Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:11:16 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> Cc: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c Message-ID: <4230A9E4.2080807@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <20050310140023.J94379@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us> References: <422E407B.4080507@portaone.com> <86k6oht386.fsf@xps.des.no> <422F087F.9030906@portaone.com> <20050309.085035.129356491.imp@bsdimp.com> <422F6703.70409@portaone.com> <20050310161607.GO98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> <86d5u7fn1z.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050310171917.GQ98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> <42308769.5080506@samsco.org> <4230A3B7.1000402@portaone.com> <20050310140023.J94379@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Dillon wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> Well, know what? This is really bad example. For what MS can't be >> blaimed it is the lack of forward and backward compatibility. I still >> can run Office 2003 on Windows 95 without any problems. > > > How did you manage that? Office 2003 will only run on Windows 2000 SP3 > or later. That's not nearly as backwards compatible as your example > would suggest. :-) Really? Maybe that was Office XP, indeed. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4230A9E4.2080807>