From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 5 01:13:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AC516A40F for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web83104.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web83104.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.101.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C57643D45 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:13:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 37345 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Oct 2006 01:13:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UMNzuiWj6Jl3SC158sykUH92EoMbTwvfS/jvze12ghNMoGPzSPybe3pbr8QIJmEdy08W7HBlTlhslZD4D3Wz51rEUbsbLkTZaOIWZIaD7V8bEd/tZqDtXQNXi4PGOvHX1AhlK8fjsFnQRJktM1KfuJIVqtyxsCRFq7rxy6/nQHQ= ; Message-ID: <20061005011350.37343.qmail@web83104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.183.243.202] by web83104.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:13:50 PDT Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 18:13:50 -0700 (PDT) From: backyard To: FreeBSD Mailing List In-Reply-To: <26CA30AF-09CF-4B9D-A2E8-A84D0FE71E2D@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: vr0: watchdog timeout FreeBSD 6.1-p10 Crashing my backups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:13:51 -0000 --- Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:32 AM, perikillo wrote: > > My kernel file is this: > > > > machine i386 > > cpu I686_CPU > > You should also list "cpu I586_CPU", otherwise you > will not include > some optimizations intended for Pentium or higher > processors. > are you sure about this??? This statement seems to contradict the handbook which says "it is best to use only the CPU you have" I would think I686_CPU would cause the build know it is higher then a pentium and thus use those optimizations. But if this is true... -brian