Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:34:06 -0700
From:      Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problems with ipfw/natd and axe(4)
Message-ID:  <CAHu1Y73Xu64NY1B=idaKmHKDGOB3AHbcXKi4A48-SNkhJrMy6Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130415015850.Y56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References:  <CAEJyAvOZ6fW0i3yT_D4fH1huje-qsJwA7GGeXqAO1PKzge-YNw@mail.gmail.com> <20130415015850.Y56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote:

> 'allow ip' aka 'allow all' doesn't usually take a port number, which
> applies only to tcp and udp.

It does in ipfw - in which case it means ( udp | tcp )



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y73Xu64NY1B=idaKmHKDGOB3AHbcXKi4A48-SNkhJrMy6Q>