Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:35:36 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        ache@nagual.pp.ru
Subject:   Re: HTT on single CPU?
Message-ID:  <20030709213536.GA9764@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030709.151856.81408195.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20030709123734.GA50458@nagual.pp.ru> <3F0C0ED6.4030202@liwing.de> <20030709150718.GC28375@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20030709.151856.81408195.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:18:56PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20030709150718.GC28375@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
>             Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> writes:
> : P4's below ~3.1GHz do not actually provide logical CPU support.
>=20
> We have several 2.4GHz parts that appear to contradict this
> statement.  However, we can't use HTT w/o a proper motherboard that
> supports HTT CPUs.

As everyone and their brother has pointed out :-), I was incorrect.  I
didn't realize HTT was made standard on 800MHz FSB machines.  I was
aware that Xeons support it since I have about 70 dual Xeons running
with HTT enabled.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/DIqnXY6L6fI4GtQRAnqzAJ9yOWOEWKdyvfzi2H2XN1chBdTEdACdHQ3B
EhR+eKjpnzqxvUB7VGZkjPs=
=orbx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030709213536.GA9764>