELENG_4_11 security branch dated=20 > after the correction date. >=20 > 2) To patch your present system: >=20 > The following patch has been verified to apply to FreeBSD=20 > 4.11, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 6.0, and 6.1 systems. >=20 > a) Download the patch from the location below, and verify the=20 > detached PGP signature using your PGP utility. >=20 > # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-06:23/openssl.patch > # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-06:23/openssl.patch.asc > b) Execute the following commands as root: >=20 > # cd /usr/src > # patch < /path/to/patch >=20 > c) Recompile the operating system as described in > and=20 > reboot the system. I have done these 3 steps already: # make buildworld # make buildkernel # make installkernel Do i need to do these steps too? # mergemaster -p # make installworld # mergemaster I have FreeBSD 6.1 Release Thanks for your help Pascal Bleyler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 19:40:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4EF16A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C136643D49 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8UJdh7k087828; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:39:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8UJdh7k087828 Message-ID: <451EC7F8.3040005@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:39:36 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pascal Bleyler References: <003a01c6e4c4$60fffd30$0500a8c0@voodoo5> In-Reply-To: <003a01c6e4c4$60fffd30$0500a8c0@voodoo5> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9CDB52AEBD407294567CC1B3" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:40:03 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1952/Sat Sep 30 15:35:55 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security AdvisoryFreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl [REVISED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:40:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9CDB52AEBD407294567CC1B3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pascal Bleyler wrote: >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl =20 >> Security Advisory [snip] > I have done these 3 steps already: > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel > # make installkernel >=20 > Do i need to do these steps too? > # mergemaster -p > # make installworld > # mergemaster >=20 > I have FreeBSD 6.1 Release Yes, you absolutely do need to do those steps. The OpenSSL vulnerabilities were in various shared libraries installed as part of the base system. Just replacing the kernel won't do a thing to fix those shlibs. 'make installworld' will, and you need to run mergemaster to keep your /etc files in sync with the rest of the world. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9CDB52AEBD407294567CC1B3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHsf+8Mjk52CukIwRCJG5AJ42D104Exkhn3M9aJvRU0STij19cgCcD6Pw RDaFM0DOrHSc+6Ffbwptv6E= =sUSo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9CDB52AEBD407294567CC1B3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 20:06:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F030D16A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from whatawonderfulworldweliveintoo@yahoo.com) Received: from web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2237C43D49 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:06:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whatawonderfulworldweliveintoo@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 39136 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Sep 2006 20:06:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=d6XJ7Bh4/SuntSBJgM3y4SjSJRWFq6si1BhbiTxZSQyUjcfmxS5pfntasqhvw2whuwnWSdw5Sz1uK7MTPFq1EZXEXdqTqL6RZ3YqBPxBFcamcsz7QOtEnf8oEENYRVhbRfob4Ky9+Dtt9Q2DBadzrxDIM2xsQ0i1qHCz8j8e9r8= ; Message-ID: <20060930200648.39134.qmail@web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.64] by web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:06:48 PDT Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:06:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Ted Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Building Python From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:06:50 -0000 Hi; The latest and greatest Python is version 2.5; however, I seem to only be able to build version 2.4.3 from the port. I ran my standard battery of clean-up and get ready commands: portupgrade -a portsclean -C portsclean -D portaudit -F /usr/ports/lang/python but that didn't change things. How do I upgrade to python 2.5.0? TIA, Ted 2 --------------------------------- Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 20:20:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E382316A40F for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE043D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:20:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765261A3C1C; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A7C185159A; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:20:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:20:16 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ted Johnson Message-ID: <20060930202016.GA79180@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060930200648.39134.qmail@web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060930200648.39134.qmail@web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building Python From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:20:18 -0000 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 01:06:48PM -0700, Ted Johnson wrote: > Hi; > The latest and greatest Python is version 2.5; however, I seem to only be= able to build version 2.4.3 from the port. I ran my standard battery of c= lean-up and get ready commands: >=20 > portupgrade -a > portsclean -C > portsclean -D > portaudit -F /usr/ports/lang/python >=20 > but that didn't change things. How do I upgrade to python 2.5.0? > TIA, Why do you expect that to give you python 2.5? That port lives in python-devel. Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFHtF/Wry0BWjoQKURAnCDAJ0U1UwMshKTI/q2STuD6yFtGomN8gCeISpN ok62OS8vcuRrHBDAsNe/1+g= =ysTT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 20:54:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379F016A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEECC43D5C for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF051384F2; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alexis.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 94152-01-8; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 42ACF1386B2; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:29:45 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060930202945.GB91736@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060930200648.39134.qmail@web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060930200648.39134.qmail@web58415.mail.re3.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Subject: Re: Building Python From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:54:20 -0000 On Sat, Sep 30, 2006, Ted Johnson wrote: >Hi; >The latest and greatest Python is version 2.5; however, I seem to only be able to build version 2.4.3 from the port. I ran my standard battery of clean-up and get ready commands: > ... >but that didn't change things. How do I upgrade to python 2.5.0? Personally I would wait a bit as the .0 releases often have ``interesting'' problems (e.g. python-2.4.0 had major problems with the Berkeley database routines). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, Inc. UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``We maintain that the very foundation of our way of life is what we call free enterprise,'' said Cash McCall, "but when one of our citizens show enough free enterprise to pile up a little of that profit, we do our best to make him feel that he ought to be ashamed of himself." -- Cameron Hawley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 20:55:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685A716A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54A843D77 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:55:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so1751252pye for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:55:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ZofnuLfI6wnL46avEQKkxGBadoWn5E6YaEDXM3+YhdQRe5kVKKNy3u9QztINNKVxqNJhPZLVc9ym7DfgiwyoeX+d6sygr1ud85C88lw3s4Q5gnL/QVK16D3vl776SKhZmRKry4+2s21zlMqQLXdQ5A4NjLDQ/PnKrjGM0UWF4wg= Received: by 10.65.219.1 with SMTP id w1mr5066366qbq; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609301355q6da91573r34d2f266c52119b9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:55:03 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Restoring FreeBSD grub loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:55:06 -0000 Hello, I installed FreeBSD 6.1 on one machine with grub boot loader. In the beginning there was only one entry in grub - namely FreeBSD. Later, I had to install Windows XP on the machine and of course, it destroyed grub and now I cannot boot FreeBSD. I tried with booting from the FreeBSD installation disk choosing Fixit option, but I could not use successfully grub-install command. My question is: how can I restore the FreeBSD grub loader? Could you please give me any hints or advance. Thank you very much in advance. Regards Ivan -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 21:11:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004E216A40F for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=eaBS/VOT=DN=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from mail.asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AF143D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:11:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=eaBS/VOT=DN=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from anonymizer.asarian-host.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8ULB7kh057406 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:11:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: 127.0.0.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) receiver=anonymizer.asarian-host.net; client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=; helo=clientrunner.asarian-host.net; Message-Id: <200609302111.k8ULB3jU057396@asarian-host.net> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:11:07 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: DJ7AgiLBM+RTdBUkQxKT0L9h06bU+s1D7tFMImZNGvgL30tRSF1sR5duIpjG0Mxv X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: "'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 In-Reply-To: <451EB059.1030005@dial.pipex.com> X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUARR7dazFqW1BleBN9AQETfQgAirxHWZkXy5pSamvN3DMaRXfiNbUm5IBq 9gjUnHdnss4EX21XjQkwuJal21SLCDqAEHx6QoS9O2xb/WtSNBHVU0jXwBIJm3Wv STdi2ubgeRfKfC1e7Hfze8WIdx3K5FhDI6jmU+NDd6CrJ15OTwoeg19QGjAp2j2o t/2K7xDf/161/eSu/ILi6pPHpBnTG9/O8LFP9/z2SZGcRMvE4oq2aDswrw5VCYNk g98/hDk6SsfBvExzpjoA9kRJ4DBBWCoCYoPyYoHGcKlQADypi2MLb0M2xR+kAtJ6 7rMGTgh6eYn1jkR1/IOJg+8WWp4mx3Jz/Te0CCjWIFPdb0DS3Dh+Sg== =AVEK Subject: RE: Trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:11:10 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Zbyslaw [mailto:xfb52@dial.pipex.com] > Sent: zaterdag 30 september 2006 20:14 > To: Mark > Cc: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions' > Subject: Re: Trouble with Berkeley DB version 4.4.20? > > > I have done this upgrade path for BerkeleyDB and Perl several times; > > from 1.85 -> 4.1 -> 4.2, and now -> 4.4.20. It has always worked well. > > Even now it compiles just fine. It just isn't stable anymore. > > > > If someone out there has an idea, I'd really like to know. > > I don't have any good answers for you, sorry. Probably no-one is answer- > ing because no-one active is doing anything with these particular pack- > age versions. > > But, there is a port of BerkeleyDB (databases/p5-BerkeleyDB) which would > save you from having to mess around configuring config.in yourself. Just > set something like WITH_BDB_VER=44 (or 42 or...) in pkgtools.conf (for > portupgrade) or make.conf or on the command line. The port doesn't seem > to do any local patches so I wouldn't expect it to work any better for > you, unless you have been doing something wrong. Thanks for answering. Really appreciate it. I actually already tried p5-BerkeleyDB too. Had high hopes for it. It took a good 10 minutes or so to compile a new gcc, 3.2.23, first; but after that, everything went well. Except that it shows the same behavior. Compile goes fine; "make tests" too. But my app core dumps every, say, 30 times it accesses BerkeleyDB. > I use 4.2 with p5-BerkeleyDB and no problems for me, but I do nothing > complicated - really just pretend it's 1.85 without bugs! My BerkeleyDB 4.2 with Perl is rock-stable, too. Never a glitch of any kind. > If you don't need the functionality of 4.4 then downgrade back to 4.2 > and keep an eye on the 4.4 and p5-BerkeleyDB ports, and try again in a > few months. I think I'll do that. I believe BerkeleyDB 4.5 has just been released already. I'll wait for it to appear in the ports. I do not actually need the functionality of 4.4. Like you, I just use 4.2 as 1.85 without the bugs. :) Upgrading just seemed like the thing to do. If you look at the Sleepycat bug-list, it seems they fixed a whole lot of them since 4.2; but I cannot say I ever really ran into one. So, I'll wait for 4.5. Not much I can do. Should have been a pretty straightforward upgrade; but it isn't. And analyzing a Perl core dump without symbolic information is pretty useless too. Besides, from my own debug markers I set, it does not core dump in the same place each time. So, it's just that: unstable. Thanks, - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 21:21:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022A416A412 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC87443D5A for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:21:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so1757164pye for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=NXW4W57zraDlf614p5fghAv75k0dV+N/ftHuamq7GHvt7HAtLiVeyr2y+eOxV/rgM8Icpf5REMP6fKkVbEGxKRcLJqhnFoCvJIGFXQanNZnzbUph1CHcX+ggc8fzqReDWfH1zDsxwp7NI3tb/Y4B21uNYeKCfvw85gGyPX2rzF8= Received: by 10.35.123.10 with SMTP id a10mr3650925pyn; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pres1750.airedalians.com ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k62sm5628201pyk.2006.09.30.14.21.27; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:21:28 -0700 (PDT) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:21:23 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20060930183932.GA2712@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <20060930183932.GA2712@teddy.fas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609301621.23425.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: stan Subject: Re: Problems properly setting up /etc/exports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:21:32 -0000 On Saturday 30 September 2006 13:39, stan wrote: > I've got a FBSD 6 machine built from a 6.2 PRERELEASE set of sources > that I need to use as an NFS server for some other similar machines. > If I specify the machines by host name, or IP address in /etc/exports, > I can mount the requisite directories from the test client. > > However, I really need to be able to allow 2 whole 1/2 class C's > to mount these directories. My reading of the /etc/exports man page > leads me to believe that I should be able to use a line like this: > > /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask > 255.255.255.128 > > When I do this, and start mountd with the -d flag, I get: > > ountd: getting export list > mountd: got line /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network > aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask 255.255.255.128mountd: making new ep > fs=0x3e331e2f,0xe47d1981 > > But when I try to mount from a client n this network, it reports > premission denied. > > I also tried putting a line like this in /etc/exports: > > /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network mine > > and putting the following in /etc/networks: > > mine aaa.bbb > > But I still get the same error. > > What am I doing wrong? Try this line in /etc/exports: /usr /usr/ports /usr/ports/distfiles -maproot=root \ -network aaa.bbb.ccc -mask 255.255.255.128 Do you have something like this in /etc/rc.conf: rpcbind_enable="YES" nfs_server_enable="YES" mountd_flags="-r" That should help you. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 21:41:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC76016A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web83110.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web83110.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.101.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24A2943D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:41:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 43210 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Sep 2006 21:41:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AgHYVF4Sa7ueRTk0GuS/d5/RXA2I3WKtxlJsKnSsceuhLlhLwShTf6H0sCKNs/K99TVX8drKiq6A2xmzmnhc+BxCHdziWNZwr1TJSppgqqLyEsABXQdMeKsuHV4YggY72Qbjagvb7ahHJPGNxgX23Se4DqyXL2ScVqJ4SqhKze8= ; Message-ID: <20060930214149.43208.qmail@web83110.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [75.11.9.227] by web83110.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:41:49 PDT Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:41:49 -0700 (PDT) From: backyard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <89ce7f740609301355q6da91573r34d2f266c52119b9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Restoring FreeBSD grub loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:41:50 -0000 --- "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" wrote: > Hello, > > I installed FreeBSD 6.1 on one machine with grub > boot loader. In the > beginning there was only one entry in grub - namely > FreeBSD. Later, I > had to install Windows XP on the machine and of > course, it destroyed > grub and now I cannot boot FreeBSD. > > I tried with booting from the FreeBSD installation > disk choosing Fixit > option, but I could not use successfully > grub-install command. > > My question is: how can I restore the FreeBSD grub > loader? Could you > please give me any hints or advance. Thank you very > much in advance. > > Regards > Ivan > > -- I would suggest you make a grub booting floppy disk then you can escape to command mode once the disk loades and install grub with root (hd0,0,a) # or wherever it is setup (hd0 # again wherever it is assuming you have already placed the grub bootfiles on your hard drive and configured menu.lst you should be all set. I have only encountered one computer this method failed. you could alternatively flip the kernel tunable that allows raw writes to the boot sectors of the disks. I don't recall what it is but I think the grub docs talk about it in the man or info pages. I'm supprised XP messed it up, 2000 seemed to respect existing bootloaders... -brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 22:01:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570C616A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E1143D45 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:01:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF9B5A695; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:01:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1B434CBE1; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:00:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GTmtE-0002Ex-00; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:00:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:00:56 -0400 From: stan To: "Donald J. O'Neill" Message-ID: <20060930220056.GA8587@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Donald J. O'Neill" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060930183932.GA2712@teddy.fas.com> <200609301621.23425.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609301621.23425.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 17:59:26 up 166 days, 19:02, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems properly setting up /etc/exports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:01:16 -0000 On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 04:21:23PM -0500, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > On Saturday 30 September 2006 13:39, stan wrote: > > I've got a FBSD 6 machine built from a 6.2 PRERELEASE set of sources > > that I need to use as an NFS server for some other similar machines. > > If I specify the machines by host name, or IP address in /etc/exports, > > I can mount the requisite directories from the test client. > > > > However, I really need to be able to allow 2 whole 1/2 class C's > > to mount these directories. My reading of the /etc/exports man page > > leads me to believe that I should be able to use a line like this: > > > > /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask > > 255.255.255.128 > > > > When I do this, and start mountd with the -d flag, I get: > > > > ountd: getting export list > > mountd: got line /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network > > aaa.bbb.ccc.0 -mask 255.255.255.128mountd: making new ep > > fs=0x3e331e2f,0xe47d1981 > > > > But when I try to mount from a client n this network, it reports > > premission denied. > > > > I also tried putting a line like this in /etc/exports: > > > > /usr/ports/distfiles maproot=root -network mine > > > > and putting the following in /etc/networks: > > > > mine aaa.bbb > > > > But I still get the same error. > > > > What am I doing wrong? > > Try this line in /etc/exports: > /usr /usr/ports /usr/ports/distfiles -maproot=root \ > -network aaa.bbb.ccc -mask 255.255.255.128 > > Do you have something like this in /etc/rc.conf: > rpcbind_enable="YES" > nfs_server_enable="YES" > mountd_flags="-r" > Thanks. Turns out I needed a ":" after the maproot clause. -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 23:56:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593BA16A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B17B43D4C for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:56:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FF813A868 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:56:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0225634CBE1 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:56:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GTogs-000308-00 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:56:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:56:17 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20060930235617.GA11336@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 19:49:21 up 166 days, 20:52, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: More NFS exports questions :-( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:56:20 -0000 Sorry, this should be simpople, but i'm having a bad day with it :-( Given and /etc/exports file that looks like this: cvsup# cat /etc/exports /data/FreeBSD/distfiles -maproot=root: -network 170.85.113.0 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/FreeBSD/distfiles -maproot=root: -network 170.85.109.0 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/FreeBSD/distfiles -maproot=root: -network 170.85.106.128 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/OpenBSD/distfiles -maproot=root: -network 170.85.113.0 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/OpenBSD/distfiles -maproot=root: -network 170.85.109.0 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/OpenBSD/distfiles -maproot=root: -network 170.85.106.128 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/OpenBSD/packages -maproot=root: -network 170.85.113.0 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/OpenBSD/packages -maproot=root: -network 170.85.109.0 -mask 255.255.255.128 /data/OpenBSD/packages -maproot=root: -network 170.85.106.128 -mask 255.255.255.128 And a filesystem structure that looks like this: cvsup# ls -ld /data drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Sep 30 17:58 /data cvsup# ls -l /data/OpenBSD total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 30 17:58 distfiles drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 30 19:34 packages Can anyone tell me why mountd gives me this error? mountd: got line /data/OpenBSD/packages -maproot=root: -network 170.85.106.128 -mask 255.255.255.128 mountd: found ep fs=0x3e331d82,0xb21e5b03 mountd: doing opt -maproot=root: -network 170.85.106.128 -mask 255.255.255.128 mountd: doing opt -network 170.85.106.128 -mask 255.255.255.128 get_net: v4 addr 170.85.106.128 mountd: doing opt -mask 255.255.255.128 get_net: v4 addr 255.255.255.128 mountd: can't change attributes for /data/OpenBSD/packages -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)